- Forwarded by Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US on 09/21/2006 06:49 PM -----

"Flynn, Amy E." <Amy_E._Flynn@omb.eop.gov> 

09/21/2006 04:31 PM

	

To

Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE:









Got it.  Thank you for the update. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Sasser.Erika@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Sasser.Erika@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:01 PM

To: Flynn, Amy E.

Cc: Bachmann.Johnd@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: 

Amy--

We wanted you to know that we accepted almost all of Gok's comments,

including ones on p. 93 (typo), p. 97 (changed phrasing to match

preamble), p. 104 (changed to "numerous" to match preamble), p. 110

(changed to match preamble).

Only 2 we didn't take:        p. 105-- here "fundamentally flawed" is

usage from preamble

                  p. 166-- reference to prescribed fires-- we want to

stay away from commenting on fire issues becuase this is a BIG topic for

exceptional events rule and we want to let that rule speak to these

issues/examples.

Working to sync up other passges in RTC with final preamble as well.

We are also taking Cecelia's comments-- all 4 of them.

Erika

