NRMRL­
RTP­
236a
January
2002
Characterization
of
Mercury
Emissions
at
a
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant
VOLUME
I
Report
and
Appendices
A­
E
John
S.
Kinsey
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Office
of
Research
and
Development
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory
Research
Triangle
Park,
North
Carolina
27711
ii
ABSTRACT
Current
estimates
indicate
that
up
to
160
short
tons
(
146
Mg)
of
mercury
(
Hg)
is
consumed
by
the
chlor­
alkali
industry
each
year.
Very
little
quantitative
information
is
currently
available,
however,

on
the
actual
Hg
losses
from
these
facilities.
The
Hg
cell
building
roof
vent
is
considered
to
be
the
most
significant
potential
emission
point
in
chlor­
alkali
plants,
especially
when
the
cells
are
opened
for
maintenance.
Because
of
their
potential
importance,
chlor­
alkali
plants
have
been
identified
as
needing
more
accurate
measurements
of
Hg
emissions.
To
obtain
a
better
understanding
of
the
fate
of
Hg
within
their
manufacturing
process,
the
Olin
Corporation
voluntarily
agreed
to
cooperate
with
the
U.
S.

Environmental
Protection
Agency
in
a
comprehensive
study
of
the
Hg
emissions
from
their
Augusta,

GA,
facility,
in
collaboration
with
other
members
of
the
Chlorine
Institute
representing
the
active
chloralkali
plants
in
the
United
States.

To
investigate
the
Hg
releases
from
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
facility,
the
EPA's
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory,
Air
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Division
(
EPA­
APPCD)
in
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
organized
a
special
study
involving
multiple
organizations
and
personnel.
However,
only
the
research
conducted
by
EPA­
APPCD
involving
roof
vent
monitoring
and
air
flow
studies
conducted
in
the
Olin
cell
building
is
discussed
in
this
report.

The
overall
objective
of
monitoring
the
cell
building
roof
vent
was
to
determine
the
total
elemental
mercury
(
Hg0)
mass
flux
from
the
cell
building
under
a
range
of
typical
wintertime
meteorological
conditions,
including
both
normal
operation
of
the
cell
building
and
routine
maintenance
of
Hg
cells
and
decomposers.
Secondary
objectives
of
the
research
were
to
perform
an
air
flow
mass
balance
for
the
building
and
to
compare
various
Hg
monitoring
methods
under
a
variety
of
sampling
conditions.
Both
objectives
were
met
during
the
February
2000
field
sampling
campaign,
which
showed
an
average
Hg0
emission
rate
of
0.36
g/
min
from
the
roof
ventilator
as
determined
over
the
9­

day
monitoring
period.
iii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Volume
I
ABSTRACT
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ii
LIST
OF
FIGURES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
vi
LIST
OF
TABLES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
viii
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS
AND
SYMBOLS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ix
UNIT
CONVERSION
TABLE
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
xi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
xii
SECTION
1
INTRODUCTION
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1.1
Background
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1.2
Overall
Program
Description
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
1.2.1
Preliminary
Survey
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
1.2.2
Winter
Sampling
Campaign
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
1.3
Research
Objectives
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
1.4
Organization
of
Report
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
SECTION
2
CONCLUSIONS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
SECTION
3
PROCESS
DESCRIPTION
AND
OPERATION
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
3.1
General
Process
Description
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
3.2
Plant
Operation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
3.3
Cell
Building
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
SECTION
4
EXPERIMENTAL
PROCEDURES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
24
4.1
Measurement
Methods,
Setup,
and
Calibration
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
24
4.1.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
24
4.1.2
Manual
Tracer
Gas
Analyses
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
4.1.3
Manual
Velocity
Measurements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
4.2
Data
Reduction
and
Analysis
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
32
4.2.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
32
4.2.2
Tracer
Gas
Analyses
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
33
4.2.3
Emission
Rate
Calculations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
4.2.4
Manual
Velocity
Measurements
and
Flow
Balance
Calculations
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
(
Continued)

iv
SECTION
5
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
44
5.1
Mercury
Monitoring
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
44
5.1.1
Monitoring
Data
and
Mercury
Emission
Rates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
44
5.1.2
Comparison
of
Mercury
Measurement
Methods
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
55
5.2
Tracer
Gas
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
63
5.2.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
63
5.2.2
Tracer
Gas
Study
 
Manual
Bag
Sampling
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
63
5.3
Air
Flow
Study
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
66
5.3.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
66
5.3.2
Flow
Balance
Calculations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
68
5.4
Discussion
of
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
69
5.4.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
69
5.4.2
Building
Air
Flow
Evaluation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
70
5.4.3
Comparison
with
Historical
Information
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
71
SECTION
6
QUALITY
ASSURANCE/
QUALITY
CONTROL
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
74
6.1
UV­
DOAS
Measurements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
74
6.2
Optical
Anemometry
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
74
6.3
SF
6
Release,
Sampling,
and
Analysis
(
FTIR)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
76
6.4
Long­
Path
FTIR
QA/
QC
Checks
(
Roof
Vent)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
77
6.5
On­
Site
Audit
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
79
6.6
Data
Quality
Indicators
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
80
SECTION
7
REFERENCES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
81
APPENDICES
A
Description
of
Buildings
and
Processes
at
the
Olin
Facility
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A­
i
B
FTIR
Spectral
Analyses
Conducted
by
ManTech,
Inc.
(
Jeff
Childers)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
B­
i
C
FTIR
Spectral
Analyses
Conducted
by
ARCADIS
Geraghty
&
Miller
(
David
Natschke)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
C­
i
D
Roof
Vent
Manual
Velocity
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
D­
i
E
Manual
Velocity
Data
in
Cell
Building
Openings
and
Associated
Air
Flow
Balance
Calculations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
E­
i
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
(
Continued)

v
Volume
II
F
Elemental
Mercury
Emission
Rate
Calculations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
F­
i
G
Elemental
Mercury
and
Air
Velocity
Measurements
at
Entrance
to
Roof
Vent
Made
During
January
2000
Presurvey
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
G­
i
H
UV­
DOAS
Quality
Control
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
H­
i
I
Bag
Sampling
Quality
Control
Data
and
Rotameter
Calibrations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I­
i
J
Copies
of
Field
Sampling
Notebook
Pages
from
Manual
Bag
Sampling
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
J­
i
vi
LIST
OF
FIGURES
1­
1
Project
organization
chart
(
includes
contractor
support
from
OPSIS
®
,
Inc.,
and
Eastern
Research
Group,
Inc.).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
1­
2
Location
of
measurement
activities.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
3­
1
Simplified
diagram
of
the
mercury
cell
process.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
13
3­
2
Process
flow
diagram
for
Olin­
Augusta.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
14
3­
3a
Cell
building
showing
interior
of
roof
ventilator.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16
3­
3b
Cell
building
showing
exterior
of
roof
ventilator
(
from
north).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17
3­
4
Electrolyzer
used
at
the
Olin­
Augusta
plant.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
3­
5
Mercury
cell:
horizontal
view
and
outlet
end­
box
view.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
19
3­
6
North
line
of
electrolytic
cells
in
Olin
cell
building.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
20
3­
7
Decomposer
used
at
the
Olin­
Augusta
plant.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
3­
8
General
diagram
of
the
cell
building
showing
cell
rows,
general
fan
locations,
etc.
.
.
.
.
23
4­
1
Cross­
section
of
roof
ventilator
showing
internal
structure.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
4­
2
From
left
to
right,
the
FTIR
retroreflector,
UV­
DOAS
light
source,
and
optical
anemometer
receiver
unit
installed
on
the
east
sampling
platform.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
27
4­
3
Relative
locations
of
instrument
beam
paths
in
roof
vent
cross
section.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
4­
4
Cylinder
layout
along
the
cell
building
basement.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
34
4­
5
Soaker
tubing
layout
inside
the
cell
room.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
34
4­
6a
Average
roof
vent
temperature
differential
as
determined
from
15­
min
monitoring
data.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
4­
6b
Calculated
temperature
differential
for
roof
ventilator
as
determined
from
average
monitoring
data
shown
in
Figure
4­
6a.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
5­
1
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
17,
2000.
.
.
.
.
45
5­
2
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
18,
2000.
.
.
.
.
45
5­
3
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
19,
2000.
.
.
.
.
46
5­
4
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
20,
2000.
.
.
.
.
46
5­
5
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
21,
2000.
.
.
.
.
47
5­
6
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
22,
2000.
.
.
.
.
47
5­
7
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
23,
2000.
.
.
.
.
48
5­
8
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
24,
2000.
.
.
.
.
48
5­
9
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
25,
2000.
.
.
.
.
49
5­
10
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
17,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
50
5­
11
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
18,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
50
5­
12
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
19,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
51
5­
13
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
20,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
51
5­
14
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
21,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
52
LIST
OF
FIGURES
(
Continued)

vii
5­
15
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
22,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
52
5­
16
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
23,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
53
5­
17
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
24,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
53
5­
18
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
25,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
54
5­
19
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
17,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
56
5­
20
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
18,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
56
5­
21
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
19,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
57
5­
22
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
20,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
57
5­
23
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
21,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
58
5­
24
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
22,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
58
5­
25
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
23,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
59
5­
26
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
24,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
59
5­
27
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
25,
2000.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
60
5­
28
Lateral
profile
of
elemental
mercury
concentration
as
determined
by
the
Jerome
431­
X
instrument.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
61
5­
29
UV­
DOAS/
Tekran
comparison
(
February
17­
21,
2000).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
62
5­
30
Chronology
of
elemental
mercury
concentrations
measured
by
OPSIS
 
Model
AR
500
UV­
DOAS
and
Tekran
Model
2537A
CVAFS
for
February
17­
21,
2000.
.
.
.
.
62
5­
31
Bag
sampling
locations
in
cell
building.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
64
5­
32
Hand­
held
anemometer
readings
at
the
optical
anemometer
measurement
height
on
the
east
sampling
platform,
looking
west
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
67
5­
33
Hand­
held
anemometer
readings
at
the
optical
anemometer
measurement
height
on
the
west
sampling
platform,
looking
west.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
67
5­
34
Profile
of
elemental
mercury
concentration
along
length
of
roof
vent
entrance
as
obtained
during
the
January
2000,
presurvey.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
70
viii
LIST
OF
TABLES
4­
1
Roof
Vent
Instrumentation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
4­
2
Typical
FTIR
Operating
Parameters
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
4­
3
Gas
Release
Concentrations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
36
5­
1
Summary
of
30­
sec
Roof
Vent
DOAS
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
49
5­
2
Summary
of
1­
min
Roof
Vent
Optical
Anemometer
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
54
5­
3
Summary
of
Calculated
Elemental
Mercury
Emission
Rates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
60
5­
4
Manual
Bag
Analysis
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
64
5­
5
Comparison
of
Velocity
Measurements
in
Roof
Vent
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
68
5­
6
Results
of
Air
Flow
Balance
Calculations
for
the
Olin
Cell
Building
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
68
5­
7
Comparison
of
Current
Study
with
Prior
Research
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
72
6­
1
QC
Checks
for
Experimental
Methods
Included
in
QA
Plan
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
75
6­
2
Quality
Control
Checks
for
UV­
DOAS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
75
6­
3
Results
of
Daily
QC
Checks
of
Model
104a
Optical
Anemometer
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
76
6­
4
Manual
Bag
Sampling/
Analysis
Blank
Control
Checks
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
78
6­
5
Manual
Bag
Sampling/
Analysis
Quality
Control
Checks
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
78
6­
6
Data
Quality
Indicator
Results
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
80
ix
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS
AND
SYMBOLS
APPCD
Air
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Division
ATREEs
anemometer
trees
CAPs
Chlor­
alkali
plants
CH
4
methane
Cl
2
chlorine
gas
CO
carbon
monoxide
CVAFS
cold­
vapor
atomic
fluorescence
spectrometer
DAS
data
acquisition
system
DMB
direct
mass
balance
DOAS
differential
optical
absorption
spectrometer
DQI
data
quality
indicator
EPA
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
ERG
Eastern
Research
Group,
Inc.

FTIR
Fourier
transform
infrared
spectrometer
H
2
hydrogen
HCl
hydrogen
chloride
Hg
mercury
Hg0
elemental
mercury
LIDAR
Light
Detection
and
Ranging
LOA
Scientific
Technology
Model
LOA­
104
optical
anemometer
LRPCD
Land
Remediation
and
Pollution
Control
Division
N
2
O
nitrous
oxide
NaCl
sodium
chloride
LIST
OF
ABBREVIATIONS
AND
SYMBOLS
(
Continued)

x
NaOH
sodium
hydroxide
NERL
National
Exposure
Research
Laboratory
NIST
National
Institute
for
Standards
and
Technology
NWS
National
Weather
Service
OECA
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance
ORNL
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
OxyChem
Occidental
Chemical
Corporation
PI
Principal
Investigator
QAPjP
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
QC
quality
control
SOP
Standard
Operating
Procedure
SF
6
sulfur
hexafluoride
UM
University
of
Michigan
UV­
DOAS
ultraviolet
differential
optical
absorption
spectrometer
xi
UNIT
CONVERSION
TABLE
Multiply
By
To
Obtain
atm
29.92
in.
Hg
atm
760
mm
Hg
ft
0.3048
m
km
0.6214
mi
L/
day
0.264
gal./
day
m3/
min
35.31
ft3/
min
pounds
453.6
g
short
ton
0.91
metric
ton
temperature
(

C
+
17.8)
1.8
temperature
(

F)
xii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This
report
was
prepared
with
the
assistance
of
Julie
Swift
and
Joan
Bursey
of
Eastern
Research
Group,
Inc.,
1600
Perimeter
Park
Drive,
Morrisville,
NC
27560,
under
EPA
Contract
68­
D7­
0001.
Julie
Swift
was
responsible
for
the
tracer
gas
release
and
manual
bag
sampling
conducted
in
the
field
as
well
as
preparing
applicable
sections
of
the
report.
Joan
Bursey
was
responsible
for
the
QA/
QC
sections
of
the
report
as
well
as
supervising
its
overall
production.

The
author
acknowledges
the
excellent
contributions
of
both
individuals.
1
SECTION
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
Current
estimates
indicate
that
up
to
160
short
tons
(
146
Mg)
of
mercury
(
Hg)
is
consumed
by
the
chlor­
alkali
industry
each
year
(
Chlorine
Institute,
1999).
Very
little
quantitative
information
is
currently
available,
however,
on
the
actual
Hg
losses
from
these
facilities.
The
most
significant
potential
emission
point
in
chlor­
alkali
plants
(
CAPs)
is
thought
to
be
the
mercury
cell
building
roof
vent,
especially
when
the
cells
are
opened
for
maintenance.
Because
of
their
potential
importance,
CAPs
have
been
identified
as
needing
more
accurate
measurements
of
Hg
emissions.

In
order
to
better
understand
the
fate
of
mercury
within
their
manufacturing
process,
the
Olin
Corporation
voluntarily
agreed
to
cooperate
with
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
in
a
comprehensive
study
of
the
Hg
emissions
from
their
Augusta,
GA,
facility.
This
effort
is
in
collaboration
with
other
members
of
the
Chlorine
Institute
representing
the
active
chlor­
alkali
plants
in
the
United
States.

Chlorine
Institute
members
have
committed
to
reduce
overall
mercury
consumption
by
50%
(
from
1990­
95
levels)
by
the
year
2005.

To
investigate
the
Hg
releases
from
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
facility,
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency's
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory,
Air
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Division
(
EPA­
APPCD)
in
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
organized
a
special
study
involving
multiple
organizations
and
personnel.
Each
major
aspect
of
the
study
was
addressed
by
a
separate
Principal
Investigator
(
PI)
based
on
the
individual
area
of
expertise.
It
should
be
noted,
however,
that
only
the
research
conducted
by
EPA­
APPCD
involving
roof
vent
monitoring
and
air
flow
studies
conducted
in
the
Olin
cell
building
is
discussed
in
this
report.
The
following
sections
describe
the
overall
study
2
conducted
at
the
Augusta
plant,
the
objectives
of
the
specific
research
described
in
this
report,
and
organization
of
the
remainder
of
the
document.

1.2
Overall
Program
Description
A
multidisciplinary
research
team
was
assembled
for
the
purpose
of
the
Olin
study.
This
team
was
made
up
of
the
following
organizations
and
associated
principal
investigators
(
PIs):


Olin
Corporation,
Olin
Chemicals,
Charleston,
TN
(
W.
Rankin)
and
Chlor­
Alkali
Division,
Augusta,
GA
(
S.
Asbill).


U.
S.
Department
of
Energy,
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
(
ORNL),
Environmental
Sciences
Division,
Oak
Ridge,
TN
(
S.
Lindberg).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance
(
EPA­
OECA),
Office
of
Regulatory
Enforcement,
Washington,
DC.
(
C.
Secrest).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
National
Exposure
Research
Laboratory
(
EPA­
NERL),
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
(
M.
Landis).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory,
Air
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Division
(
EPA­
APPCD),
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
(
J.
Kinsey).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory,
Land
Remediation
and
Pollution
Control
Division
(
EPA­
LRPCD),
Cincinnati,
OH
(
P.
Randall).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Region
4
(
EPA­
Region
4),
Science
and
Ecosystem
Support
Division,
Atlanta,
GA
(
D.
France).


U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Region
5
(
EPA­
Region
5),
Great
Lakes
Program
Office,
Chicago,
IL
(
F.
Anscombe).


University
of
Michigan
(
UM),
Department
of
Environmental
&
Industrial
Health,
School
of
Public
Health,
Ann
Arbor,
MI
(
J.
Nriagu).

As
shown,
the
research
team
represents
nine
different
organizations
with
up
to
28
people
working
on­
site.
Figure
1­
1
shows
the
organization
of
the
project,
including
the
various
monitoring
activities
conducted
and
PIs
responsible
for
each
facet
of
the
program
as
well
as
contractor
support
to
EPA­
APPCD
from
OPSIS
®
,
Inc.
and
Eastern
Research
Group
(
ERG),
Inc.
3
Frank
Anscombe
EPA­
Region
5
Administrative
Lead
John
Kinsey
EPA­
APPCD
Technical
Lead
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
(
EPA­
APPCD)

PI
­
John
Kinsey
(
EPA­
APPCD)

Long­
Path
FTIR
(
EPA­
Region
4)
Long­
Path
UV­
DOAS
(
Opsis)
Optical
Scintillation
Anemometer
(
EPA­
APPCD)

Point
Source
Measurements
(
ORNL)

PI
­
Steve
Lindberg
(
ORNL)

Tekran
Model
2537A
Automated
Hg
Analyzer
Jerome
Model
431­
X
electrical
conductivity
analyzer
and
Lumex
Model
RA
915
Zeeman
Mercury
Spectrometer
Denuder
Grab
Samples
(
EPA­
NERL)
Cell
Building
Air
Flow
Determination
(
EPA­
APPCD)

PI
­
John
Kinsey
(
EPA­
APPCD)

Long­
path
Optical
Anemometer
(
EPA­
APPCD)
Tracer
Gas
Release
and
Analysis
of
Point
SF6
(
Eastern
Research
Group)
Manual
Anemometry
(
EPA­
APPCD)

Flux
Measurements
(
ORNL)

PI
­
Steve
Lindberg
(
ORNL)

Tekran
Model
2537A
with
Flux
Chambers
Upwind/
Downwind
Monitoring
(
EPA­
NERL,
EPA­
Region
4,
EPA­
OECA,
and
EPA­
APPCD)

PIs
­
Matt
Landis
(
EPA­
NERL),
Danny
France
(
EPA­
Region
4),
and
Cary
Secrest
(
EPA­
OECA)

Tekran
Model
2537A
with
1130
and
1135
Speciators
(
EPA­
NERL)
EPA
Denuders
(
EPA­
NERL)
Open­
Path
FTIR
Spectrometer
(
EPA­
APPCD)
UV­
DOAS
(
EPA­
Region
4/
OECA)

Waste
Stream
and
Product
Evaluation
(
UM,
EPA­
LRPCD)

PIs­
Jerome
Nriagu
(
UM)
and
Paul
Randall
(
EPA­
LRPCD)

Liquid
Waste
Sample
Collection/
Analysis
Solid
Waste
Sample
Collection/
Analysis
Product
Sample
Collection/
Analysis
Nancy
Adams
EPA­
APPCD
Quality
Assurance
Officer
On­
site
Quality
Control
Officers
Geddes
Ramsey/
Jimmy
Pau,
EPA­
APPCD
W.
Rankin
Olin
­
Charleston
S.
Asbill
Olin
­
Augusta
Figure
1­
1.
Project
organization
chart
(
includes
contractor
support
from
OPSIS
®
,
Inc.,
and
Eastern
Research
Group,
Inc.).
4
The
program
was
divided
into
two
phases:
a
preliminary
survey,
and
a
winter
sampling
campaign
conducted
in
February
2000.
A
summer
campaign
was
also
planned
to
evaluate
the
effects
of
elevated
ambient
temperature
but
this
phase
was
eliminated
and
thus
is
not
discussed
here.
Implementation
of
the
overall
program
is
briefly
outlined
below
with
formal
publication
of
the
results
by
the
respective
Principal
Investigator
planned
for
late­
2002.

1.2.1
Preliminary
Survey
The
purpose
of
the
survey
was
to
obtain
preliminary
information
to
assist
in
planning
the
second,

and
more
significant,
phase
of
the
program.
The
survey
included
measurements
of
the
typical
range
of
elemental
mercury
(
Hg0)
concentrations
in
the
cell
building
as
well
as
similar
measurements
external
to
the
cell
building.
In
addition,
flow
visualization
experiments
were
also
performed
and
meetings
held
with
Olin
operating
personnel
to
plan
the
logistics
of
the
winter
sampling
campaign.

The
Hg
monitoring
methods
used
in
the
preliminary
survey
generally
involved
portable
hand­
held
instruments,
including
both
the
Jerome
Model
431­
X
electrical
conductivity
analyzer
and
the
Lumex
Model
RA­
915
Zeeman
Mercury
Spectrometer.
The
Model
RA­
915
is
a
portable
cold­
vapor
atomic
absorption
(
CVAA)
spectrometer
capable
of
monitoring
Hg0
at
nanograms
per
cubic
meter
levels.
Both
instruments
were
used
to
measure
and
spatially
map
Hg0
levels
in
and
around
the
electrolytic
cells
as
well
as
upwind
and
downwind
of
the
cell
building.

In
addition
to
point
monitoring,
profiles
of
air
velocity
and
Hg0
concentration
were
also
obtained
near
the
entrance
to
the
roof
vent.
The
measurements
were
conducted
by
mounting
a
sampling
line
and
hotwire
anemometer
on
a
non­
conducting
mast
attached
to
the
upper
platform
of
the
movable
crane
used
for
cell
maintenance.
The
sampling
line
was
connected
to
a
Jerome
431­
X
electrical
conductivity
analyzer
with
the
velocity
measurements
made
at
selected
intervals
along
the
length
of
the
vent.

Finally,
since
the
determination
of
air
flow
is
critical
to
study
implementation,
special
flow
visualization
equipment
was
also
used
as
part
of
the
preliminary
survey.
This
equipment
included
an
infrared
camcorder
to
observe
and
record
thermal
plumes
from
the
cell
building
and
a
commercial
smoke
generator
and
associated
video
camcorder
for
visualizing
the
overall
flow
field
within
the
cell
room.
Flow
5
visualization
answered
several
important
questions
regarding
the
nature
of
the
air
flow
pattern
inside
the
building
as
well
as
dispersion
of
the
plume
after
it
exits
the
roof
vent.

1.2.2
Winter
Sampling
Campaign
The
overall
objective
of
the
winter
sampling
campaign
was
to
determine
the
total
Hg
release
from
the
plant
using
parallel
sampling
approaches
under
typical
wintertime
meteorological
conditions.
The
activities
in
the
winter
campaign
included:
roof
vent
monitoring,
point
source
measurements,
air
flow
studies,
flux
measurements,
upwind/
downwind
monitoring,
and
waste
and
product
evaluation.
The
locations
of
the
various
activities
at
the
Olin
plant
site
are
shown
in
Figure
1­
2.

As
stated
above,
the
research
described
in
this
report
includes
only
the
roof
vent
monitoring
and
air
flow
studies
conducted
by
EPA­
APPCD
with
contractor
support
from
OPSIS
®
,
Inc.
and
ERG.
The
other
related
activities
performed
by
study
collaborators
are
briefly
summarized
below.

Point
Source
Measurements
The
objective
of
the
point
measurements
was
to
characterize
the
distribution
of
airborne
Hg0
in
the
cell
room
(
including
the
floor
below
the
cells)
and
around
the
exterior
of
the
cell
building.
The
primary
instrument
used
for
point
monitoring
was
the
Tekran
Model
2537A
automated
Hg
analyzer.
The
Model
2537A
is
a
cold­
vapor
atomic
fluorescence
(
CVAF)
spectrometer
which
is
equipped
with
dual
gold
traps
for
preconcentration
of
the
sample
prior
to
analysis.
This
analyzer
was
housed
in
the
control
room
with
samples
obtained
from
a
high­
flow
sampling
line
which
extended
to
a
point
near
the
center
of
the
roof
vent
entrance.

In
addition
to
the
Tekran
monitoring,
walking
surveys
were
also
conducted
using
a
Jerome
Model
431­
X
and/
or
Lumex
Model
RA­
915
instrument.
These
data
were
combined
with
measurements
from
a
hand­
held
air
anemometer
to
identify
potential
hot
spots
and
any
ancillary
emission
points
found
in
or
around
the
cell
building.
Manual
"
denuders"
were
also
employed
to
determine
the
concentration
of
nonelemental
Hg
(
e.
g.,
divalent
Hg
compounds)
in
the
cell
room.
A
series
of
short­
duration
grab
samples
was
collected
from
the
crane
above
the
south
cell
line
and
analyzed
on­
site
using
a
Tekran
Model
2537A.
6
Preliminary
results
of
these
analyses
indicate
that
non­
elemental
forms
of
Hg
represent
<
~
5%
of
the
total
Hg
at
the
time
of
sample
collection
(
Landis
et
al.,
2000).
7
H
C
D
I
E
B
A
G
F
A
B
=
200
m
Key:

A/
B
=
Downwind
Hg0
and
SF6
monitoring
using
open­
path
instruments.

C
=
Flux
chamber
measurements
and
waste
stream
evaluation.

D/
E
=
Roof
vent
monitoring.

F/
H
=
Upwind/
downwind
monitoring
using
mobile
laboratories.

G
=
Main
plant
observation
point.

I
=
Point
source
measurements
and
building
air
flow
study.

Figure
1­
2.
Location
of
measurement
activities.
8
Flux
Measurements
Mercury
fluxes
from
surfaces
in
and
around
the
cell
building
(
especially
the
basement
floor
of
the
building)
were
also
determined
to
assess
the
role
of
these
surfaces
as
sources.
Flux
chambers
of
various
designs
were
used
over
the
cell
room
and
ground
(
basement)
floors
to
determine
their
source
strength
and
Hg0
emission
characteristics.
Chambers
were
also
deployed
over
old
waste
deposits
within
the
plant
facility
and,
since
solar
radiation
can
strongly
influence
soil
fluxes,
operated
throughout
the
diurnal
cycle.

Upwind/
Downwind
Monitoring
Upwind/
downwind
ambient
air
monitoring
was
also
conducted
as
part
of
the
overall
program.
The
purpose
of
this
monitoring
was
to
estimate
the
total
mass
flux
of
Hg
compounds
from
the
entire
facility
as
a
check
on
the
source
estimates
obtained
within
the
plant,
for
model
validation
purposes,
and
to
collect
data
which
can
potentially
be
compared
to
similar
measurements
conducted
outside
other
facilities.

For
the
upwind/
downwind
monitoring,
instrumentation
was
deployed
at
different
locations.
Tekran
analyzers
were
used
in
two
mobile
monitoring
laboratories
located
a
significant
distance
upwind
and
downwind
from
the
process
area
(
Figure
1­
2).
(
Note
that
two
of
the
Tekran
instruments
used
in
the
mobile
laboratories
were
a
Model
1130
analyzer
and
the
prototype
Model
1135
capable
of
measuring
gas­
and
particle­
phase
elemental
and
non­
elemental
Hg.)
In
addition,
an
open­
path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
FTIR)
spectrometer
and
ultraviolet
differential
optical
absorption
spectrometer
(
UV­
DOAS)
were
also
installed
near
the
cell
building
in
the
prevailing
downwind
direction
(
Figure
1­
2).
Using
the
various
instruments,
the
concentration
of
elemental
and
non­
elemental
Hg
and
SF6
tracer
gas
could
be
determined
in
near­
real­
time.
(
Note
that
the
open­
path
monitoring
was
not
successful
due
to
atypical
wind
conditions
occurring
during
the
limited
9­
day
study
period.)

Waste
and
Product
Evaluation
Sampling
and
analysis
of
liquid
and
solid
wastes
and
selected
liquid
product
streams
were
also
performed.
Wipe
samples
were
also
collected
from
various
environmental
surfaces
including
building
walls
and
exterior
cell
surfaces.
These
samples
were
subsequently
analyzed
for
total
Hg,
Hg0
,
and
9
dissolved
reactive
Hg
(
also
referred
to
as
"
easily
reduced
Hg"),
as
appropriate,
using
a
Tekran
analyzer
as
the
primary
measurement
tool.

1.3
Research
Objectives
The
overall
objective
of
the
roof
vent
monitoring
described
in
this
report
was
to
determine
the
total
Hg0
mass
flux
from
the
cell
building
under
a
range
of
typical
wintertime
meteorological
conditions.
This
research
was
to
include
both
normal
operation
of
the
cell
building
as
well
as
routine
maintenance
of
Hg
cells
and
decomposers.
Secondary
objectives
of
the
research
were
to
perform
an
air
flow
mass
balance
for
the
building
and
to
compare
various
Hg
monitoring
methods
under
a
variety
of
sampling
conditions.
Each
of
these
objectives
was
met
in
the
study.

1.4
Organization
of
Report
This
report
is
organized
into
five
additional
sections
plus
references
and
appendices.
Section
2
provides
the
conclusions
and
recommendations
derived
from
the
study
results,
and
Section
3
describes
the
mercury
cell
process
and
its
operation.
Section
4
outlines
the
experimental
procedures
used
in
the
research,

and
Section
5
presents
and
discusses
the
study
results.
Finally,
Section
6
presents
the
quality
control/
quality
assurance
procedures
used
in
the
research
to
ensure
collection
of
high
quality
data.
10
SECTION
2
CONCLUSIONS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
This
section
provides
conclusions
drawn
from
the
use
of
the
equipment,
methods,
and
data
analysis
procedures
described
in
Section
4
to
determine
the
total
Hg
release
and
volumetric
air
flow
from
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
cell
building:


Elemental
mercury
concentrations
measured
by
the
UV­
DOAS
varied
over
an
order
of
magnitude
from
~
73
to
7.3
µ
g/
m3.
The
overall
average
for
the
9­
day
study
period
was
24
µ
g
Hg0/
m3.


Hg0
emission
rates
measured
in
the
roof
ventilator
varied
from
0.08
to
1.2
g/
min.
An
overall
average
for
the
monitoring
period
of
0.36
g/
min
(
472
g/
day)
was
calculated
from
the
data.
These
values
appear
to
represent
only
a
small
percentage
of
the
total
potential
Hg0
emissions,
however,
based
on
available
estimates
of
the
makeup
Hg0
added
to
the
cells
on
an
annual
basis.


A
comparison
between
the
concentration
of
Hg0
measured
by
the
UV­
DOAS
and
similar
measurements
conducted
using
a
hand­
held
instrument
across
the
width
of
the
roof
vent
showed
that
the
Hg0
concentrations
were
relatively
consistent
across
the
vent
and
compare
reasonably
well
to
the
average
concentration
obtained
with
the
UV­
DOAS.


Comparison
of
roof
vent
monitoring
data
obtained
by
the
UV­
DOAS
and
point
measurements
made
using
a
Tekran
Model
2537A
automated
Hg
analyzer
at
the
entrance
to
the
vent
exhibited
a
relatively
high
degree
of
scatter
with
only
about
63%
of
the
variance
explained
by
linear
regression.
The
data
do,
however,
show
comparable
trends
in
Hg0
concentration
with
time.
Scatter
in
the
data
is
potentially
due
to
a
combination
of
factors
including
differences
in
analysis
method,
non­
representative
sampling,
and
sampling
line
losses.


The
SF6
tracer
gas
results
obtained
using
the
long­
path
FTIR
in
the
roof
vent
were
found
to
be
unusable
for
the
purpose
of
determining
volumetric
air
flow
due
to
optical
saturation
of
the
detector.


Results
of
the
24­
hour,
time­
integrated
bag
sampling
showed
SF6
tracer
gas
concentrations
either
at
or
below
the
instrumental
detection
limit
except
for
one
sampling
period
on
February
20,
2000.
11

The
average
roof
vent
air
velocity
measured
by
a
hand­
held
anemometer
as
compared
to
that
obtained
by
the
optical
anemometer
showed
that
the
two
methods
agreed
within
±
10
%.


Very
good
closure
(
79
to
100%)
was
obtained
for
each
of
the
three
air
flow
balance
calculations
performed
for
the
cell
building.
The
three
methods
also
correlate
well
with
each
other,
and
the
high
degree
of
closure
of
these
flow
balances
lends
further
credibility
to
the
air
velocity
measurements
made
by
the
optical
anemometer
in
the
roof
ventilator.


No
specific
pattern
could
be
discerned
from
daily
plots
of
Hg0
emission
rates.
Various
episodic
events
were
observed
during
the
study
where
the
emission
rate
rose
for
a
period
of
time,
then
dropped
back
to
some
nominal
level
which
could
not
be
correlated
to
either
process
operation
or
maintenance
events
using
plant
records.


Although
the
concentration
of
Hg0
was
found
to
be
relatively
homogeneous
across
the
lateral
dimension
of
the
roof
vent,
concentrations
of
Hg0
were
not
consistent
along
the
length
of
the
ventilator.

On
the
basis
of
the
results
obtained
for
this
study,
the
following
recommendations
are
applicable:


This
study
was
conducted
at
one
chlor
alkali
plant,
in
a
time
window
of
approximately
2
weeks.
For
more
thorough
characterization
of
operations
in
this
industry,
extended
monitoring
at
a
single
location
and/
or
monitoring
at
more
plants
is
recommended
to
better
characterize
maintenance
events
and
other
operational
transients.
Better
monitoring
of
these
transients
is
also
needed.


Roof
vent
instrumentation
may
be
a
useful
tool
for
process
monitoring
in
some
facilities
to
identify
problems
in
the
operation
of
the
cells
that
may
require
corrective
action.
The
long­
term
suitability
of
these
instruments
must
be
established,
however,
by
additional
on­
site
evaluations.


The
high
electromagnetic
field
at
the
facility
had
an
adverse
effect
upon
instrument
operation.
For
future
studies
of
this
type,
optical
modems
and
cables
should
be
used
to
allow
logging
of
data
at
a
remote
location
to
reduce
data
loss
and
make
troubleshooting
much
easier
for
the
operator.


The
variation
in
Hg0
concentrations
along
the
length
of
the
ventilator
vs.
the
homogeneous
values
observed
for
Hg0
across
the
lateral
dimension
argue
strongly
for
the
use
of
spatially
integrated
measurements
rather
than
point
sampling
with
a
manifold
system.


Roof
vent
tracer
gas
data
in
this
study
were
not
usable.
Since
the
use
of
a
tracer
is
well
accepted
for
determining
flow
rates,
the
possibility
of
tracer
gas
analyses
for
future
flow
measurement
studies
should
not
be
abandoned.
Greater
care
is
needed,
however,
to
verify
proper
instrument
setup
and
operation.
12

The
possibility
of
using
different
tracer
gases
has
been
discussed.
Some
of
these
candidate
tracer
gases
(
e.
g.,
carbon
tetrafluoride)
can
be
determined
using
UV­
DOAS,
making
concurrent
sampling
and
analysis
of
mercury
and
tracer
gas
highly
desirable.
Additional
research
is
also
recommended
to
determine
the
best
way
to
diffuse
the
tracer
gas
into
the
cell
room.


Additional
measurements
of
non­
elemental
(
oxidized)
forms
of
Hg
should
also
be
conducted
to
determine
their
overall
environmental
significance.
13
SECTION
3
PROCESS
DESCRIPTION
AND
OPERATION
3.1
General
Process
Description
In
Hg
cell
CAPs,
Hg0
is
used
as
a
flowing
cathode
in
electrolytic
cells.
The
Hg
electrolytic
cell
consists
of
an
electrolyzer
and
a
decomposer.
In
the
electrolyzer
section,
a
sodium
chloride
(
NaCl)
brine
solution
flows
concurrently
with
the
Hg0
cathode.
A
high
current
density
is
applied
between
the
Hg0
cathode
and
metal
anodes.
Chlorine
gas
(
Cl2)
forms
at
the
anode
and
a
sodium
amalgam
forms
at
the
Hg0
cathode.
The
amalgam
is
separated
from
the
brine
in
a
discharge
end­
box
and
then
enters
the
decomposer
section,
where
deionized
water
is
added.
In
the
decomposer,
the
amalgam
becomes
the
anode
to
a
shortcircuited
graphite
cathode
resulting
in
formation
of
hydrogen
(
H2)
gas
and
sodium
hydroxide
(
NaOH),
and
conversion
of
the
amalgam
back
to
Hg0.
The
Hg0
is
then
recycled
to
the
inlet
end­
box,
where
it
reenters
the
electrolyzer.
Cell
surface
temperatures
of
~
66

C
(
150

F)
and
decomposer
surface
temperatures
of
~

116

C
(
240

F)
are
typical
at
the
Olin
facility.

The
chlor­
alkali
electrolysis
process
results
in
the
manufacture
of
Cl2,
H2,
and
NaOH
caustic
solution.
Of
these
three,
the
primary
product
is
Cl2.
The
overall
process
reaction
is:

2NaCl
+
2H2O

Cl2
+
H2
+
2NaOH
(
3­
1)

Figure
3­
1
is
a
general
diagram
of
the
mercury
cell
process.

3.2
Plant
Operation
The
basic
process
flow
diagram
for
the
Olin
Corporation's
Augusta,
GA,
facility
is
shown
in
Figure
3­
2.
As
can
be
seen,
the
plant
produces
NaOH,
H2,
and
Cl2
as
described
above
plus
HCl
and
14
Brine
Saturation
Sodium
Chloride
Precipitation
Filtration
Cooling
Electrolysis
Amalgam
Decomposition
Cooling
Mercury
Removal
Raw
Brine
Mercury
Hydrogen
Dechlorination
Cooling
Mercury
Removal
Storage
Sodium
Hydroxide
Diluted
Brine
Caustic
Solution
Hydrochloric
Acid
Analyte
Amalgam
Water
Caustic
Solution
Hydrogen
Precipitants
Residue
Hydrochloric
Acid
Cooling
Drying
Chlorine
Gas
Compression
Chlorine
Figure
3­
1.
Simplified
diagram
of
the
mercury
cell
process.
DC
Electric
Power
Sodium
Chloride
Water
Chlorine
Gas
Chlorine
Gas
Chlorine
Gas
Chlorine
Electrolytic
Cells
98%
Acid
Drying
Towers
Chlorine
Compressors
Refrigeration
Liquid
Chlorine
Decomposers
Reactors
Hydrochloric
Acid
Unit
Water
Water
Sulfur
Dioxide
Sodium
Amalgam
Sodium
Amalgam
Hydrogen
Compressor
Hydrogen
Gas
50%
Sodium
Hydroxide
Hydrochloric
Acid
Liquid
Sodium
Hydrosulfite
(
Reductone
and
Hydrolin
)

R
R
Figure
3­
2.
Process
flow
diagram
for
Olin­
Augusta.

14
16
liquid
sodium
hydrosulfite.
A
description
of
the
various
buildings
and
processes
at
the
facility
as
provided
by
Olin
can
be
found
in
Appendix
A.

The
Olin
facility
has
a
total
rated
output
of
309
Mg/
day
(
340
short
tons/
day)
of
Cl2,
348
Mg/
day
(
383
short
tons/
day)
of
NaOH,
and
8.2
Mg/
day
(
9
short
tons/
day)
of
H2
produced
by
the
60
cells
in
the
building.
According
to
plant
records
provided
to
the
research
team,
the
process
was
operated
at
a
relatively
constant
production
rate
except
for
a
few
brief
periods
when
cells
were
taken
off
line
for
maintenance.

3.3
Cell
Building
The
cell
building
at
the
Olin
facility
is
a
single
fiberglass
and
steel
structure
approximately
62
m
(
204
ft)
long
by
34
m
(
112
ft)
wide
which
is
generally
oriented
in
a
east/
west
direction.
The
peak
of
the
building
is
located
approximately
16
m
(
51
ft)
above
grade
with
a
single
monovent
(
Figures
3­
3a
and
3­
3b)

running
its
entire
length.

The
Hg
cell
building
consists
of
two
floors.
The
ground
floor
(
basement)
is
used
for
storage
tanks
and
various
other
process
equipment
and,
except
for
the
Reductone
®
area,
is
open
to
the
atmosphere
on
three
sides.
The
Hg
cells
and
associated
decomposers
are
mounted
on
a
support
structure
on
the
cell
room
floor
which
is
open
to
the
basement
below
except
for
concrete
aisles
along
the
edges
and
through
the
center
of
the
cell
array.
In
this
configuration,
each
cell
is
exposed
to
ventilation
air
used
for
cooling
or
worker
protection.

The
cell
building
houses
the
60
electrolysis
cells
(
Figures
3­
4
and
3­
5)
containing
a
total
estimated
Hg
inventory
of
~
169,000
kg
(
372,000
lb).
In
1997,
7,444
kg
(
16,411
lb)
of
"
virgin"
makeup
Hg
was
supplied
to
the
cells
(
Rosario,
2001).
This
amount
of
makeup
Hg
represents
~
5%
of
the
total
quantity
used
by
all
plants
in
the
chlor­
alkali
industry
during
that
year
(
Rosario,
2001).

The
electrolytic
cells
in
the
Olin
cell
building
are
mounted
in
two
rows
of
30
units
each
which
run
east
to
west
(
Figure
3­
6).
The
cell
rows
are
separated
by
a
~
2.4
m
(
8
ft)
wide
aisle
running
along
the
centerline
of
the
building
with
other,
~
3.4
m
(
11
ft)
wide
aisles
located
along
the
perimeter
of
the
cell
rows
to
allow
access
for
equipment
maintenance.
The
decomposers
used
for
Hg
recovery
(
Figure
3­
7)
are
located
on
the
end
of
each
cell
near
either
the
north
or
south
wall.
17
Figure
3­
3a.
Cell
building
showing
interior
of
roof
ventilator.
18
Figure
3­
3b.
Cell
building
showing
exterior
of
roof
ventilator
(
from
north).
19
48
ft
4
in.
Cell
Cutout
Switch
Anode
Adjustment
Hg
Inlet
End
Anode
Frame
Amalgam
Return
Line
Cell
Cover
Clamps
Copper
Studs
Rubber
Cell
Cover
Chlorine
Outlet
Air
Switch
For
Pneumatic
Operation
of
Cell
Switches
Brine
Feed
Waste
Water
To
Sewer
To
Decomposer
Amalgam
Return
Line
0
Figure
3­
4.
Electrolyzer
used
at
the
Olin­
Augusta
plant.
20
10
ft
Floor
Level
Amalgam
Return
Line
Cell
Suports
Upper
Cell
Cover
Flexible
Copper
Bus
Graphite
Anode
Graphite
Anode
Plates
Horizontal
View
Outlet
End­
Box
View
Depleted
Brine
Header
10
in.
&
12
in.

To
Sewer
Amalgam
Return
Line
Flush
Gate
Handle
7
ft
5
in.

Figure
3­
5.
Mercury
cell:
horizontal
view
and
outlet
end­
box
view.
21
Figure
3­
6.
North
line
of
electrolytic
cells
in
Olin
cell
building.
22
Figure
3­
7.
Decomposer
used
at
the
Olin
Augusta
plant.
H
Outlet
2
Caustic
Outlet
Hg
Distributor
Tray
0
Water
Feed
To
Decomposer
Baskets
Lump
Carbon
Packing
Hg
to
Pump
Tank
0
Perforated
Plates
Screens
Amalgam
Return
Decomposer
Seal
Pot
Figure
3­
7.
Decomposer
used
at
the
Olin­
Augusta
plant.
23
The
building
is
ventilated
by
natural
convection
with
three
sides
of
the
basement
and
cell
room
floor
(
except
for
the
Reductone
®
area)
open
to
the
atmosphere.
During
colder
weather,
two
large
sliding
doors
on
the
west
end
of
the
cell
room
floor
can
be
closed
to
reduce
ventilation.
Also,
various
1.1
m
(
3.7
ft)
high
panels
located
on
the
north
and
south
sides
of
the
building
can
be
either
removed
or
replaced
as
ambient
conditions
dictate.

To
further
assist
with
ventilation
of
the
cell
room,
13
large
axial­
blade
fans
located
in
and
along
the
walls
can
also
be
operated,
as
needed,
depending
on
ambient
temperature.
Each
of
these
fans
is
rated
at
626
actual
m3/
min
(
22,100
actual
ft3/
min)
and
is
manually
activated/
deactivated
by
operating
personnel.

A
general
diagram
of
the
cell
building,
showing
the
cell
rows
and
general
fan
locations,
is
shown
in
Figure
3­
8.

In
general,
the
internal
temperature
of
the
cell
room
varies
with
the
ambient
outdoor
temperature.

The
impact
of
this
variation
on
ventilation
rate
is
discussed
in
further
detail
in
Section
4.2.3
below.

In
the
northwest
corner
of
the
cell
building
is
the
Reductone
®
process
area.
This
area
contains
reactors
used
for
the
production
of
303,000
L/
day
(
80,000
gal./
day)
of
liquid
sodium
hydrosulfite
which
is
operated
from
a
separate
control
room
in
that
part
of
the
building.
Since
sodium
amalgam
from
the
electrolytic
cells
is
used
in
this
process,
the
Reductone
®
area
is
also
a
source
of
fugitive
Hg
emissions.

Finally,
based
on
observations
made
during
the
study,
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
plant
appeared
to
be
a
very
well
operated
and
maintained
facility.
General
housekeeping
of
the
cell
building
and
adjacent
areas
was
excellent
and
the
Olin
staff
were
found
to
be
highly
motivated
to
reduce
Hg
emissions
from
the
process.
Periodic
maintenance
was
also
performed
throughout
the
study
period
as
part
of
the
normal
operation
of
the
cell
building.
In
addition,
two
specific
maintenance
events
expected
to
generate
elevated
Hg
levels
were
monitored:
a
cell
opening
and
a
decomposer
"
basket"
changeout.
To
facilitate
maintenance,

both
operations
were
conducted
after
the
equipment
had
been
taken
off­
line
and
allowed
to
cool.
(
Note
that
cooling
of
hot
process
equipment
before
opening
is
not
only
a
good
maintenance
practice,
but
also
a
good
engineering
practice
to
minimize
release
of
Hg
emissions.)
Neither
of
these
events
resulted
in
abnormally
high
Hg0
concentrations
either
in
the
area
adjacent
to
the
maintenance
activity
or
in
the
roof
vent.
24
Sulfur
Dioxide
Storage
Tank
Reductone
Reactors
Hg
Collection
Area
Reductone
Truck
Fill
Area
Large
Sliding
Doors
Cell
Row
(
30
Cells)

Cell
Row
(
30
Cells)

Control
Room
Cooling
&
Drying
Brine
Dechlorination
&
Head
Tank
Spent
Acid
Pumps
&
Sump
Spent
Acid
Tanks
Rectiformers
X
=
Approx.
location
of
13
ventilation
fans
in
walls
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
~
8
ft
~
11
ft
~
9
ft
48
ft
4
in.

Figure
3­
8.
General
diagram
of
the
cell
building
showing
cell
rows,
general
fan
locations,
etc.
25
SECTION
4
EXPERIMENTAL
PROCEDURES
This
section
provides
detailed
information
on
the
field
measurements
conducted
during
the
period
February
17
to
25,
2000.
Both
the
manual
and
automated
techniques
are
described
along
with
the
procedures
used
to
reduce
and
analyze
the
experimental
data.

4.1
Measurement
Methods,
Setup,
and
Calibration
A
combination
of
measurement
methods
was
used
for
data
collection
at
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
facility.
Past
studies
of
this
type
show
that
parallel
approaches
reduce
the
overall
uncertainty
of
the
estimates
and
provide
useful
constraints
on
measurement
accuracy.
The
methods
used
were:
roof
vent
monitoring,
tracer
gas
analyses,
and
manual
velocity
measurements.
Each
is
described
in
detail
below.

4.1.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
The
basic
measurement
approach
used
in
this
portion
of
the
research
was
the
"
roof
monitor
method"
developed
in
the
late
1970s
for
fugitive
emissions
(
Cowherd
and
Kinsey,
1986).
In
this
particular
study,
however,
long­
path
instruments
were
used
in
lieu
of
extractive
sampling
using
a
manifold
system
(
EPA,
1984).
The
use
of
long­
path
instruments
allows
measurements
to
be
made
on
a
spatially
integrated
basis,
thus
eliminating
problems
with
representative
sampling
typical
of
point
measurements.

The
primary
instrumentation
used
in
the
roof
vent
consisted
of:


UV­
DOAS
for
the
measurement
of
Hg0
concentration;


Optical
scintillometer
(
anemometer)
for
the
determination
of
air
velocity;
and

FTIR
spectrometer
for
the
measurement
of
SF6
tracer
gas
concentration.
26
This
equipment
was
selected
because
it
has
been
used
successfully
for
testing
of
similar
emissions
in
other
industries
monitoring
roof
vents.
In
fact,
the
Model
LOA­
104
optical
anemometer
has
recently
received
an
EPA
Reference
Method
14
equivalency
designation
for
the
determination
of
air
velocity
in
aluminum
pot
room
roof
vents
(
EPA,
1984;
Hunt,
1998).
The
long­
path
instruments
used
for
roof
vent
monitoring
are
described
in
Table
4­
1.

Table
4­
1.
Roof
Vent
Instrumentation
Parameter
Monitored
Type
of
Instrument
Manufacturer
Model
No.
Optical
Configurationa
Gas­
phase
Hg0
UV­
DOAS
OPSIS
 
,
Inc.
Model
AR
500
Bi­
static
Air
velocity
Optical
scintillometer
(
anemometer)
Scientific
Technology
Model
LOA­
104b
Bi­
static
SF6
tracer
gas
concentration
FTIR
Environmental
Technologies
Group
Air
Sentry
Mono­
static
a
Bi­
static
=
separate
light
source
and
receiver;
mono­
static
=
combination
light
source
and
receiver
in
one
unit.
b
Modified
with
a
2­
in.
aperture
in
place
of
the
standard
6­
in.
aperture
for
path
lengths
<
100
m.

The
long­
path
instruments
were
mounted
on
wooden
sampling
platforms
erected
at
the
east
and
west
ends
of
the
cell
building
roof
vent
(
Figure
4­
1).
The
UV­
DOAS
receiver,
FTIR,
and
optical
anemometer
transmitter
were
located
on
the
west
platform
with
the
UV­
DOAS
transmitter
(
light
source),
a
retroreflector,
and
the
optical
anemometer
receiver
mounted
on
the
east
platform.
Except
for
the
optical
anemometer,
the
signals
from
all
instruments
were
directed
by
optical
fiber
to
computerized
data
acquisition
systems
(
DASs)
located
in
a
trailer
parked
directly
beneath
the
roof
ventilator
at
the
west
end
of
the
cell
building.
For
the
optical
anemometer,
the
microprocessor
and
associated
laptop
computer
used
for
data
acquisition
were
located
on
the
sampling
platform
itself.
This
arrangement
was
necessary
due
to
the
high
electromagnetic
field
which
precluded
the
use
of
the
low­
voltage
modems
supplied
with
the
instrument.

Due
to
practical
considerations,
the
optical
measurement
path
of
all
the
instruments
was
positioned
slightly
above
the
exit
plane
of
the
ventilator
"
throat"
as
shown
in
Figure
4­
2.
27
Figure
4­
1.
Cross­
section
of
roof
ventilator
showing
internal
structure.
28
Figure
4­
2.
From
left
to
right,
the
FTIR
retroreflector,
UV­
DOAS
light
source,
and
optical
anemometer
receiver
unit
installed
on
the
east
sampling
platform.
29
Each
instrument
was
set
up
and
calibrated
according
to
the
operating
manual
and/
or
approved
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPjP)
for
the
study
(
Kinsey
et
al.,
2000).
For
the
UV­
DOAS,
both
the
transmitter
and
receiver
units
were
bolted
to
steel
plates
attached
to
the
internal
building
structure
at
the
approximate
centerline
of
the
vent
cross
section.
Instrument
calibration
was
performed
at
the
beginning
and
end
of
the
study
using
a
sealed
Hg
gas
cell
placed
in
the
measurement
path.
Daily
checks
of
instrument
performance
were
made
by
OPSIS
®
personnel
who
operated
and
maintained
the
UV­
DOAS
during
the
course
of
the
study.

For
operation
of
the
optical
anemometer,
the
transmitter
and
receiver
were
bolted
directly
to
the
wooden
platform
on
the
south
side
of
the
roof
vent
centerline.
The
instrument
was
initially
compared
against
a
standard
unit
evaluated
in
the
National
Institute
for
Standards
and
Technology
(
NIST)
low­
speed
wind
tunnel
and
thus
is
considered
to
be
NIST­
traceable.
Since
a
dynamic
calibration
could
not
be
performed
on
site,
daily
quality
control
(
QC)
checks
were
made
each
morning
using
the
electronic
calibrator
supplied
with
the
instrument.
In
addition,
two
sets
of
manual
velocity
measurements
were
also
made
as
a
comparison
with
the
readings
made
by
the
optical
anemometer
as
described
below.

The
open­
path
FTIR
and
associated
retroreflector
were
also
bolted
to
the
wooden
platforms
on
the
north
side
of
the
roof
ventilator
centerline.
The
instrument
was
calibrated
both
before
and
after
the
main
data
collection
period
using
a
nitrogen
purge
followed
by
500
ppmv
n­
butane
and
25
ppmv
SF6
according
to
EPA
Method
TO­
16
(
EPA,
1999).
Daily
QC
checks
were
also
made
by
the
instrument
operator.
A
diagram
showing
the
location
and
beam
path
of
each
long­
path
instrument
relative
to
the
roof
vent
cross
section
is
shown
in
Figure
4­
3.

Finally,
a
Met
One
Model
062
temperature
controller
and
meteorological
station
and
associated
laptop
computer
were
also
installed
on
the
west
sampling
platform
to
monitor
air
temperature
and
relative
humidity.
This
system
provided
15­
min
average
data
for
these
two
parameters
as
logged
by
the
computer.

(
Note
that
the
high
electromagnetic
field
precluded
the
transfer
of
electronic
files
from
the
meteorological
station
computer
in­
situ
and
thus
the
data
were
provided
as
hard
copy
output
directly
from
the
computer.)

Note,
however,
that
the
meteorological
station
was
not
available
until
about
midday
on
February
21,
and
thus
temperature
and
humidity
data
are
not
available
for
the
entire
study.
The
available
data
were
analyzed,
however,
to
estimate
the
air
temperature
for
periods
where
actual
monitoring
was
not
conducted.

Ambient
data
for
the
study
period
were
also
obtained
either
from
30
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Dis
tan
ce
fr
om
We
s
t
Buildin
g
Wall,
m
Distance
from
South
Vent
Wall,
m
LOA
DOAS
FTIR
Figure
4­
3.
Relative
locations
of
instrument
beam
path
in
roof
vent
cross
section.

on­
site
meteorological
monitoring
conducted
by
study
collaborators
or
from
National
Weather
Service
(
NWS)
archives
for
Bush
Airport
located
~
2.4
km
(
1.5
mi)
north
of
the
facility.

With
regard
to
on­
site
data
processing
and
storage,
the
raw
data
stream
from
each
instrument
was
continuously
logged
and
accumulated
by
the
associated
DAS.
For
QC
purposes,
a
copy
of
each
instrument
data
file
was
made
by
the
EPA
Work
Assignment
Manager
on
a
daily
basis
and
stored
separately
both
in
electronic
format
and
as
hard
copy.
The
hard
copy
data
were
stored
in
ring
binders
to
provide
a
permanent
record
for
the
study.

4.1.2
Manual
Tracer
Gas
Analyses
The
SF6
tracer
gas
concentration
was
measured
inside
the
Hg
cell
building
by
ERG's
Optical
Measurements
Group
using
manually
operated
bag
samplers
and
a
closed­
cell
Nicolet
Magna
760
FTIR
to
analyze
the
gas
samples.
The
roof
vent
and
upwind/
downwind
monitoring
was
conducted
using
EPA­
operated
FTIRs
to
determine
tracer
gas
concentrations.
All
analyses
and
measurements
for
the
tracer
gas
were
completed
following
EPA
Method
TO­
16
(
EPA,
1999).
31
Manual
sampling
was
accomplished
by
drawing
sample
air
into
a
Tedlar
®
bag
over
a
nominal
24­
hour
period.
Tedlar
®
bags
were
used
for
air
sampling,
and
were
constructed
of
a
material
that
minimizes
adsorption
of
many
ambient
air
chemical
species.
Tedlar
®
bags
will
be
referred
to
as
"
bags"
for
the
remainder
of
this
section.
A
bag
sampling
location
consisted
of
a
rigid
container
with
an
enclosed
bag,

a
sample
pump
to
pull
a
vacuum
on
the
container,
and
associated
flow
measurement
and
control
devices
(
rotameters).

Sampling
was
achieved
by
placing
an
evacuated
bag
inside
the
container,
sealing
the
container,
and
attaching
a
pump
and
sampling
lines
to
the
container.
The
sample
pump
was
started
and
withdrew
air
from
the
container,
creating
a
vacuum
within
the
container
which
then
inflated
the
bag
by
drawing
in
sample
air.

Sampling
rate
was
controlled
by
adjustment
of
the
pump
flow
rate.

Multiple
sampling
locations
were
used
to
obtain
a
distribution
of
tracer
concentration
at
key
locations
in
and
around
the
cell
building.
The
locations
were
sampled
nearly
simultaneously
for
approximately
24
hours.
Sampling
locations
were
determined
based
on
estimated
air
flow
patterns
and/
or
wind
conditions
prior
to
sampling.

Prior
to
sampling,
all
equipment
was
inspected
for
proper
operation.
Bags
were
inspected
for
integrity,
and
the
sampling
containers
were
inspected
and
tested
for
leaks.
When
all
equipment
passed
inspection,
the
equipment
was
placed
in
its
designated
sampling
location
and
assembled.
All
clocks
used
during
sampling
were
synchronized
with
a
master
clock
set
to
the
atomic
clock
in
Boulder,
CO.

Due
to
the
density
difference
between
air
and
SF6,
all
flowmeters
were
calibrated
with
tracer
gas
before
sampling
using
a
manual
Buck
calibrator.
After
the
bag
samples
were
obtained,
they
were
removed
from
the
rigid
container
(
10­
gal.
drum),
labeled,
and
transported
to
the
trailer
for
analysis.
All
samples
were
analyzed
at
Olin
using
the
ERG
Nicolet
FTIR.

The
bag
samples
were
analyzed
by
FTIR
spectroscopy
because
of
the
high
sensitivity
of
FTIR
to
SF6
and
the
ability
of
FTIR
to
simultaneously
detect
many
other
analytes
of
interest.
The
FTIR
operating
parameters
are
given
in
Table
4­
2.
These
parameters
provide
acceptable
detection
limits
for
the
target
analytes
anticipated
in
this
study.
32
Table
4­
2.
Typical
FTIR
Operating
Parameters
Parameter
Value
Spectral
Range
(
cm­
1)
400
­
4000
Spectral
Resolution
(
cm­
1)

0.5
Optical
Cell
Pathlength
(
m)
10
(
approximate)

Optical
Cell
Temperature
(

C)
Ambient
(
nominally
25

C)

Sample
Volume
(
L)
3
Integration
Time
(
min)
6
(
Average
of
256
interferograms)

Prior
to
each
day's
analysis,
the
FTIR
instrument
was
checked
for
proper
operation,
and
a
background
spectrum
was
collected
using
ultra­
high
purity
nitrogen.
A
background
spectrum
was
considered
a
zero­
response
measurement.
After
the
background
spectrum
was
collected,
QC
measurements
were
performed
at
nominal
SF6
concentrations
of
0.1
and
0.5
ppm
(
volume).
QC
results
are
described
in
detail
in
Section
6.

4.1.3
Manual
Velocity
Measurements
Manual
anemometer
measurements
were
also
performed
as
part
of
the
study.
The
objective
of
these
measurements
was
to
evaluate
air
velocity
in
the
roof
vent
as
an
independent
check
on
the
optical
anemometer
as
well
as
to
determine
the
air
velocity
in
various
building
openings
for
the
purpose
of
performing
an
overall
flow
balance
for
the
cell
building.

The
original
study
design
proposed
the
use
of
three
specially
designed
"
anemometer
trees"

(
ATREEs)
for
the
determination
of
air
velocity
and
air
flow.
The
ATREEs
consisted
of
multiple
thermal
anemometer
probes
which
were
mounted
on
a
movable
metal
mast
and
connected
to
a
central
data
logger.

Upon
initial
deployment,
however,
it
was
determined
that
the
thermal
anemometers
used
in
the
ATREEs
were
far
too
sensitive
for
these
measurements
and
immediately
went
off­
scale.
Therefore,
a
hand­
held,

Davis
Instruments
TurboMeter
®
propeller
anemometer
was
used
for
the
manual
velocity
measurements.

This
instrument
is
capable
of
integrated
air
velocity
measurements
down
to
0.1
m/
s
and
thus
was
well
suited
to
this
particular
application.
The
propeller
anemometer
was
also
compared
with
a
hand­
held
33
hot­
wire
instrument
during
selected
measurement
periods.
Since
propeller
data
were
available
for
all
of
the
manual
measurements,
only
this
information
was
used
in
the
analyses
described
below.

Propeller
anemometer
readings
were
obtained
both
in
the
roof
ventilator
and
in
cell
building
openings.
For
the
vent
measurements,
readings
were
made
at
selected
locations
across
the
width
of
the
ventilator
throat
both
at
the
same
height
as
the
optical
anemometer
measurement
path
and
also
~
20
cm
(
8
in.)
below
the
throat
exit.
For
the
various
building
openings,
anemometer
readings
were
obtained
at
the
approximate
geometric
center
of
each
opening.
All
data
collected
during
the
manual
velocity
measurements
were
recorded
by
hand
in
a
bound
field
notebook.

4.2
Data
Reduction
and
Analysis
The
data
reduction
and
analyses
conducted
in
the
study
are
described
below.
Copies
of
the
Excel
®
spreadsheets
containing
the
reduced
data
are
appended,
as
appropriate.

4.2.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
For
the
Hg0
concentration
measurements
made
by
the
UV­
DOAS,
the
raw
30­
sec
average
values
generated
by
the
spectrometer
were
downloaded
directly
from
the
instrument
in
the
form
of
an
ASCII
text
file
for
each
day
of
the
study.
The
individual
text
files
were
then
imported
into
separate
pages
of
an
Excel
®
spreadsheet
where
the
data
were
checked
for
any
obvious
errors
or
anomalies.
Any
entries
in
the
spreadsheet
which
appeared
corrupted
or
questionable
were
deleted,
the
remaining
information
plotted
as
a
chronology,
and
summary
statistics
calculated
for
each
24­
hr
period.
In
addition,
a
second
data
set
consisting
of
1­
min
averages
was
downloaded
from
the
DAS
for
the
purpose
of
the
emission
rate
calculations.
These
data
were
analyzed
in
a
similar
fashion
except
that
graphs
and
summary
statistics
were
not
generated.

A
similar
procedure
was
also
used
for
analysis
of
the
optical
anemometer
results.
In
this
case,

however,
raw
1­
min
averages
were
generated
by
the
instrument
and
were
imported
as
ASCII
text
files
into
the
spreadsheet
pages.
Due
to
the
high
electromagnetic
field
and
subsequent
frequency
of
corrupted
data,

special
care
was
taken
to
check
each
data
line
prior
to
further
reduction
and
analysis.
Note,
however,
that
the
data
generated
by
the
optical
anemometer
were
provided
at
actual
roof
vent
temperature
and
pressure,
34
whereas
the
DOAS
results
were
reported
at
a
constant
temperature
of
30

C
(
86

F)
and
pressure
of
760.7
mm
Hg
(
29.95
in.
Hg).
Therefore,
an
appropriate
temperature
and
pressure
correction
was
applied
to
the
optical
anemometer
results
prior
to
the
two
data
sets
being
used
to
calculate
Hg0
emission
rates.

For
the
roof
vent
meteorological
station,
the
temperature
and
humidity
data
were
entered
by
hand
into
a
spreadsheet
from
the
hard
copy
records.
The
data
entries
were
then
checked
by
the
analyst
for
accuracy.
These
data
were
later
combined
with
applicable
ambient
temperature
information
to
make
the
necessary
corrections
for
the
emission
rate
calculations
described
below.

Finally,
probably
the
most
complex
data
set
to
be
analyzed
was
that
obtained
from
the
roof
vent
FTIR.
This
data
set
consisted
of
individual
infrared
(
IR)
spectra
generated
by
the
instrument
from
64
separate
scans
conducted
over
a
time
period
of
approximately
5
min.
The
individual
spectra
were
analyzed
by
post­
processing
to
determine
the
concentration
of
SF6
and
other
gases
of
interest.

Data
files
containing
the
FTIR
spectra
were
provided
to
two
separate
EPA
contractors
for
post­
test
data
reduction
and
analysis.
An
initial
set
of
~
300
spectra
collected
late
in
the
study
was
first
provided
to
Jeff
Childers
of
ManTech,
Inc.,
who
developed
the
basic
spectral
analysis
scheme
and
provided
a
quality
control
check
of
the
data
(
Appendix
B).
A
complete
set
of
spectra
(
including
those
provided
previously
to
ManTech)
was
also
furnished
to
EPA's
in­
house
contractor
(
ARCADIS
Geraghty
&
Miller)
who
conducted
a
separate
analysis
(
Appendix
C)
of
the
information
generated
in
the
field
using
the
methodology
developed
by
Childers.

As
stated
in
Childers'
report
(
Appendix
B),
the
FTIR
detector
was
found
to
be
optically
saturated
due
to
poor
instrument
setup
in
the
field.
Because
of
detector
saturation,
the
response
of
the
instrument
is
highly
non­
linear,
making
quantitative
interpretation
of
the
spectra
impossible.
Therefore,
the
entire
data
set
was
considered
to
be
unuseable
for
the
quantitative
determination
of
air
flow
rate
from
the
cell
building.

The
data
are
of
some
qualitative
interest,
however,
as
discussed
in
Section
5.

4.2.2
Tracer
Gas
Analyses
The
SF6
tracer
gas
was
released
as
a
diffuse
line
source
along
the
centerline
of
the
cell
room.
The
tracer
was
provided
from
two
separate
compressed
gas
cylinders
through
a
`
soaker
hose'
running
the
length
35
of
the
building.
Figure
4­
4
shows
the
cylinder
layout
along
the
cell
building
basement.
Figure
4­
5
shows
the
soaker
tubing
layout
inside
the
cell
room.

Gas
was
metered
from
the
cylinder
using
a
pressure
regulator
and
precision
rotameter
which
was
calibrated
in
the
field
with
SF6
using
a
bubble
test
meter
prior
to
use.
Single­
point
calibration
checks
36
G1
F1
E1
D1
C1
B1
60
30
31
58
59
29
1
3
2
G11
A11
A1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D11
North
South
Column
number
along
basement
All
columns
continue
from
1
to
11
Rotameters
1
&
2
on
cell
room
floor
1
2
3
4
SF6
cylinder
SF6
cylinder
Cell
numbers
Rotameter
3
on
cell
room
floor;
Rotameter
4
in
basement
Rotameter
4
and
soaker
tubing
was
along
basement
on
2/
23
and
2/
24/
00
Figure
4­
4.
Cylinder
layout
along
the
cell
building
basement.

60
30
31
58
59
29
1
3
2
North
South
Rotameters
1
&
2
1
2
3
Rotameter
to
SF6
cylinders
in
basement
continue
cells
31
to
58
continue
cells
3
to
29
Cells
1­
29
&
59
on
Northside
Cells
30­
58
&
60
on
Southside
Reductone
Area
TM
to
SF6
cylinders
in
basement
Figure
4­
5.
Soaker
tubing
layout
inside
the
cell
room.
37
were
made
at
the
beginning,
middle,
and
end
of
the
tests.
Calibration
checks
are
presented
in
Section
6
(
Quality
Assurance/
Quality
Control).

The
total
average
gas
release
for
the
first
3
days
of
sampling,
February
17
through
February
20,

2000,
was
137.4
g/
min.
Gas
concentration
was
increased
on
February
21,
2000,
because
the
FTIR
instrument
was
detecting
baseline
amounts
of
SF6.
The
average
release
from
February
21
to
23,
2000,
was
248.1
g/
min.
Because
there
was
still
a
problem
with
the
detection
of
SF6
from
the
long­
path
roof
vent
FTIR,
the
rotameters
were
exchanged
and
calibrated,
and
a
higher
flow
was
set
to
run
the
last
2
days
of
sampling,
February
23
and
24,
2000.
The
average
release
was
3356.0
g/
min.
Gas
release
concentrations
are
listed
in
Table
4­
3.

4.2.3
Emission
Rate
Calculations
Using
the
data
sets
described
in
Section
4.2.1
above,
the
emission
rate
for
each
1­
min
averaging
period
was
calculated
according
to:

(
4­
1)
E
60VcAeC(
10)
6
=
 

Where:

E
=
Hg
0
emission
rate
(
g/
min);
Vc
=
air
velocity
obtained
from
optical
anemometer
corrected
for
temperature
and
pressure
(
m/
s);
Ae
=
effective
flow
area
of
vent
(
m2);
and
C
=
Hg
0
concentration
as
measured
by
the
UV­
DOAS
(
µ
g/
m3).

The
corrected
air
velocity
was
calculated
by
Equation
4­
2
as:

(
4­
2)
Vc
Va
TrPa
TaPr
=

Where:

Va
=
air
velocity
obtained
from
optical
anemometer
at
actual
conditions
(
m/
s);
Tr
=
reference
absolute
temperature
(
303
K);
38
Table
4­
3.
Gas
Release
Concentrations
Date
Time
Rotameter
Concentration
mL/
mina
SF6
Concentration
(
g/
min)
b
Comments
Rotameter
Site
Locationc
Total
Flow
Rotameter
Site
Locationc
Total
Flow
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2/
17
18:
30
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
Density
of
SF6
=
5.13
g/
mL
19:
00
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
2/
18
9:
00
20.9
3.5
21.1
45.5
107.2
17.7
108.3
233.2
9:
01
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
10:
00
8.8
6.6
9.4
24.8
45.0
34.1
48.1
127.1
11:
30
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
12:
10
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
16:
00
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
17:
10
8.8
6.1
9.4
24.3
45.0
31.4
48.1
124.4
17:
11
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
17:
30
8.8
6.1
8.4
23.2
45.0
31.4
42.9
119.2
17:
31
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
17:
45
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
18:
00
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
2/
19
7:
40
7.8
16.8
17.8
42.3
39.9
86.0
91.1
217.0
7:
41
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
9:
00
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
10:
15
8.8
5.6
6.0
20.4
45.0
28.6
30.9
104.5
10:
16
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
10:
50
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
11:
45
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
12:
45
7.8
6.9
9.4
24.1
39.9
35.5
48.1
123.5
12:
46
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
13:
39
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
14:
30
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
14:
57
8.8
6.6
9.4
24.8
45.0
34.1
48.1
127.1
14:
58
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
16:
40
8.8
7.4
9.4
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
17:
00
7.1
6.1
9.4
22.6
36.6
31.4
48.1
116.0
17:
01
8.76
7.44
9.37
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
2/
20
8:
30
8.76
19.4
24.5
52.7
45.0
99.7
125.5
270.1
8:
31
8.76
7.44
9.37
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
9:
30
8.76
7.44
9.37
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
10:
30
7.78
7.44
9.37
24.6
39.9
38.2
48.1
126.2
10:
31
8.76
7.44
9.37
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
11:
00
5.49
6.11
11.0
22.6
28.1
31.4
56.7
116.2
Average
in
g/
min
137.4
11:
01
8.76
7.44
9.37
25.6
45.0
38.2
48.1
131.2
2/
20
15:
00
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
16:
00
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
(
Continued)
Table
4­
3.
(
Continued)

Date
Time
Rotameter
Concentration
mL/
mina
SF6
Concentration
(
g/
min)
b
Comments
Rotameter
Site
Locationc
Total
Flow
Rotameter
Site
Locationc
Total
Flow
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
39
2/
21
8:
30
13.7
16.8
21.1
51.6
70.2
86.0
108.3
264.5
8:
31
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
9:
30
13.7
10.1
12.7
36.5
70.2
51.9
65.3
187.3
9:
31
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
10:
35
13.7
8.78
11.0
33.5
70.2
45.0
56.7
171.9
10:
36
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
11:
40
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
2/
22
10:
15
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
11:
00
13.7
8.78
11.0
33.5
70.2
45.0
56.7
171.9
11:
01
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
11:
20
13.7
8.78
11.0
33.5
70.2
45.0
56.7
171.9
11:
21
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
12:
00
15.0
8.78
11.0
34.8
76.9
45.0
56.7
178.6
12:
01
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
14:
00
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
15:
00
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
19:
40
13.7
11.2
14.1
38.9
70.2
57.3
72.2
199.7
19:
41
13.7
11.4
14.4
39.5
70.2
58.7
73.9
202.8
Average
in
g/
min
248.1
2/
23
10:
00
47.7
66.9
35.0
149.7
244.9
343.4
179.7
768.0
10:
01
47.7
43.1
47.2
138.0
244.9
221.3
242.0
708.2
New
rotameters
2/
23
11:
30
59.4
43.1
47.2
51.2
200.9
304.7
221.3
242.0
262.8
1030.8
14:
00
59.4
43.1
47.2
51.2
200.9
304.7
221.3
242.0
262.8
1030.8
Average
in
g/
min
1606.3
16:
15
59.4
209.7
217.1
51.2
537.5
304.7
1076.0
1113.9
262.8
2757.3
2/
24
8:
30
176.1
209.7
217.1
51.2
654.2
903.4
1076.0
1113.9
262.8
3356.0
11:
00
176.1
209.7
217.1
51.2
654.2
903.4
1076.0
1113.9
262.8
3356.0
Average
in
g/
min
3356.0
13:
00
176.1
209.7
217.1
51.2
654.2
903.4
1076.0
1113.9
262.8
3356.0
a
Reading
in
mL/
min
=
(
Flowmeter
reading
mL/
min
*
slope)
+
y
intercept.
Slope
and
intercept
were
obtained
for
initial
day
that
the
flowmeters
were
calibrated.
b
Concentration
in
g/
min
=
density
in
g/
mL
x
mL/
min
[
Density
of
SF6
=
5.13
g/
mL].
c
See
Figures
4­
4
and
4­
5
for
rotameter
site
locations.
40
Pa
=
actual
barometric
pressure
(
mm
Hg)
=
1.006
Psta
;
Psta
=
station
pressure
for
Bush
field
(
mm
Hg);
1.006
=
altitude
correction
for
Bush
field;
Ta
=
actual
absolute
temperature
(
K)
=

C
+
273;
and
Pr
=
reference
atmospheric
pressure
=
760.7
mm
Hg.

To
obtain
the
value
of
Ta
in
Equation
4­
2,
the
temperature
data
obtained
from
the
roof
vent
meteorological
station
were
used,
where
available.
However,
for
time
periods
when
actual
monitoring
was
not
conducted,
the
available
data
were
analyzed
separately
to
estimate
the
vent
air
temperature.

To
estimate
roof
vent
air
temperature,
the
available
monitoring
data
were
copied
into
a
separate
spreadsheet
and
the
difference
between
the
vent
temperature
and
the
ambient
temperature
calculated
for
each
15­
min
averaging
period.
The
temperature
differentials
( 
Ts)
obtained
from
these
calculations
were
then
plotted
on
the
same
graph
as
a
series
of
daily
time
histories.
Upon
examination
of
these
plots,
a
similar
daily
trend
in
 
T
was
observed,
as
would
be
expected
for
a
naturally
ventilated
building.

Appropriate
averages
were
then
calculated
from
the
15­
min
monitoring
results
which
were
subsequently
applied
to
the
ambient
temperature
data
for
those
time
periods
where
actual
monitoring
was
not
conducted.

The
time
histories
generated
from
the
monitoring
results
and
the
average
daily
 
T
cycle
calculated
from
these
data
are
shown
in
Figures
4­
6a
and
4­
6b,
respectively.
As
shown
by
Figure
4­
6b,
the
"
artificial"

chronology
developed
from
the
average
data
is
very
similar
to
the
daily
trends
actually
determined
from
the
monitoring
results
(
Figure
4­
6a)
and
thus
should
be
adequate
to
estimate
vent
air
temperature.

Finally,
the
concentration,
velocity,
temperature,
and
pressure
data
described
above
were
imported
into
an
Excel
®
spreadsheet
and
the
Hg0
emission
rate
calculated
for
each
1­
min
averaging
period
using
Equations
4­
1
and
4­
2.
Also
generated
in
the
spreadsheet
were
summary
statistics
and
a
time
history
for
each
24­
hr
period.
A
copy
of
this
spreadsheet
is
provided
in
Appendix
F.
41
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
0:
15
1:
30
2:
45
4:
00
5:
15
6:
30
7:
45
9:
00
10:
15
11:
30
12:
45
14:
00
15:
15
16:
30
17:
45
19:
00
20:
15
21:
30
22:
45
Tim
e
o
f
Day
Delta
Temperature
(
°
C)

2
2
­
Feb
2
3
­
Feb
2
4
­
Feb
2
5
­
Feb
Figure
4­
6a.
Average
roof
vent
temperature
differential
as
determined
from
15­
min
monitoring
data.

11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
0
:
15
1:
30
2
:
45
4:
00
5
:
15
6:
30
7
:
45
9:
00
10:
15
11:
30
12:
45
14:
00
15
:
15
16:
30
17
:
45
19:
00
20:
15
21:
30
22
:
45
Tim
e
of
Day
Delta
Temperature
(
°
C)

Figure
4­
6b.
Calculated
temperature
differential
for
roof
ventilator
as
determined
from
average
monitoring
data
shown
in
Figure
4­
6a.
42
4.2.4
Manual
Velocity
Measurements
and
Flow
Balance
Calculations
For
the
manual
velocity
measurements
in
the
roof
vent,
the
data
from
the
field
notebook
were
entered
by
hand
into
an
Excel
®
spreadsheet
(
Appendix
D).
These
data
were
then
plotted
with
respect
to
the
physical
boundaries
of
the
ventilator
throat
and
averages
calculated
for
each
set
of
observations.
The
averages
were
then
compared
to
similar
values
obtained
from
the
optical
anemometer
for
the
same
time
period.
In
addition,
the
data
points
obtained
at
both
edges
of
the
ventilator
were
extrapolated
by
linear
regression
to
the
point
of
zero
velocity.
These
locations
were
then
used
to
determine
the
effective
flow
area
of
the
vent
(
Ae)
for
the
emission
rate
calculations
shown
in
Equation
4­
1
above.

In
the
case
of
the
building
openings,
the
manual
velocity
data
were
also
entered
by
hand
into
an
Excel
®
spreadsheet
(
Appendix
E).
These
values
were
then
multiplied
by
the
cross
sectional
area
of
each
opening
as
determined
either
from
building
drawings
or
field
notes
to
determine
volumetric
flow
rate.
The
individual
flow
rates
were
then
combined
with
the
total
volumetric
flow
of
the
electrically
powered
ventilation
fans
to
obtain
the
total
ambient
air
entering
the
cell
building.
Similar
calculations
were
also
performed
for
the
roof
vent
using
the
applicable
optical
anemometer
data
for
the
same
measurement
period
and
the
effective
flow
area
as
described
earlier.

To
perform
the
flow
balance
for
the
building,
three
separate
techniques
were
used.
The
first
technique
simply
corrected
the
total
flow
obtained
for
the
building
inlets
and
roof
vent
to
standard
temperature
and
pressure
and
compared
the
two
values
on
a
volumetric
basis.
In
the
second
method,
the
mass
of
air
entering
and
leaving
the
building
was
calculated
and
a
similar
comparison
made.
Finally,
a
method
developed
by
the
Occidental
Chemical
Corporation
(
OxyChem)
as
part
of
their
direct
mass
balance
(
DMB)
modeling
effort
was
also
used.
For
the
sake
of
consistency,
all
flow
balance
calculations
were
performed
in
English
units
as
described
in
the
following
paragraphs.

In
the
first
approach,
the
total
flow
for
both
the
building
inlets
and
the
roof
vent
was
corrected
to
a
standard
temperature
of
77

F
(
25

C)
and
pressure
of
29.92
in.
Hg
(
760
mm
Hg)
according
to:

(
4­
3)
Qs
Qa
TsPa
TaPs
=
43
Where:

Qs
=
volumetric
flow
rate
at
standard
conditions
(
ft3/
min);
Qa
=
volumetric
flow
rate
at
actual
conditions
(
ft3/
min);
Ts
=
standard
absolute
temperature
(
537

R);
Ta
=
actual
absolute
temperature:
(

R)
=

F
+
460;
Pa
=
actual
barometric
pressure
(
in.
Hg)
=
1.006
Psta;
Psta
=
station
pressure
for
Bush
field
(
in.
Hg);
1.006
=
altitude
correction
for
Bush
field;
and
Ps
=
standard
atmospheric
pressure
=
29.92
in.
Hg.

As
shown
by
Equation
4­
3
above,
no
correction
for
relative
humidity
(
water
vapor)
was
made
in
the
calculations.

Percent
closure
of
the
volume
balance
was
then
calculated
as:

(
4­
4)
%
Balance
100
Qin
Qout
Qin
*
100
=
 
 












	




Where:

Qin
=
volumetric
air
flow
entering
the
cell
building
(
standard
ft3/
min);
and
Qout
=
volumetric
air
flow
exiting
the
roof
ventilator
(
standard
ft3/
min).

In
the
second
calculation
scheme,
a
traditional
mass
balance
was
performed
which
compared
the
quantity
of
air
entering
the
building
through
the
various
openings
to
that
exiting
the
roof
vent
per
unit
time.

For
these
calculations,
the
partial
pressure
of
water
vapor
in
moist
air
(
pw)
at
the
building
inlet
and
outlet
was
found
by
(
ASHRAE,
1981):

(
4­
5)
p
w
p
s
=
 
Where:

pw
=
partial
pressure
of
water
vapor
in
moist
air
(
in.
Hg/
in.
2);

 
=
relative
humidity
(
expressed
as
a
fraction);
and
ps
=
vapor
pressure
of
water
in
moist
air
at
saturation
(
in.
Hg/
in.
2).
44
Equation
4­
5
assumes
that
pw
is
approximately
equal
to
the
vapor
pressure
of
saturated
pure
water
(
pws)

which
is
generally
accepted
for
most
calculations
(
ASHRAE,
1981).

Next,
the
volume
of
moist
air
per
unit
mass
of
dry
air
(
 )
was
found
for
the
air
entering
and
leaving
the
building
by
(
ASHRAE,
1981):

(
4­
6)
 
=
 
RaT
(
p
pw)

Where:

 
=
volume
of
moist
air
per
unit
mass
of
dry
air
(
ft3
of
mixture/
lbm
dry
air);
Ra
=
ideal
gas
constant
for
dry
air
(
in.
Hg/
in.
2
°
lbm
­
1
°
OR­
1);
lbm
=
pound
mass
of
air
(
engineering
units);
T
=
absolute
temperature
(

R);
p
=
barometric
pressure
(
in.
Hg/
in.
2
);
and
pw
=
partial
pressure
of
water
vapor
in
moist
air
(
in.
Hg/
in.
2)
from
Equation
4­
5.

The
mass
of
air
either
entering
or
leaving
the
building
per
unit
of
time
was
then
calculated
according
to
Equation
4­
7:

(
4­
7)
M
V
=
 
Where:

M
=
mass
of
dry
air
per
unit
time
(
lbm/
min);
V
=
volumetric
flow
rate
(
ft3/
min);
and
 
=
volume
of
moist
air
per
unit
mass
of
dry
air
(
ft3
of
mixture/
lbm
dry
air)
from
Equation
4­
6.

To
assess
the
percent
closure
of
the
mass
balance,
Equation
4­
8
was
used:

(
4­
8)
%
Balance
100
Min
Mout
Min
*
100
=
 
 












	




45
Where:

Min
=
mass
of
dry
air
per
unit
time
entering
the
building
(
lbm/
min)
Mout
=
mass
of
dry
air
per
unit
time
exiting
the
building
(
lbm/
min)

Finally,
the
field
data
were
entered
into
a
special
Excel
®
spreadsheet
developed
by
Michael
Shaffer
of
OxyChem's
Delaware
City
plant.
This
spreadsheet
uses
a
slightly
different
approach
to
performing
the
mass
balance
which
was
adopted
as
an
independent
check
on
the
calculations
described
above.
46
SECTION
5
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION
This
section
provides
the
results
of
the
Olin
field
study
as
obtained
using
the
equipment,
methods,

and
data
analysis
procedures
described
in
Section
4.
Also
included
in
this
section
is
a
discussion
of
key
experimental
results.

5.1
Mercury
Monitoring
Results
The
outcome
of
the
roof
vent
monitoring
conducted
at
the
Olin
cell
building
is
discussed
below.

Both
the
Hg0
emission
rates
calculated
from
the
continuous
monitoring
data
as
well
as
comparisons
of
the
UV­
DOAS
results
to
other
Hg0
measurement
techniques
are
also
described.

5.1.1
Monitoring
Data
and
Mercury
Emission
Rates
As
discussed
above,
continuous
monitoring
was
conducted
at
the
roof
vent
for
Hg0
concentration
and
air
velocity
from
which
1­
minute
average
Hg0
emission
rates
were
calculated.
In
addition,
continuous
monitoring
was
also
attempted
for
SF6
tracer
gas
as
a
separate
measure
of
the
air
flow
rate
from
the
vent.

The
results
of
these
measurements
are
discussed
below.

The
raw
30­
sec
averages
generated
by
the
UV­
DOAS
were
reduced
to
produce
daily
plots
of
the
Hg0
monitoring
results
as
well
as
summary
statistics
for
each
day.
The
daily
data
plots
are
shown
in
Figures
5­
1
to
5­
9
with
summary
statistics
calculated
from
the
data
provided
in
Table
5­
1.
As
can
be
seen
from
Table
5­
1,
the
measured
Hg0
concentration
varied
over
an
order
of
magnitude
from
~
73
to
7.3
µ
g/
m3.

The
overall
average
for
the
study
period
was
24
µ
g
Hg0/
m3.

Similar
plots
and
statistics
were
also
created
from
analysis
of
the
1­
min
optical
anemometer
data
as
discussed
in
Section
4.1.1.
The
plots
are
shown
in
Figures
5­
10
to
5­
18
with
summary
statistics
for
each
daily
data
set
provided
in
Table
5­
2.
As
shown
in
Table
5­
2,
the
air
velocities
measured
by
the
47
48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
11:
18
11:
56
12:
36
13:
15
13:
52
14:
30
15:
07
15:
45
16:
22
16:
59
17:
37
18:
15
18:
53
19:
30
20:
08
20:
45
21:
22
22:
01
22:
39
23:
16
23:
53
Time
of
Day
HgO
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
1.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
17,
2000.

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
07
2:
15
3:
22
4:
35
5:
41
6:
52
8:
05
10:
04
11:
11
12:
20
13:
26
14:
36
15:
42
16:
49
18:
05
19:
13
20:
19
21:
27
22:
35
23:
41
Time
of
Day
HgO
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
2.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
18,
2000.
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
06
2:
10
3:
14
4:
19
5:
23
6:
29
7:
33
8:
40
10:
08
11:
14
12:
19
13:
23
14:
34
15:
44
16:
55
18:
02
19:
12
20:
18
21:
24
22:
32
23:
39
Time
of
Day
HgO
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m
3
)

Figure
5­
3.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
19,
2000.

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
05
2:
13
3:
21
4:
27
5:
32
6:
39
7:
45
8:
52
10:
19
11:
23
12:
29
13:
34
14:
41
15:
48
16:
57
18:
03
19:
08
20:
14
21:
19
22:
25
23:
36
Time
of
Day
Hg0
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
4.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
20,
2000.
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
18
2:
29
3:
35
4:
42
5:
51
6:
57
8:
06
9:
44
10:
48
11:
52
12:
56
14:
00
15:
04
16:
12
17:
16
18:
24
19:
27
20:
31
21:
35
22:
38
23:
43
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
6.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
22,
2000.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
06
2:
13
3:
17
4:
24
5:
31
6:
34
7:
40
8:
51
10:
15
11:
23
12:
34
13:
46
14:
57
16:
03
17:
16
18:
29
19:
33
20:
36
21:
41
22:
48
23:
51
Time
of
Day
Hg0
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
5.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
21,
2000.
51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
00
2:
00
2:
58
3:
57
4:
53
5:
48
6:
47
7:
48
8:
58
10:
12
11:
15
12:
14
13:
19
14:
18
15:
24
18:
38
19:
47
20:
48
21:
46
22:
41
23:
41
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3)

Figure
5­
8.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
24,
2000.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
1:
01
2:
06
3:
10
4:
14
5:
17
6:
20
7:
27
8:
34
9:
58
11:
20
12:
32
13:
37
14:
42
15:
46
16:
49
18:
02
19:
06
20:
20
21:
24
22:
31
23:
39
Time
of
Day
Hg
o
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m
3)

Figure
5­
7.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
23,
2000.
52
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0:
00
0:
19
0:
40
1:
00
1:
20
1:
40
1:
59
2:
16
2:
38
2:
58
3:
18
3:
37
3:
56
4:
15
4:
38
4:
58
5:
15
5:
36
5:
54
6:
12
6:
32
6:
52
7:
11
7:
30
7:
50
8:
07
8:
26
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3
)

Figure
5­
9.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
elemental
mercury
concentration
for
February
25,
2000.

Table
5­
1.
Summary
of
30­
sec
Roof
Vent
DOAS
Dataa
Date
Hg0
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3)
a
No.
of
Observations
(
n)
b
%
Completenessb
Maximum
Minimum
Mean
Standard
Deviation
2/
17/
00
56.6
15.5
27.4
6.01
1281
89
2/
18/
00
35.5
10.2
22.1
4.33
2553
89
2/
19/
00
38.8
7.32
16.8
4.83
2549
89
2/
20/
00
73.0
8.49
23.0
11.9
2553
89
2/
21/
00
71.3
8.43
19.0
9.00
2555
89
2/
22/
00
36.6
7.83
20.0
5.97
2544
88
2/
23/
00
40.0
10.5
21.2
7.03
2546
88
2/
24/
00
62.7
15.3
30.7
8.15
2317
80
2/
25/
00
51.1
19.3
34.7
7.13
922
89
Mean
51.7
11.4
23.9
­­­
­­­
88
a
At
30

C
and
29.95
in.
Hg.
Three
significant
figures.
53
b
Dimensionless.
Target
value

75%.
54
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
10:
45
11:
26
12:
06
12:
49
13:
31
14:
11
14:
52
15:
32
16:
13
16:
53
17:
34
18:
15
18:
56
19:
36
20:
17
20:
57
21:
39
22:
19
23:
00
23:
40
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
10.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
17,
2000.

0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
00
0:
57
1:
54
2:
51
3:
50
4:
50
5:
46
6:
46
7:
45
8:
45
9:
41
10:
5411:
53
12:
4913:
4514:
4515:
41
16:
3817:
4218:
4019:
3720:
3321:
31
22:
28
23:
24
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
11.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
18,
2000.
55
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0:
00
0:
59
2:
00
3:
02
4:
03
5:
01
6:
01
7:
02
8:
02
9:
02
10:
2111:
1912:
1813:
1714:
17
15:
1916:
2117:
21
18:
2219:
2020:
20
21:
18
22:
1823:
19
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
13.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
20,
2000.
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
00
1:
29
2:
56
4:
24
5:
52
7:
20
8:
48
10:
40
12:
09
13:
38
15:
14
16:
49
18:
23
19:
55
21:
23
22:
54
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
12.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
19,
2000.
56
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
00
1:
03
2:
06
3:
07
4:
10
5:
15
6:
16
7:
18
8:
20
9:
43
10:
4811:
53
13:
01
14:
07
15:
0916:
12
17:
19
18:
28
19:
28
20:
2921:
31
22:
34
23:
34
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
14.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
21,
2000.

0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
00
1:
04
2:
11
3:
09
4:
08
5:
10
6:
09
7:
08
8:
10
9:
39
10:
3511:
32
12:
2813:
2614:
2215:
2016:
2017:
1718:
16
19:
14
20:
1021:
0722:
0323:
0023:
57
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
15.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
22,
2000.
57
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0:
00
0:
56
1:
56
2:
55
3:
53
4:
50
5:
50
6:
48
7:
49
8:
50
10:
12
11:
22
12:
2513:
2414:
2315:
2416:
21
17:
2718:
2619:
26
20:
3321:
31
22:
3523:
32
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
16.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
23,
2000.

0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
00
1:
01
2:
07
3:
07
4:
09
5:
10
6:
09
7:
13
8:
15
9:
30
10:
4611:
49
12:
51
13:
52
14:
54
16:
0517:
19
18:
28
19:
41
20:
46
21:
48
22:
47
23:
50
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
17.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
24,
2000.
58
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0:
000:
17
0:
350:
53
1:
1
1:
291:
47
2:
042:
21
2:
402:
583:
15
3:
343:
524:
10
4:
294:
505:
075:
23
5:
445:
596:
15
6:
346:
537:
11
7:
287:
468:
028:
208:
408:
57
Time
of
Day
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
s)

Figure
5­
18.
Time
history
of
roof
vent
air
velocity
for
February
25,
2000.

Table
5­
2.
Summary
of
1­
min
Roof
Vent
Optical
Anemometer
Dataa
Date
Air
Velocity
(
m/
s)
No.
of
Observations
(
n)
b
%
Completenessb
Maximum
Minimum
Mean
Standard
Deviation
2/
17/
00
1.1
0.62
0.85
0.091
780
98
2/
18/
00
1.3
0.67
0.94
0.10
1380
96
2/
19/
00
1.3
0.70
0.97
0.10
1367
95
2/
20/
00
1.5
0.66
0.94
0.11
1372
95
2/
21/
00
1.3
0.58
0.89
0.12
1323
92
2/
22/
00
1.3
0.51
0.96
0.10
1347
94
2/
23/
00
1.3
0.24
0.91
0.13
1314
91
2/
24/
00
1.3
0.68
0.93
0.10
1264
88
2/
25/
00
1.3
0.76
1.0
0.083
492
90
Mean
1.3
0.60
0.93
­­
­­
93
a
Measured
at
actual
vent
temperature
and
pressure.
Two
significant
figures.
59
b
Dimensionless.
Target
value
=
90%.
60
optical
anemometer
varied
from
0.24
to
1.5
m/
s
with
an
overall
average
for
the
monitoring
period
of
0.94
m/
s.

The
1­
min
average
Hg0
emission
rates
calculated
from
the
monitoring
data
are
plotted
in
Figures
5­

19
to
5­
27
for
the
9­
day
study
period.
Summary
statistics
calculated
from
these
data
are
shown
in
Table
5­

3.
As
indicated
by
Table
5­
3,
the
Hg0
emission
rate
varied
over
about
2
orders
of
magnitude
from
0.08
to
1.2
g/
min.
An
overall
average
Hg0
emission
rate
for
the
monitoring
period
of
0.36
g/
min
was
also
calculated
from
the
data.

5.1.2
Comparison
of
Mercury
Measurement
Methods
In
addition
to
the
continuous
monitoring
described
above,
the
UV­
DOAS
results
were
also
compared
to
other
measurement
techniques
performed
by
collaborators
from
the
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
(
ORNL).
Each
comparison
is
described
below
along
with
the
results
obtained.

In
the
first
analysis,
a
comparison
was
made
between
the
concentration
of
Hg0
measured
by
the
UV­
DOAS
and
similar
measurements
conducted
using
a
hand­
held
instrument
at
various
points
across
the
width
of
the
roof
vent
(
i.
e.,
from
north
to
south).
This
comparison
was
made
to
determine
whether
any
stratification
in
the
Hg0
concentration
was
evident
across
the
width
of
the
vent.
The
hand­
held
measurements
were
made
by
ORNL
using
a
Jerome
Model
431­
X
survey
instrument.
(
Note
that
the
Model
431­
X
uses
an
electrical
resistance
cell
to
measure
Hg0,
and
thus
the
readings
are
not
directly
comparable
to
an
optical
method
such
as
the
UV­
DOAS.
Also,
the
lower
detection
limit
of
the
Jerome
is
3000
ng/
m3
as
compared
to
~
130
ng/
m3
for
the
DOAS.)
The
data
obtained
from
this
evaluation
are
summarized
graphically
in
Figure
5­
28.

As
shown
by
Figure
5­
28,
the
Hg0
concentrations
determined
by
the
Jerome
instrument
were
relatively
consistent
across
the
width
of
the
vent
and
compare
reasonably
well
to
the
average
concentration
obtained
with
the
UV­
DOAS.
Based
on
these
results,
the
measurements
made
by
the
UV­
DOAS
were
considered
to
be
representative
of
the
entire
vent
cross
section
and
thus
useful
for
the
purpose
of
the
emission
rate
calculations.
61
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
04
2:
09
3:
12
4:
21
5:
26
6:
33
7:
41
8:
49
10:
43
11:
50
12:
53
13:
56
15:
03
16:
07
17:
12
18:
23
19:
28
20:
31
21:
37
22:
41
23:
44
Time
of
Day
Hg
o
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
20.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
18,
2000.
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
11:
18
11:
54
12:
32
13:
08
13:
44
14:
20
14:
55
15:
30
16:
06
16:
41
17:
17
17:
53
18:
28
19:
04
19:
39
20:
15
20:
50
21:
25
22:
02
22:
38
23:
13
23:
48
Time
of
Day
Hg
o
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
19.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
17,
2000.
62
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
0:
00
1:
06
2:
15
3:
24
4:
31
5:
37
6:
46
7:
52
9:
00
10:
28
11:
33
12:
40
13:
46
14:
55
16:
03
17:
12
18:
20
19:
25
20:
32
21:
40
22:
46
23:
57
Time
of
Day
Hg
0
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
22.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
20,
2000.
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
07
2:
12
3:
17
4:
23
5:
28
6:
35
7:
41
8:
48
10:
17
11:
24
12:
30
13:
37
14:
49
15:
59
17:
12
18:
21
19:
30
20:
38
21:
47
22:
52
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min
)

Figure
5­
21.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
19,
2000.
63
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
15
2:
27
3:
32
4:
38
5:
46
6:
51
7:
59
9:
36
10:
39
11:
42
12:
44
13:
48
14:
50
15:
58
17:
01
18:
04
19:
10
20:
12
21:
15
22:
18
23:
22
Time
of
Day
Hg0
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min
)

Figure
5­
24.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
22,
2000.
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
06
2:
13
3:
17
4:
24
5:
31
6:
34
7:
40
8:
51
10:
15
11:
23
12:
34
13:
46
14:
57
16:
03
17:
16
18:
29
19:
33
20:
36
21:
41
22:
48
23:
51
Time
of
Day
Hg
0
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
23.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
21,
2000.
64
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
00
2:
04
3:
07
4:
10
5:
12
6:
14
7:
20
8:
25
9:
47
11:
04
12:
20
13:
23
14:
27
15:
32
16:
34
17:
46
18:
46
19:
57
21:
04
22:
06
23:
15
Time
of
Day
Hg
o
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
25.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
23,
2000.

0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
1:
00
2:
00
2:
58
3:
57
4:
53
5:
48
6:
47
7:
48
8:
58
10:
12
11:
15
12:
1413:
1914:
1815:
24
18:
38
19:
4720:
4821:
46
22:
4123:
41
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
26.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
24,
2000.
65
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0:
00
0:
20
0:
43
1:
04
1:
26
1:
46
2:
05
2:
25
2:
46
3:
09
3:
29
3:
50
4:
10
4:
31
4:
54
5:
13
5:
35
5:
54
6:
13
6:
346:
55
7:
17
7:
36
7:
56
8:
15
Time
of
Day
Hgo
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

Figure
5­
27.
Elemental
mercury
emission
rates
for
February
25,
2000.

Table
5­
3.
Summary
of
Calculated
Elemental
Mercury
Emission
Ratesa
Date
Hg0
Emission
Rate
(
g/
min)

No.
of
Observationsb
Total
Daily
Emissions
(
g/
day)
c
Maximum
Minimum
Mean
Standard
Deviation
2/
17/
00
0.82
0.24
0.38
0.076
747
N/
A
2/
18/
00
0.58
0.15
0.33
0.075
1339
481
2/
19/
00
0.64
0.10
0.26
0.085
1364
370
2/
20/
00
1.2
0.13
0.35
0.19
1368
510
2/
21/
00
0.88
0.12
0.27
0.11
1311
387
2/
22/
00
0.69
0.12
0.31
0.080
1340
453
2/
23/
00
0.65
0.080
0.30
0.090
1300
438
2/
24/
00
0.83
0.24
0.46
0.12
1130
662
2/
25/
00
0.87
0.33
0.58
0.11
450
N/
A
Mean
0.80
0.17
0.36
­­­
­­­
472
a
Two
significant
figures.
b
Dimensionless.
c
Sum
of
measured
1­
min
values
adjusted
to
standard
day
of
1440
min
to
account
for
missing
data.
66
Three
significant
figures.
67
R
o
o
f
V
en
t
L
a
te
ra
l
H
g
0
P
rofile
(
West
P
latform)
F
eb
ru
ary
2
1
,
2
0
00
0
5
10
15
20
25
­
1
.0
0
0
.00
1.0
0
2.0
0
3
.00
4.0
0
5.0
0
Dis
tan
ce
f
rom
No
r
th
Sid
e
o
f
V
e
n
t
(
m
)
Hg0
Concentration
(
10
µ
g/
m
3)

A
vg
.
DOA
S
C
o
nc.
=
2
0
(
1
0
)
µ
g
/
m3
Std
.
D
ev.
=
0
.7
5
µ
g
/
m3
Figure
5­
28.
Lateral
profile
of
elemental
mercury
concentration
as
determined
by
the
Jerome
431­
X
instrument.

In
the
second
analysis,
monitoring
data
obtained
by
the
UV­
DOAS
were
compared
to
point
measurements
made
using
a
Tekran
Model
2537A
automated
Hg
analyzer
operated
by
ORNL.
The
Model
2537A
is
a
cold­
vapor
atomic
fluorescence
spectrometer
(
CVAFS)
originally
designed
for
ambient
air
monitoring
which
uses
gold
traps
to
preconcentrate
the
sample
prior
to
analysis.
The
Tekran
analyzer
was
located
in
the
cell
building
control
room
with
air
samples
collected
from
a
high­
flow
sampling
line
which
extended
to
a
point
in
the
ceiling
of
the
cell
building
~
5
m
(
16
ft)
below
the
approximate
center
of
the
roof
vent
entrance.

Selected
data
from
both
instruments
were
imported
into
an
Excel
®
spreadsheet.
The
two
data
sets
were
time­
synchronized
and
plotted
against
each
other,
and
a
simple
linear
regression
calculation
performed
on
the
data.
The
results
of
this
analysis
are
shown
in
Figure
5­
29.

As
Figure
5­
29
shows,
the
data
exhibit
a
relatively
high
degree
of
scatter
with
only
about
63%
of
the
variance
being
explained
by
the
linear
regression.
Possible
reasons
for
these
results
include
differences
in
analysis
method,
non­
representative
sampling
(
e.
g.,
sample
extraction
at
a
single
point
vs.
a
pathaveraged
method),
and
sampling
line
losses.
The
data
do,
however,
show
comparable
trends
in
Hg0
68
concentration
with
time
(
Figure
5­
30)
which
may
be
useful
for
identifying
process
upsets
or
maintenance
events
as
discussed
below.
69
y
=
0.6572x
+
10.748
R2
=
0.6312
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Tekran
Hg
0
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m
3
)
DOAS
Hg
Conc.
(
ug/
m
)

3
o
Figure
5­
29.
UV­
DOAS/
Tekran
comparison
(
February
17­
21,
2000).

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
12:
00:
00
2/
17/
00
20:
37:
30
2/
17/
00
5:
12:
30
2/
18/
00
14:
32:
30
2/
18/
00
23:
50:
00
2/
18/
00
8:
25:
00
2/
19/
00
18:
15:
00
2/
19/
00
2:
50:
00
2/
20/
00
11:
25:
00
2/
20/
00
20:
05:
00
2/
20/
00
4:
40:
00
2/
21/
00
Date/
Time
UV­
DOAS
Tekran
2537
Hg
Concentration
(
ug/
m
)

0
3
Figure
5­
30.
Chronology
of
elemental
mercury
concentration
measured
by
OPSIS
 
Model
AR
500
UV­
DOAS
and
Tekran
Model
2537A
CVAFS
for
February
17­
21,
2000.
70
5.2
Tracer
Gas
Results
The
results
of
the
tracer
gas
measurements
are
provided
in
the
following
paragraphs.
These
results
include
both
the
roof
vent
monitoring
conducted
using
the
open­
path
FTIR
and
the
manual
bag
sampling
conducted
in
various
building
openings.

5.2.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
As
was
discussed
in
Section
4.2.1
above,
the
FTIR
results
were
found
to
be
unuseable
for
the
purpose
of
determining
volumetric
air
flow
due
to
optical
saturation
of
the
detector.
However,
the
qualitative
results
are
of
at
least
some
general
interest.

In
the
analysis
of
the
IR
spectra,
several
trace
gases
other
than
SF6
were
found
in
measurable
amounts.
These
gases
include
carbon
monoxide
(
CO),
nitrous
oxide
(
N2O),
and
methane
(
CH4),
all
of
which
were
estimated
to
be
in
concentrations
above
background.
(
Note
that
background
readings
were
obtained
from
the
ambient
FTIR
located
at
the
east
plant
road
which
was
also
operated
by
EPA
as
part
of
the
larger
study.)
Although
the
emission
rate
of
these
compounds
could
not
be
quantified,
it
is
interesting
to
note
that
three
"
greenhouse"
gases
were
found
in
measurable
quantities
in
the
roof
vent
effluent.
The
exact
source(
s)
of
these
gases
could
not
be
determined,
however,
from
the
available
data.

5.2.2
Tracer
Gas
Study
 
Manual
Bag
Sampling
The
bags
were
sampled
manually
by
drawing
sample
air
into
a
Tedlar
®
bag
over
a
nominal
24­
hour
period.
Multiple
sampling
locations
were
chosen
(
Figure
5­
31)
to
obtain
a
distribution
of
tracer
concentrations
at
key
building
openings.
This
sampling
process
was
conducted
to
obtain
ambient
levels
of
SF6
released
along
the
open
areas
in
the
basement
and
in
the
cell
room.
If
SF6
were
detected,
it
would
have
indicated
possible
release
of
Hg
along
the
vents
from
the
cell
building.

The
sampling
results
for
the
manual
bag
analyses
are
presented
in
Table
5­
4.
The
average
concentration
of
SF6
for
the
low
release
days,
February
17
through
February
20,
2000,
was
0.019
ppmv,

which
is
just
over
the
detection
limit
of
0.008
ppmv.
The
average
concentration
for
the
high
release
71
G1
F1
E1
D1
C1
B1
A1
60
30
31
58
59
29
1
2
3
D2
D3
D4
D5
D11
A11
G11
Bag
sampling
locations
­
shown
in
basement,
although
sampling
was
performed
on
both
levels
North
South
Figure
5­
31.
Bag
sampling
locations
in
cell
building.

Table
5­
4.
Manual
Bag
Analysis
Results
Bag
ID
Site
Description
Date
Taken
Date
Analyzed
Reported
Concentrations
(
ppmv)
Description
Column
Location
Basement
or
Cell
Room
E8­
22
Under
Cell
8
G3
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
NDa
E13­
22
Under
Cell
13
G8
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
A31­
22
Under
Cell
31
A3
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
0.016
A53­
22
Under
Cell
58
A8
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
0.014
B1­
22
Southwest
B1
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
Table
5­
4.
(
Continued)

Bag
ID
Site
Description
Date
Taken
Date
Analyzed
Reported
Concentrations
(
ppmv)
Description
Column
Location
Basement
or
Cell
Room
72
Wall
(
Continued)

DE1­
22
Between
D1&
E1
D1
&
E1
Basement
02/
18/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
UPG3­
22
Cell
3
G3
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
UPG13­
22
Cell
13
G8
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
UPA31­
22
Cell
31
A3
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
02/
22/
00
0.016
UPA53­
22
Cell
53
A8
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
02/
22/
00
0.017
UAB1­
22
Southwest
Wall
Opening
B1
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
na
Bag
leaked
UPDE1­
22
Between
D1&
E1
Column
D1
&
E1
Cell
Room
02/
19/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
UPB1­
22
Southwest
Wall
B1
Cell
Room
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
NWEND­
22
Northwest
Wall
F3
Basement
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
0.022
20UG3­
22
Cell
20
G3
Cell
Room
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
0.022
LOG13­
22
Under
Cell
13
G8
Basement
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
ND
LOA31B­
22
Under
Cell
31
A31
Basement
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
0.024
UA53­
22
Cell
53
A8
Cell
Room
02/
20/
00
02/
22/
00
0.020
A31­
24
Cell
31
A3
Basement
02/
23/
00
02/
24/
00
ND
A53­
24
Cell
53
A8
Basement
02/
23/
00
02/
24/
00
ND
G13­
24
Cell
13
G8
Basement
02/
23/
00
02/
24/
00
ND
G3­
24
Cell
8
G11
Basement
02/
23/
00
02/
24/
00
ND
UPDEL­
25
Mid
Wall
Column
D1
&
E1
Basement
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
1B1­
25
Southwest
Wall
Opening
B1
Cell
Room
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
UPG3­
25
Cell
3
G3
Basement
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
LOG13­
25
Cell
13
G8
Cell
Room
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
UPA31­
25
Cell
31
A3
Basement
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
LOA53­
25
Cell
53
A8
Cell
Room
02/
24/
00
02/
25/
00
ND
aDetection
limit
=
0.013
ppmv
73
days,
February
22
through
23,
2000,
was
below
the
method
detection
limit
(
MDL).
Although
the
concentrations
of
SF6
on
February
20,
2000,
were
less
than
5
x
MDL
(
MDL
=
0.008
ppbV),
the
concentrations
detected
were
significantly
higher,
on
average
(
0.022
ppbV),
than
any
other
sampling
day,

suggesting
very
minimal
Hg
transport
during
this
sampling
period.
The
bags
that
detected
SF6
were
located
on
the
upper
and
lower
northwest
and
southwest
levels
of
the
cell
building.
Samples
were
also
taken
from
the
standard
check
cylinder
used
to
QC
the
long­
path
FTIR.
The
results
of
these
measurements
are
presented
in
the
Quality
Control/
Quality
Assurance
Section
of
this
report.

5.3
Air
Flow
Study
Results
The
results
of
the
manual
velocity
measurements
and
the
associated
air
flow
balance
calculations
performed
for
the
cell
building
are
described
below.

5.3.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
The
data
obtained
from
the
manual
velocity
measurements
are
shown
in
Figures
5­
32
and
5­
33
for
the
east
and
west
sampling
platforms,
respectively.
As
these
graphs
show,
the
velocity
profiles
obtained
on
each
platform
exhibit
a
distinct
decrease
at
the
approximate
center
of
the
vent
created
by
a
structural
member
running
the
length
of
the
building.
In
addition,
the
air
velocity
drops
off
rapidly
outside
the
physical
boundaries
of
the
vent
throat
as
would
be
expected.

The
average
air
velocity
measured
manually
by
the
propeller
anemometer
was
also
compared
to
that
obtained
by
the
optical
anemometer
for
the
same
time
period.
The
results
of
this
comparison
are
provided
in
Table
5­
5.
As
shown,
the
average
air
velocities
determined
by
the
two
methods
were
within
+
10%
which
is
quite
acceptable
considering
the
differences
in
measurement
technique
(
i.
e.,
optical
vs.

mechanical),
the
limited
amount
of
manual
data
collected,
etc.
Based
on
these
results,
the
measurement
path
of
the
optical
anemometer
was
considered
to
be
located
at
a
point
representative
of
the
average
velocity
and
thus
appropriate
for
use
in
the
emission
rate
calculations.
74
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
­
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Distance
Relative
to
South
Edge
of
Ve
nt
(
m
)
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
sec)

22­
Feb
1
5
4
5
hrs
(
Prop)
23­
Feb
~
1
0
0
8
hrs
(
Prop)
23­
Feb
~
1
0
2
1
hrs
(
Ho
t
W
ire)
South
Edge
o
f
V
ent
LOA
B
eam
Pat
h
=
~
1
.8
m
Figure
5­
32.
Hand­
held
anemometer
readings
at
the
optical
anemometer
measurement
height
on
the
east
sampling
platform,
looking
west.

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Dis
tance
Re
lative
to
South
Edge
of
Vent
(
m
)
Air
Velocity
(
actual
m/
sec)

22­
Feb
23­
Feb
So
ut
h
Ed
g
e
o
f
V
ent
LOA
B
eam
Pat
h
=
~
1
.8
m
Figure
5­
33.
Hand­
held
anemometer
readings
at
the
optical
anemometer
measurement
height
on
the
west
sampling
platform,
looking
west.
75
Table
5­
5.
Comparison
of
Velocity
Measurements
in
Roof
Venta
Sampling
Location
Sampling
Date
Average
Velocity
(
Propeller
Anemometer)
Average
Velocity
(
Optical
Anemometer)
Percent
Difference
East
platform
February
22,
2000
0.9
m/
s
0.8
m/
s
10
February
23,
2000
1
m/
s
0.9
m/
s
4
West
platform
February
22,
2000
0.9
m/
s
0.9
m/
s
7
February
23,
2000
0.9
m/
s
0.9
m/
s
­
1
a
Rounded
to
one
significant
figure.
Propeller
anemometer
=
Davis
Instruments
TurboMeter
®
;
optical
anemometer
=
Scientific
Technology
Model
LOA­
104A.

5.3.2
Flow
Balance
Calculations
The
results
of
the
cell
building
flow
balance
calculations
are
shown
in
Table
5­
6
for
the
three
methods
described
in
Section
4.2.4.
As
Table
5­
6
shows,
unusually
good
closure
(
i.
e.,
79
to
100%)
was
obtained
in
each
of
the
three
flow
balance
calculations
performed.
In
addition,
the
three
methods
also
correlate
well
with
each
other,
providing
additional
confidence
in
the
calculations
performed.
Finally,
the
high
degree
of
closure
of
these
flow
balances
lends
further
credibility
to
the
air
velocity
measurements
made
by
the
optical
anemometer
in
the
roof
ventilator
to
adequately
characterize
the
air
flow
from
the
cell
building.

Table
5­
6.
Results
of
Air
Flow
Balance
Calculations
for
the
Olin
Cell
Buildinga
Date
Volume
Balance
(%
Closure)
Mass
Balance
(%
Closure)
OxyChem
DMB
Resultsb
(%
Closure)
Mass
Balance
(%
Difference)

February
24,
2000
82
82
79
2.9
February
25,
2000
100
99
100
­
0.9
a
Rounded
to
two
significant
figures.
b
Occidental
Chemical
Corporation
direct
mass
balance
(
DMB)
method
as
provided
by
Michael
Shaffer.
76
5.4
Discussion
of
Results
The
following
sections
discuss
the
results
presented
above
for
the
roof
vent
monitoring,
cell
building
air
flow
evaluation,
and
the
tracer
gas
study
conducted
at
the
Olin
chlor­
alkali
facility.

5.4.1
Roof
Vent
Monitoring
No
specific
pattern
could
be
discerned
from
the
daily
plots
of
Hg0
emission
rate
determined
from
the
roof
vent
monitoring
conducted
in
this
study.
Figures
5­
19
to
5­
27
demonstrate
that
various
episodic
events
were
observed
where
the
emission
rate
rises
for
a
period
of
time
then
drops
back
to
some
nominal
level.

An
attempt
was
made
to
correlate
these
episodes
to
either
process
operation
(
Figure
3­
3)
or
maintenance
events
using
plant
records.
Except
for
one
specific
event
on
February
20,
when
a
significant
Hg
leak
occurred
in
the
Reductone
®
area
of
the
building
,
this
analysis
failed
to
find
any
useful
association.

The
plant
operational
logs
were
simply
not
adequate
to
pinpoint
when
certain
maintenance
operations
were
performed
on
the
cells
and
thus
when
high
airborne
Hg
levels
might
be
expected.
The
data
do
suggest,

however,
that
roof
vent
instrumentation
may
be
a
useful
tool
for
long­
term
process
monitoring
to
identify
when
problems
occur
in
the
operation
of
the
cells
which
may
require
corrective
action.

Another
observation
made
during
the
study
involves
the
impact
of
the
high
electromagnetic
field
on
instrument
operation.
If
future
studies
of
this
type
are
conducted,
optical
modems
and
cables
should
be
used
for
the
optical
anemometer
to
allow
logging
of
the
data
at
a
remote
location.
This
procedure
would
substantially
reduce
the
amount
of
lost
data
and
make
troubleshooting
much
easier
for
the
operator.

Finally,
although
the
concentration
of
Hg0
was
found
to
be
relatively
homogeneous
across
the
lateral
dimension
of
the
roof
vent,
such
was
found
not
to
be
the
case
along
the
longitudinal
dimension.
This
observation
is
illustrated
in
Figure
5­
34
which
shows
Hg0
concentration
data
collected
during
the
January
presurvey
(
Appendix
G).
These
data
were
obtained
by
sampling
from
the
mobile
crane
over
the
south
cell
line
using
a
Jerome
Model
431­
X
survey
instrument
and
a
long
sampling
tube
attached
to
a
non­
conducting
pole
which
extended
to
a
point
near
the
entrance
of
the
roof
ventilator
throat.
77
Elemental
Hg
Longitudinal
Profile
in
R
oof
Ventilator
(
1/
13/
00)

0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Dis
tance
from
We
s
t
Wall
(
m
)
Hg0
Concentration
(
mg/
m
3)

Figure
5­
34.
Profile
of
elemental
mercury
concentration
along
length
of
roof
vent
entrance
as
obtained
during
the
January
2000,
presurvey.

As
shown
in
Figure
5­
34,
the
Hg0
concentrations
were
not
consistent
along
the
length
of
the
ventilator.
The
lowest
concentrations
were
found
on
the
west
end
of
the
building
near
the
two
large
open
doors.
Figure
5­
34
also
at
least
partially
explains
the
lack
of
correlation
between
the
Tekran
and
DOAS
measurements
described
earlier.
These
differences
constitute
yet
another
argument
supporting
spatially
integrated
readings
in
lieu
of
point
sampling
with
a
manifold
system.
However,
also
note
that
these
measurements
were
conducted
below
the
ventilator
throat,
which
can
also
affect
the
homogenity
of
the
Hg0
levels
obtained.

5.4.2
Building
Air
Flow
Evaluation
Unexpectedly
good
closure
was
obtained
for
each
of
the
three
air
flow
balance
calculations
performed
in
the
study,
especially
for
February
25
(
Table
5­
6).
One
possible
reason
the
balance
obtained
for
February
25
has
the
highest
degree
of
closure
is
that
the
manual
velocity
data
were
collected
very
quickly
(
i.
e.,
within
about
15
min)
as
compared
to
the
previous
day
when
the
measurements
required
about
78
1.5
hr
to
complete.
Conditions
within
the
cell
building
tend
to
change
rapidly;
thus,
there
is
a
need
to
obtain
the
necessary
data
over
as
short
a
time
period
as
possible.
A
much
larger
data
base
is
required,

however,
to
verify
the
results
of
the
current
flow
study
at
other
naturally
ventilated
buildings
of
this
type.

As
a
final
note,
it
was
unfortunate
that
the
roof
vent
tracer
gas
data
were
not
useable
in
our
analysis.
The
use
of
a
tracer
is
a
very
well
accepted
technique
for
determining
flow
rates
in
situations
where
other
methods
prove
difficult
to
implement.
Therefore,
the
possibility
of
a
tracer
gas
analysis
for
future
flow
measurement
studies
should
not
be
abandoned.
However,
greater
care
is
needed
to
verify
proper
instrument
setup
and
operation
in
the
field.

5.4.3
Comparison
with
Historical
Information
Additional
analyses
can
be
made
of
the
data
obtained
in
the
study
which
are
worthy
of
note.
First
is
the
comparison
of
the
current
results
with
those
of
prior
emission
testing
of
chlor­
alkali
plants.
For
this
analysis,
only
four
documents
were
found
in
the
literature
which
provide
emission
data
for
cell
building
roof
vents.
Two
of
these
documents
were
EPA
reports
of
contractor
testing
conducted
in
the
1970s
as
part
of
the
original
development
of
the
Hg
National
Emission
Standard
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
R.
F.

Weston,
1971;
Marks
and
Davidson,
1972).
The
other
two
documents
were
journal
articles
of
two
remote
sensing
studies
conducted
in
Sweden
and
Italy
(
Edner
et
al.,
1989;
Ferrara
et
al.,
1992,
respectively).
The
remote
sensing
studies
were
conducted
using
light
detection
and
ranging
(
LIDAR)
systems
to
profile
the
plume
from
the
cell
building
and
as
such
were
indirect
measures
of
the
Hg0
emissions
from
the
building.

Table
5­
7
summarizes
the
data
contained
in
the
above
documents
as
compared
to
current
study
results.
As
shown,
the
daily
emission
rate
obtained
at
the
Olin
facility
is
a
factor
of
~
2
to
3
lower
than
that
obtained
in
prior
testing
reported
in
the
literature.
It
should
be
noted,
however,
that
the
literature
values
are
based
on
generally
outdated
information
from
studies
of
more
limited
duration
as
compared
to
the
current
research.

Another
observation
that
can
be
made
from
the
historical
data
is
a
comparison
of
the
estimated
annual
emissions
from
the
cell
building
roof
vent
to
the
amount
of
makeup
Hg
added
by
the
plant.
79
Table
5­
7.
Comparison
of
Current
Study
with
Prior
Research
Reference
Description
of
Study
Daily
Hg0
Emission
Rate
(
g/
day)
a
Roy
F.
Weston,
Inc.
1971
Monitoring
of
two
roof
vents
and
nine
powered
ventilators
using
a
Barringer
Airborne
Spectrometer
and
hot­
wire
anemometer;
one
test
per
location
990
Marks
and
Davidson,
1972
Monitoring
of
two
roof
vents
and
ten
powered
ventilators
using
an
iodine
monochloride
impinger
train
and
vane
anemometer;
two
runs
per
location
1,500
Edner
et
al.,
1989
Differential
absorption
light
detection
and
ranging
(
DIAL)
of
a
Swedish
plant;
1­
week
study
(
number
of
tests
not
specified)
720
Ferrara
et
al.,
1992
Differential
absorption
light
detection
and
ranging
(
DIAL)
of
an
Italian
plant;
3­
day
study
930b
Current
study
Continuous
monitoring
with
UV­
DOAS
and
optical
anemometer
in
roof
vent
for
9­
day
study
period
470
a
Extrapolates
short­
term
values
to
annual
basis
assuming
24
hr/
day
and
365
days/
yr
operation.
Rounded
to
two
significant
figures.

b
Average
of
all
tests
conducted.
Value
could
be
adjusted
upward
by
at
least
20%
to
account
for
interferences
in
the
measurement
path
plus
elimination
of
minor
sources
from
the
calculated
average.

Assuming
that
the
9­
day
study
period
is
indicative
of
the
annual
operation
of
the
plant,
which
may
or
may
not
actually
be
the
case,
172
kg/
year
of
Hg0
would
theoretically
be
released
to
the
atmosphere
from
the
cell
building
vent.
This
value
represents
2.3%
of
the
total
makeup
Hg0
added
by
the
plant
in
1997.
Note,

however,
that
Olin
has
implemented
an
aggressive
Hg
conservation
program
since
1997,
and
it
is
currently
not
known
how
much
Hg
was
actually
added
during
the
year
in
which
the
study
was
conducted
(
2000).

Therefore,
the
above
comparison
is
probably
not
valid
for
the
2000
operating
year.
However,
taking
these
factors
into
consideration,
it
still
appears
that
a
substantial
percentage
of
the
potential
Hg
emissions
were
not
measured
in
the
roof
vent
during
the
current
study.
Data
from
other
parts
of
the
measurement
program
described
in
Section
1.2
may,
however,
provide
additional
information
on
other
Hg
sources
within
the
plant
which
are
not
currently
available
for
analysis.
80
Finally,
in
the
1997
Mercury
Study
Report
to
Congress,
18.8
Mg/
yr
was
estimated
for
all
noncombustion
Hg
sources
for
the
period
1994­
95
(
Keating
et
al.,
1997).
Again
assuming
that
the
above
annual
emissions
from
the
current
study
are
valid,
the
Olin
cell
building
represents
less
than
1%
of
the
total
non­
combustion
Hg
emissions
inventory
for
1994­
95.
Also,
assuming
a
worst
case
makeup
Hg
consumption
for
the
entire
industry
of
146
Mg
as
mentioned
in
Section
1,
the
Olin
cell
building
annual
emissions
would
constitute
approximately
0.1%
of
this
value.

Based
on
the
above
analyses,
there
is
an
apparent
discrepancy
between
the
results
obtained
in
the
current
study
and
the
potential
Hg
emissions
from
this
and
other
CAPs.
However,
a
number
of
factors
could
explain
differences
in
the
Hg0
emission
rate,
including
better
process
control
and
increased
plant
maintenance.
It
is
recommended,
therefore,
that
extended
monitoring
at
the
Olin
plant
and/
or
monitoring
at
additional
plants
be
performed
to
address,
among
other
issues,
maintenance
events
and
operational
transients
which
are
suspected
as
being
the
major
cause
of
Hg
release
to
the
atmosphere
from
the
cell
building.
81
SECTION
6
QUALITY
ASSURANCE/
QUALITY
CONTROL
A
number
of
quality
control
(
QC)
checks
were
made
for
the
measurements
conducted
in
the
study.

For
the
automated
methods,
both
long­
path
and
point
monitors,
checks
included
calibration
using
standards,
daily
system
checks,
and
calibration
of
flow
meters.
For
the
manual
techniques,
QC
checks
included
duplicate
samples,
field
and
instrument
blanks,
QC
samples,
and
spiked
samples.
Table
6­
1
summarizes
the
QC
checks
used
for
the
various
measurements
conducted
in
the
program.
More
detailed
information
on
these
checks
can
be
found
in
the
following
sections.
As
discussed
in
Section
1,
only
the
cell
room
data
are
discussed
in
this
report.
The
other
collaborators
in
this
study
will
provide
the
quality
assurance
from
their
programs
in
separate
publications.

6.1
UV­
DOAS
Measurements
The
UV­
DOAS
instrument
used
in
the
roof
vent
was
initially
calibrated
in
the
laboratory
using
an
optical
bench.
In
the
field,
instruments
were
calibrated
using
a
sealed
optical
cell
with
the
concentration
determined
based
on
temperature.
Temperature
was
measured
by
a
calibrated,
laboratory­
grade
electronic
thermometer.
Calibrations
are
presented
in
Appendix
H
for
the
Hg0
response
obtained
on
February
17,
24,

and
25,
2000.
QC
checks
are
reported
in
Table
6­
2,
and
percent
completeness
was
shown
previously
in
Table
5­
1.

6.2
Optical
Anemometry
As
mentioned
in
the
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
Kinsey,
et
al.,
2000),
an
assessment
of
precision
and
accuracy
for
the
optical
anemometer
was
not
possible.
However,
percent
completeness
was
calculated
for
each
24­
hr
monitoring
period
as
shown
previously
in
Table
5­
2.
In
addition,
QC
checks
were
also
performed
each
morning
using
the
electronic
calibrator
supplied
with
the
instrument.
82
Table
6­
1.
QC
Checks
for
Experimental
Methods
Included
in
QA
Plana
QC
Check
Long­
Path
FTIR
UV­
DOAS
SF6
Bag
Samples
Calibration
procedure
SOP
in
QAPjP
OPSIS
 
QA
in
QAPjP
SOP
in
QAPjP
Calibration
frequency
Before
and
after
testing
Before
and
after
testing
Before
and
after
testing
Type
of
calibration
standard
used
Optical
cell
w/
certified
gas
standard
(
vent
only)
Sealed
optical
cell
Optical
cell
with
gas
standard
Standard
concentration
or
value
25
ppm
SF6;
500
ppm
n­
butane
(
vent
only)
Saturated
Hg
vapor
(
function
of
temp.)
0.1
and
0.5
ppm
SF6
Source
of
standard
Scott
Specialty
Gases
(
vent
only)
OPSIS
 
Spectra
Gases
Standard
traceability
NIST
(
vent
only)
N/
A
Certified
at
±
10%

Instrument
flow
rate
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
Duplicate
samples
N/
A
N/
A
10%

Field
blanks
N/
A
N/
A
One
per
bag
Instrument
blanks
Nitrogen
purge
N/
A
Zero
gas
 
one
per
day
QC
samples
or
checks
Daily
system
check
per
SOP
Daily
system
check
per
QA
manual
Daily
system
check
per
SOP
Reagent
blanks
(
if
applicable)
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
Spiked
samples
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
a
SOP
=
Standard
Operating
Procedure;
QAPjP
=
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan.

Table
6­
2.
Quality
Control
Checks
for
UV­
DOAS
Description
Date
Taken
Concentration
(
µ
g/
m3)
Percent
Recovery
(%)

Test
2/
24/
00
­
1.2
NA
Expected
7.0
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
6.45
92.1
Expected
41.7
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
34.0
81.5
Expected
83.4
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
72.55
87.0
Zero
Test
2/
24/
00
­
0.35
NA
Expected
5.7
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
4.63
81.2
Expected
37.5
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
40.4
108
Expected
75
µ
g/
m3
2/
24/
00
78.2
104
Zero
Test
2/
25/
00
­
0.96
NA
Expected
4.3
µ
g/
m3
2/
25/
00
4.75
110
Expected
42.5
µ
g/
m3
2/
25/
00
42.0
98.8
Expected
83.3
µ
g/
m3
2/
25/
00
83.4
100
83
The
results
of
these
checks
are
summarized
in
Table
6­
3
below.
All
QC
checks
were
within
the
acceptable
ranges
specified
by
the
manufacturer.

Table
6­
3.
Results
of
Daily
QC
Checks
of
Model
104a
Optical
Anemometer
Output
from
Electronic
Calibrator
by
Measurement
Rangea
Breakout
Box
Voltage
Date
0.1
m/
s
5
m/
s
10
m/
s
Channel
A
Channel
B
February
17
0.03
1.70
3.37
2.56
2.49
February
18
0.03
1.71
N/
A
2.40
2.38
February
19
N/
A
1.69
3.36
2.37
2.37
February
20
0.03
1.71
N/
A
2.36
2.46
February
21
0.03
1.71
N/
A
2.38
2.48
February
22
0.03
1.71
N/
A
2.24
2.40
February
23
0.03
1.72
N/
A
2.41
2.41
February
24
0.03
1.70
N/
A
2.45
2.39
February
25
(
b)
(
b)
(
b)
2.65
2.32
a
Readings
obtained
from
computer
DAS
in
m/
s
for
each
calibrator
range
indicated.
Since
a
2­
in.
aperture
was
used
in
place
of
the
standard
6­
in.
aperture,
all
values
shown
must
be
multiplied
by
a
factor
of
3
to
obtain
equivalent
value.
N/
A
=
not
available.
b
DAS
crashed
just
prior
to
daily
QC
check.
Instrument
operational
until
QC
check
attempted
per
downloaded
data
files.

6.3
SF
6
Release,
Sampling,
and
Analysis
(
FTIR)

The
SF6
tracer
gas
was
released
as
a
diffuse
line
source
along
the
centerline
of
the
cell
room.
The
tracer
was
provided
from
compressed
gas
cylinders
through
a
"
soaker
hose"
running
the
length
of
the
building.
Gas
was
metered
from
the
cylinder
using
a
pressure
regulator
and
precision
rotameter
calibrated
with
SF6
using
a
bubble
test
meter
prior
to
deployment.
Single­
point
calibration
checks
were
made
at
least
every
4
days
throughout
the
program.
Calibrations
are
presented
in
Appendix
I
for
the
rotameter
calibrations
obtained
on
February
16
and
23,
2000.
84
QC
procedures
for
bag
sampling
and
analysis
were
performed.
Sampling
QC
activities
were
conducted
separately
from
analytical
QC.
Field
sampling
data
were
recorded
in
a
laboratory
notebook.

Copies
of
the
notebook
pages
are
presented
in
Appendix
J.

Sampling
QC
included
daily
inspection
of
the
FTIR
spectrometer
and
a
bag
container
leak
check.

Sampling
system
QC
was
performed
prior
to
each
sample
run
including
blank
values
for
each
sample
collection
bag.
Acceptable
blank
values
were

5x
MDL
(
MDL
for
closed
cell
SF6
=
0.008
ppbV).
Blank
and
quality
control
checks
are
reported
in
Tables
6­
4
and
6­
5,
respectively.

QC
procedures
for
the
FTIR
spectrometer
included:


Instrument
sample
cell
integrity
check;


Collection
of
diagnostic
spectra;
and

Gas
standard
measurements.

These
procedures
were
conducted
each
test
day
prior
to
analysis.
Diagnostic
spectra
were
collected
for
the
SF6
gas
standards
which
included
0.1
and
0.5
ppm
SF6.
The
analytical
procedures
for
both
diagnostic
spectra
and
gas
standards
were
identical.
All
calibration
procedures
for
bag
sample
collection
and
FTIR
analysis
were
included
in
the
Standard
Operating
Procedure
(
SOP)
as
listed
in
Table
6­
1
above.

6.4
Long­
Path
FTIR
QA/
QC
Checks
(
Roof
Vent)

Based
on
the
quality
review
provided
by
ManTech
Environmental,
the
data
from
the
long­
path
roof
vent
FTIR
were
not
used.
Appendix
B
contains
a
complete
description
of
problems
with
data
validation.

For
calibration
and
QA/
QC
purposes,
the
roof
vent
FTIR
optical
cell
was
first
purged
with
99%

purity
nitrogen.
During
this
procedure
a
background
spectrum
was
collected
and
recorded.
After
purging,

the
instrument's
optical
cell
was
challenged
with
n­
butane
certified
at
500
ppm.
Resulting
spectra
were
collected
and
recorded.
Then
the
cell
was
again
purged
with
99%
purity
nitrogen
to
remove
any
residue.

The
cell
was
then
challenged
with
SF6
certified
at
25
ppm.
Resulting
spectra
were
collected
and
recorded.

Finally,
the
cell
was
again
purged
with
99%
purity
nitrogen.
This
procedure
was
performed
before
the
85
FTIR
began
to
collect
data
and
when
data
collection
for
the
study
was
completed.
For
QA/
QC
purposes,

the
FTIR
was
purged
with
99%
purity
nitrogen
and
challenged
with
SF6
throughout
the
sampling
period.

Table
6­
4.
Manual
Bag
Sampling/
Analysis
Blank
Control
Checksa
Bag
ID
Description
Date
Taken
Date
Analyzed
Average
Concentration
(
ppmv)
zero1­
17
Blank
02/
17/
00
02/
17/
00
0.0000
zero2­
17
Blank
02/
17/
00
02/
17/
00
0.0000
zero3­
17
Blank
02/
17/
00
02/
17/
00
0.1310
zero1­
18
Blank
02/
18/
00
02/
18/
00
0.0000
zero2­
18
Blank
02/
18/
00
02/
18/
00
0.0017
zero3­
18
Blank
02/
18/
00
02/
18/
00
0.0020
zero1­
22
Blank
02/
22/
00
02/
22/
00
0.0000
zero2­
22
Blank
02/
22/
00
02/
22/
00
0.0140
zero3­
22
Blank
02/
22/
00
02/
22/
00
0.0140
ZERO4­
22
Blank
02/
22/
00
02/
22/
00
0.0135
ZERO1­
23
Blank
02/
23/
00
02/
23/
00
0.0000
ZERO2­
23
Blank
02/
23/
00
02/
23/
00
0.1022
ZERO1­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZERO2­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZERO3­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZER04­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZERO5­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZERO6­
24
Blank
02/
24/
00
02/
24/
00
0.0000
ZERO1­
25
Blank
02/
25/
00
02/
25/
00
0.0000
ZERO2­
25
Blank
02/
25/
00
02/
25/
00
0.0000
ZERO3­
25
Blank
02/
25/
00
02/
25/
00
0.0000
a
All
high
blanks
were
followed
by
recalibrations
and
re­
analysis
Table
6­
5.
Manual
Bag
Sampling/
Analysis
Quality
Control
Checks
Bag
ID
Description
Date
Taken
Date
Analyzed
Concentration
(
ppmv)
True
Value
(
ppmv)
Percent
Recovery
Comments
std
1­
18
Standard
2/
18/
00
2/
18/
00
0.104
0.1
104.4
std
2­
18
Standard
2/
18/
00
2/
18/
00
0.480
0.5
96.02
std
2a­
18
Standard
2/
18/
00
2/
18/
00
0.478
0.5
95.62
std
2­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.510
0.5
101.92
std
3­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.115
0.1
115.1
QC
check
repeated
(
std
7­
22)
std
4­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.122
0.1
121.6
std
5­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.499
0.5
99.84
std
6­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.467
0.5
93.44
(
Continued)

Table
6­
5
(
Continued)
86
Bag
ID
Description
Date
Taken
Date
Analyzed
Concentration
(
ppmv)
True
Value
(
ppmv)
Percent
Recovery
Comments
std
7­
22
Standard
2/
22/
00
2/
22/
00
0.486
0.5
97.2
std
1­
23
Standard
2/
23/
00
2/
23/
00
0.482
0.5
96.42
std
2­
23
Standard
2/
23/
00
2/
23/
00
0.104
0.1
103.6
std
3­
23
Standard
2/
23/
00
2/
23/
00
0.104
0.1
103.5
std
4­
23
Standard
2/
23/
00
2/
23/
00
0.095
0.1
95.3
std
6­
23
Standard
2/
23/
00
2/
23/
00
0.101
0.1
101.2
std
1­
24
Standard
2/
24/
00
2/
24/
00
0.113
0.1
113.1
QC
check
repeated
(
std
2­
24)
std
2­
24
Standard
2/
24/
00
2/
24/
00
0.508
0.5
101.62
std
3­
24
Standard
2/
24/
00
2/
24/
00
0.504
0.5
100.7
std
4­
24
Standard
2/
24/
00
2/
24/
00
1
0.5
103.76
std
1­
25
Standard
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.502
0.5
100.36
std
2­
25
Standard
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.110
0.1
110.1
QC
check
repeated
(
std
3­
25)
std
3­
25
Standard
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.488
0.5
97.52
VanQC­
25
FTIR
Roof
QC
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
20.7
25
82.7496
Check
against
Roof
FTIR's
QC
std
4­
25
Standard
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.490
0.5
98.02
std
5­
25
Standard
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.104
0.1
103.8
std
bag
1­
25
Standard
in
Bag
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.083
0.1
83.3
std
bag
2­
25
Standard
in
Bag
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.430
0.5
86.06
std
bag
3­
25
Standard
in
Bag
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.087
0.1
87.2
std
bag
4­
25
Standard
in
Bag
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
0.439
0.5
87.84
VanQC­
25
FTIR
Roof
QC
2/
25/
00
2/
25/
00
23.3
25
93.196
Check
against
Roof
FTIR's
QC
6.5
On­
Site
Audit
An
on­
site
audit
was
performed
by
two
members
of
EPA­
APPCD's
QA
staff.
An
audit
report
was
written
and
submitted
to
the
research
team
for
their
response.
The
written
responses
from
the
research
team
were
accepted
as
submitted
without
further
clarification.
87
6.6
Data
Quality
Indicators
Data
quality
indicators
(
DQIs)
were
described
in
the
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan,

Section
4.
The
field
verification
of
the
DQI
results
is
presented
in
Table
6­
6.
With
the
exception
of
the
FTIR
roof
vent
monitoring,
only
one
other
DQI
failed
to
meet
acceptance
criteria.
Because
of
the
optical
saturation
of
the
FTIR
detector
used
for
the
Roof
Vent
monitoring,
the
DQIs
were
not
achieved;
the
FTIR
results
are
discussed
in
Section
4.2.1.

Table
6­
6.
Data
Quality
Indicator
Results
Parameter
Measurement
Method
Data
Quality
Indicator
Value
Obtained
Achieved
criteria?

SF6
Tracer
Concentration
Manual
bag
sampler
Precision
20%
12.2
­
16.7%
Yes
Accuracy
6%
4.4
­
4.7%
Yes
Detection
Limit
6
ppb
6­
13
ppb
­­­­­
a
Completeness
95%
96.4%
Yes
Air
Velocity
in
Cell
Building
Long­
path
optical
anemometer
Detection
Limit
0.2
m/
s
0.2
m/
s
Yes
Completeness
90%
93%
Yes
Total
Gas­
Phase
Hg0
Roof
vent
UV­
DOAS
Precision
15%
­­­­­
b
­­­­­
b
Accuracy
15%
8
­
18.8%
Yes
Detection
Limit
~
130
ng/
m3
­­­­­
b
­­­­­
b
Completeness
at
75%
80
­
89%
Yes
a
The
detection
limits
for
the
bag
sampling
determined
during
each
analysis
day
of
the
field
testing
ranged
from
6
to
13
ppb.
The
highest
detection
limit
value
determined
was
used
to
facilitate
data
processing
and
determine
daily
analytical
values.

b
Information
on
achievement
of
Data
Quality
Indicators
is
not
available
from
field
data.
The
references
in
the
Data
Quality
Indicator
table
of
the
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
were
generated
in
the
laboratory
for
backup
of
published
specifications.
The
procedures
for
establishing
these
values
for
non­
Criteria
Pollutants
were
never
intended
to
be
"
field
verified."
The
actual
procedure
used
to
verify
the
values
is
written
for
the
gaseous
Criteria
Pollutants
(
SO2,
NO2,
O3)
which
are
available
in
cylinders
or
from
a
generator.
The
gases
are
introduced
into
a
cell
in
the
measurement
path
to
determine
precision
and
accuracy.
For
mercury,
vapor
standards
are
not
used
by
the
testing
group
(
Opsis);
the
measurement
work
is
performed
with
closed
cells.
A
closed
cell
was
not
available
for
the
field
test;
therefore,
field
verification
of
the
literature
value
for
measurement
of
Hg0
could
not
be
performed.
88
SECTION
7
REFERENCES
ASHRAE.
1981.
American
Society
of
Heating,
Refrigerating
and
Air­
Conditioning
Engineers
(
1981).
ASHRAE
Handbook
1981
Fundamentals,
Atlanta,
GA.

Chlorine
Institute.
1999.
Second
Annual
Report
of
the
Chlorine
Institute
to
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Chlorine
Institute,
Washington,
DC.

Cowherd,
C.,
Jr.,
and
J.
S.
Kinsey.
1986.
Identification,
Assessment,
and
Control
of
Fugitive
Particulate
Emissions.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Air
and
Energy
Engineering
Research
Laboratory,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
August;
EPA­
600/
8­
86­
023
(
NTIS
PB86­
230083).

Edner,
H.,
G.
W.
Faris,
A.
Sunesson,
and
S.
Svanberg.
1989.
Atmospheric
Atomic
Mercury
Monitoring
Using
Differential
Lidar
Techniques.
Applied
Optics,
28,
921­
930.

EPA.
1984.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Method
14­
Determination
of
Fluoride
Emissions
from
Potroom
Roof
Monitors
for
Primary
Aluminum
Plants,
40
Code
of
Federal
Regulations,
Part
60,
Appendix
A,
February
21,
1984.

EPA.
1999.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Compendium
Method
TO­
16,
Long­
Path
Open­
Path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
Monitoring
of
Atmospheric
Gases,
in
"
Compendium
of
Methods
for
the
Determination
of
Toxic
Organic
Compounds
in
Ambient
Air,"
Center
for
Environmental
Research
Information,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
Cincinnati,
OH,
January;
EPA/
625/
R­
96/
010b
(
NTIS
PB99­
172355).

Ferrara,
R.,
B.
E.
Maserti,
H.
Edner,
P.
Ragnarson,
S.
Svanberg,
and
E.
Wallinder.
1992.
Mercury
Emissions
into
the
Atmosphere
from
a
Chlor­
Alkali
Complex
Measured
with
the
Lidar
Technique.
Atmospheric
Environment,
26A,
1253­
1258.

Hunt,
W.
1998.
Personal
communication
from
William
Hunt,
Director,
Emissions
Monitoring
and
Analysis
Division,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
to
Michael
Palazzolo,
ALCOA
Corporation,
Pittsburgh,
PA,
July
9,
1998.

Keating,
M.
H.,
D.
Beauregard,
W.
G.
Benjey,
L.
Driver,
W.
H.
Maxwell,
W.
D.
Peters,
and
A.
A.
Pope.
1997.
Mercury
Study
Report
to
Congress,
Volume
II:
An
Inventory
of
Anthropogenic
Mercury
Emissions
in
the
United
States,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
89
Agency,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
December;
EPA­
452/
R­
96­
004
(
NTIS
PB98­
124746).

Kinsey,
J.
S.,
M.
Landis,
D.
France,
S.
Lindberg,
J.
Nriagu,
J.
Swift,
G.
Ramsey,
J.
Pau,
F.
Anscombe,
and
N.
Adams.
2000.
Characterization
of
Mercury
Emissions
at
a
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant,
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
National
Risk
Management
Research
Laboratory,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
February
11,
2000.

Landis,
M.
S.,
R.
K.
Stevens,
T.
Crawford,
D.
France,
C.
Secrest,
and
S.
Lindberg.
2000.
Speciation
of
Mercury
Emissions
from
a
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant,
Presented
at
the
AWMA
International
Symposium
on
the
Measurement
of
Toxic
and
Related
Air
Pollutants,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
September
12­
14,
2000.

Marks,
P.
J.,
and
J.
Davidson.
1972.
EPA
Test
No.
72­
PC­
04,
B.
F.
Goodrich
Chemical
Company
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant
Calvert
City,
Kentucky;
EPA
Contract
No.
CPA­
70­
132,
Task
Order
No.
3,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
May.

Rosario,
I.
2001.
Personal
communication
from
Iliam
Rosario,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
August
15,
2001.

Weston,
Roy
F.
1971.
Georgia­
Pacific
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant,
Bellingham,
Washington;
EPA
Contract
No.
CPA­
70­
132,
Task
Order
No.
2,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC.
A­
i
Appendix
A
Description
of
Buildings
and
Processes
at
the
Olin
Facility
A­
ii
(
Intentionally
Blank)
A­
1
Olin
CORPORATION
AUGUSTA,
GEORGIA
November
4,
1995
30
YEAR
CELEBRATION
COMMUNITY
OPEN
HOUSE
PLANT
TOUR
TOUR
ROUTE
­­
AT
A
GLANCE
1
OCEAN
BUILDING
This
building
contains
the
equipment
we
use
to
respond
to
product
emergencies
that
occur
outside
the
plant.
The
acronym
OCEAN
stands
for
Olin
Chemical
Emergency
Action
Network.
We
have
a
trained
team
that
will
respond
to
a
product
emergency
24
hours/
day,
7
days/
week.
If
you
desire,
as
soon
as
we
finish
our
tour,
you
will
be
able
to
see
the
OCEAN
trailer,
which
is
set
up
in
front
of
the
plant
in
the
parking
lot.
You
will
be
able
to
view
our
emergency
equipment.

2
ANODE
SHOP
This
shop
contains
the
equipment
used
to
rebuild
worn
or
damaged
anodes
that
have
been
removed
from
the
cells.
The
rebuilt
anodes
are
then
placed
in
stock
and
are
reinstalled
in
another
cell
at
a
later
date.

The
anode
is
constructed
of
titanium
metal
that
is
coated
with
a
thin
precious
metal
coating.
The
coating
will
wear
off
in
time
and
will
eventually
have
to
be
replaced.

3
SODIUM
HYDROSULFITE
AREA
(
Reductone
®
and
Hydrolin
®
)


Sodium
Hydrosulfite
loading
and
storage
Sodium
Hydrosulfite
is
stored
in
six
insulated
fiberglass
tanks.
It
must
be
kept
cool
since
it
will
decompose
when
it
gets
too
warm.
It
is
stored
at
a
slightly
stronger
concentration
than
required
by
our
customers
and
is
diluted
to
proper
specifications
as
it
is
loaded
into
insulated
trailers
through
the
piping
on
the
loading
stations.
135,000
gallons
of
material
can
be
stored
in
these
tanks.


Sodium
Hydrosulfite
Refrigeration
The
Sodium
Hydrosulfite
reaction
is
exothermic
­­
it
gives
off
heat.
This
heat
must
be
removed
from
the
process.
The
major
portion
of
the
heat
removal
is
accomplished
using
the
two
large
Carrier
Corporation
refrigeration
units
housed
in
this
building.
A­
2

Sodium
Hydrosulfite
Reactors
The
Sodium
Hydrosulfite
reactors
are
sophisticated
mixers.
They
take
in
water,
sulfur
dioxide,
caustic
and
sodium
amalgam
to
produce
a
solution
of
sodium
hydrosulfite.
The
operating
parameters
­­
acidity
concentrations
and
mixing
rates
­­
must
be
carefully
controlled
to
get
the
proper
product
quality.
Computers
help
control
this
operation
using
software
designed
by
Olin
Technical
Center
Engineers.

4
FIRE
HOSE
STATION
The
small
red
building
located
on
the
side
of
the
roadway
contains
fire
hoses
and
other
fire
fighting
equipment.
These
stations
are
located
throughout
the
plant.

5
SAFETY
SHOWER
Also,
located
throughout
the
plant
are
many
safety
showers
and
eye
wash
stations.
In
the
event
an
employee
is
exposed
to
acid,
caustic,
or
other
chemicals,
a
safety
shower
is
always
close
by
so
the
employee
can
quickly
turn
on
the
shower
and
flush
away
the
dangerous
material.

6
MAIN
CONTROL
ROOM
This
control
room
has
equipment
used
to
monitor
all
major
plant
processes.
The
front
panel
houses
the
equipment
which
measures
and
controls
the
amount
of
DC
electrical
power
applied
to
the
cells.
The
back
panel
contains
instrumentation
to
monitor
and
control
most
of
the
major
processes
in
the
plant,
such
as
tank
levels,
pH
measurements,
line
pressures,
etc.

7
AUTOMATIC
ANODE
ADJUSTING
SYSTEM
This
computer
controlled
system
continuously
scans
all
sixty
cells
and
automatically
adjusts
the
anodes
in
each
cell
to
optimize
the
operation
of
each.
By
doing
so,
the
amount
of
electrical
power
needed
to
produce
a
given
amount
of
product
is
greatly
reduced
and
the
life
of
the
anodes
is
greatly
extended
since
the
computer
can
make
this
adjustment
far
more
accurately
than
humans
can.

8
CELL
ROOM
The
cell
room
is
the
heart
of
our
process.
Here
up
to
160,000
amps
of
DC
electricity
pass
through
the
60
electrolytic
cells.
In
the
cell,
brine
(
salt
water)
is
electrolytically
reduced
to
sodium
and
chlorine.
The
wet
chlorine
gas
from
the
cells
flows
through
a
drying
system
to
remove
all
the
water
from
it
and
then
travels
on
to
the
compressor
building.
The
sodium
combines
with
mercury
and
flows
to
the
decomposer.
In
the
decomposer,
the
sodium
reacts
with
water
and
forms
sodium
hydroxide
(
caustic).
Caustic
is
pumped
through
cooling
and
filtration
equipment
and
then
is
transferred
to
product
storage.
A
by­
product
from
the
decomposer
is
hydrogen
gas.
It
passes
through
coolers
and
then
on
to
blowers.
It
is
burned
in
our
boilers
for
steam
generation.
It
is
also
used
for
production
of
hydrochloric
acid
and
it
is
sold
to
Sunox
Corporation.
A­
3
9
BRINE
DECHLORINATION
In
this
area,
the
residual
chlorine
left
in
the
spent
brine
leaving
the
cells
is
removed.
This
is
accomplished
by
passing
the
brine
through
two
tanks
that
are
kept
under
a
high
vacuum.
The
vacuum
"
boils"
the
chlorine
gas
out
of
the
brine
stream.
The
chlorine
is
recovered
and
the
dechlorinated
brine
is
pumped
to
the
CP
Salt
Tank
where
it
picks
up
a
renewed
supply
of
salt
prior
to
beginning
its
return
trip
to
the
cells.

10
HYDROGEN
BLOWERS
Hydrogen
is
taken
from
the
decomposers
and
passes
through
coolers
that
are
cooled
with
chilled
water.
The
cooling
process
removed
most
of
the
heat
and
mercury.
The
mercury
is
returned
to
the
process.
Hydrogen
is
then
compressed
using
one
or
both
blowers
and
sent
to
the
boiler
house
where
it
is
used
as
fuel
and
is
also
sent
to
other
users.

11
AC
POWER
DISTRIBUTION
Georgia
Power
provides
our
electrical
power.
Incoming
voltage
is
115,000
volts.
Here
we
step
it
down
to
13,800
volts,
rectify
part
of
it
for
the
cell
room
use
and
distribute
the
remaining
for
usage
throughout
the
plant
at
various
voltages
(
2400,
480,
120).

12
BRINE
FILTERS
This
is
the
first
stage
of
brine
purification.
Fourteen
brine
filters
are
used
to
filter
impurities
from
the
brine.
Each
filter
is
independent
of
all
others
and
must
be
removed
from
service
periodically
and
backwashed
for
cleaning.
The
dirty
backwashed
brine
is
then
collected
in
a
tank,
cleaned
and
recycled
in
the
filter
backwash
system.

13
BRINE
SETTLER
The
480,000
gallon
brine
settler
tank
is
used
to
settle
out
insoluble
sludge
in
the
brine.
The
sludge
is
flushed
out
the
bottom
of
the
settler.

14
PURASIV
®
UNITS
Hydrogen
is
a
by­
product
of
the
chlor/
alkali
process
and
it
is
contaminated
with
small
quantities
of
mercury.
The
mercury
concentration
must
be
further
reduced
before
the
hydrogen
can
be
used.
This
is
accomplished
by
passing
the
hydrogen
through
packed
carbon
beds,
which
absorb
mercury.
Absorbers
polish
and
further
remove
mercury
before
the
hydrogen
is
sent
to
our
HCl
plants.

15
BOILER
HOUSE
The
steam
generation
plant
consists
of
two
separate
boilers
­­
each
capable
of
producing
15,000
pounds
of
steam
per
hour
at
250
pounds
per
square
inch
of
pressure.
They
are
normally
fired
with
hydrogen.
They
can
operate
on
natural
gas,
if
necessary.

The
steam
is
used
throughout
the
plant
for
various
purposes,
such
as
brine
dechlorination,
brine
heating,
steam
tracing
of
lines
and
heating
certain
tanks.
A­
4
16
SECONDARY
TREATMENT
All
liquid
waste
streams
contaminated
with
mercury
must
be
cleaned
before
allowing
them
to
proceed
into
our
waste
treatment
system.
On
the
average,
the
concentration
of
mercury
in
these
wastes
is
reduced
to
less
than
50
parts
per
billion
of
the
discharged
solution.

17
DECOMPOSER
REPAIR
BUILDING
The
Decomposer
Repair
Building
holds
equipment
to
rebuild
and
repack
cell
room
decomposers.
The
decomposer
is
filled
with
graphite
pellets
which
aid
in
creating
the
sodium
hydroxide
solution.

18
SUNOX
CORPORATION
The
Sunox
Corporation
is
one
of
Olin's
customers.
They
purchase
hydrogen
gas
from
Olin.
It
is
delivered
to
them
through
the
pipeline
along
the
side
of
the
roadway.
They
receive
and
compress
the
hydrogen
gas
and
load
it
into
the
trailers
parked
at
the
loading
stations.
The
hydrogen
is
then
shipped
to
customers
in
Augusta
and
throughout
the
Southeast.

19
INSTRUMENT
AND
ELECTRICAL
SHOP
This
shop
is
equipped
with
test
equipment
and
tools
required
to
repair
and
troubleshoot
the
electrical
equipment
and
the
large
number
of
instruments
needed
to
keep
the
Augusta
Plant
operating
efficiently.

20
COOLING
TOWERS
These
large
cooling
towers
are
one
of
the
ways
Olin
reduces
water
consumption.
The
plant
uses
about
6000
gallons
per
minute
of
water
to
remove
heat
from
the
process
by
pumping
the
water
through
various
heat
exchangers.
The
hot
water
is
then
recycled
back
to
the
cooling
towers
where
evaporation
cools
the
water
so
it
can
be
used
again.

21
PLANT
EFFLUENT
SYSTEM
Waste
water
streams
are
collected
throughout
the
plant
in
the
process
sewer
system.
This
is
the
covered
concrete
ditch
running
through
the
center
of
the
plant.
Also,
all
rainwater
runoff
is
collected.
All
of
this
water
is
monitored
for
pH,
mercury,
and
chlorine
content
before
it
is
released.
If
the
streams
are
not
acceptable,
they
are
treated
in
the
large
tanks
you
see
beside
the
road
before
the
water
is
discharged
to
the
Savannah
River
through
a
monitored
and
regulated
national
pollutant
discharge
elimination
system.

22
GROUND
WATER
FILTERS
The
square
filters
beside
the
roadway
are
used
to
treat
the
groundwater
from
shallow
wells
around
the
plant.
Here
rainwater
that
has
collected
underground
is
pumped
to
the
surface,
checked
for
pH
and
mercury
content,
treated
if
necessary
and
released.
A­
5
23
CP
SALT
STORAGE
TANK
The
CP
salt
is
received
in
100
ton
hopper
cars
from
Olin's
diaphragm
cell
plant
in
McIntosh,
Alabama.
It
is
pumped
from
the
hopper
cars
into
the
CP
sale
storage
tank,
from
which
is
it
pumped
to
the
cell
building.

Spent
brine
returns
here
from
the
cell
room
after
it
has
been
stripped
of
its
salt
in
the
cells.
The
depleted
brine
flows
into
the
"
diplegs"
where
it
is
resaturated
before
it
is
sent
to
the
filters
on
its
way
back
to
the
cells.

The
Brine
Saturation
System
has
been
retired
for
several
years
but
can
be
reactivated
if
needed.
It
serves
the
same
function
as
the
CP
salt
tank.

24
RAILROAD
YARD
A
significant
portion
of
raw
materials
and
finished
product
is
handled
by
rail.
We
have
six
tracks
in
the
plant
designed
and
laid
out
so
that
shuffling
of
cars
is
possible.
Each
track
serves
its
own
purpose
with
track
#
3
being
the
outward
product
shipment
track.
Southern
Railway
makes
one
switch
daily.
We
perform
other
switching
using
one
of
our
two
Trackmobiles.

25
CHLORINE
LOADING
AND
STORAGE
Liquid
chlorine
may
be
loaded
directly
from
the
process
into
rail
cars
at
loading
stations
#
1
&
#
2
or
stored
in
one
of
four
chlorine
storage
tanks.
Stored
chlorine
will
be
later
loaded
into
railcars
or
shipped
to
customers
through
a
pipeline.

26
INDUSTRIAL
FILTER
The
dirty
backwash
brine
from
the
brine
filters
is
pumped
through
the
industrial
filter
where
it
is
cleaned
up
and
recycled.
The
industrial
filter
must
be
cleaned
daily
after
brine
filter
backwashing
is
completed
and
the
sludge
has
been
removed.

27
HYPO
TANKS
AND
BLEACH
SYSTEM
In
these
tanks
we
create
a
weak
caustic
solution.
This
solution
reacts
with
chlorine
to
form
sodium
hypochlorite
(
hypo).
During
process
upsets,
this
system
will
keep
us
from
emitting
chlorine
to
the
atmosphere.
It
acts
as
a
"
scrubber"
to
remove
chlorine
from
the
process.
Chlorine
gas
from
the
process
can
also
be
added
to
the
caustic
solution
to
increase
the
amount
of
hypo
produced.
The
hypo
is
then
sold
as
bleach.
The
hypo
is
similar
to
the
material
you
purchase
at
the
store
under
the
trade
name
Clorox
®
Bleach,
but
we
manufacture
a
much
stronger
solution.

28
HYDROCHLORIC
ACID
PLANTS
The
original
hydrochloric
acid
plant
was
built
in
1982
to
supply
approximately
3
tons
per
day
of
acid
to
treat
the
brine
system.
Starting
in
1983
some
of
the
acid
was
sold
to
customers.
Various
modifications
and
additions
to
the
basic
equipment
have
been
made
over
the
years
so
that
today
the
original
burner
system
produces
30
tons
per
day
of
A­
6
hydrochloric
acid.
In
1992,
a
near
duplicate
unit
was
added
to
the
west,
giving
us
an
additional
30
tons
per
day
capacity.

The
acid
is
made
by
burning
hydrogen
and
chlorine
together
in
a
furnace.
The
resulting
HCl
vapors
are
then
absorbed
into
purified
water
to
form
a
37%
acid
solution.
The
acid
is
then
piped
to
the
large
white
storage
tanks,
where
it
is
stored
until
it
is
shipped
to
customers
in
either
tank
trucks
or
railcars.

29
COMPRESSION
AND
LIQUEFACTION
Chlorine
gas
is
pulled
from
the
cells
by
two
banks
of
compressors
located
in
this
building
and
pushed
through
two
liquefiers
where
the
chlorine
gas
is
condensed
into
a
liquid.
From
there,
it
proceeds
to
the
loading
and
storage
area.
The
liquefiers
condense
about
99%
of
all
the
chlorine
gas
entering
them.
The
remaining
1%
is
either
absorbed
into
the
inlet
brine
stream
or
sent
to
the
hypo
system.

The
compressor
building
also
houses
the
plant
air
compressors.
They
provide
dry,
compressed
air
for
various
uses
in
the
plant.
This
system
consists
of
two
main
plant
air
compressors,
two
high
pressure
booster
compressors,
one
instrument
air
compressor
and
one
back­
up
diesel
powered
air
compressor.

30
CAUSTIC
AREA
There
are
two
main
caustic
storage
tanks
­­
each
capable
of
holding
250,000
gallons
(
800
tons)
of
caustic
soda.
The
caustic
is
pumped
from
here
into
tank
cars
or
tank
trucks
for
shipment
to
our
customers.

The
two
tall,
narrow
tanks
are
caustic
day
tanks
and
are
dedicated
to
service
for
Federal
Paper
Board.
Caustic
is
pumped
to
Federal
Paper
from
these
tanks
through
a
7,000
foot
long
pipeline.

31
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
AND
WAREHOUSE
Most
plant
equipment
repairs
are
handled
in
our
own
shop.
It
is
equipped
with
tools,
lathes
and
other
machinery
that
enable
us
to
accomplish
this.
It
is
made
up
of
three
departments
­­
mechanical,
instrumentation
and
electrical.
Very
little
maintenance
work
is
done
outside
of
the
plant.

Our
warehouse,
situated
in
the
center
of
the
building,
provides
ready
access
to
most
materials
and
supplies
necessary
for
continuous
plant
operations.

32
ENGINEERING
The
plant
has
a
technical
staff
which
provides
project
and
technical
support
for
the
plant.
We
have
the
ability
to
generate
computer
drawings
(
CAD)
and
manual
drawings.
Plant
drawings
are
stored
in
this
area.

33
QUALITY
CONTROL
LABORATORY
A­
7
The
laboratory
responsible
for
the
Quality
Assurance
of
all
of
our
outbound
products
and
inbound
raw
materials.
The
Lab
also
ensures
we
are
in
compliance
with
the
parameters
of
various
plant
effluents.
In
addition,
the
Lab
furnishes
the
plant
with
analyses
of
various
streams
in
the
process
in
order
to
monitor
equipment
performance
and
minimize
downtime.
The
Augusta
Plant
is
an
ISO
9002
registered
facility.

34
DATA
PROCESSING
The
plant
has
its
own
computer
network
(
LAN)
and
can
also
communicate
with
other
Olin
plants
(
WAN).
The
networks
are
administered
from
this
area.

35
MEDICAL
The
plant
has
a
medical
department
staffed
with
a
Certified
Occupational
Health
Nurse.
This
area
is
equipped
to
handle
on
site
emergencies
as
well
as
routine
physicals,
exams,
etc.

REMARKS
This
concludes
your
tour
of
the
Augusta
Plant.
Please
return
your
safety
gear
to
the
boxes
provided.
Please
return
your
copy
of
the
tour
script
if
you
don't
intend
to
keep
it
for
future
reference.
If
you
are
interested
in
seeing
a
further
demonstration
of
the
types
of
equipment
we
have
on
hand
to
respond
to
an
outside
emergency,
we
encourage
you
to
visit
the
OCEAN
trailer
that
is
set
up
in
the
parking
lot.
If
it
is
not
your
wish
to
visit
the
OCEAN
trailer,
join
the
other
visitors
in
the
tent
area
at
this
time.
Thank
you
for
visiting
our
plant
and
participating
in
our
tour.
B­
i
Appendix
B
FTIR
Spectral
Analyses
Conducted
by
ManTech,
Inc.
(
Jeff
Childers)
B­
ii
(
Intentionally
Blank)
B­
1
September
5,
2003
To:
E.
Hunter
Daughtrey,
Jr.,
Area
Supervisor
From:
Jeffrey
W.
Childers,
Principal
Scientist
Subject:
WA­
IV­
119
 
FTIR
Data
Interpretation
Support
1.0
Background
The
Air
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Division
(
APPCD)
participated
in
a
major
field
experiment
that
was
conducted
in
February
of
this
year
to
characterize
the
mercury
emissions
from
a
chlor­
alkali
plant
in
Augusta,
GA.
A
tracer
gas,

SF
6,
was
released
at
a
controlled
rate
on
the
cell
building
floor
to
determine
the
total
volumetric
air
flow
from
the
roof
vent
of
the
building.
One
method
used
to
determine
the
concentration
of
SF
6
emitted
from
the
roof
vent
was
open­
path
Fourier
transform
infrared
(
OP/
FTIR)
spectrometry.
Approximately
3000
OP/
FTIR
spectra
were
obtained
over
a
10­
day
monitoring
period.
A
subset
of
these
data
containing
305
spectra
was
analyzed
under
this
work
assignment.

The
primary
objective
of
this
Work
Assignment
was
to
provide
technical
support
to
the
APPCD
for
the
interpretation,
analysis,
and
quality
control
(
QC)
of
OP/
FTIR
spectra
data
collected
during
the
field
test
at
the
chlor­
alkali
plant.

ManTech
staff
applied
QC
procedures
developed
under
previous
Work
Assignments
to
NERL
to
the
spectral
data
collected
during
the
Augusta
field
study.
These
procedures
are
described
in
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document1
and
Compendium
Method
TO­
16
 
Long­
Path
Open­
Path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
Monitoring
of
Atmospheric
Gases.
2
Additional
B­
2
guidance
and
operating
procedures
are
given
in
an
ASTM
guide3
and
standard
practice.
4
The
QC
and
data
interpretation
procedures
applied
to
the
OP/
FTIR
data
collected
at
the
chlor­
alkali
plant
included:


Inspection
of
the
single­
beam
spectra
for
evidence
of
detector
saturation
or
excessive
stray
light;


Measurement
of
the
signal
strength
over
time
and
the
relative
signal
intensities
in
different
spectral
regions;


Estimation
of
the
random
baseline
noise
between
successive
data
files
over
different
spectral
regions;


Development
of
a
synthetic
background
spectrum;


Examination
of
the
range
of
absorbance
values
exhibited
by
the
SF
6
spectral
features;


Identification
of
any
interfering
species;


Generation
of
relevant
reference
spectra
from
the
HITRAN
data
base;


Inspection
of
the
absorbance
files
for
wavenumber
shifts
and
changes
in
resolution;


Development
and
evaluation
of
an
analysis
method;


Comparison
of
the
concentration
values
generated
by
the
automated
multivariate
data
analysis
method
to
the
manual
comparison
method
or
advanced
nonlinear
algorithms;
and

Development
of
relevant
control
charts.
B­
3
2.0
Results
and
Discussion
2.1
Inspection
of
the
Single­
beam
Spectra
for
Evidence
of
Detector
Saturation
or
Excessive
Stray
Light
Two
steps
that
should
be
completed
during
the
initial
instrument
setup
before
data
are
collected
include
determining
the
distance
at
which
the
detector
becomes
saturated
and
measuring
the
signal
due
to
internal
stray
light.
Apparently,
neither
of
these
two
steps
was
done
during
this
study.
The
ramifications
of
this
oversight
on
the
accuracy
of
the
reported
concentration
data
are
discussed
below.

2.1.1
Determining
the
Distance
to
Detector
Saturation
The
distance
at
which
the
detector
becomes
saturated
determines
the
minimum
pathlength
over
which
quantitative
data
can
be
obtained
with
that
particular
instrument
configuration.
A
procedure
for
determining
this
distance
in
given
in
Section
3.3
of
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document.
Evidence
of
detector
saturation
indicates
that
the
detector
is
not
responding
linearly
to
changes
in
the
incident
light
intensity
and,
therefore,
will
not
respond
linearly
to
changes
in
concentration
of
the
gases
along
the
path.
Detector
saturation
causes
errors
in
how
the
interferogram
is
sampled.

These
errors
can
result
in
aliasing
or
folding
of
spectral
features
outside
the
normal
sampling
frequency
range
into
the
recorded
spectrum.
5
This
effect
gives
rise
to
abnormal
shapes
in
the
single­
beam
spectrum
and
the
appearance
of
non­
physical
energy
in
spectral
regions
where
there
is
no
real
spectral
information.
Because
this
anomalous
information
becomes
part
of
the
recorded
interferogram,
there
is
no
way
to
compensate
for
the
errors
in
the
photometric
accuracy
due
to
detector
saturation.

Once
the
OP/
FTIR
system
is
set
up
along
the
desired
monitoring
pathlength,
a
singlebeam
spectrum
should
be
obtained.
This
spectrum
should
be
inspected
in
the
wave
number
region
below
the
detector
cutoff
frequency.
For
most
MCT
detectors
commonly
B­
4
used
in
OP/
FTIR
applications,
this
cutoff
frequency
occurs
between
650
and
700
cm­
1.

The
instrument
response
in
this
wavenumber
region
should
be
flat
and
at
the
baseline.

An
elevated
baseline
in
this
region
is
due
to
non­
physical
energy
and
indicates
that
the
detector
is
saturated.
If
an
elevated
baseline
is
observed
in
this
region
of
the
single­
beam
spectrum,
the
operator
has
three
choices:


Increase
the
monitoring
pathlength
until
the
instrument
response
is
flat
and
at
the
baseline
in
this
region;


Place
a
wire
mesh
screen
in
the
modulated,
collimated
IR
beam
to
attenuate
the
signal
intensity;
or

Rotate
the
retroreflector
to
reduce
the
signal
intensity.

A
representative
single­
beam
spectrum
from
the
Augusta
field
study
is
shown
in
Figure
1.
This
spectrum
exhibits
evidence
of
nonphysical
energy
in
spectral
regions
that
should
be
flat
and
at
the
baseline,
including
those
below
the
detector
cutoff
frequency
and
in
the
totally
opaque
spectral
regions
between
1400
and
1800
cm­
1
and
3600
and
3900
cm­

1.
This
spectrum
also
exhibits
an
unusual
curvature
in
the
baseline
in
the
2550
to
2850­

cm­
1
region.
As
a
comparison,
a
single­
beam
spectrum
collected
in
Research
Triangle
Park
(
RTP),
NC,
with
an
ETG
OP/
FTIR
system
over
a
414­
m
total
path
is
shown
in
Figure
2.
The
spectrum
collected
in
RTP
over
a
longer
pathlength
exhibits
a
flat
baseline
below
the
detector
cutoff
frequency
and
a
steadily
decreasing
baseline
from
2400
to
3250
cm­
1.

All
of
the
305
spectra
examined
in
the
subset
of
data
collected
during
the
Augusta
study
exhibit
evidence
of
detector
saturation.
Because
of
this
observation,
the
accuracy
of
the
concentration
values
reported
from
this
data
set
is
suspect
and
there
is
no
way
to
assess
errors
in
these
measurements.
In
addition
to
errors
in
the
absolute
concentration
measurements,
changes
in
relative
concentrations
from
one
spectrum
to
another
are
most
likely
nonlinear
and
cannot
be
quoted
with
any
certainty.
B­
5
2.1.2
Measuring
the
Signal
Due
to
Internal
Stray
Light
Single­
beam
spectra
recorded
with
an
OP/
FTIR
monitor
can
exhibit
a
non­
zero
response
in
wavenumber
regions
in
which
the
atmosphere
is
totally
opaque.
If
the
detector
has
been
determined
to
be
responding
linearly
to
changes
in
the
incident
IR
intensity,
this
non­
zero
response
can
be
attributed
to
internal
stray
light
in
monostatic
instruments
that
use
a
single
telescope
to
transmit
and
receive
the
IR
beam.
The
presence
of
internal
stray
light
causes
errors
in
the
photometric
accuracy,
and
ultimately,
errors
in
the
reported
concentration
values.
The
effects
of
stray
light
on
photometric
accuracy
are
illustrated
in
Section
3.5
of
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document.
If
uncorrected,
the
presence
of
stray
light
results
in
errors
in
the
concentration
measurements
approximately
equal
to
the
percentage
that
the
stray
light
contributes
to
the
total
signal.

Evidence
of
internal
stray
light
is
observed
in
the
single­
beam
spectrum
collected
at
RTP
in
the
CO
2
absorption
region
between
2300
and
2380
cm­
1
(
see
Figure
2).
The
strong
CO
2
absorption
bands
in
this
region
should
extend
completely
to
the
baseline.

However,
in
this
case,
the
presence
of
internal
stray
light
causes
the
apparent
baseline
to
be
elevated.
In
this
particular
instrument,
stray
light
contributed
to
approximately
6%
of
the
total
signal.
No
evidence
of
stray
light
can
be
observed
in
the
single­
beam
spectra
collected
during
the
Augusta
study
(
see
Figure
1).
However,
the
severe
nonlinearity
exhibited
by
these
spectra
prevents
observation
of
the
presence
of
stray
light.
A
singlebeam
spectrum
of
the
internal
stray
light
was
not
supplied
with
this
data
set.
Therefore,

the
effect
of
stray
light
on
the
data
collected
during
the
Augusta
study
cannot
be
determined.
If
stray
light
does
contribute
to
the
total
signal
in
these
spectra,
the
reported
concentration
values
would
contain
errors
proportional
to
the
amount
of
stray
light.

2.2
Measurement
of
the
Signal
Strength
over
Time
and
the
Relative
Signal
Intensities
at
Different
Spectral
Regions
B­
6
The
magnitude
of
the
signal
strength
is
indicative
of
the
performance
of
the
instrument,
i.
e.,
the
output
of
the
source
or
response
of
the
detector,
and
the
alignment
of
the
transmitting/
receiving
telescope
and
the
retroreflector.
The
relative
signal
strength
over
different
spectral
regions
is
also
indicative
of
the
instrument
performance
and
is
influenced,
among
other
factors,
by
the
internal
alignment
of
the
interferometer.
For
example,
if
the
interferometer
is
misaligned,
the
signal
strength
in
the
high
wavenumber
region
will
be
relatively
low.

The
signal
strengths
at
985,
2500,
and
4400
cm­
1
were
measured
in
the
subset
of
305
single­
beam
spectra
collected
during
the
Augusta
study.
The
signal
strength
at
985
cm­
1
is
reported
directly,
whereas
the
signal
strengths
at
2500
and
4400
cm­
1
are
ratioed
to
that
at
985
cm­
1
to
determine
the
relative
signal
strength
in
the
single­
beam
spectra.
Plots
of
the
signal
strength
at
985
cm­
1
and
the
relative
signal
strengths
at
2500
and
4400
cm­
1
for
the
single­
beam
spectra
in
this
subset
are
given
in
Figures
3
 
5.

The
signal
strength
at
985
cm­
1
over
time
is
shown
in
Figure
3.
This
signal
strength
in
arbitrary
units
ranged
from
67.22
to
69.96
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
68.41
±
0.59,
for
a
relative
standard
deviation
of
0.86%.
The
signal
strength
at
2500
cm­
1
relative
to
that
at
985
cm­
1
ranged
from
a
ratio
of
0.832
to
0.854,
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
0.842
±
0.005
and
a
relative
standard
deviation
of
0.59%
(
see
Figure
4).
The
signal
strength
at
4400
cm­
1
relative
to
that
at
985
cm­
1
ranged
from
a
ratio
of
0.193
to
0.210,
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
0.201
±
0.004
and
a
relative
standard
deviation
of
2.0
%
(
see
Figure
5).

The
overall
signal
strength
as
measured
in
the
single­
beam
spectra
at
985
cm­
1
and
the
relative
signal
strengths
measured
at
2500
and
4400
cm­
1
were
nearly
constant
throughout
the
monitoring
period
represented
by
the
305
spectra
analyzed
in
this
subset
of
spectra
from
the
Augusta
study.
These
results
indicate
that
no
significant
changes
in
the
instrument
performance
or
alignment
occurred
during
this
time
period.
B­
7
2.3
Estimation
of
the
Random
Baseline
Noise
Between
Successive
Data
Files
over
Different
Spectral
Regions
Another
indicator
of
instrument
performance
is
the
random
baseline
noise.
This
noise
is
measured
as
the
root­
mean­
square
(
RMS)
deviation
between
successive
single­
beam
spectra
collected
sequentially
during
a
monitoring
period.
To
make
this
measurement,
a
series
of
absorption
spectra
was
created
from
the
subset
of
single­
beam
spectra
by
using
the
preceding
single­
beam
spectrum
as
the
background
spectrum.
For
example,
spectrum
#
d0224302
was
used
as
the
background
spectrum
for
single­
beam
spectrum
#
d0224303,

and
so
on.
The
RMS
deviation
was
measured
between
958
and
1008
cm­
1,
2480
and
2530
cm­
1,
and
4375
and
4425
cm­
1
and
is
reported
in
absorbance
units.
The
random
baseline
noise
measurements
from
the
subset
of
single­
beam
field
spectra
over
time
are
given
in
Figures
6
 
8.

The
random
baseline
noise
between
958
and
1008
cm­
1
ranged
from
0.111
×
10­
3
to
0.405
×
10­
3
absorbance
units,
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
0.217
×
10­
3
±
0.053
×
10­
3
(
see
Figure
6).
The
random
baseline
noise
between
2480
and
2530
cm­
1
ranged
from
0.037
×
10­
3
to
0.073
×
10­
3
absorbance
units,
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
0.056
×
10­
3
±
0.006
×
10­
3
(
see
Figure
7).
The
random
baseline
noise
between
4375
and
4425
cm­
1
ranged
from
0.179
×
10­
3
to
0.368
×
10­
3
absorbance
units,
with
a
mean
and
standard
deviation
of
0.255
×
10­
3
±
0.029
×
10­
3
(
see
Figure
8).

Although
there
was
some
variability
in
the
random
baseline
noise
measurements
(
the
relative
standard
deviations
for
these
measurements
ranged
from
11
to
24%)
there
were
no
obvious
outliers
in
these
data.
The
RMS
noise
levels
in
each
spectral
region
were
within
the
ranges
expected
for
this
type
of
instrument.

2.4
Development
of
a
Synthetic
Background
Spectrum
B­
8
Three
methods
were
used
to
generate
background
(
I
0)
spectra
so
that
the
single­
beam
field
spectra
could
be
converted
to
absorbance
files.
One
method
used
a
field
spectrum
collected
at
the
end
of
the
monitoring
period
that
did
not
contain
any
spectral
features
due
to
SF
6.
This
method
is
similar
to
using
an
upwind
background
spectrum
as
described
in
Section
4.3
of
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document.
File
#
d0224306
was
used
for
these
purposes.
With
this
method,
the
spectral
features
of
the
atmospheric
gases
and
the
instrument
response
essentially
cancel
out,
leaving
only
the
absorption
features
due
to
SF
6.
When
this
is
the
case,
quantitative
data
can
only
be
obtained
for
the
released
tracer
gas.
The
remaining
absorption
features
of
the
atmospheric
gases
represent
the
difference
between
the
concentrations
in
the
other
field
spectra
relative
to
those
in
spectrum
#
d0224306.

The
second
method
used
to
generate
an
I
0
spectrum
was
to
create
a
synthetic
background
spectrum
from
a
representative
field
spectrum.
File
#
d0224306
was
again
used
for
this
purpose.
A
synthetic
background
spectrum
was
created
from
this
file
using
the
method
described
in
Section
4.2
of
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document.
This
synthetic
background
spectrum
was
created
from
650
to
4500
cm­
1
so
that
the
entire
spectrum
could
be
analyzed
for
the
target
gas
and
other
atmospheric
gases.

The
third
method
used
to
generate
an
I
0
spectrum
fitted
a
series
of
segmented
polynomial
curves
to
each
single­
beam
spectrum
as
part
of
an
automated
analysis
method
using
an
innovative
nonlinear
algorithm.
6
No
differences
were
found
in
the
reported
concentrations
of
SF
6
in
the
absorbance
files
created
by
using
either
file
#
d0224306
as
the
background
spectrum
or
the
synthetic
background
spectrum.
The
I
0
spectrum
generated
by
the
nonlinear
algorithm
was
used
only
during
the
nonlinear
analyses
and
was
not
used
to
generate
absorbance
files
for
subsequent
analysis
by
another
method.
All
of
the
concentration
data
reported
from
the
B­
9
Classical
Least
Squares
(
CLS)
analyses
were
computed
from
absorbance
files
created
by
using
a
synthetic
background
spectrum.

2.5
Examination
of
the
Range
of
Absorbance
Values
Exhibited
by
the
SF
6
Spectral
Features
The
tracer
gas
SF
6
has
a
relatively
high
absorption
coefficient
at
the
peak
maximum
at
approximately
948
cm­
1.
Because
of
the
inherent
nonlinear
response
of
an
OP/
FTIR
system
over
a
wide
range
of
absorbance
values,
it
is
imperative
to
determine
the
range
of
absorbance
values
exhibited
in
the
field
spectra.
The
tracer
gas
was
not
detected
in
all
of
the
field
spectra
in
this
subset.
For
those
spectra
in
which
SF
6
was
not
detected,
the
net
absorbance
at
948
cm­
1
was
approximately
0.02
absorbance
units.
This
positive
value
was
due
to
a
small
water
vapor
absorption
band.
The
minimum
net
absorbance
at
948
cm­
1
in
those
spectra
that
did
exhibit
a
detectable
quantity
of
SF
6
was
0.145
absorbance
units.
The
maximum
net
absorbance
for
SF
6
(
0.185)
was
found
for
file
#
d0224291.
The
concentration
of
SF
6
found
in
this
file
exhibited
a
sharp
increase
relative
to
the
concentrations
in
the
other
files
and
did
not
fit
the
trend
exhibited
by
the
preceding
data
files.
For
those
spectra
that
did
fit
the
overall
trend,
the
maximum
net
absorbance
was
0.164
(
file
#
d0224002).
The
range
of
absorbance
values
(
0.145
to
0.185)
observed
for
this
subset
of
data
is
relatively
small
and
should
not
result
in
a
severe
nonlinear
response
in
absorbance
with
respect
to
changes
in
concentration,
assuming
that
the
detector
was
operating
in
a
linear
mode.
B­
10
2.6
Identification
of
Any
Interfering
Species
The
absorption
spectra
that
were
created
using
the
synthetic
background
spectrum
as
I
0
were
visually
inspected
for
interfering
or
unidentified
species.
Only
the
tracer
gas
SF
6
and
common
atmospheric
gases
were
identified
in
the
absorption
spectra.
Water
vapor
was
the
only
interfering
species
that
exhibited
spectral
features
in
the
wavenumber
region
used
to
analyze
for
SF
6.

2.7
Generation
of
Relevant
Reference
Spectra
from
the
HITRAN
Database
Several
reference
spectra
of
selected
atmospheric
gases,
including
CH
4,
N
2
O,
CO,

CO
2,
and
H
2
O,
were
generated
from
the
HITRAN
database
using
Etrans
(
Ontar
Corporation,
North
Andover,
MA).
Spectra
of
the
individual
target
gases
were
originally
generated
at
a
nominal
1­
cm­
1
resolution
with
triangular
apodization
at
a
temperature
of
295K
and
atmospheric
pressure
of
760
Torr.
Each
spectrum
was
generated
at
a
pathlength
of
108
m.
An
absorption
file
compatible
with
Grams/
32
(
Galactic,
Salem,

NH)
was
selected
as
the
output
from
Etrans.
After
the
original
set
of
reference
spectra
were
generated
and
used
in
the
CLS
analysis,
analyses
conducted
by
SpectraSoft
Technology
revealed
that
the
true
resolution
of
the
instrument
was
1.462
cm­
1.
A
new
set
of
reference
spectra
was
generated
at
1.462­
cm­
1
resolution
and
the
CLS
analyses
were
repeated.

2.8
Inspection
of
the
Absorbance
Files
for
Wavenumber
Shifts
and
Changes
in
Resolution
Prior
to
analyzing
the
data
with
the
CLS
methods,
the
reference
spectra
were
compared
to
the
field
absorption
spectra
for
evidence
of
wavenumber
shifts.
If
any
wavenumber
shifts
were
found,
the
reference
spectra
were
adjusted
by
using
the
"
peak
B­
11
align"
subroutine
in
Grams/
32.
The
data
point
density
and
spacing
of
the
reference
and
field
spectra
were
matched
by
using
the
"
interpolate"
routine
in
Grams/
32.

The
innovative
nonlinear
analysis
method
automatically
determines
the
wavenumber
shift
in
the
single­
beam
field
spectra
relative
to
the
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans
and
calculates
the
actual
spectral
resolution
of
the
field
spectra.
The
field
spectra
exhibited
a
constant
0.5­
cm­
1
shift
relative
to
the
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans.

The
actual
spectral
resolution
was
relatively
constant,
but,
at
a
value
of
1.462
±
0.011
cm­

1,
was
significantly
higher
than
expected
for
an
instrument
operating
at
a
nominal
1­
cm­
1
resolution.
These
data
are
plotted
in
Figure
9
and
imply
that,
although
the
instrument
was
stable,
it
might
not
have
been
operating
properly
initially
at
the
beginning
of
the
field
study.

2.9
Development
and
Evaluation
of
an
Analysis
Method
The
method
used
to
determine
the
concentrations
of
target
gases
from
OP/
FTIR
spectra
should
account
for
the
inherent
nonlinearities
in
the
response
of
the
instrument.

There
are
two
types
of
nonlinearity
that
can
affect
the
accuracy
of
the
concentration
data
reported
by
an
OP/
FTIR
monitor:
detector
nonlinearity
and
nonlinearity
in
absorbance.

Evidence
of
detector
nonlinearity
was
discussed
in
Section
2.1.1
of
this
report
and,

unfortunately,
no
analysis
method
can
account
for
this
type
of
nonlinearity.
The
OP/
FTIR
system
can
also
exhibit
a
nonlinearity
in
the
change
in
absorbance
with
respect
to
changes
in
concentration.
This
nonlinearity
is
due
to
the
convolution
of
the
instrument
line
shape
function,
which
is
influenced
by
the
resolution
and
apodization
used
to
collect
and
process
the
interferograms,
with
the
spectral
data.
The
nonlinearity
with
respect
to
changes
in
absorbance
can
be
accounted
for
by
using
a
multilevel
calibration
model
or
some
other
type
of
nonlinear
analysis
algorithm.
A
multilevel
CLS
analysis
and
an
innovative
nonlinear
algorithm
have
been
previously
applied
successfully
to
APPCD
field
data
collected
at
a
concentrated
swine
production
facility
to
account
for
the
nonlinearity
B­
12
in
the
absorbance
over
the
wide
range
of
concentration­
pathlength
products
of
the
targets
gases
detected
at
that
site.

The
spectral
data
from
the
Augusta
study
were
analyzed
using
four
different
methods.

Three
methods
were
based
on
a
CLS
analysis
using
AutoQuant3
(
MIDAC,
Irvine,
CA),

while
the
fourth
used
an
innovative
nonlinear
algorithm
developed
by
Dr.
Bill
Phillips
of
SpectraSoft
Technology
(
Tullahoma,
TN).
6
A
matrix
of
the
wavenumber
ranges,
target
gases,
and
interfering
species
is
given
in
Table
1.
Different
sets
of
reference
spectra
were
used
for
the
three
CLS
methods.
One
CLS
method
used
a
set
of
reference
spectra
from
the
Hanst
1.0­
cm­
1
spectral
library
(
Infrared
Analysis,
Inc.,
Anaheim,
CA).
Another
CLS
method
used
a
set
of
reference
spectra
of
atmospheric
gases
generated
from
the
HITRAN
database
using
Etrans
and
a
reference
spectrum
of
SF
6
from
the
NIST
Standard
Reference
Database
79
(
Gaithersburg,
MD).
For
this
method,
the
spectra
of
the
atmospheric
gases
were
generated
at
a
concentration­
pathlength
product
that
produced
absorbance
values
of
the
analytical
IR
bands
near
the
median
of
those
found
in
the
field
spectra.
The
third
CLS
method
also
used
a
set
of
reference
spectra
of
the
atmospheric
gases
generated
from
the
HITRAN
database
using
Etrans
and
a
reference
spectrum
of
SF
6
from
the
NIST
database.
A
multilevel
calibration
was
used
for
this
method,
with
reference
spectra
of
the
atmospheric
gases
generated
at
concentration­
pathlength
products
corresponding
to
10%

lower,
10%
higher,
the
median,
and
midpoints
between
the
median
and
the
high
and
low
absorbance
values
of
those
in
the
field
spectra.
The
concentration­
pathlength
products
used
for
this
multilevel
CLS
analysis
are
given
in
Table
2.
B­
13
Table
1.
Analysis
Region
Matrix
for
CLS
Analyses
Analyte
900.20
 
980.70
cm­
1
2083.9
 
2223.3
cm­
1
2881.9
 
2929.2
cm­
1
SF6
!

H2O(
1)
!

CO
!

N2O
!

H2O(
2)
!

CH4
!

H2O(
3)
!

Table
2.
Concentration
Pathlength­
Products
(
ppm­
m)
for
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis
Analyte
Low
­
10%
Midpoint
1
Median
Midpoint
2
High
+
10%

SF6
 
 
1
 
 
H2O(
1)
1080000
1350000
1620000
1890000
2160000
CO
108
135
162
189
216
N2O
31.32
32.94
34.56
36.18
37.8
H2O(
2)
1080000
1350000
1620000
1890000
2160000
CH4
140.4
237.6
334.8
432
540
H2O(
3)
1080000
1350000
1620000
1890000
2160000
2.10
Comparison
of
the
Concentration
Values
Generated
by
the
Automated
Multivariate
Data
Analysis
Method
to
Manual
Comparison
Method
or
Advanced
Nonlinear
Algorithms
Selected
absorption
files
were
analyzed
by
the
manual
comparison
method
described
in
Section
2.6.5.3.1
of
the
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document
to
check
the
output
of
the
automated
CLS
method.
An
example
of
this
procedure
is
given
in
Table
3
for
SF6
for
data
files
that
represent
the
extremes
in
the
reported
concentration
values.
B­
14
Table
3.
Reported
Concentration
Values
of
Selected
Files
Using
the
Comparison
and
Multilevel
CLS
Methods
File
Number
Comparison
Method
(
ppm)
Multilevel
CLS
(
ppm)

d0224002
0.054
0.047
d0224089
0.036
0.028
d0224291
0.061
0.059
d0224305
0.006
0
As
shown
in
Table
3,
the
reported
values
for
SF6
from
the
multilevel
CLS
analysis
are
very
similar
to
those
determined
by
using
the
comparison
method
for
these
selected
files.
There
is
a
slight
positive
bias
in
the
concentration
values
determined
by
the
comparison
method
because
of
interference
from
a
water
vapor
band.
Otherwise,
the
two
methods
are
comparable
for
these
representative
data
files.

More
extensive
comparisons
were
made
between
the
single­
level
CLS
analyses
using
reference
spectra
from
the
Hanst
spectral
library
and
those
generated
from
Etrans,
the
multilevel
CLS
analysis
with
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans,
and
an
analysis
using
the
innovative
nonlinear
algorithm.
Dr.
Phillips
of
SpectraSoft
Technology
performed
the
nonlinear
analysis
under
a
subcontractual
agreement
with
ManTech
under
WA­
IV­
119.
The
concentration
values
of
SF6
and
selected
atmospheric
gases
determined
by
using
the
different
analysis
methods
are
given
in
Attachments
1
 
4.
The
mean
concentration
values
reported
from
the
four
different
analysis
methods
are
summarized
in
Table
4.
Also
included
in
Table
4
are
the
results
from
the
original
CLS
analyses
using
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans
using
a
nominal
1­

cm­
1
resolution.

The
mean
concentrations
of
SF6
reported
by
each
of
the
analysis
methods
were
nearly
identical
even
though
the
concentration­
pathlength
products
of
the
reference
spectra
for
SF6
were
significantly
different
in
the
single­
level
CLS
method
using
the
Hanst
reference
spectrum
(
66
ppm­
m,
Absmax
=
1.5578)
and
the
other
methods,
which
used
a
reference
spectrum
from
the
NIST
database
(
1
ppm­
m,
Absmax
=
0.02811).

The
mean
concentrations
of
CH4
during
this
monitoring
period
were
similar
for
the
B­
15
Table
4.
Mean
Concentration
Values
(
ppm)
for
SF6
and
Selected
Atmospheric
Gases
Method
SF6
CH4
CO
N2O
H2O
(
1)
H2O
(
2)
H2O
(
3)
CO2
CLS
Hanst,
Single
Level
0.04
3.006
2.348
0.378
 
 
 
 
CLS
Etrans,
Single
Level
(
1
cm­
1)
0.04
2.256
1.312
0.321
11820
12464
11539
C
CLS
Etrans,
Single
Level
(
1.462
cm­
1)
0.04
2.68
2.058
0.35
15531
15841
12719
C
CLS
Etrans,
Multilevel
(
1
cm­
1)
0.04
2.243
1.267
0.321
11519
11317
11344
C
CLS
Etrans,
Multilevel
(
1.462
cm­
1)
0.04
2.671
2.161
0.348
15095
16492
12328
 
Nonlinear
0.04
2.758
2.208
0.382
9496
 
 
519.2
two
CLS
methods
using
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans
at
1.462­
cm­
1
resolution,
but
were
slightly
higher
for
the
nonlinear
algorithm
and
the
CLS
method
using
the
Hanst
reference
spectra.
There
were
significant
differences
between
the
two
CLS
methods
using
Etrans
reference
spectra
generated
at
either
a
nominal
1­
cm­
1
resolution
or
1.462­
cm­
1
resolution.
In
each
case,
the
CLS
method
using
the
nominal
1­
cm­
1
resolution
Etrans
reference
spectra
under­
reported
the
mean
concentration.

The
mean
concentrations
of
CO
and
N2O
reported
by
the
nonlinear
algorithm
were
slightly
higher
than
those
reported
by
the
CLS
methods
using
the
1.462­
cm­
1
Etrans
reference
spectra,
whereas
the
water
vapor
concentration
reported
by
the
nonlinear
algorithm
was
lower
than
that
reported
by
the
CLS
methods.
The
reasons
for
these
discrepancies
are
not
known,
but
could
include
differences
in
developing
the
synthetic
background
spectrum
for
the
CLS
analyses
and
the
fitted
polynomial
background
for
the
nonlinear
algorithm
or
the
nonlinearity
in
the
data
caused
by
the
saturated
detector.
The
cause
of
these
discrepancies
has
not
been
investigated
further.
The
mean
concentration
for
CO2
reported
from
the
nonlinear
algorithm
was
519.2
ppm,
which
is
slightly
higher
than
normal
ambient
levels.
The
concentration
of
CO2
was
not
reported
for
the
CLS
methods
because
of
the
difficulties
in
analyzing
for
this
gas
in
1­
cm­
1
resolution
spectra
due
to
spectral
overlap
with
CO
and
water
vapor.
B­
16
2.11
Development
of
Relevant
Control
Charts
As
discussed
above
in
Sections
2.2
and
2.3,
control
charts
were
developed
for
the
signal
strength
and
the
random
baseline
noise,
respectively.
Control
charts
were
also
developed
for
the
concentrations
of
selected
atmospheric
gases
over
time.
These
charts
were
developed
from
the
concentration
data
reported
by
the
multilevel
CLS
method
and
are
given
in
Figures
10
 
14.

The
reported
concentrations
of
SF6
fluctuated
between
28
and
50
ppb
throughout
most
of
the
monitoring
period
and
was
relatively
constant
(
38
±
9
ppb)
except
for
a
sharp
increase
that
was
observed
in
files
d0224290
and
d0224291
(
see
Figure
10).
The
concentration
of
SF6
decreased
rapidly
after
file
#
d0224291
and
was
not
detected
in
files
after
d0224300.

The
reported
concentration
of
CH4
was
more
variable,
2.671
±
0.729
ppm
(
see
Figure
11).
The
pathaveraged
concentration
ranged
from
near
or
slightly
below
ambient
background
levels
to
more
than
5.5
ppm.
Although
the
concentration
of
SF6
was
relatively
constant
throughout
the
monitoring
period,
the
CH4
concentrations
increased
rapidly
during
three
separate
episodes.
No
other
gases
exhibited
increases
in
concentrations
during
these
time
periods.

The
path­
averaged
concentration
of
carbon
monoxide
was
relatively
high
(
2.161
±
0.181)
for
ambient
measurements.
High
concentrations
of
CO
were
detected
inside
the
spectrometer
of
the
ETG
system
evaluated
at
RTP,
NC.
The
CO
concentration
in
this
instrument
increased
over
time.
Purging
the
spectrometer
box
with
dry
N2
removed
the
CO
from
the
system.
This
procedure
should
be
done
on
all
ETG
systems
in
the
field.
The
concentration
of
CO
was
relatively
constant,
but
showed
a
steady
increase
near
the
end
of
the
monitoring
period
(
see
Figure
12).

The
concentrations
of
N2O
were
relatively
constant
(
0.348
±
0.010
ppm)
and
slightly
higher
than
expected
ambient
levels
(
see
Figure
13).
Slight
increases
in
the
N2O
concentrations
were
observed
near
the
end
of
the
monitoring
period.
Assuming
that
the
ambient
concentrations
of
N2O
were
constant,
these
results
indicate
that
the
instrument
was
stable
throughout
this
monitoring
period.

As
a
quality
control
check,
the
water
vapor
concentration
was
measured
in
three
different
regions.

Region
1
corresponds
to
the
analysis
region
used
for
SF6
between
900.20
and
980.70
cm­
1;
region
2
corresponds
to
the
analysis
region
used
for
CO
and
N2O
between
2083.90
and
2223.3
cm­
1;
and
region
3
B­
17
corresponds
to
the
analysis
region
used
for
CH4
between
2881.9
and
2929.2
cm­
1.
The
concentrations
of
water
vapor
reported
for
each
region
were
in
close
agreement
and
on
average
were
approximately
14,500
ppm.
This
path­
averaged
concentration
is
equivalent
to
approximately
11
Torr.
If
the
water
vapor
concentration
was
measured
by
some
independent
means
during
the
field
study,
these
data
could
be
used
to
assess
the
accuracy
of
the
OP/
FTIR
data.

3.0
Conclusions
and
Recommendations
The
QC
procedures
used
to
assess
the
instrument
operation
during
the
Augusta
field
study
indicate
that
the
instrument
was
stable
throughout
the
monitoring
period
represented
by
the
subset
of
data
analyzed
for
this
work
assignment.
However,
these
procedures
revealed
significant
problems
in
the
performance
of
the
system
and
in
the
initial
setup
of
the
instrument.
The
single­
beam
field
spectra
exhibited
a
wavenumber
shift
of
0.5
cm­
1
relative
to
the
reference
spectra
generated
from
Etrans.
Also,
the
instrument
resolution
was
calculated
to
be
approximately
1.46
cm­
1,
instead
of
the
selected
value
of
1.0
cm­
1.
In
addition
to
these
problems,
all
of
the
single­
beam
spectra
from
this
subset
of
data
exhibit
evidence
of
detector
saturation.
As
a
result,
the
instrument
was
most
likely
operating
in
a
nonlinear
mode
during
this
study,
which
makes
the
accuracy
of
the
reported
concentration
values
highly
questionable.
Although
different
analysis
methods
and
algorithms
can
be
used
to
account
for
nonlinearities
due
to
the
convolution
of
the
instrument
response
function
on
the
spectral
data,
methods
to
correct
for
the
nonlinearities
due
to
detector
saturation
do
not
exist.
The
likelihood
of
detector
saturation
can
be
minimized
by
examining
the
single­
beam
spectra
during
the
initial
instrument
setup.
Procedures
for
the
initial
instrument
setup
are
given
in
EPA­
sponsored
guidance
documents1,2
and
ASTM
standards.
3,4
These
documents
should
be
reviewed
and
adhered
to
during
future
studies
with
the
OP/
FTIR
system.
In
addition
to
these
documents,
an
example
of
a
USEPA
audit
on
an
OP/
FTIR
field
study,
including
an
extensive
audit
questionnaire,
has
been
presented
and
is
very
helpful
in
applying
many
of
the
operating
principles
and
quality
control
procedures
discussed
in
these
documents
to
OP/
FTIR
field
data.
7
The
comparison
of
the
data
collected
by
the
roof
vent
OP/
FTIR
system
to
those
obtained
by
manual
bag
sampling
with
subsequent
analysis
by
FTIR
spectrometry
is
of
particular
interest
to
the
APPCD.

Because
of
the
uncertainties
in
the
OP/
FTIR
data,
conclusions
drawn
from
this
comparison
should
be
made
with
the
caveat
that
the
OP/
FTIR
instrument
was
most
likely
operating
in
a
nonlinear
mode
due
to
detector
saturation.
B­
18
4.0
Literature
Cited
1.
Russwurm,
G.
M.
and
Childers,
J.
W.,
FT­
IR
Open­
Path
Monitoring
Guidance
Document,
3rd
Edition,
TR­
4423­
99­
03,
ManTech
Environmental
Technology,
Inc.,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
June,
1999.

2.
Compendium
of
Methods
for
the
Determination
of
Toxic
Organic
Compounds
in
Ambient
Air,
2nd
Edition,
EPA/
625/
R­
96/
010b,
Center
for
Environmental
Research
Information,
Office
of
Research
&
Development,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Cincinnati,
OH
45268,
January
1997.

3.
E
1865
Standard
Guide
for
Open­
Path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
OP/
FT­
IR)
Monitoring
of
Gases
and
Vapors
in
Air,
Annual
Book
of
ASTM
Standards,
Vol
03.06,
American
Society
for
Testing
and
Materials,
West
Conshohocken,
PA.

4.
E
1982
Standard
Practice
for
Open­
Path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
OP/
FT­
IR)
Monitoring
of
Gases
and
Vapors
in
Air,
Annual
Book
of
ASTM
Standards,
Vol
03.06,
American
Society
for
Testing
and
Materials,
West
Conshohocken,
PA.

5.
Griffiths,
P.
R.
and
deHaseth,
J.
A.,
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
Spectrometry,
John
Wiley
&
Sons,
Inc.(
1986),
pp.
56­
65.

6.
Phillips,
B.,
Moyers,
R.,
and
Lay,
L.
T.,
"
Improved
FTIR
Open
Path
Remote
Sensing
Data
Reduction
Technique,"
Proceedings
of
Optical
Sensing
for
Environmental
and
Process
Monitoring,
VIP­
37,
Air
&
Waste
Management
Association,
Pittsburgh,
PA,
1995,
pp.
374­
388.

7.
Childers,
L.
O.,
"
The
USEPA
QA
Auditor
is
Scheduled
for
a
Visit.
What
Can
I
Expect?",
Proceedings
of
Optical
Remote
Sensing
for
Environmental
and
Process
Monitoring,
VIP­
55,
Air
&
Waste
Management
Association,
Pittsburgh,
PA,
1996,
pp.
127­
138.
B­
19
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
2000
2
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
4
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
Single­
Beam
Intensity
Wavenumber
(
cm
)
­
1
Figure
1.
Single­
beam
OP/
FTIR
spectrum
collected
during
the
Augusta
study
with
a
108­
m
pathlength.

5
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
4
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
Single­
Beam
Intensity
Wavenumber
(
cm
)
­
1
Figure
2.
Single­
beam
OP/
FTIR
spectrum
collected
at
Research
Triangle
Park
with
a
414­
m
pathlength.
B­
20
6
7
.5
6
8
.5
6
9
.5
7
0
.5
Signal
Intensity
Signal
S
t
rength
at
9
8
5
cm
­
1
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
File
N
umber
6
7
.0
6
8
.0
6
9
.0
7
0
.0
Figure
3.
Single­
beam
signal
intensity
(
in
arbitrary
units)
at
985
cm­
1.

0
.8
3
5
0
.8
4
5
0
.8
5
5
Relative
Signal
Intensity
Relative
Signal
Strength
(
2
5
0
0
/
9
8
5
)

2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
File
N
umber
0
.8
5
0
0
.8
4
0
0
.8
3
0
Figure
4.
Relative
single­
beam
signal
intensity
at
2500
cm­
1
ratioed
to
that
at
985
cm­
1.
B­
21
0
.1
9
5
0
.2
0
5
0
.2
1
5
Relative
Signal
Intensity
Relat
ive
S
ignal
Strength
(
4
4
0
0
/
9
8
5
)

2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
File
N
umber
0
.2
1
0
0
.2
0
0
0
.1
9
0
Figure
5.
Relative
single­
beam
signal
intensity
at
4400
cm­
1
ratioed
to
that
at
985
cm­
1.

File
N
umber
0
.0
5
0
.1
0
0
.1
5
0
.2
0
0
.2
5
0
.3
0
0
.3
5
0
.4
0
0
.4
5
Thousandths
RMS
Deviation
(
Abs
Units)
Random
Baseline
Noise
9
5
8
­
1
0
0
8
cm­
1
3
2
3
4
3
63
8
3
1
03
12
3
1
43
1
6
3
1
83
2
0
3
2
23
24
3
2
6
3
2
83
30
3
Figure
6.
Random
baseline
noise
measured
between
958
and
1008
cm­
1.
B­
22
File
Number
0
.0
3
0
.0
4
0
.0
5
0
.0
6
0
.0
7
0
.0
8
Thousandths
2
48
0
­
2
5
3
0
cm­
1
3
2
3
4
3
6
3
8
3
1
0
3
1
2
3
1
4
3
1
6
3
1
8
3
2
0
3
2
2
3
2
4
3
2
6
3
2
8
3
3
03
RMS
Deviation
(
Abs
Units)
Random
Baseline
Noise
Figure
7.
Random
baseline
noise
measured
between
2480
and
2530
cm­
1.

File
N
umber
0
.1
5
0
.2
0
0
.2
5
0
.3
0
0
.3
5
0
.4
0
Thousandths
4
3
7
5
­
4
42
5
cm­
1
3
2
3
4
3
6
3
8
3
1
0
3
1
2
3
1
4
3
1
6
3
1
8
3
2
0
3
2
2
3
2
4
3
2
6
3
2
8
3
3
0
3
RMS
Deviation
(
Abs
Units)
Random
Baseline
Noise
Figure
8.
Random
baseline
noise
measured
between
4375
and
4425
cm­
1.
B­
23
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
Wavenumbers
2
18
34
50
66
82
98
114
130
146
162
178
194
210
226
242
258
274
290
306
File
Number
resolution
shift
Figure
9.
Measurement
of
the
resolution
and
wavenumber
shift
calculated
from
the
nonlinear
algorithm.

0
0
.0
1
0
.0
2
0
.0
3
0
.0
4
0
.0
5
0
.0
6
0
.0
7
S
F6
Concentration
(
ppm)

File
N
um
be
r
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
Figure
10.
Concentration
of
SF6
Determined
from
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis.
B­
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
M
ethane
Concentration
(
ppm)

File
N
um
ber
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
Figure
11.
Concentration
of
CH4
Determined
from
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis.

1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
Concentration
(
ppm)
Carbon
M
onoxide
File
N
umber
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
02
1
2
2
1
4
2
16
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
Figure
12.
Concentration
of
CO
Determined
from
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis.
B­
25
0
.3
3
0
.3
4
0
.3
5
0
.3
6
0
.3
7
0
.3
8
N
it
rous
O
xide
File
N
um
ber
Concentration
(
ppm)

2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
Figure
13.
Concentration
of
N2O
Determined
from
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis.

8
1
0
1
2
1
4
1
6
1
8
2
0
2
2
Thousands
Concentration
(
ppm)
W
ater
V
apor
File
N
um
ber
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
2
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
2
1
6
2
1
8
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
2
2
8
2
3
0
2
Figure
14.
Concentration
of
H2O
Determined
from
Multilevel
CLS
Analysis.
B­
26
Attachment
1
Concentration
Data
from
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
B­
27
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

2
2.645
2.487
0.384
0.051
14540
12863
12074
3
2.508
2.433
0.383
0.049
14707
12963
12233
4
2.416
2.372
0.381
0.046
14629
13017
12352
5
2.398
2.472
0.383
0.045
14828
13110
12424
6
2.459
2.403
0.382
0.043
14650
13083
12442
7
2.508
2.385
0.382
0.042
14743
13085
12402
8
2.595
2.435
0.383
0.043
14693
13089
12383
9
2.786
2.367
0.382
0.047
14852
13141
12437
10
2.864
2.360
0.381
0.043
14891
13137
12467
11
2.946
2.381
0.381
0.042
14824
13106
12425
12
2.849
2.388
0.380
0.041
14592
13126
12447
13
2.698
2.321
0.379
0.045
14880
13221
12605
14
2.643
2.378
0.379
0.046
14983
13237
12553
15
2.628
2.395
0.379
0.046
15038
13246
12528
16
2.599
2.325
0.377
0.044
14941
13235
12575
17
2.583
2.327
0.377
0.048
14953
13241
12618
18
2.584
2.312
0.376
0.045
14962
13286
12647
19
2.553
2.302
0.375
0.043
15002
13302
12728
20
2.631
2.293
0.374
0.045
15095
13348
12721
21
2.624
2.306
0.374
0.048
15132
13381
12736
22
2.503
2.297
0.373
0.044
15029
13346
12704
23
2.432
2.276
0.372
0.047
15126
13427
12785
24
2.495
2.269
0.371
0.046
15233
13460
12844
25
2.459
2.227
0.369
0.042
15256
13491
12922
26
2.309
2.200
0.369
0.044
15244
13463
12825
27
2.28
2.190
0.368
0.043
15036
13398
12757
28
2.269
2.172
0.368
0.043
14996
13385
12751
29
2.411
2.181
0.368
0.036
14836
13391
12755
30
2.361
2.189
0.368
0.045
15106
13393
12748
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
28
31
2.392
2.177
0.368
0.038
14792
13261
12541
32
2.468
2.165
0.367
0.041
14967
13358
12691
33
2.283
2.145
0.367
0.041
14875
13302
12599
34
2.316
2.143
0.367
0.043
14791
13199
12448
35
2.278
2.149
0.368
0.031
14483
13197
12419
36
2.136
2.143
0.369
0.033
14341
13114
12359
37
2.177
2.146
0.367
0.036
14550
13208
12485
38
2.205
2.154
0.368
0.033
14709
13304
12572
39
2.168
2.168
0.367
0.036
14780
13333
12606
40
2.219
2.185
0.368
0.036
14858
13323
12638
41
2.077
2.140
0.368
0.032
14482
13154
12401
42
2.145
2.139
0.368
0.035
14655
13216
12517
43
2.165
2.155
0.367
0.041
14833
13253
12509
44
2.363
2.143
0.367
0.039
14884
13340
12673
45
2.375
2.162
0.368
0.035
14873
13375
12706
46
2.786
2.170
0.366
0.042
15072
13414
12716
47
2.685
2.165
0.366
0.045
14859
13301
12568
48
2.54
2.156
0.366
0.042
14677
13220
12433
49
2.472
2.151
0.367
0.042
14557
13110
12304
50
2.499
2.152
0.366
0.040
14792
13210
12461
51
2.489
2.163
0.368
0.032
14581
13251
12495
52
2.352
2.154
0.367
0.036
14918
13418
12744
53
2.314
2.165
0.367
0.041
14980
13391
12734
54
2.236
2.178
0.367
0.041
14852
13300
12590
55
2.316
2.168
0.367
0.041
14879
13311
12611
56
2.286
2.153
0.367
0.038
14809
13308
12563
57
2.266
2.166
0.366
0.042
14936
13330
12561
58
2.285
2.151
0.366
0.037
14874
13317
12518
59
2.349
2.177
0.367
0.037
14867
13329
12521
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
29
60
2.579
2.171
0.366
0.040
14884
13332
12493
61
2.303
2.174
0.366
0.041
14899
13400
12547
62
2.243
2.158
0.366
0.040
14999
13435
12685
63
2.539
2.166
0.366
0.033
14834
13384
12649
64
2.584
2.194
0.366
0.037
14907
13366
12625
65
2.465
2.153
0.365
0.040
14802
13288
12506
66
2.612
2.159
0.365
0.042
14778
13281
12460
67
2.718
2.167
0.365
0.038
14575
13211
12382
68
2.549
2.196
0.366
0.038
14423
13109
12197
69
2.523
2.169
0.365
0.042
14547
13108
12248
70
2.54
2.158
0.366
0.043
14473
13119
12224
71
2.742
2.167
0.366
0.043
14604
13177
12335
72
2.714
2.170
0.366
0.037
14621
13156
12335
73
2.573
2.159
0.366
0.039
14524
13140
12273
74
2.585
2.151
0.366
0.038
14702
13251
12489
75
2.671
2.156
0.366
0.041
14663
13152
12323
76
2.638
2.158
0.366
0.039
14757
13272
12494
77
2.73
2.185
0.366
0.037
14885
13405
12654
78
2.809
2.155
0.365
0.038
14680
13306
12549
79
2.667
2.168
0.366
0.041
14522
13165
12304
80
2.592
2.225
0.367
0.040
14678
13248
12432
81
2.528
2.171
0.366
0.041
14489
13137
12261
82
2.522
2.182
0.366
0.041
14474
13101
12242
83
2.482
2.170
0.366
0.038
14587
13143
12265
84
2.649
2.163
0.366
0.038
14828
13338
12580
85
2.688
2.160
0.366
0.038
14752
13269
12470
86
2.431
2.168
0.366
0.041
14583
13173
12255
87
2.555
2.163
0.366
0.034
14509
13180
12293
88
2.355
2.162
0.366
0.032
14540
13214
12319
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
30
89
2.288
2.163
0.366
0.031
14412
13248
12405
90
2.47
2.171
0.366
0.039
14564
13150
12248
91
2.747
2.180
0.366
0.038
14478
13158
12250
92
2.841
2.159
0.366
0.040
14595
13191
12332
93
2.942
2.166
0.366
0.039
14597
13205
12382
94
3.287
2.163
0.366
0.041
14808
13294
12485
95
3.509
2.163
0.366
0.041
14632
13240
12415
96
3.718
2.163
0.365
0.041
14798
13300
12502
97
3.341
2.163
0.365
0.043
14694
13250
12428
98
2.877
2.171
0.366
0.043
14666
13214
12376
99
2.975
2.169
0.367
0.040
14748
13259
12432
100
3.126
2.169
0.367
0.040
14717
13263
12456
101
3.025
2.164
0.366
0.042
14718
13226
12392
102
2.947
2.164
0.366
0.042
14712
13225
12431
103
3.014
2.170
0.366
0.043
14633
13190
12352
104
3.091
2.171
0.367
0.040
14589
13208
12394
105
3.219
2.172
0.366
0.041
14678
13207
12394
106
3.633
2.173
0.367
0.041
14627
13265
12460
107
4.46
2.173
0.367
0.040
14838
13360
12611
108
4.815
2.174
0.366
0.039
14946
13438
12638
109
4.549
2.181
0.367
0.039
14971
13409
12633
110
4.244
2.175
0.367
0.039
14913
13408
12644
111
4.139
2.172
0.367
0.042
14915
13403
12644
112
4.052
2.171
0.366
0.043
14945
13396
12649
113
4.162
2.172
0.367
0.041
14989
13441
12701
114
4.182
2.176
0.367
0.038
15018
13451
12725
115
4.255
2.183
0.367
0.043
15172
13483
12741
116
4.299
2.180
0.368
0.040
15044
13512
12787
117
4.581
2.184
0.368
0.041
15187
13598
12829
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
31
118
4.948
2.183
0.368
0.040
15355
13631
12850
119
5.45
2.185
0.368
0.039
15378
13639
12891
120
5.51
2.181
0.368
0.040
15399
13653
12933
121
4.957
2.186
0.368
0.041
15438
13627
12898
122
4.567
2.199
0.368
0.037
15388
13629
12871
123
4.38
2.216
0.369
0.038
15330
13630
12864
124
4.73
2.225
0.369
0.039
15448
13656
12815
125
5.264
2.222
0.369
0.039
15518
13731
12876
126
5.967
2.210
0.369
0.039
15536
13806
12978
127
6.026
2.213
0.370
0.039
15711
13810
13062
128
6.001
2.213
0.370
0.039
15623
13803
13053
129
5.908
2.203
0.370
0.038
15591
13798
13070
130
5.454
2.202
0.370
0.038
15623
13797
13102
131
5.518
2.215
0.370
0.037
15664
13839
13146
132
5.468
2.210
0.370
0.037
15570
13832
13143
133
5.173
2.210
0.370
0.038
15636
13783
13089
134
4.964
2.212
0.370
0.039
15469
13756
13086
135
5.376
2.203
0.370
0.037
15494
13728
13073
136
6.26
2.200
0.370
0.038
15467
13735
13092
137
4.888
2.197
0.370
0.039
15112
13548
12897
138
4.01
2.210
0.370
0.037
15094
13491
12814
139
3.55
2.218
0.370
0.040
15199
13505
12850
140
3.089
2.225
0.372
0.042
14985
13373
12712
141
2.736
2.238
0.373
0.045
14941
13341
12628
142
2.891
2.229
0.373
0.043
14823
13288
12624
143
2.902
2.220
0.373
0.039
14768
13220
12505
144
2.857
2.218
0.373
0.043
14759
13209
12489
145
2.988
2.222
0.373
0.046
14803
13164
12405
146
3.04
2.232
0.374
0.046
14698
13100
12347
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
32
147
3.044
2.246
0.375
0.046
14712
13080
12292
148
2.941
2.232
0.375
0.043
14632
13093
12348
149
2.887
2.234
0.375
0.042
14576
13056
12301
150
3.118
2.233
0.376
0.042
14403
12969
12145
151
3.131
2.231
0.376
0.043
14470
12935
12144
152
3.068
2.227
0.377
0.046
14368
12890
12043
153
2.93
2.229
0.376
0.046
14326
12810
11941
154
3.004
2.254
0.377
0.044
14175
12740
11858
155
3.007
2.241
0.377
0.044
14167
12717
11847
156
2.989
2.236
0.377
0.045
14161
12698
11823
157
2.761
2.245
0.377
0.044
14273
12722
11861
158
2.66
2.247
0.376
0.043
14024
12675
11790
159
2.556
2.251
0.377
0.042
13915
12636
11735
160
2.663
2.263
0.377
0.040
13892
12613
11699
161
2.805
2.280
0.378
0.043
13894
12579
11652
162
2.788
2.290
0.378
0.045
14039
12604
11614
163
2.809
2.346
0.379
0.044
13873
12490
11488
164
2.832
2.383
0.380
0.043
13821
12491
11474
165
2.791
2.298
0.379
0.043
13736
12527
11570
166
2.745
2.278
0.379
0.044
13607
12532
11596
167
2.724
2.278
0.379
0.047
13924
12552
11637
168
2.61
2.261
0.378
0.047
13932
12532
11608
169
2.574
2.278
0.378
0.047
13874
12512
11598
170
2.459
2.299
0.379
0.045
13806
12520
11609
171
2.316
2.357
0.379
0.044
13893
12513
11582
172
2.324
2.284
0.379
0.046
13811
12457
11521
173
2.505
2.295
0.379
0.047
13674
12343
11344
174
2.538
2.276
0.379
0.044
13558
12285
11296
175
2.342
2.277
0.379
0.045
13693
12386
11405
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
33
176
2.293
2.289
0.379
0.044
13659
12390
11391
177
2.328
2.297
0.378
0.047
13737
12376
11378
178
2.41
2.292
0.378
0.044
13681
12354
11355
179
2.432
2.286
0.379
0.044
13617
12322
11305
180
2.282
2.373
0.380
0.044
13615
12278
11189
181
2.187
2.293
0.379
0.047
13716
12305
11276
182
2.186
2.280
0.379
0.048
13650
12324
11348
183
2.199
2.279
0.378
0.044
13626
12318
11338
184
2.305
2.326
0.379
0.046
13490
12208
11153
185
2.3
2.317
0.380
0.048
13458
12176
11123
186
2.201
2.290
0.379
0.047
13560
12215
11187
187
2.175
2.283
0.379
0.044
13490
12283
11276
188
2.128
2.285
0.378
0.044
13749
12401
11444
189
2.154
2.284
0.378
0.041
13658
12398
11451
190
2.209
2.285
0.377
0.043
13812
12471
11517
191
2.342
2.286
0.378
0.042
13895
12472
11558
192
2.515
2.291
0.378
0.046
14011
12527
11648
193
2.582
2.298
0.377
0.044
14020
12600
11716
194
2.584
2.318
0.377
0.048
14084
12589
11696
195
2.735
2.339
0.378
0.047
14051
12589
11634
196
3.327
2.330
0.377
0.046
14018
12612
11717
197
4.492
2.309
0.377
0.047
14138
12632
11717
198
4.729
2.312
0.378
0.044
13895
12514
11557
199
4.625
2.324
0.379
0.043
13667
12324
11239
200
3.832
2.316
0.380
0.044
13472
12209
11126
201
3.182
2.305
0.381
0.046
13257
12022
10927
202
3.007
2.299
0.381
0.045
13133
11966
10868
203
3.279
2.297
0.382
0.043
13194
12066
11018
204
3.066
2.286
0.382
0.042
13202
12088
11059
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
34
205
2.815
2.293
0.382
0.044
13207
11986
10939
206
2.685
2.298
0.381
0.044
13075
11943
10855
207
2.557
2.304
0.382
0.047
13104
11885
10802
208
2.525
2.307
0.382
0.045
12655
11678
10425
209
2.559
2.313
0.383
0.044
12526
11526
10281
210
2.527
2.317
0.383
0.044
12350
11424
10086
211
2.491
2.322
0.383
0.042
12352
11439
10153
212
2.398
2.310
0.383
0.044
12528
11490
10223
213
2.387
2.309
0.383
0.045
12592
11518
10255
214
2.379
2.312
0.382
0.045
12564
11514
10259
215
2.351
2.344
0.383
0.046
12496
11444
10134
216
2.399
2.319
0.383
0.044
12432
11418
10133
217
2.431
2.320
0.383
0.044
12501
11467
10194
218
2.461
2.319
0.383
0.045
12390
11378
10074
219
2.428
2.320
0.383
0.046
12304
11293
9948
220
2.384
2.358
0.384
0.045
12272
11247
9878
221
2.471
2.410
0.385
0.042
11974
11144
9706
222
2.516
2.372
0.384
0.045
12029
11180
9743
223
2.652
2.371
0.384
0.043
11996
11125
9675
224
2.899
2.412
0.384
0.041
12107
11253
9818
225
2.955
2.396
0.383
0.044
12475
11484
10090
226
3.215
2.431
0.384
0.049
12380
11280
9786
227
3.075
2.427
0.384
0.046
12190
11226
9680
228
2.827
2.412
0.384
0.046
12325
11315
9865
229
3.05
2.406
0.384
0.047
12515
11392
9995
230
2.823
2.389
0.384
0.046
12404
11331
9930
231
2.844
2.365
0.384
0.041
12179
11307
9971
232
3.223
2.381
0.384
0.043
12342
11356
9984
233
3.665
2.386
0.384
0.048
12447
11354
9960
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
35
234
4.641
2.401
0.383
0.045
12732
11577
10251
235
5.518
2.406
0.383
0.045
12850
11675
10364
236
4.718
2.435
0.384
0.046
12375
11294
9780
237
3.958
2.440
0.384
0.045
12400
11348
9784
238
3.846
2.430
0.384
0.046
12412
11401
9823
239
3.627
2.435
0.384
0.046
12554
11409
9877
240
3.536
2.406
0.384
0.047
12425
11355
9796
241
3.573
2.393
0.384
0.047
12432
11382
9762
242
3.316
2.391
0.385
0.046
12247
11209
9666
243
3.153
2.397
0.385
0.042
11903
11049
9535
244
3.121
2.413
0.386
0.044
11726
10863
9264
245
3.147
2.410
0.386
0.044
11829
10930
9336
246
3.075
2.389
0.386
0.045
11795
10890
9345
247
3.104
2.413
0.386
0.046
11840
10935
9389
248
2.969
2.477
0.386
0.045
11770
10879
9306
249
2.834
2.420
0.387
0.045
11682
10780
9232
250
2.75
2.404
0.386
0.046
11503
10704
9127
251
2.717
2.391
0.386
0.047
11593
10685
9113
252
2.876
2.400
0.386
0.044
11612
10739
9194
253
2.979
2.411
0.386
0.044
11666
10788
9256
254
2.612
2.404
0.387
0.044
11631
10807
9275
255
2.357
2.391
0.387
0.048
11806
10850
9366
256
2.434
2.457
0.388
0.046
11671
10790
9253
257
2.482
2.483
0.388
0.046
11484
10670
9055
258
2.539
2.484
0.389
0.045
11448
10602
8956
259
2.557
2.489
0.389
0.042
11269
10541
8853
260
2.598
2.462
0.388
0.045
11205
10417
8691
261
2.599
2.485
0.388
0.044
11188
10496
8785
262
2.59
2.456
0.387
0.047
11527
10632
9024
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
36
263
2.71
2.475
0.388
0.047
11604
10709
9084
264
2.735
2.451
0.387
0.045
11539
10720
9095
265
2.636
2.438
0.387
0.048
11592
10661
9060
266
2.699
2.441
0.387
0.044
11374
10607
8992
267
2.683
2.445
0.389
0.044
11291
10470
8786
268
2.655
2.531
0.389
0.045
11192
10421
8680
269
2.617
2.525
0.390
0.045
11129
10365
8607
270
2.592
2.508
0.389
0.045
11231
10400
8680
271
2.583
2.545
0.390
0.044
11141
10435
8705
272
2.541
2.588
0.390
0.044
11211
10494
8773
273
2.729
3.032
0.396
0.044
11395
10653
8830
274
3.351
2.849
0.394
0.045
11577
10765
9037
275
3.231
2.643
0.392
0.047
11571
10651
8969
276
3.168
2.582
0.391
0.046
11445
10630
8979
277
3.114
2.601
0.391
0.044
11408
10614
8901
278
3.024
2.770
0.393
0.045
11362
10599
8839
279
2.927
2.833
0.394
0.045
11410
10623
8877
280
2.85
2.837
0.394
0.043
11428
10650
8932
281
2.872
2.904
0.395
0.043
11409
10658
8908
282
2.883
2.862
0.394
0.041
11367
10623
8876
283
2.857
2.816
0.393
0.040
11106
10517
8738
284
2.864
2.774
0.393
0.044
11144
10433
8652
285
2.878
3.144
0.399
0.044
11090
10435
8519
286
2.898
3.075
0.398
0.041
11077
10486
8528
287
2.92
3.164
0.399
0.042
11019
10436
8376
288
2.964
3.187
0.399
0.044
11310
10587
8588
289
3.112
3.141
0.398
0.045
11373
10613
8591
290
3.124
3.118
0.398
0.056
10979
10673
8700
291
3.16
3.184
0.399
0.061
10781
10558
8383
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Hanst
1.0
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
37
292
3.237
3.267
0.400
0.015
10150
10554
8161
293
3.374
3.360
0.402
0.007
9832
10569
8054
294
3.452
3.217
0.399
0.005
9899
10674
8539
295
3.219
2.995
0.396
0.003
10027
10829
8963
296
3.166
3.028
0.396
0.002
10100
10906
9104
297
3.187
2.944
0.395
0.002
10081
10915
9122
298
3.152
2.879
0.394
0.001
10165
10942
9260
299
3.149
2.833
0.393
0.002
10243
11003
9371
300
3.328
2.957
0.395
0.001
10461
11176
9613
301
3.316
2.953
0.395
0.000
10561
11297
9747
302
3.224
2.860
0.394
0.000
10734
11401
9940
303
3.224
2.808
0.398
0.001
10926
11521
10114
304
3.369
2.827
0.403
0.000
11024
11581
10235
305
3.469
2.832
0.404
0.000
11013
11622
10241
306
3.562
2.848
0.407
0.000
11108
11660
10281
Avg
3.006
2.348
0.378
0.041
13614
12394
11329
Std
0.835
0.241
0.010
0.009
1524
1076
1470
B­
38
Attachment
2
Concentration
Data
from
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
Reference
Spectra
B­
39
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

2
2.385
2.177
0.356
0.049
16341
16428
13537
3
2.271
2.134
0.354
0.048
16598
16565
13726
4
2.196
2.086
0.353
0.045
16610
16639
13848
5
2.182
2.167
0.354
0.044
16944
16763
13961
6
2.234
2.111
0.353
0.042
16808
16727
13973
7
2.275
2.097
0.353
0.041
16997
16729
13954
8
2.344
2.137
0.353
0.042
16889
16740
13917
9
2.508
2.084
0.353
0.046
16892
16801
13992
10
2.571
2.079
0.352
0.042
17113
16781
13971
11
2.637
2.095
0.352
0.041
17063
16748
13926
12
2.555
2.102
0.352
0.040
16839
16770
13959
13
2.431
2.049
0.350
0.044
16961
16892
14132
14
2.388
2.094
0.350
0.045
17081
16918
14111
15
2.376
2.108
0.349
0.044
17178
16933
14106
16
2.353
2.051
0.348
0.043
17110
16930
14161
17
2.340
2.053
0.348
0.046
16956
16940
14202
18
2.340
2.041
0.347
0.044
17114
16999
14248
19
2.316
2.034
0.346
0.042
17247
17016
14324
20
2.379
2.027
0.345
0.044
17224
17083
14315
21
2.374
2.038
0.345
0.047
17172
17119
14338
22
2.269
2.031
0.344
0.043
17200
17070
14290
23
2.211
2.016
0.343
0.046
17176
17166
14366
24
2.267
2.011
0.342
0.045
17344
17207
14435
25
2.235
1.978
0.341
0.041
17599
17254
14511
26
2.108
1.956
0.341
0.043
17502
17211
14389
27
2.080
1.948
0.339
0.041
17329
17123
14313
28
2.072
1.933
0.339
0.042
17238
17107
14317
29
2.195
1.940
0.340
0.035
17405
17123
14340
30
2.151
1.945
0.339
0.044
17260
17135
14352
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
40
31
2.177
1.934
0.340
0.037
17210
16964
14125
32
2.241
1.925
0.339
0.040
17259
17099
14302
33
2.085
1.908
0.338
0.040
17164
17020
14175
34
2.113
1.905
0.338
0.042
16933
16892
14017
35
2.080
1.910
0.340
0.030
17159
16892
13984
36
1.956
1.905
0.341
0.032
16881
16768
13880
37
1.995
1.908
0.339
0.035
16942
16890
14043
38
2.022
1.915
0.339
0.033
17310
17021
14173
39
1.992
1.928
0.339
0.035
17296
17055
14210
40
2.032
1.941
0.339
0.035
17402
17044
14225
41
1.910
1.902
0.340
0.031
17089
16832
13952
42
1.969
1.901
0.340
0.034
17131
16921
14114
43
1.990
1.914
0.338
0.040
17084
16982
14134
44
2.157
1.906
0.338
0.038
17218
17090
14303
45
2.168
1.922
0.339
0.034
17444
17138
14359
46
2.512
1.929
0.337
0.041
17304
17182
14364
47
2.426
1.923
0.337
0.044
16873
17041
14191
48
2.301
1.915
0.337
0.041
16795
16928
14026
49
2.242
1.909
0.339
0.041
16615
16782
13855
50
2.265
1.911
0.337
0.039
17049
16912
14019
51
2.258
1.921
0.339
0.031
17153
16965
14088
52
2.147
1.917
0.338
0.035
17452
17175
14375
53
2.113
1.925
0.338
0.039
17263
17142
14370
54
2.046
1.934
0.338
0.040
17073
17027
14189
55
2.116
1.925
0.338
0.040
17092
17055
14237
56
2.094
1.911
0.337
0.037
17150
17070
14241
57
2.079
1.923
0.337
0.041
17043
17091
14290
58
2.097
1.910
0.337
0.036
17272
17081
14244
59
2.149
1.931
0.337
0.036
17265
17093
14226
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
41
60
2.346
1.926
0.337
0.039
17094
17102
14259
61
2.115
1.930
0.337
0.040
17081
17183
14371
62
2.060
1.918
0.337
0.039
17298
17218
14431
63
2.304
1.925
0.337
0.032
17430
17149
14310
64
2.339
1.946
0.337
0.036
17320
17126
14266
65
2.239
1.912
0.336
0.039
17013
17025
14119
66
2.362
1.918
0.336
0.041
16886
17011
14062
67
2.450
1.922
0.336
0.037
16842
16928
13995
68
2.308
1.944
0.337
0.037
16610
16799
13793
69
2.287
1.921
0.336
0.041
16548
16807
13847
70
2.302
1.913
0.337
0.042
16430
16821
13838
71
2.471
1.921
0.336
0.042
16623
16893
13939
72
2.448
1.923
0.337
0.036
16984
16865
13940
73
2.329
1.915
0.337
0.038
16728
16844
13890
74
2.339
1.910
0.337
0.037
17036
16981
14109
75
2.411
1.913
0.337
0.040
16793
16854
13916
76
2.383
1.916
0.336
0.038
16982
17005
14111
77
2.463
1.941
0.336
0.036
17273
17168
14305
78
2.528
1.914
0.336
0.037
16933
17049
14177
79
2.407
1.922
0.337
0.040
16521
16864
13901
80
2.346
1.969
0.337
0.039
16800
16975
14039
81
2.287
1.925
0.337
0.040
16550
16821
13837
82
2.284
1.932
0.337
0.040
16475
16790
13834
83
2.253
1.923
0.337
0.037
16822
16852
13881
84
2.396
1.920
0.336
0.037
17110
17103
14239
85
2.428
1.917
0.337
0.037
17043
17015
14119
86
2.210
1.921
0.336
0.040
16636
16899
13883
87
2.317
1.917
0.336
0.033
16934
16909
13927
88
2.150
1.918
0.337
0.031
17094
16943
13970
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
42
89
2.092
1.921
0.337
0.030
16954
16969
14033
90
2.242
1.925
0.337
0.038
16735
16843
13835
91
2.474
1.932
0.337
0.037
16695
16853
13834
92
2.550
1.917
0.337
0.039
16722
16888
13912
93
2.635
1.923
0.337
0.038
16799
16911
13974
94
2.925
1.921
0.337
0.040
16954
17018
14078
95
3.113
1.920
0.337
0.040
16761
16959
14018
96
3.286
1.921
0.336
0.040
16960
17030
14100
97
2.972
1.920
0.336
0.042
16703
16971
14049
98
2.583
1.926
0.336
0.042
16640
16932
13994
99
2.667
1.924
0.337
0.039
16905
16994
14061
100
2.792
1.924
0.337
0.039
16859
17000
14091
101
2.708
1.920
0.337
0.041
16756
16952
14019
102
2.640
1.921
0.338
0.041
16769
16937
14036
103
2.694
1.926
0.338
0.042
16607
16887
13929
104
2.757
1.927
0.338
0.039
16691
16907
13968
105
2.868
1.927
0.338
0.040
16753
16908
13977
106
3.214
1.929
0.338
0.040
16666
16986
14053
107
3.908
1.930
0.337
0.039
17039
17107
14211
108
4.209
1.932
0.337
0.038
17197
17207
14248
109
3.987
1.937
0.337
0.038
17273
17183
14279
110
3.732
1.933
0.338
0.038
17200
17175
14297
111
3.645
1.930
0.337
0.041
17044
17170
14289
112
3.569
1.929
0.337
0.042
17060
17164
14293
113
3.663
1.930
0.337
0.040
17175
17218
14347
114
3.678
1.934
0.337
0.037
17363
17225
14369
115
3.737
1.941
0.338
0.042
17343
17259
14364
116
3.777
1.939
0.338
0.039
17363
17295
14436
117
4.019
1.943
0.338
0.040
17492
17410
14516
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
43
118
4.330
1.943
0.339
0.039
17734
17453
14541
119
4.745
1.945
0.339
0.038
17814
17456
14566
120
4.792
1.942
0.339
0.039
17804
17472
14598
121
4.332
1.946
0.339
0.040
17822
17442
14577
122
4.010
1.955
0.339
0.036
17960
17461
14582
123
3.858
1.969
0.339
0.037
17859
17460
14606
124
4.154
1.976
0.339
0.038
17951
17488
14584
125
4.603
1.976
0.340
0.038
18002
17579
14654
126
5.192
1.968
0.339
0.038
18089
17673
14762
127
5.240
1.970
0.340
0.038
18251
17686
14816
128
5.214
1.970
0.340
0.038
18207
17672
14792
129
5.133
1.962
0.340
0.037
18191
17656
14798
130
4.753
1.961
0.340
0.037
18230
17663
14829
131
4.806
1.972
0.341
0.036
18291
17707
14868
132
4.763
1.970
0.341
0.036
18188
17686
14849
133
4.514
1.968
0.341
0.037
18291
17630
14794
134
4.340
1.969
0.34
0.038
18035
17600
14786
135
4.685
1.961
0.340
0.036
18171
17576
14783
136
5.425
1.958
0.340
0.037
18054
17586
14788
137
4.275
1.953
0.341
0.038
17481
17347
14568
138
3.534
1.962
0.34
0.036
17628
17270
14463
139
3.149
1.969
0.341
0.039
17549
17288
14516
140
2.763
1.972
0.343
0.041
17158
17121
14377
141
2.468
1.982
0.344
0.044
16961
17075
14288
142
2.591
1.975
0.344
0.042
16931
16992
14224
143
2.600
1.967
0.344
0.038
17049
16907
14097
144
2.563
1.966
0.344
0.042
16835
16892
14079
145
2.675
1.968
0.345
0.045
16717
16836
13991
146
2.716
1.975
0.346
0.044
16643
16752
13913
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
44
147
2.718
1.987
0.347
0.045
16637
16714
13851
148
2.634
1.975
0.347
0.042
16643
16747
13929
149
2.589
1.976
0.347
0.041
16610
16695
13868
150
2.785
1.973
0.348
0.041
16466
16595
13718
151
2.790
1.972
0.349
0.042
16455
16535
13694
152
2.740
1.967
0.349
0.044
16205
16481
13590
153
2.620
1.967
0.349
0.045
16149
16379
13445
154
2.683
1.987
0.350
0.042
16066
16285
13372
155
2.684
1.977
0.350
0.043
16011
16250
13328
156
2.665
1.973
0.350
0.044
16017
16214
13274
157
2.474
1.981
0.349
0.043
16241
16247
13316
158
2.388
1.982
0.349
0.042
15919
16184
13233
159
2.301
1.985
0.349
0.041
15851
16132
13178
160
2.392
1.993
0.350
0.039
15913
16109
13140
161
2.511
2.007
0.351
0.042
15759
16063
13075
162
2.500
2.014
0.351
0.044
15839
16107
13083
163
2.517
2.056
0.351
0.043
15631
15965
12922
164
2.534
2.087
0.352
0.042
15626
15958
12889
165
2.501
2.020
0.351
0.042
15523
15995
12999
166
2.461
2.004
0.351
0.043
15286
16009
13029
167
2.445
2.005
0.352
0.045
15643
16027
13060
168
2.345
1.992
0.352
0.046
15615
15989
13014
169
2.317
2.004
0.351
0.046
15520
15974
13009
170
2.218
2.022
0.352
0.044
15624
15972
12994
171
2.100
2.068
0.352
0.043
15782
15968
12987
172
2.104
2.009
0.352
0.045
15577
15896
12917
173
2.256
2.015
0.352
0.046
15336
15754
12718
174
2.281
2.000
0.353
0.043
15286
15668
12630
175
2.122
2.001
0.352
0.044
15459
15820
12803
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
45
176
2.081
2.010
0.352
0.043
15490
15823
12788
177
2.109
2.017
0.351
0.046
15371
15806
12772
178
2.181
2.012
0.351
0.043
15443
15787
12745
179
2.195
2.007
0.352
0.043
15368
15739
12672
180
2.071
2.075
0.353
0.043
15317
15681
12568
181
1.990
2.013
0.352
0.046
15357
15705
12626
182
1.988
2.003
0.352
0.047
15243
15728
12701
183
1.998
2.003
0.351
0.043
15394
15722
12679
184
2.084
2.038
0.352
0.044
15198
15575
12455
185
2.082
2.031
0.353
0.046
15022
15534
12431
186
1.997
2.010
0.353
0.046
15163
15587
12494
187
1.977
2.006
0.352
0.043
15142
15668
12601
188
1.939
2.008
0.351
0.043
15531
15828
12809
189
1.962
2.007
0.351
0.040
15626
15829
12810
190
2.010
2.009
0.350
0.042
15637
15931
12903
191
2.121
2.009
0.35
0.041
15775
15937
12952
192
2.267
2.014
0.350
0.045
15827
16000
13041
193
2.324
2.021
0.349
0.043
15872
16092
13122
194
2.326
2.037
0.35
0.047
15835
16075
13104
195
2.450
2.056
0.350
0.045
15859
16059
13008
196
2.945
2.048
0.350
0.045
15816
16093
13089
197
3.918
2.032
0.349
0.046
15927
16121
13066
198
4.114
2.032
0.351
0.043
15755
15966
12889
199
4.029
2.038
0.352
0.042
15490
15726
12556
200
3.362
2.030
0.353
0.043
15191
15576
12430
201
2.819
2.018
0.354
0.045
14801
15347
12225
202
2.671
2.013
0.355
0.043
14707
15274
12138
203
2.899
2.013
0.355
0.042
14863
15398
12292
204
2.724
2.004
0.356
0.041
14966
15431
12361
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
46
205
2.510
2.008
0.356
0.043
14858
15299
12197
206
2.399
2.013
0.355
0.043
14675
15229
12093
207
2.292
2.015
0.356
0.046
14588
15161
12041
208
2.262
2.016
0.357
0.044
14143
14887
11627
209
2.288
2.018
0.358
0.043
13953
14689
11424
210
2.261
2.020
0.358
0.043
13740
14559
11217
211
2.228
2.025
0.358
0.041
13845
14578
11275
212
2.153
2.016
0.358
0.043
13952
14641
11340
213
2.143
2.015
0.358
0.044
13984
14684
11382
214
2.140
2.016
0.357
0.044
13990
14685
11408
215
2.115
2.041
0.358
0.045
13845
14596
11293
216
2.156
2.021
0.358
0.043
13817
14561
11272
217
2.180
2.022
0.358
0.043
13944
14627
11344
218
2.208
2.020
0.358
0.043
13799
14511
11212
219
2.179
2.019
0.358
0.045
13590
14405
11072
220
2.142
2.049
0.359
0.044
13621
14351
10978
221
2.210
2.091
0.360
0.041
13363
14195
10758
222
2.249
2.060
0.36
0.044
13261
14247
10833
223
2.364
2.058
0.359
0.042
13326
14176
10752
224
2.574
2.093
0.359
0.040
13585
14346
10931
225
2.622
2.085
0.358
0.043
13935
14627
11239
226
2.841
2.108
0.359
0.048
13573
14377
10908
227
2.726
2.103
0.359
0.045
13449
14317
10814
228
2.517
2.094
0.358
0.045
13653
14431
11002
229
2.704
2.090
0.358
0.045
13850
14528
11155
230
2.514
2.074
0.358
0.045
13718
14458
11076
231
2.527
2.055
0.359
0.040
13691
14421
11078
232
2.848
2.069
0.359
0.042
13807
14485
11127
233
3.215
2.074
0.359
0.047
13650
14470
11058
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
47
234
4.032
2.089
0.357
0.043
14259
14765
11383
235
4.765
2.095
0.357
0.044
14373
14886
11515
236
4.097
2.113
0.359
0.045
13688
14391
10871
237
3.468
2.116
0.359
0.044
13783
14470
10930
238
3.374
2.110
0.358
0.045
13769
14532
10989
239
3.192
2.114
0.358
0.045
13925
14546
11046
240
3.120
2.089
0.359
0.046
13720
14485
10976
241
3.152
2.079
0.359
0.046
13728
14513
10960
242
2.931
2.075
0.360
0.045
13552
14297
10813
243
2.788
2.077
0.360
0.041
13284
14090
10614
244
2.757
2.087
0.361
0.043
12949
13849
10297
245
2.782
2.086
0.361
0.043
13092
13936
10410
246
2.715
2.069
0.361
0.044
12982
13881
10357
247
2.740
2.089
0.361
0.045
12985
13929
10412
248
2.626
2.139
0.361
0.044
12951
13863
10313
249
2.512
2.092
0.362
0.044
12856
13734
10226
250
2.438
2.079
0.362
0.045
12558
13630
10073
251
2.410
2.069
0.362
0.046
12661
13602
10059
252
2.544
2.076
0.362
0.043
12790
13683
10149
253
2.630
2.086
0.361
0.043
12870
13744
10231
254
2.329
2.079
0.362
0.042
12865
13778
10275
255
2.112
2.070
0.363
0.046
12893
13828
10367
256
2.178
2.122
0.364
0.045
12794
13751
10239
257
2.219
2.141
0.364
0.045
12569
13603
10026
258
2.263
2.140
0.364
0.044
12557
13510
9899
259
2.280
2.143
0.365
0.041
12498
13433
9781
260
2.311
2.121
0.364
0.044
12205
13272
9610
261
2.312
2.140
0.364
0.043
12269
13371
9708
262
2.307
2.119
0.363
0.046
12562
13547
9968
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
48
263
2.408
2.136
0.363
0.046
12634
13636
10045
264
2.428
2.117
0.363
0.044
12641
13653
10058
265
2.341
2.106
0.363
0.047
12588
13570
9989
266
2.397
2.106
0.363
0.043
12487
13514
9949
267
2.384
2.107
0.364
0.043
12391
13346
9730
268
2.360
2.175
0.365
0.044
12243
13283
9606
269
2.329
2.169
0.365
0.044
12164
13216
9527
270
2.307
2.157
0.365
0.044
12283
13254
9605
271
2.302
2.186
0.365
0.043
12212
13306
9634
272
2.268
2.221
0.365
0.043
12323
13385
9730
273
2.429
2.577
0.368
0.042
12594
13592
9846
274
2.946
2.434
0.367
0.044
12772
13717
10019
275
2.842
2.269
0.366
0.046
12649
13568
9906
276
2.790
2.219
0.366
0.045
12538
13541
9915
277
2.745
2.234
0.366
0.043
12566
13528
9841
278
2.668
2.369
0.367
0.044
12464
13507
9770
279
2.589
2.419
0.367
0.044
12529
13544
9826
280
2.530
2.421
0.367
0.042
12664
13586
9912
281
2.546
2.475
0.367
0.042
12605
13598
9877
282
2.554
2.440
0.367
0.040
12676
13561
9847
283
2.531
2.403
0.367
0.039
12417
13419
9687
284
2.537
2.368
0.367
0.043
12220
13311
9598
285
2.554
2.662
0.370
0.043
12159
13326
9484
286
2.574
2.610
0.370
0.040
12273
13376
9514
287
2.592
2.680
0.371
0.041
12147
13304
9342
288
2.634
2.701
0.371
0.043
12453
13503
9624
289
2.759
2.664
0.370
0.044
12517
13533
9629
290
2.769
2.647
0.370
0.055
11491
13614
9759
291
2.804
2.698
0.371
0.060
11015
13464
9460
CLS
Single
Level
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
49
292
2.880
2.765
0.372
0.015
12459
13458
9305
293
3.004
2.837
0.372
0.007
12428
13492
9270
294
3.054
2.725
0.370
0.005
12651
13627
9653
295
2.848
2.550
0.368
0.003
12902
13821
10017
296
2.798
2.578
0.368
0.002
13053
13920
10146
297
2.817
2.510
0.367
0.002
13039
13929
10169
298
2.784
2.460
0.367
0.001
13211
13960
10279
299
2.783
2.424
0.366
0.002
13280
14036
10406
300
2.929
2.526
0.367
0.001
13631
14255
10651
301
2.920
2.524
0.366
0.000
13783
14414
10804
302
2.844
2.453
0.366
0.000
14028
14542
11020
303
2.847
2.413
0.37
0.001
14195
14697
11237
304
2.968
2.429
0.375
0.000
14398
14770
11343
305
3.053
2.434
0.376
0.000
14394
14823
11347
306
3.133
2.446
0.378
0.000
14543
14879
11412
avg
2.680
2.058
0.35
0.040
15531
15841
12719
std
0.703
0.182
0.011
0.009
1859
1402
1727
B­
50
Attachment
3
Concentration
Data
from
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
Reference
Spectra
B­
51
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

2
2.364
2.295
0.355
0.047
15684
17435
13145
3
2.247
2.25
0.353
0.046
15897
17636
13343
4
2.172
2.200
0.352
0.043
15881
17743
13474
5
2.158
2.285
0.353
0.042
16189
17925
13597
6
2.209
2.226
0.352
0.040
16048
17873
13606
7
2.252
2.211
0.352
0.039
16226
17876
13590
8
2.321
2.253
0.353
0.040
16141
17892
13558
9
2.489
2.198
0.352
0.044
16247
17982
13634
10
2.554
2.193
0.351
0.040
16365
17953
13601
11
2.621
2.210
0.350
0.039
16341
17905
13566
12
2.537
2.216
0.349
0.038
16208
17936
13589
13
2.411
2.162
0.349
0.042
16344
18116
13782
14
2.367
2.209
0.349
0.043
16463
18155
13768
15
2.355
2.223
0.349
0.042
16534
18177
13761
16
2.332
2.163
0.347
0.041
16505
18173
13822
17
2.318
2.165
0.347
0.044
16423
18188
13864
18
2.319
2.153
0.346
0.042
16568
18275
13914
19
2.294
2.145
0.345
0.040
16659
18300
13991
20
2.358
2.138
0.344
0.042
16714
18403
13986
21
2.353
2.150
0.344
0.044
16709
18512
14006
22
2.246
2.142
0.343
0.041
16705
18379
13960
23
2.188
2.127
0.342
0.043
16792
18660
14041
24
2.244
2.122
0.341
0.043
16971
18789
14110
25
2.212
2.103
0.341
0.039
17142
18936
14190
26
2.085
2.064
0.339
0.040
17046
18799
14062
27
2.056
2.055
0.338
0.039
16924
18528
13982
28
2.048
2.040
0.338
0.039
16868
18480
13987
29
2.171
2.047
0.339
0.033
16921
18528
14013
30
2.126
2.052
0.337
0.042
16964
18565
14025
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
52
31
2.153
2.040
0.338
0.035
16804
18224
13781
32
2.218
2.031
0.337
0.038
16839
18453
13975
33
2.061
1.995
0.337
0.038
16796
18306
13839
34
2.089
1.991
0.337
0.039
16654
18118
13663
35
2.056
1.997
0.338
0.028
16662
18118
13629
36
1.931
1.991
0.339
0.030
16480
17936
13516
37
1.970
1.995
0.338
0.033
16547
18114
13694
38
1.998
2.021
0.338
0.030
16869
18308
13838
39
1.967
2.034
0.338
0.032
16848
18359
13881
40
2.008
2.048
0.338
0.032
16891
18342
13896
41
1.885
1.987
0.338
0.029
16563
18029
13596
42
1.944
1.986
0.338
0.032
16647
18160
13775
43
1.965
2.019
0.337
0.038
16746
18250
13801
44
2.133
1.992
0.337
0.036
16831
18427
13980
45
2.145
2.028
0.337
0.032
17001
18577
14041
46
2.494
2.036
0.336
0.039
17036
18713
14042
47
2.406
2.028
0.336
0.042
16768
18339
13857
48
2.279
2.020
0.336
0.039
16605
18170
13671
49
2.218
1.996
0.337
0.039
16412
17956
13493
50
2.242
1.998
0.336
0.037
16767
18148
13666
51
2.235
2.027
0.337
0.029
16720
18226
13748
52
2.123
2.023
0.337
0.033
17052
18691
14056
53
2.089
2.031
0.336
0.037
16939
18589
14053
54
2.022
2.040
0.337
0.038
16773
18318
13861
55
2.092
2.031
0.336
0.038
16825
18360
13912
56
2.070
1.998
0.336
0.035
16856
18383
13924
57
2.054
2.029
0.335
0.039
16792
18433
13989
58
2.073
1.997
0.335
0.034
16927
18403
13937
59
2.125
2.037
0.336
0.034
16916
18441
13914
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
53
60
2.323
2.032
0.335
0.037
16882
18469
13956
61
2.089
2.036
0.335
0.038
16820
18719
14088
62
2.035
2.041
0.337
0.037
17012
18829
14134
63
2.282
2.031
0.335
0.030
17079
18611
13994
64
2.317
2.053
0.335
0.034
17082
18540
13945
65
2.216
2.000
0.334
0.037
16900
18315
13784
66
2.340
2.023
0.334
0.039
16795
18295
13721
67
2.431
2.028
0.335
0.034
16680
18172
13647
68
2.285
2.050
0.335
0.035
16469
17983
13438
69
2.264
2.027
0.334
0.039
16528
17996
13493
70
2.279
2.018
0.335
0.040
16444
18015
13483
71
2.451
2.027
0.335
0.040
16634
18120
13585
72
2.428
2.029
0.335
0.033
16710
18080
13590
73
2.306
2.020
0.335
0.036
16555
18048
13538
74
2.317
1.997
0.335
0.035
16868
18251
13773
75
2.390
2.000
0.335
0.037
16742
18063
13564
76
2.362
2.021
0.335
0.036
16857
18286
13777
77
2.444
2.047
0.335
0.033
17034
18672
13985
78
2.510
2.020
0.335
0.035
16820
18351
13848
79
2.386
2.028
0.335
0.038
16523
18079
13547
80
2.324
2.077
0.336
0.037
16733
18242
13696
81
2.263
2.031
0.335
0.038
16508
18014
13480
82
2.260
2.038
0.335
0.038
16473
17969
13478
83
2.229
2.028
0.335
0.035
16719
18061
13531
84
2.376
2.026
0.335
0.035
16988
18469
13923
85
2.408
2.022
0.335
0.035
16905
18301
13786
86
2.186
2.027
0.335
0.038
16654
18129
13535
87
2.294
2.023
0.335
0.031
16801
18144
13581
88
2.126
2.023
0.335
0.029
16850
18196
13630
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
54
89
2.068
2.026
0.335
0.028
16754
18232
13697
90
2.219
2.031
0.335
0.036
16662
18046
13476
91
2.454
2.038
0.336
0.035
16624
18062
13477
92
2.532
2.022
0.336
0.037
16719
18113
13553
93
2.620
2.028
0.335
0.036
16740
18146
13632
94
2.920
2.027
0.335
0.038
17026
18306
13745
95
3.115
2.025
0.336
0.038
16736
18218
13683
96
3.294
2.027
0.335
0.038
16882
18322
13773
97
2.968
2.026
0.335
0.040
16785
18235
13720
98
2.566
2.032
0.335
0.040
16748
18179
13646
99
2.653
2.030
0.336
0.037
16931
18269
13736
100
2.783
2.030
0.336
0.037
16830
18279
13764
101
2.696
2.025
0.335
0.039
16774
18208
13687
102
2.624
2.026
0.336
0.039
16813
18186
13703
103
2.680
2.032
0.336
0.040
16687
18111
13584
104
2.746
2.033
0.336
0.037
16665
18141
13629
105
2.861
2.033
0.336
0.038
16770
18142
13635
106
3.219
2.035
0.336
0.038
16679
18258
13719
107
3.945
2.037
0.336
0.037
16996
18482
13873
108
4.260
2.055
0.337
0.036
17141
18792
13915
109
4.028
2.043
0.336
0.036
17163
18718
13949
110
3.761
2.039
0.336
0.036
17108
18692
13968
111
3.669
2.036
0.336
0.038
17035
18677
13962
112
3.589
2.035
0.336
0.039
17090
18658
13967
113
3.689
2.053
0.337
0.038
17143
18826
14023
114
3.703
2.057
0.337
0.035
17243
18848
14050
115
3.766
2.064
0.338
0.040
17338
18956
14037
116
3.808
2.062
0.338
0.036
17245
19069
14113
117
4.061
2.067
0.338
0.038
17400
19269
14202
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
55
118
4.386
2.067
0.338
0.037
17563
19335
14222
119
4.824
2.069
0.338
0.035
17648
19339
14248
120
4.874
2.067
0.339
0.036
17661
19364
14280
121
4.388
2.070
0.338
0.037
17635
19318
14260
122
4.052
2.080
0.339
0.034
17749
19347
14270
123
3.892
2.094
0.339
0.034
17627
19346
14299
124
4.202
2.102
0.339
0.036
17658
19389
14281
125
4.674
2.102
0.339
0.036
17758
19530
14351
126
5.284
2.093
0.339
0.036
17772
19677
14463
127
5.333
2.096
0.340
0.035
18045
19696
14517
128
5.307
2.096
0.340
0.035
17935
19675
14489
129
5.225
2.088
0.340
0.035
17868
19650
14493
130
4.833
2.087
0.340
0.034
17877
19662
14530
131
4.889
2.098
0.340
0.034
17982
19730
14567
132
4.842
2.096
0.341
0.033
17906
19697
14545
133
4.581
2.094
0.341
0.034
17956
19609
14489
134
4.397
2.094
0.340
0.036
17758
19562
14478
135
4.761
2.086
0.340
0.033
17843
19526
14478
136
5.522
2.083
0.340
0.034
17778
19541
14475
137
4.329
2.078
0.340
0.036
17174
19170
14251
138
3.552
2.087
0.340
0.034
17287
18991
14144
139
3.151
2.094
0.341
0.037
17303
19048
14215
140
2.753
2.080
0.342
0.039
16889
18525
14072
141
2.448
2.091
0.343
0.041
16778
18390
13968
142
2.574
2.084
0.343
0.039
16676
18267
13908
143
2.584
2.075
0.343
0.036
16637
18141
13763
144
2.546
2.074
0.343
0.040
16551
18118
13739
145
2.661
2.076
0.344
0.043
16555
18036
13647
146
2.703
2.083
0.345
0.042
16444
17912
13566
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
56
147
2.705
2.096
0.346
0.043
16417
17857
13498
148
2.618
2.083
0.346
0.040
16377
17905
13583
149
2.571
2.084
0.346
0.039
16260
17829
13507
150
2.774
2.081
0.348
0.039
16152
17683
13362
151
2.779
2.080
0.348
0.040
16142
17596
13335
152
2.728
2.075
0.348
0.042
15929
17517
13226
153
2.604
2.075
0.348
0.043
15819
17365
13075
154
2.668
2.096
0.349
0.040
15755
17228
12995
155
2.670
2.085
0.349
0.041
15694
17177
12950
156
2.650
2.081
0.349
0.042
15678
17124
12895
157
2.454
2.089
0.348
0.041
15857
17173
12924
158
2.366
2.090
0.348
0.040
15583
17079
12839
159
2.278
2.093
0.349
0.039
15484
17004
12783
160
2.371
2.101
0.349
0.037
15480
16970
12744
161
2.492
2.116
0.350
0.040
15360
16903
12673
162
2.481
2.124
0.349
0.042
15493
16967
12684
163
2.498
2.168
0.348
0.041
15224
16761
12519
164
2.515
2.200
0.349
0.040
15199
16750
12481
165
2.482
2.130
0.349
0.040
15067
16804
12594
166
2.441
2.113
0.349
0.041
14864
16825
12626
167
2.424
2.114
0.350
0.043
15255
16850
12653
168
2.323
2.100
0.349
0.044
15219
16796
12607
169
2.295
2.113
0.349
0.044
15076
16773
12605
170
2.194
2.132
0.349
0.042
15211
16770
12587
171
2.075
2.180
0.349
0.041
15348
16765
12581
172
2.080
2.118
0.349
0.043
15169
16661
12509
173
2.232
2.125
0.350
0.044
14929
16315
12303
174
2.258
2.092
0.350
0.041
14820
16072
12208
175
2.097
2.110
0.350
0.042
15067
16504
12391
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
57
176
2.056
2.120
0.349
0.041
15063
16515
12377
177
2.084
2.127
0.349
0.044
14954
16465
12358
178
2.156
2.121
0.350
0.041
14992
16411
12332
179
2.171
2.100
0.350
0.041
14904
16273
12255
180
2.046
2.171
0.350
0.041
14855
16109
12150
181
1.964
2.106
0.350
0.044
14908
16177
12210
182
1.962
2.096
0.350
0.045
14793
16243
12280
183
1.973
2.095
0.349
0.041
14897
16226
12262
184
2.059
2.133
0.349
0.043
14738
15862
12031
185
2.056
2.125
0.350
0.044
14561
15805
12000
186
1.972
2.102
0.349
0.044
14699
15877
12066
187
1.951
2.098
0.349
0.041
14671
16072
12179
188
1.913
2.117
0.349
0.041
15052
16527
12396
189
1.937
2.116
0.349
0.038
15075
16529
12393
190
1.985
2.118
0.349
0.040
15188
16712
12494
191
2.097
2.118
0.350
0.039
15212
16720
12541
192
2.243
2.124
0.349
0.043
15322
16812
12630
193
2.301
2.131
0.349
0.041
15391
16945
12713
194
2.303
2.148
0.349
0.045
15368
16920
12692
195
2.429
2.168
0.349
0.043
15336
16895
12592
196
2.940
2.160
0.349
0.043
15308
16946
12684
197
3.955
2.143
0.349
0.044
15450
16987
12644
198
4.159
2.143
0.348
0.041
15236
16762
12454
199
4.071
2.133
0.349
0.040
14940
16237
12113
200
3.372
2.124
0.350
0.041
14671
15862
12001
201
2.810
2.111
0.352
0.043
14306
15547
11793
202
2.657
2.106
0.353
0.042
14182
15446
11706
203
2.892
2.106
0.353
0.041
14210
15617
11861
204
2.711
2.096
0.354
0.039
14409
15662
11935
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
58
205
2.491
2.101
0.354
0.042
14295
15481
11752
206
2.377
2.106
0.353
0.041
14069
15385
11648
207
2.269
2.109
0.354
0.044
14063
15292
11590
208
2.238
2.109
0.355
0.042
13633
14918
11158
209
2.265
2.112
0.356
0.042
13382
14643
10949
210
2.237
2.114
0.356
0.042
13213
14465
10739
211
2.204
2.118
0.356
0.040
13227
14491
10798
212
2.129
2.109
0.356
0.042
13334
14577
10861
213
2.118
2.108
0.355
0.043
13429
14637
10906
214
2.115
2.109
0.355
0.042
13404
14638
10934
215
2.090
2.136
0.356
0.043
13330
14516
10818
216
2.132
2.115
0.356
0.042
13253
14468
10794
217
2.156
2.116
0.356
0.041
13367
14558
10871
218
2.183
2.114
0.356
0.042
13215
14398
10733
219
2.155
2.112
0.356
0.044
13106
14254
10591
220
2.118
2.143
0.357
0.042
13088
14181
10497
221
2.185
2.188
0.358
0.040
12785
13845
10272
222
2.226
2.155
0.357
0.042
12681
13986
10346
223
2.342
2.154
0.357
0.040
12802
13797
10264
224
2.557
2.190
0.357
0.039
12942
14173
10445
225
2.606
2.182
0.356
0.042
13357
14558
10773
226
2.832
2.206
0.357
0.046
13095
14215
10435
227
2.713
2.201
0.357
0.044
12971
14134
10344
228
2.498
2.191
0.356
0.043
13130
14289
10521
229
2.691
2.187
0.356
0.044
13248
14421
10687
230
2.495
2.171
0.356
0.043
13082
14326
10592
231
2.508
2.151
0.357
0.038
13057
14275
10591
232
2.839
2.165
0.357
0.040
13177
14363
10657
233
3.220
2.170
0.356
0.046
12987
14342
10583
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
59
234
4.074
2.185
0.355
0.042
13493
14748
10896
235
4.844
2.192
0.355
0.042
13626
14915
11025
236
4.142
2.211
0.357
0.043
13038
14234
10375
237
3.482
2.214
0.356
0.042
13073
14343
10457
238
3.384
2.208
0.356
0.043
13180
14427
10520
239
3.196
2.212
0.356
0.043
13253
14447
10576
240
3.121
2.186
0.356
0.044
13129
14363
10510
241
3.154
2.175
0.357
0.044
13103
14401
10497
242
2.924
2.171
0.358
0.043
12882
14107
10341
243
2.778
2.156
0.357
0.040
12667
13571
10138
244
2.745
2.167
0.358
0.041
12294
13181
9827
245
2.771
2.165
0.358
0.042
12419
13292
9936
246
2.703
2.148
0.358
0.043
12399
13221
9878
247
2.728
2.169
0.358
0.044
12342
13283
9930
248
2.610
2.221
0.358
0.043
12387
13198
9839
249
2.493
2.172
0.359
0.042
12162
13033
9742
250
2.418
2.158
0.359
0.044
11968
12900
9593
251
2.389
2.148
0.359
0.044
11912
12865
9580
252
2.526
2.155
0.359
0.042
12021
12968
9664
253
2.615
2.165
0.358
0.042
12223
13046
9754
254
2.307
2.158
0.359
0.041
12178
13090
9789
255
2.087
2.149
0.360
0.045
12246
13154
9876
256
2.154
2.203
0.361
0.043
12229
13055
9755
257
2.195
2.223
0.361
0.043
11977
12866
9551
258
2.240
2.223
0.361
0.043
11817
12749
9429
259
2.257
2.226
0.361
0.039
11784
12651
9316
260
2.289
2.202
0.361
0.043
11553
12446
9154
261
2.289
2.222
0.361
0.042
11639
12573
9246
262
2.284
2.200
0.360
0.045
11899
12795
9495
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
60
263
2.387
2.218
0.360
0.045
11959
12908
9568
264
2.408
2.198
0.360
0.043
12038
12929
9582
265
2.319
2.187
0.360
0.046
11871
12824
9513
266
2.376
2.187
0.360
0.042
11809
12753
9476
267
2.363
2.188
0.361
0.042
11673
12540
9267
268
2.338
2.259
0.362
0.043
11586
12460
9152
269
2.307
2.253
0.362
0.042
11563
12374
9074
270
2.284
2.240
0.362
0.043
11592
12423
9150
271
2.279
2.270
0.362
0.041
11629
12491
9179
272
2.245
2.307
0.362
0.041
11632
12590
9267
273
2.408
2.680
0.364
0.041
11889
12853
9386
274
2.941
2.531
0.364
0.042
12113
13012
9558
275
2.834
2.357
0.363
0.044
11887
12822
9444
276
2.780
2.305
0.363
0.043
11873
12788
9451
277
2.733
2.320
0.362
0.042
11846
12771
9386
278
2.654
2.463
0.363
0.043
11713
12744
9318
279
2.572
2.514
0.364
0.042
11838
12791
9361
280
2.511
2.517
0.364
0.040
12011
12846
9444
281
2.528
2.573
0.364
0.041
11894
12860
9410
282
2.536
2.537
0.363
0.039
11833
12814
9381
283
2.513
2.498
0.364
0.037
11665
12633
9228
284
2.519
2.462
0.364
0.042
11511
12497
9142
285
2.535
2.769
0.367
0.042
11447
12518
9037
286
2.556
2.715
0.366
0.039
11597
12580
9070
287
2.574
2.789
0.367
0.040
11457
12489
8921
288
2.617
2.810
0.367
0.042
11696
12741
9190
289
2.746
2.772
0.367
0.042
11756
12778
9200
290
2.757
2.754
0.366
0.054
11023
12881
9322
291
2.792
2.808
0.367
0.059
10623
12692
9046
CLS
Multilevel
Calibration
Using
Etrans
1.462
cm­
1
Reference
Spectra
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O(
1)
H2O(
2)
H2O(
3)

B­
61
292
2.870
2.877
0.368
0.013
11605
12684
8907
293
2.997
2.953
0.368
0.006
11629
12727
8881
294
3.051
2.835
0.367
0.003
11797
12898
9226
295
2.838
2.652
0.365
0.002
12090
13146
9564
296
2.788
2.681
0.365
0.001
12221
13272
9685
297
2.807
2.610
0.364
0.000
12257
13284
9709
298
2.773
2.557
0.363
0.000
12322
13324
9808
299
2.772
2.520
0.363
0.000
12475
13430
9926
300
2.923
2.626
0.363
0.000
12707
14006
10171
301
2.914
2.624
0.363
0.000
12872
14265
10323
302
2.836
2.567
0.363
0.000
13065
14439
10543
303
2.839
2.526
0.368
0.000
13233
14653
10766
304
2.963
2.543
0.372
0.000
13306
14754
10874
305
3.052
2.547
0.374
0.000
13420
14827
10877
306
3.134
2.561
0.376
0.000
13500
14904
10943
Avg
2.671
2.161
0.348
0.038
15095
16492
12328
Std
0.729
0.181
0.010
0.009
2035
2270
1784
B­
62
Attachment
4
Concentration
Data
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
B­
63
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
2
2.527
2.401
0.397
0.051
10684
520.1
0.52
1.486
3
2.404
2.344
0.396
0.050
10724
515.3
0.51
1.481
4
2.323
2.285
0.398
0.047
10902
510.9
0.51
1.487
5
2.306
2.399
0.399
0.046
10969
510.9
0.51
1.485
6
2.348
2.316
0.398
0.044
10894
509.1
0.51
1.483
7
2.393
2.295
0.397
0.043
10879
509.1
0.51
1.482
8
2.448
2.339
0.393
0.044
10684
509.7
0.51
1.475
9
2.612
2.269
0.393
0.047
10719
510.5
0.51
1.473
10
2.685
2.255
0.390
0.043
10546
510.0
0.52
1.466
11
2.746
2.268
0.388
0.043
10467
509.2
0.52
1.463
12
2.661
2.274
0.388
0.042
10464
509.5
0.52
1.462
13
2.520
2.202
0.387
0.046
10566
509.5
0.52
1.461
14
2.470
2.261
0.387
0.047
10552
509.9
0.52
1.460
15
2.451
2.278
0.385
0.046
10534
510.1
0.52
1.459
16
2.440
2.209
0.386
0.045
10527
510.0
0.51
1.459
17
2.417
2.212
0.384
0.048
10516
510.4
0.51
1.459
18
2.412
2.193
0.383
0.045
10525
510.4
0.51
1.458
19
2.383
2.186
0.383
0.044
10516
510.4
0.51
1.458
20
2.444
2.176
0.382
0.046
10546
510.0
0.51
1.458
21
2.431
2.188
0.382
0.048
10525
510.7
0.51
1.457
22
2.327
2.184
0.382
0.045
10490
510.0
0.51
1.457
23
2.258
2.160
0.381
0.047
10521
515.5
0.52
1.456
24
2.313
2.158
0.379
0.047
10535
529.3
0.52
1.455
25
2.276
2.112
0.379
0.043
10547
511.4
0.52
1.456
26
2.149
2.087
0.380
0.044
10485
501.1
0.52
1.455
27
2.108
2.071
0.379
0.043
10352
500.4
0.52
1.453
28
2.103
2.050
0.378
0.043
10347
499.0
0.52
1.454
29
2.215
2.062
0.378
0.036
10349
505.3
0.52
1.455
30
2.161
2.064
0.378
0.045
10297
498.2
0.51
1.453
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
64
31
2.199
2.050
0.378
0.039
10178
495.2
0.51
1.455
32
2.256
2.040
0.377
0.041
10256
495.9
0.51
1.454
33
2.096
2.024
0.379
0.041
10140
494.6
0.51
1.453
34
2.118
2.013
0.377
0.043
10032
494.2
0.51
1.453
35
2.097
2.024
0.378
0.031
10069
494.1
0.51
1.454
36
1.974
2.013
0.378
0.033
9997
494.1
0.52
1.453
37
2.010
2.014
0.377
0.037
10087
494.5
0.52
1.453
38
2.036
2.028
0.377
0.034
10191
497.4
0.51
1.453
39
2.003
2.039
0.377
0.036
10206
495.4
0.52
1.453
40
2.049
2.056
0.377
0.036
10194
491.1
0.51
1.453
41
1.923
2.012
0.377
0.032
10040
492.3
0.51
1.453
42
1.982
2.010
0.377
0.035
10100
490.9
0.51
1.454
43
1.996
2.027
0.376
0.041
10130
493.3
0.51
1.455
44
2.168
2.027
0.378
0.039
10214
492.9
0.51
1.454
45
2.181
2.046
0.378
0.035
10291
494.1
0.51
1.455
46
2.510
2.054
0.377
0.043
10246
497.4
0.51
1.454
47
2.418
2.049
0.377
0.045
10076
493.6
0.51
1.453
48
2.292
2.031
0.376
0.042
9955
493.2
0.51
1.453
49
2.233
2.023
0.377
0.042
9851
492.2
0.51
1.452
50
2.254
2.021
0.376
0.041
9958
492.4
0.51
1.451
51
2.259
2.032
0.376
0.033
10073
491.3
0.51
1.451
52
2.152
2.033
0.377
0.036
10263
491.2
0.51
1.451
53
2.105
2.035
0.376
0.041
10226
491.0
0.51
1.451
54
2.051
2.049
0.376
0.041
10107
490.7
0.51
1.450
55
2.114
2.042
0.376
0.041
10127
490.3
0.51
1.450
56
2.086
2.026
0.376
0.038
10103
492.7
0.51
1.451
57
2.043
2.041
0.376
0.043
10114
494.1
0.51
1.451
58
2.062
2.030
0.376
0.037
10066
495.6
0.51
1.449
59
2.121
2.053
0.376
0.037
10071
496.1
0.51
1.449
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
65
60
2.289
2.038
0.375
0.040
10082
494.7
0.51
1.449
61
2.051
2.054
0.376
0.041
10150
492.4
0.51
1.449
62
2.022
2.038
0.376
0.040
10207
491.5
0.51
1.450
63
2.277
2.041
0.376
0.034
10113
491.2
0.51
1.449
64
2.301
2.065
0.376
0.038
10033
491.5
0.51
1.449
65
2.207
2.025
0.375
0.041
9912
491.3
0.51
1.448
66
2.314
2.022
0.374
0.043
9864
491.8
0.51
1.446
67
2.406
2.035
0.375
0.038
9780
492.9
0.51
1.446
68
2.264
2.057
0.374
0.039
9668
494.8
0.51
1.445
69
2.240
2.030
0.374
0.043
9665
492.5
0.51
1.447
70
2.263
2.020
0.374
0.043
9682
491.7
0.51
1.447
71
2.426
2.032
0.374
0.043
9749
492.2
0.51
1.447
72
2.400
2.036
0.374
0.037
9751
491.8
0.51
1.448
73
2.283
2.023
0.375
0.039
9729
491.4
0.51
1.449
74
2.295
2.015
0.375
0.038
9861
491.5
0.51
1.449
75
2.370
2.021
0.375
0.041
9754
490.8
0.51
1.449
76
2.345
2.026
0.374
0.040
9888
491.2
0.51
1.448
77
2.426
2.061
0.375
0.037
10034
491.3
0.51
1.448
78
2.485
2.020
0.374
0.038
9895
491.4
0.51
1.446
79
2.368
2.029
0.373
0.041
9734
491.3
0.51
1.446
80
2.306
2.089
0.374
0.041
9813
491.2
0.51
1.446
81
2.245
2.034
0.374
0.041
9683
491.7
0.51
1.447
82
2.243
2.046
0.374
0.042
9652
492.2
0.51
1.449
83
2.214
2.033
0.374
0.038
9725
491.4
0.51
1.449
84
2.350
2.033
0.375
0.038
9929
491.7
0.51
1.448
85
2.377
2.026
0.374
0.039
9817
491.8
0.51
1.448
86
2.158
2.034
0.374
0.041
9668
492.0
0.51
1.447
87
2.263
2.024
0.374
0.034
9700
491.7
0.51
1.447
88
2.109
2.029
0.374
0.032
9782
491.9
0.51
1.449
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
66
89
2.044
2.027
0.375
0.031
9808
491.7
0.51
1.448
90
2.200
2.036
0.374
0.039
9683
491.9
0.51
1.449
91
2.428
2.043
0.374
0.038
9698
493.5
0.51
1.449
92
2.500
2.024
0.374
0.041
9749
493.7
0.51
1.448
93
2.590
2.032
0.374
0.040
9768
491.9
0.51
1.448
94
2.879
2.018
0.373
0.042
9874
493.0
0.51
1.447
95
3.074
2.026
0.374
0.041
9834
492.9
0.51
1.449
96
3.243
2.032
0.374
0.041
9890
493.2
0.51
1.449
97
2.924
2.025
0.374
0.043
9831
492.3
0.51
1.448
98
2.534
2.034
0.373
0.044
9773
491.5
0.51
1.448
99
2.621
2.042
0.376
0.041
9848
491.4
0.51
1.449
100
2.751
2.036
0.375
0.041
9864
491.7
0.51
1.450
101
2.656
2.031
0.375
0.043
9809
492.2
0.51
1.449
102
2.594
2.026
0.375
0.043
9816
491.6
0.51
1.449
103
2.650
2.029
0.374
0.044
9768
491.4
0.51
1.448
104
2.705
2.030
0.374
0.041
9779
491.5
0.51
1.447
105
2.814
2.033
0.374
0.042
9781
491.7
0.51
1.447
106
3.169
2.033
0.374
0.042
9856
492.7
0.51
1.447
107
3.879
2.040
0.374
0.040
9974
495.0
0.51
1.448
108
4.201
2.048
0.375
0.040
10073
496.4
0.51
1.449
109
3.975
2.049
0.375
0.040
10058
496.1
0.51
1.450
110
3.718
2.049
0.376
0.040
10066
495.5
0.51
1.450
111
3.624
2.046
0.375
0.042
10079
494.8
0.51
1.450
112
3.550
2.044
0.374
0.043
10081
494.3
0.51
1.451
113
3.643
2.045
0.375
0.041
10126
494.8
0.51
1.450
114
3.660
2.052
0.376
0.039
10154
494.5
0.51
1.451
115
3.731
2.060
0.376
0.044
10195
495.2
0.51
1.451
116
3.780
2.058
0.377
0.040
10249
496.5
0.52
1.452
117
4.032
2.065
0.377
0.042
10354
498.4
0.51
1.451
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
67
118
4.357
2.065
0.377
0.041
10410
499.6
0.51
1.451
119
4.803
2.068
0.378
0.039
10431
500.4
0.52
1.452
120
4.868
2.068
0.378
0.040
10456
500.7
0.52
1.452
121
4.382
2.070
0.377
0.041
10437
500.3
0.52
1.452
122
4.041
2.086
0.377
0.038
10475
501.6
0.51
1.453
123
3.875
2.104
0.378
0.038
10467
502.5
0.51
1.453
124
4.182
2.111
0.378
0.040
10507
504.6
0.51
1.453
125
4.663
2.107
0.377
0.040
10615
504.7
0.51
1.453
126
5.318
2.105
0.379
0.040
10714
504.7
0.51
1.454
127
5.381
2.106
0.379
0.039
10737
504.2
0.51
1.454
128
5.358
2.109
0.380
0.039
10732
504.3
0.51
1.454
129
5.273
2.099
0.380
0.039
10737
504.5
0.52
1.454
130
4.871
2.097
0.379
0.038
10751
503.3
0.51
1.454
131
4.937
2.107
0.380
0.038
10799
503.7
0.52
1.454
132
4.882
2.102
0.379
0.037
10792
503.8
0.52
1.454
133
4.632
2.103
0.379
0.038
10759
503.8
0.52
1.455
134
4.437
2.104
0.379
0.040
10722
503.5
0.52
1.455
135
4.813
2.092
0.379
0.037
10723
503.9
0.51
1.455
136
5.625
2.089
0.379
0.038
10747
504.1
0.51
1.456
137
4.341
2.082
0.378
0.040
10527
499.1
0.51
1.457
138
3.573
2.089
0.377
0.037
10420
495.6
0.51
1.456
139
3.181
2.097
0.378
0.041
10452
493.9
0.51
1.456
140
2.792
2.096
0.377
0.043
10381
497.1
0.51
1.457
141
2.503
2.114
0.379
0.045
10377
504.2
0.51
1.456
142
2.631
2.098
0.379
0.043
10315
501.5
0.52
1.456
143
2.639
2.091
0.379
0.039
10227
500.2
0.52
1.457
144
2.593
2.090
0.378
0.043
10217
501.6
0.52
1.456
145
2.726
2.091
0.378
0.047
10204
506.8
0.52
1.457
146
2.767
2.101
0.379
0.046
10150
513.1
0.51
1.457
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
68
147
2.770
2.111
0.378
0.046
10140
516.4
0.52
1.458
148
2.686
2.108
0.379
0.044
10181
518.5
0.51
1.459
149
2.641
2.108
0.379
0.042
10160
522.4
0.51
1.460
150
2.851
2.097
0.379
0.042
10102
535.6
0.51
1.460
151
2.857
2.091
0.379
0.043
10075
536.3
0.51
1.461
152
2.813
2.095
0.379
0.046
10022
533.9
0.51
1.461
153
2.680
2.091
0.379
0.046
9923
525.5
0.51
1.461
154
2.749
2.115
0.380
0.044
9860
533.2
0.51
1.462
155
2.749
2.102
0.380
0.045
9846
532.7
0.52
1.461
156
2.738
2.093
0.380
0.045
9836
530.1
0.52
1.462
157
2.547
2.103
0.380
0.044
9872
514.4
0.52
1.463
158
2.463
2.099
0.380
0.043
9817
512.3
0.52
1.462
159
2.366
2.103
0.380
0.043
9773
510.1
0.52
1.462
160
2.468
2.114
0.380
0.041
9762
520.2
0.52
1.461
161
2.579
2.128
0.379
0.044
9736
532.1
0.52
1.463
162
2.577
2.149
0.380
0.045
9748
535.4
0.51
1.461
163
2.595
2.198
0.379
0.045
9648
538.0
0.51
1.463
164
2.609
2.239
0.380
0.044
9654
534.9
0.52
1.462
165
2.582
2.148
0.380
0.043
9706
525.5
0.52
1.462
166
2.542
2.132
0.380
0.045
9738
534.9
0.52
1.463
167
2.521
2.139
0.382
0.047
9767
539.0
0.52
1.463
168
2.425
2.117
0.381
0.047
9738
532.2
0.52
1.463
169
2.403
2.134
0.381
0.047
9727
529.4
0.52
1.463
170
2.297
2.153
0.381
0.045
9728
524.3
0.52
1.463
171
2.168
2.216
0.381
0.044
9718
530.1
0.52
1.464
172
2.180
2.129
0.381
0.046
9662
528.5
0.52
1.462
173
2.334
2.141
0.380
0.047
9559
539.1
0.52
1.464
174
2.360
2.120
0.380
0.045
9490
540.5
0.52
1.464
175
2.201
2.123
0.380
0.046
9599
527.1
0.52
1.465
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
69
176
2.160
2.141
0.382
0.045
9594
523.2
0.52
1.464
177
2.187
2.143
0.381
0.048
9573
521.2
0.52
1.464
178
2.260
2.136
0.381
0.044
9563
519.6
0.51
1.465
179
2.282
2.129
0.381
0.045
9543
520.4
0.52
1.464
180
2.150
2.220
0.381
0.045
9498
520.5
0.52
1.466
181
2.067
2.136
0.381
0.047
9531
515.4
0.52
1.465
182
2.070
2.126
0.382
0.049
9560
516.2
0.52
1.465
183
2.078
2.125
0.381
0.044
9552
516.8
0.52
1.465
184
2.173
2.170
0.381
0.046
9421
530.4
0.52
1.465
185
2.172
2.157
0.381
0.048
9404
529.8
0.52
1.466
186
2.086
2.132
0.381
0.048
9458
520.0
0.52
1.466
187
2.065
2.128
0.381
0.045
9526
518.4
0.52
1.466
188
2.031
2.131
0.381
0.044
9639
507.1
0.52
1.465
189
2.050
2.132
0.382
0.041
9648
509.8
0.52
1.466
190
2.102
2.137
0.381
0.044
9709
510.6
0.52
1.465
191
2.219
2.140
0.382
0.043
9735
511.5
0.51
1.466
192
2.366
2.136
0.381
0.046
9798
509.4
0.52
1.465
193
2.427
2.154
0.381
0.045
9859
506.6
0.52
1.467
194
2.435
2.177
0.381
0.048
9847
506.4
0.52
1.467
195
2.557
2.192
0.381
0.047
9827
506.1
0.52
1.466
196
3.073
2.188
0.381
0.047
9859
506.0
0.52
1.465
197
4.122
2.165
0.382
0.047
9890
506.4
0.52
1.467
198
4.348
2.168
0.382
0.044
9808
514.2
0.52
1.467
199
4.267
2.176
0.382
0.043
9602
526.2
0.52
1.467
200
3.534
2.166
0.382
0.045
9478
528.7
0.52
1.467
201
2.950
2.144
0.380
0.047
9298
536.2
0.52
1.467
202
2.790
2.137
0.381
0.045
9243
540.4
0.52
1.467
203
3.046
2.140
0.382
0.044
9375
545.5
0.52
1.467
204
2.855
2.124
0.382
0.043
9414
546.3
0.52
1.468
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
70
205
2.638
2.133
0.383
0.045
9309
539.0
0.52
1.468
206
2.517
2.139
0.383
0.045
9250
533.3
0.52
1.468
207
2.398
2.138
0.383
0.047
9180
531.7
0.52
1.468
208
2.375
2.139
0.382
0.045
8948
544.0
0.52
1.468
209
2.393
2.134
0.383
0.045
8781
547.6
0.52
1.467
210
2.370
2.139
0.382
0.045
8702
548.2
0.52
1.469
211
2.340
2.142
0.383
0.043
8710
543.1
0.52
1.468
212
2.265
2.125
0.382
0.045
8774
536.3
0.52
1.468
213
2.255
2.125
0.383
0.046
8808
530.4
0.52
1.467
214
2.250
2.133
0.383
0.046
8821
526.4
0.52
1.469
215
2.230
2.160
0.383
0.046
8747
528.6
0.52
1.469
216
2.267
2.142
0.385
0.045
8726
528.1
0.52
1.470
217
2.293
2.137
0.384
0.044
8786
524.0
0.52
1.471
218
2.320
2.138
0.385
0.045
8695
529.3
0.52
1.470
219
2.297
2.143
0.385
0.047
8610
529.6
0.51
1.472
220
2.265
2.177
0.386
0.045
8595
525.5
0.51
1.472
221
2.336
2.231
0.386
0.043
8483
534.2
0.52
1.474
222
2.373
2.190
0.384
0.046
8522
532.3
0.52
1.472
223
2.492
2.188
0.384
0.043
8462
539.7
0.52
1.472
224
2.704
2.231
0.384
0.042
8569
537.6
0.52
1.471
225
2.755
2.220
0.384
0.045
8788
527.7
0.52
1.470
226
2.981
2.253
0.385
0.049
8594
538.1
0.52
1.471
227
2.871
2.251
0.384
0.047
8567
537.1
0.52
1.473
228
2.653
2.235
0.385
0.046
8646
525.2
0.52
1.471
229
2.850
2.226
0.385
0.047
8735
521.1
0.52
1.470
230
2.647
2.206
0.385
0.047
8676
524.2
0.51
1.470
231
2.670
2.181
0.385
0.041
8673
530.5
0.52
1.471
232
3.004
2.202
0.386
0.043
8711
532.9
0.51
1.470
233
3.396
2.208
0.385
0.049
8693
536.8
0.52
1.471
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
71
234
4.291
2.234
0.384
0.045
8915
537.6
0.52
1.470
235
5.124
2.243
0.385
0.045
9043
535.2
0.52
1.471
236
4.369
2.260
0.384
0.047
8649
545.8
0.52
1.472
237
3.664
2.266
0.385
0.045
8697
537.2
0.52
1.471
238
3.562
2.253
0.384
0.046
8754
532.8
0.52
1.470
239
3.367
2.260
0.385
0.047
8771
531.6
0.52
1.471
240
3.291
2.233
0.385
0.048
8735
537.9
0.51
1.471
241
3.322
2.215
0.385
0.047
8760
536.9
0.52
1.471
242
3.084
2.219
0.387
0.047
8589
539.0
0.51
1.472
243
2.947
2.218
0.385
0.043
8452
543.3
0.51
1.475
244
2.914
2.232
0.385
0.044
8238
556.0
0.51
1.475
245
2.945
2.228
0.386
0.045
8322
543.6
0.51
1.475
246
2.892
2.207
0.386
0.046
8295
543.3
0.51
1.476
247
2.900
2.225
0.384
0.047
8323
541.0
0.52
1.475
248
2.778
2.291
0.384
0.046
8264
536.8
0.52
1.475
249
2.665
2.227
0.385
0.045
8183
534.9
0.52
1.475
250
2.589
2.209
0.385
0.047
8100
538.7
0.52
1.475
251
2.557
2.197
0.385
0.047
8076
540.7
0.52
1.476
252
2.707
2.208
0.386
0.045
8142
538.8
0.52
1.475
253
2.803
2.221
0.385
0.045
8199
536.3
0.52
1.475
254
2.485
2.215
0.386
0.044
8237
537.9
0.51
1.476
255
2.261
2.205
0.386
0.048
8288
555.2
0.51
1.475
256
2.325
2.273
0.386
0.046
8217
557.9
0.51
1.475
257
2.371
2.298
0.386
0.047
8088
552.0
0.51
1.476
258
2.413
2.300
0.386
0.046
8021
558.3
0.51
1.477
259
2.428
2.312
0.386
0.042
7953
572.4
0.51
1.477
260
2.460
2.276
0.386
0.046
7825
568.9
0.51
1.478
261
2.464
2.301
0.386
0.044
7918
559.1
0.52
1.477
262
2.470
2.264
0.387
0.047
8060
540.2
0.51
1.476
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
72
263
2.568
2.285
0.387
0.048
8127
533.8
0.52
1.474
264
2.587
2.260
0.387
0.046
8154
531.9
0.52
1.476
265
2.495
2.246
0.387
0.049
8082
534.3
0.52
1.476
266
2.559
2.248
0.388
0.044
8038
533.6
0.52
1.476
267
2.548
2.255
0.388
0.045
7920
538.3
0.51
1.478
268
2.519
2.343
0.388
0.046
7872
538.0
0.51
1.479
269
2.485
2.338
0.388
0.045
7815
538.3
0.51
1.479
270
2.463
2.323
0.389
0.046
7848
537.6
0.51
1.479
271
2.458
2.361
0.388
0.044
7885
541.8
0.51
1.479
272
2.423
2.409
0.388
0.044
7941
540.9
0.51
1.479
273
2.575
2.917
0.389
0.044
8034
541.7
0.51
1.478
274
3.139
2.704
0.390
0.045
8166
544.4
0.52
1.475
275
3.036
2.469
0.389
0.047
8080
545.8
0.52
1.476
276
2.979
2.401
0.390
0.046
8067
540.1
0.52
1.476
277
2.929
2.421
0.389
0.045
8053
541.6
0.52
1.476
278
2.844
2.615
0.389
0.045
8004
556.1
0.52
1.476
279
2.761
2.684
0.389
0.045
8029
552.7
0.52
1.476
280
2.693
2.691
0.389
0.043
8081
554.9
0.51
1.477
281
2.720
2.769
0.388
0.044
8076
560.4
0.51
1.476
282
2.723
2.721
0.388
0.042
8048
555.5
0.51
1.477
283
2.703
2.668
0.389
0.040
7941
554.2
0.51
1.478
284
2.702
2.619
0.389
0.044
7874
553.3
0.51
1.479
285
2.719
3.052
0.390
0.045
7840
558.0
0.51
1.479
286
2.729
2.973
0.389
0.042
7896
567.4
0.51
1.478
287
2.745
3.077
0.389
0.043
7825
574.0
0.52
1.478
288
2.784
3.109
0.389
0.044
7981
580.4
0.52
1.477
289
2.904
3.053
0.389
0.045
7995
579.9
0.52
1.476
290
2.923
3.027
0.389
0.057
8077
578.8
0.52
1.476
291
2.949
3.107
0.389
0.062
7954
583.2
0.52
1.476
Concentration
Values
Reported
from
Innovative
Nonlinear
Algorithm
(
Continued)

File
CH4
CO
N2O
SF
6
H2O
CO
2
shift
res
B­
73
292
3.014
3.215
0.389
0.015
7932
588.1
0.52
1.477
293
3.133
3.334
0.388
0.007
7932
597.7
0.51
1.478
294
3.222
3.155
0.389
0.005
8064
583.6
0.51
1.477
295
3.011
2.890
0.389
0.004
8254
568.3
0.51
1.476
296
2.959
2.930
0.389
0.003
8324
566.9
0.51
1.476
297
2.987
2.831
0.389
0.002
8337
568.4
0.51
1.476
298
2.959
2.752
0.389
0.002
8369
569.2
0.51
1.476
299
2.960
2.703
0.388
0.002
8437
566.1
0.52
1.476
300
3.109
2.848
0.389
0.002
8556
562.9
0.52
1.473
301
3.109
2.849
0.390
0.001
8676
555.2
0.52
1.473
302
3.026
2.743
0.391
0.001
8790
551.0
0.52
1.473
303
3.025
2.682
0.396
0.001
8906
549.0
0.52
1.472
304
3.156
2.708
0.402
0
8964
545.4
0.52
1.471
305
3.248
2.715
0.404
0.001
9011
544.6
0.52
1.470
306
3.329
2.735
0.404
0.001
9069
545.3
0.52
1.473
average
2.758
2.208
0.382
0.041
9496
519.2
0.51
1.462
std
0.726
0.248
0.01
0.01
879
24.4
0
0.011
C­
i
Appendix
C
FTIR
Spectral
Analyses
Conducted
by
ARCADIS
Geraghty
&
Miller
(
David
Natschke)
C­
ii
(
Intentionally
Blank)
C­
1
ARCADIS
Geraghty
&
Miller,
Inc.
P.
O.
Box
13109
Research
Triangle
Park
North
Carolina
27709
Tel
919
544
4535
Fax
919
544
5690
MEMO
To:
John
Kinsey
US
EPA,
APPCD
From:
Date:
David
F.
Natschke
27
September
2000
Subject:
Report
on
the
Analysis
of
Open
Path
FTIR
Data
from
the
Chlor­
Alkali
Plant
Introduction
EPA
supplied
two
open
path
FTIR
data
sets.
The
first
consisted
of
ten
Iomega
®
Zip
disks
that
included
.
spc
files.
These
files
were
single
beam
sample
spectra
collected
by
USEPA
Region
IV
personnel.

The
second
data
set
consisted
of
1
Fujitsu
magneto
optical
(
MO)
disk
that
included
.
spc
files.
These
files
were
absorbance
spectra
"
packed"
as
"
multifiles"
and
consisted
of
upwind
(
background)
spectra
collected
by
USEPA/
APPCD
personnel,
which
had
already
been
processed
from
raw
interferograms
to
absorbance
by
EPA.
The
"
spc"
suffix
indicates
a
data
file
format
used
by
MIDAC,
Galactic
Industries,
and
others
for
spectral
data.

The
processing
steps
consisted
of
obtaining
the
appropriate
software,
file
transfer
and
organization,

packing
the
individual
files
as
multifiles,
conversion
to
absorbance,
unpacking
the
multifiles
to
individual
absorbance
files,
processing
through
the
AutoQuant
®
program,
and
results
organization.
These
steps
are
described
in
the
following
sections.

Obtaining
the
Software
Two
software
packages
were
needed
to
accomplish
this
task:
GRAMS/
32
®
and
AutoQuant
®
.

GRAMS/
32
®
was
needed
for
the
processing
of
the
.
spc
files,
while
AutoQuant
®
is
the
quantification
package.
GRAMS/
32
®
is
a
Galactic
Industries
product
that
may
also
be
obtained
through
MIDAC
Corporation
and
other
instrument
manufacturers.
AutoQuant
®
is
a
MIDAC
Corporation
product.
Both
C­
2
packages
were
obtained
from
MIDAC.
The
"
non­
collect"
version
of
GRAMS/
32
®
was
purchased,
as
this
was
sufficient
for
the
task
and
slightly
less
expensive.

File
Transfer
and
Organization
Sample
spectra
were
obtained
as
.
spc
files
on
10
Zip
disks.
Arcadis
found
that
the
files
were
highly
disorganized
with
many
duplicates
and
files
from
sequential
samples
spread
across
multiple
disks.

In
a
few
cases,
an
individual
file
was
completely
missing.
Many
irrelevant
files,
unknown
purpose,
were
also
included.

The
disks
were
manually
cataloged
to
determine
the
location
of
sequential
sample
files
and
to
identify
missing
files.
A
total
of
1,964
unique
data
files
from
seven
nominal
sampling
dates
were
identified.

Unique
files
were
then
transferred
to
hard
disk
and
organized
in
directories
by
nominal
sampling
date.

These
files
were
then
archived
to
a
recordable
CD
before
any
file
manipulation
was
performed.
The
following
table
describes
the
number
of
sample
files
identified
by
sampling
date.

Table
1.
Samples
by
Date
Prefix
Sampling
date
prefix
Number
of
sample
files
D0217
1
D0218
276
D0219
327
D0220
501
D0222
272
D0223
282
D0224
305
Packing
Individual
Files
as
Multifiles
The
spectra
were
in
single
beam
format.
While
not
critical,
the
conversion
to
multifile
format
is
a
tremendous
time
saver
prior
to
calculation
of
absorbance
spectra.
The
multifile
format
permits
spectral
arithmetic
operations
to
be
performed
on
all
members
of
a
multifile
with
a
single
command.

The
first
file
manipulation
performed
was,
therefore,
packing
as
multifiles.
GRAMS/
32
®
was
used
for
this
conversion.
As
implemented
there
is
a
limit
of
60
files
that
can
be
packed
into
a
single
file.
For
C­
3
convenience,
50
files
were
placed
in
the
typical
multifile.
These
files
were
named
with
the
sampling
date
prefixes
described
in
Table
1
with
the
addition
of
a
single
letter
suffix
and
then
archived
to
a
separate
subdirectory
on
the
hard
disk.

Conversion
to
Absorbance
Spectra
must
be
converted
to
absorbance
prior
to
any
quantification,
based
upon
the
following
equation:

Abs
log
I
I0
=
 






In
this
equation,
I
refers
to
the
single
beam
spectrum
while
I0
is
a
reference
spectrum.

In
open
path
FTIR,
it
is
difficult
to
obtain
a
true
reference
spectrum.
The
full
optical
path
can
rarely
be
contained
and
purged
of
all
infrared
active
compounds.
A
number
of
techniques
have
been
used
to
generate
a
useful
reference
spectrum.
It
is
sometimes
possible
to
obtain
a
valid
upwind
spectrum
that
is
free
from
the
compounds
of
interest.
Another
technique
calls
for
the
generation
of
a
"
synthetic
background"
spectrum,
usually
by
taking
a
spectrum
and
removing
all
known
spectral
features
from
it.

The
synthetic
background
spectrum
is
often
generated
manually,
though
it
may
also
be
generated
by
fitting
some
function,
for
example
a
spline
function,
to
the
baseline
of
the
single
beam
reference
spectrum.

EPA
supplied
a
synthetic
background
spectrum
for
use
with
this
data
set.
The
generated
multifiles
were
converted
to
absorbance
using
this
reference
spectrum.
The
absorbance
multifiles
were
archived
to
hard
disk
in
separate
subdirectories.

Unpacking
the
Multifiles
to
Individual
Absorbance
Files
Since
AutoQuant
®
cannot
deal
with
absorbance
multifiles
GRAMS/
32
®
was
used
to
separate
multifiles
into
individual
files.
The
individual
files
were
archived
to
hard
disk.
C­
4
Processing
through
the
AutoQuant
®
Program
AutoQuant
®
requires
one
or
more
"
method"
files,
the
supporting
calibration
spectra
with
concentration
data,
and
sample
absorbance
spectra.
EPA
supplied
three
method
files
and
all
the
associated
calibration
spectra
for
use
in
the
quantification
of
these
data.

In
use,
a
given
method
is
calibrated
with
the
supplied
calibration
spectra
and
then
applied
to
the
selected
spectrum
or
spectra
(
batch
mode).
For
these
calculations,
three
separate
methods
were
needed.

Each
was
applied
sequentially
to
the
selected
set
of
spectra.
Results
are
in
ppm.
Results
were
archived
to
hard
disk
as
.
txt
files.

Organization
of
Results
The
AutoQuant
®
results
were
imported
into
Excel
®
spreadsheets,
1
per
sampling
date,
as
multiple
.
txt
files.
Since
AutoQuant
®
does
not
maintain
the
original
sample
order
in
its
results
file,
results
were
sorted
within
Excel
®
by
sample
name
(
number)
to
restore
the
original
order.

The
original
sample
date
and
time
had
been
"
lost"
(
not
transferred)
by
either
GRAMS/
32
®
during
the
conversions
to
and
from
multifiles
or
AutoQuant
®
.
Examination
of
individual
absorbance
files
within
GRAMS/
32
®
shows
that
the
sampling
date
and
time
are
still
attached
internally
after
all
manipulations
were
completed.
The
original
sampling
date
and
time
were
recovered
by
using
the
DOS
command:
dir
>>

dir.
txt
within
each
of
the
single
beam
subdirectories.
This
ASCII
file
was
then
imported
into
the
Excel
®
spreadsheets
and
aligned
with
the
results
data.
Printouts
of
these
files
are
included
with
this
memo.

Upwind
Data
Separate
from
the
sampling
performed
by
Region
IV
personnel,
upwind
data
were
independently
collected
by
APPCD
personnel
and
equipment.
These
data
were
provided
separately
to
Arcadis.
Arcadis
found
that
all
the
preliminary
data
manipulation
had
already
been
performed
and
that
spectra
already
existed
as
individual
absorbance
files
ready
for
AutoQuant
®
.
Because
these
data
were
collected
on
a
different
instrument
and
at
a
different
spectral
resolution,
the
method
files
and
calibration
spectra
used
for
the
samples
were
not
appropriate
to
the
upwind
spectra.
EPA
also
provided
the
correct
method
file
and
calibration
spectra.
C­
5
Quantification
and
results
processing
were
performed
as
described
above
for
the
60
files
generated
on
2/
14/
00.
Examination
of
the
individual
results
revealed
2
sets
of
the
60
that
had
questionable
results
for
one
or
more
compounds.
The
errors
associated
with
these
concentrations
were
much
higher
than
the
other
58
for
the
same
compound.
USEPA
personnel
had
made
the
same
observations
during
calculation
of
this
data
set.
These
two
samples
were,
therefore,
eliminated
after
examining
the
original
spectra
and
results
from
these
two
samples
were
not
used
in
the
calculation
of
average
upwind
concentrations.

The
individual
results
from
the
upwind
samples
were
used
to
calculate
average
concentrations
and
the
standard
deviation.
These
values
were
then
used
to
calculate
a
detection
limit
for
each
compound
based
upon
the
typical
equation:

Detection_
limit
mean
3
*
=
+
 
where
 
is
the
standard
deviation.

Arcadis
used
a
slight
deviation
from
the
above
equation
in
calculating
a
detection
limit
for
SF6.
As
the
Table
2
shows,
both
the
average
and
the
standard
deviation
for
this
compound
are
0.
For
this
compound
only,
Arcadis
used
the
average
error
reported
by
AutoQuant
®
in
place
of
the
standard
deviation.

Table
2.
Results
for
Upwind
Data,
including
Estimated
Detection
Limits
Results
are
in
ppm
Carbon
Monoxide
Methane
Nitrous
Oxide
Sulfur
Hexafluoride
Average
0.264
1.795
0.301
0
Standard
Deviation
0.155
0.031
0.004
0
Detection
Limit
0.729
1.887
0.312
0.000241
Intercomparison
Hardcopies
of
the
results
spreadsheets
are
being
delivered
with
this
memo/
report.
Of
these,
spectra
from
2/
24/
2000
were
separately
analyzed
by
Mantech;
these
results
were
supplied
by
the
WAM.
Arcadis
results
were
compared
point
by
point
with
the
Mantech
results.
These
comparisons
are
found
in
the
four
attached
graphs.
It
can
be
stated
that
differences
are
minor
to
none
and
are
within
the
AutoQuant
®
reported
errors.
Trendlines
were
established
for
methane,
carbon
monoxide,
nitrous
oxide,
and
sulfur
hexafluoride.
These
results
are
reported
in
Table
3.
C­
6
Table
3.
Intercomparison
Results
Slope
Intercept
R2
Methane
0.9988
0.0057
1
Carbon
monoxide
0.9735
0.0074
0.9986
Nitrous
oxide
1.0064
­
0.0013
0.9965
Sulfur
hexafluoride
1
0
1
These
factors
refer
to
Mantech
results
as
the
independent
variable
(
x)
and
Arcadis
results
as
the
dependent
variable
(
y).

The
Mantech
and
Arcadis
results
may
be
considered
identical
for
all
practical
purposes.
Table
C­
1.
HANST
SCREENING
METHOD
+
Sulfur
Hexafluoride
Upwind
Data
for
the
Chlor­
Alkali
Testing
Study.

Data
collected
on
the
Midac
Instrument
@
0.5
cm­
1
resolution.
Results
Are
in
Parts
per
Million
ammonia
carbon
monoxide
carbon
dioxide
methane
nitrous
oxide
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
method
1
water
method
2
water
method
3
absorb.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.643
352
1.8
0.3
0
18035
16648
16297
ol014001.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.643
352
1.8
0.30
0
18,035
16,648
16,297
ol014002.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.295
353
1.7
0.3
0
17940
16581
16616
ol014003.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.265
357
1.8
0.30
0
18,222
17,471
16,743
ol014004.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.191
342
1.8
0.30
0
18,004
16,565
15,496
ol014005.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.225
348
1.8
0.30
0
18,349
16,725
16,303
ol014006.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.548
353
1.8
0.29
0
17,912
16,455
16,113
ol014007.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.457
345
1.8
0.29
0
17,575
16,006
16,135
ol014008.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.761
358
1.8
0.30
0
18,359
17,049
16,188
ol014009.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.592
357
1.7
0.30
0
18,100
16,714
16,266
ol014010.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.452
355
1.8
0.30
0
18,150
16,680
16,728
ol014011.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.859
361
1.8
0.29
0
18,101
16,961
16,642
ol014012.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.251
357
1.8
0.30
0
18,288
16,818
16,844
ol014013.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.268
357
1.8
0.30
0
18,233
16,719
17,129
ol014014.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.197
358
1.8
0.31
0
18,172
16,900
16,538
ol014015.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.314
354
1.8
0.30
0
18,232
16,950
16,820
ol014017.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.005
0.297
365
1.8
0.31
0
18,306
16,717
16,031
ol014018.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.282
356
1.8
0.30
0
18,138
16,758
17,086
ol014019.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.189
351
1.8
0.30
0
18,391
16,705
16,974
ol014020.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.168
356
1.8
0.30
0
18,198
16,546
16,723
ol014021.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.174
352
1.8
0.30
0
17,919
16,413
16,527
ol014022.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.171
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,947
16,395
16,527
ol014023.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.162
356
1.8
0.30
0
17,925
16,534
16,518
ol014024.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.159
351
1.8
0.31
0
17,992
16,409
16,623
ol014025.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.161
353
1.7
0.30
0
17,780
16,366
16,286
ol014026.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.199
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,953
16,495
16,075
ol014027.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.167
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,945
16,541
16,547
ol014028.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.252
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,842
16,482
16,408
ol014029.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.247
354
1.8
0.30
0
17,800
16,453
16,207
ol014030.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.239
356
1.8
0.30
0
17,690
16,283
16,266
ol014031.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.192
348
1.8
0.30
0
17,746
16,179
16,231
ol014032.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.166
350
1.7
0.30
0
17,404
16,109
16,258
ol014033.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.211
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,532
16,139
16,275
ol014034.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.192
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,736
16,203
16,414
C­
7
Table
C­
1.
HANST
SCREENING
METHOD
+
Sulfur
Hexafluoride
(
Continued)

Results
Are
in
Parts
per
Million
ammonia
carbon
monoxide
carbon
dioxide
methane
nitrous
oxide
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
method
1
water
method
2
water
method
3
ol014035.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.266
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,983
16,332
16,236
ol014036.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.178
349
1.8
0.30
0
17,718
15,976
16,244
ol014037.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.181
349
1.8
0.30
0
17,624
15,997
16,065
ol014038.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.177
346
1.8
0.31
0
18,194
16,470
16,424
ol014039.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.004
0.203
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,589
15,774
15,938
ol014040.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.197
346
1.8
0.30
0
17,331
15,753
16,023
ol014041.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.265
346
1.7
0.30
0
17,161
15,142
15,448
ol014042.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.22
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,689
15,945
16,160
ol014043.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.202
354
1.8
0.30
0
17,159
15,629
16,083
ol014044.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.179
355
1.8
0.30
0
17,743
16,312
16,965
ol014045.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.178
354
1.9
0.30
0
18,060
16,432
16,945
ol014046.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.175
354
1.8
0.30
0
18,030
16,232
16,843
ol014047.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.173
348
1.8
0.30
0
17,857
16,001
16,237
ol014048.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.004
0.215
354
1.8
0.30
0
17,569
15,815
16,205
ol014049.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0
0.234
356
1.8
0.30
0
17,969
16,070
16,630
ol014050.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.009
0.254
335
1.9
0.28
0
16,803
15,379
15,565
ol014052.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.182
354
1.8
0.30
0
17,964
16,300
16,644
ol014053.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.181
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,809
16,134
16,590
ol014054.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.233
351
1.8
0.30
0
17,879
16,274
16,412
ol014055.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.178
344
1.8
0.30
0
17,719
15,931
16,549
ol014056.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.179
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,716
15,973
16,656
ol014057.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.003
0.176
349
1.8
0.30
0
17,808
16,003
16,525
ol014058.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.001
0.182
350
1.8
0.30
0
17,941
16,342
16,782
ol014059.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.176
343
1.8
0.30
0
17,712
15,747
16,524
ol014060.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.002
0.175
343
1.8
0.30
0
17,466
15,491
16,316
average
0.001864
0.264
352
1.79
0.30
0
17,872
16,323
16,409
std.
Dev.
0.001468
0.155
5
0.03
0.00
0
315
431
354
ol014016.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
0.01
6.643
3,190
8.4
1.53
0
24,756
363,502
773,663
ol014051.
spc
2/
14/
00
11:
13
6.948
0
245
3.4
0.01
0.84
1,142,701
1,087
1306
C­
8
Table
C­
2.
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218002
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
45a
0.035
12,484
1.578
0.349
13,934
1.959
10,322
D0218003
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
52a
0
13,039
1.587
0.349
14,112
1.962
10,415
D0218004
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
27p
0
13,730
1.57
0.348
14,722
2.184
11,039
D0218005
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
31p
0
13,721
1.63
0.347
14,723
2.255
11,009
D0218006
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
36p
0
13,553
1.595
0.347
14,718
2.238
11,043
D0218007
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
43p
0
13,796
1.581
0.346
14,775
2.312
11,097
D0218008
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
48p
0.001
13,944
1.582
0.346
14,933
2.332
11,178
D0218009
SPC
2/
18/
00
12:
55p
0.001
13,960
1.587
0.345
14,953
2.342
11,271
D0218010
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
02p
0.001
14,190
1.59
0.343
15,218
2.328
11,487
D0218011
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
07p
0.001
14,221
1.585
0.343
15,307
2.353
11,546
D0218012
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
11p
0
14,394
1.59
0.342
15,437
2.387
11,673
D0218013
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
16p
0
14,670
1.974
0.345
15,737
2.397
11,885
D0218014
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
20p
0
15,065
1.624
0.343
16,186
2.178
12,274
D0218015
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
25p
0
15,470
1.609
0.343
16,779
1.97
12,651
D0218016
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
29p
0
15,659
1.608
0.341
16,956
1.999
12,823
D0218017
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
34p
0
15,781
1.607
0.341
17,172
2.062
13,048
D0218018
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
38p
0
16,076
1.618
0.339
17,348
2.054
13,191
D0218019
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
43p
0
15,968
1.599
0.339
17,273
2.018
13,073
D0218020
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
47p
0
16,138
1.61
0.339
17,449
2.088
13,276
D0218021
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
52p
0
16,549
1.651
0.337
17,866
2.229
13,653
D0218022
SPC
2/
18/
00
1:
56p
0
16,879
1.654
0.337
18,188
2.291
13,915
D0218023
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
01p
0
16,973
1.64
0.337
18,243
2.593
13,965
D0218024
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
06p
0
16,929
1.671
0.338
18,311
2.456
14,053
D0218025
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
10p
0
16,757
1.604
0.338
18,073
2.048
13,930
D0218026
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
15p
0
16,754
1.6
0.338
18,054
2.002
13,867
D0218027
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
19p
0
16,962
1.608
0.337
18,288
2.046
14,058
D0218028
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
24p
0
17,156
1.65
0.338
18,457
2.085
14,223
D0218029
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
28p
0
17,207
1.642
0.337
18,704
2.062
14,309
D0218030
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
33p
0
17,234
1.639
0.336
18,693
2.02
14,322
D0218031
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
37p
0
17,607
1.64
0.334
19,240
2.138
14,516
C­
9
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218032
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
42p
0
17,487
1.66
0.335
19,182
2.046
14,488
D0218033
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
46p
0
17,530
1.659
0.335
19,234
1.985
14,572
D0218034
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
51p
0
17,713
1.639
0.334
19,321
2.104
14,662
D0218035
SPC
2/
18/
00
2:
55p
0
17,646
1.644
0.334
19,283
2.081
14,635
D0218036
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
00p
0
17,759
1.633
0.333
19,405
2.09
14,723
D0218037
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
04p
0
17,753
1.673
0.333
19,454
2.071
14,788
D0218038
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
09p
0
17,916
1.642
0.333
19,582
2.027
14,906
D0218039
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
14p
0
18,141
1.66
0.331
19,780
2.13
15,037
D0218040
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
18p
0
17,919
1.646
0.333
19,580
2.038
14,890
D0218041
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
23p
0
18,110
1.656
0.331
19,827
2.187
15,081
D0218042
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
27p
0
18,242
1.665
0.331
19,949
2.222
15,161
D0218043
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
32p
0
18,254
1.696
0.331
20,013
2.029
15,236
D0218044
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
36p
0
18,299
1.681
0.331
19,992
2.138
15,269
D0218045
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
41p
0
18,543
1.688
0.331
20,184
2.168
15,409
D0218046
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
45p
0
18,492
1.694
0.331
20,189
2.049
15,435
D0218047
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
50p
0
18,568
1.701
0.33
20,233
2.115
15,487
D0218048
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
54p
0
18,553
1.746
0.33
20,215
2.029
15,487
D0218049
SPC
2/
18/
00
3:
59p
0
18,722
1.728
0.329
20,353
2.234
15,657
D0218050
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
03p
0
18,653
1.654
0.328
20,230
2.005
15,529
D0218051
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
08p
0
18,541
1.648
0.329
20,273
2.164
15,601
D0218052
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
12p
0
18,706
1.662
0.329
20,339
2.295
15,675
D0218053
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
17p
0
18,803
1.681
0.329
20,423
2.099
15,757
D0218054
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
21p
0
18,882
1.677
0.328
20,486
2.043
15,852
D0218055
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
26p
0
19,015
1.666
0.328
20,505
2.225
15,848
D0218056
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
30p
0
18,961
1.693
0.328
20,468
2.314
15,736
D0218057
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
35p
0
19,075
1.691
0.328
20,580
2.299
15,910
D0218058
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
40p
0
19,018
1.669
0.327
20,534
2.209
15,866
D0218059
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
44p
0
19,210
1.673
0.326
20,691
2.415
15,966
D0218060
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
49p
0
19,118
1.672
0.327
20,604
2.472
15,878
D0218061
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
53p
0
19,150
1.669
0.327
20,581
2.257
15,905
C­
10
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218062
SPC
2/
18/
00
4:
58p
0
19,357
1.67
0.327
20,771
2.625
16,110
D0218063
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
02p
0
19,318
1.678
0.327
20,719
2.443
16,029
D0218064
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
07p
0
19,434
1.673
0.327
20,764
2.958
16,078
D0218065
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
11p
0
19,104
1.67
0.327
20,500
2.667
15,774
D0218066
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
16p
0
18,930
1.676
0.328
20,407
2.413
15,650
D0218067
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
20p
0
18,903
1.693
0.329
20,331
2.345
15,519
D0218068
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
25p
0
18,791
1.682
0.328
20,255
2.207
15,403
D0218069
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
29p
0
18,723
1.68
0.329
20,266
2.375
15,371
D0218070
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
34p
0
18,744
1.68
0.329
20,257
2.254
15,390
D0218071
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
38p
0
18,688
1.678
0.329
20,150
2.165
15,297
D0218072
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
43p
0
18,584
1.7
0.33
20,182
2.014
15,329
D0218073
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
53p
0
18,659
1.698
0.33
20,238
2.105
15,429
D0218074
SPC
2/
18/
00
5:
58p
0
18,597
1.693
0.329
20,225
2.097
15,428
D0218075
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
03p
0
18,552
1.699
0.33
20,129
2.072
15,357
D0218076
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
07p
0
18,532
1.706
0.33
20,131
2.079
15,346
D0218077
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
12p
0
18,505
1.711
0.33
20,159
2.079
15,416
D0218078
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
16p
0
18,589
1.728
0.331
20,219
2.072
15,449
D0218079
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
21p
0
18,704
1.726
0.331
20,253
2.03
15,502
D0218080
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
25p
0
18,669
1.719
0.331
20,260
1.971
15,533
D0218081
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
30p
0
18,710
1.731
0.331
20,274
2.004
15,521
D0218082
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
34p
0
18,697
1.731
0.332
20,295
1.953
15,548
D0218083
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
39p
0
18,580
1.741
0.332
20,303
1.953
15,495
D0218084
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
43p
0
18,692
1.776
0.332
20,323
1.934
15,496
D0218085
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
48p
0
18,687
1.807
0.333
20,341
1.961
15,597
D0218086
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
52p
0
18,666
1.827
0.333
20,330
1.954
15,616
D0218087
SPC
2/
18/
00
6:
57p
0
18,628
1.905
0.334
20,365
1.952
15,684
D0218088
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
01p
0
18,641
1.921
0.334
20,374
1.949
15,685
D0218089
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
06p
0
18,694
1.823
0.333
20,393
1.939
15,727
D0218090
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
10p
0
18,645
1.823
0.333
20,378
1.964
15,654
D0218091
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
15p
0
18,713
1.852
0.333
20,411
2.019
15,567
C­
11
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218092
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
19p
0
18,702
1.927
0.334
20,420
2.072
15,430
D0218093
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
24p
0
18,554
1.953
0.335
20,381
2.171
15,370
D0218094
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
28p
0
18,436
1.958
0.335
20,303
2.238
15,348
D0218095
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
33p
0
18,545
1.918
0.335
20,343
2.36
15,373
D0218096
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
37p
0
18,425
1.89
0.335
20,218
2.511
15,323
D0218097
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
42p
0.001
18,363
1.87
0.335
20,187
2.541
15,251
D0218098
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
47p
0
18,497
1.859
0.336
20,266
2.906
15,316
D0218099
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
51p
0
18,730
1.852
0.335
20,373
4.296
15,272
D0218100
SPC
2/
18/
00
7:
56p
0
19,881
1.869
0.336
20,961
7.328
15,348
D0218101
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
00p
0
20,131
1.845
0.335
21,174
8.112
15,690
D0218102
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
05p
0
20,703
1.867
0.335
21,571
9.786
16,117
D0218103
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
09p
0
20,408
1.886
0.336
21,301
6.981
15,768
D0218104
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
14p
0
19,794
1.905
0.336
20,896
4.734
15,366
D0218105
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
18p
0
19,203
1.887
0.337
20,580
4.184
15,177
D0218106
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
23p
0
18,913
1.87
0.337
20,442
4.971
15,171
D0218107
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
27p
0
18,806
1.857
0.337
20,430
6.021
15,262
D0218108
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
32p
0
18,728
1.898
0.338
20,370
5.932
15,179
D0218109
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
36p
0.001
18,411
1.888
0.338
20,139
4.93
14,947
D0218110
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
41p
0.001
18,120
1.903
0.339
19,906
3.817
14,737
D0218111
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
45p
0
17,991
1.953
0.34
19,863
2.416
14,827
D0218112
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
50p
0.001
17,990
1.973
0.34
19,813
2.25
14,909
D0218113
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
54p
0.001
17,742
1.94
0.339
19,649
2.165
14,909
D0218114
SPC
2/
18/
00
8:
59p
0.001
17,861
1.94
0.339
19,694
2.3
14,885
D0218115
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
04p
0.001
17,665
1.992
0.341
19,481
2.426
14,690
D0218116
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
08p
0.002
17,717
1.988
0.341
19,567
2.766
14,714
D0218117
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
13p
0.002
17,918
1.943
0.34
19,697
3.778
14,743
D0218118
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
17p
0.002
17,839
1.93
0.34
19,646
4.143
14,702
D0218119
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
22p
0.002
17,872
1.91
0.34
19,702
3.834
14,744
D0218120
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
26p
0.002
17,928
1.913
0.34
19,766
4.842
14,766
D0218121
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
31p
0.002
18,079
1.896
0.34
19,869
6.23
14,795
C­
12
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218122
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
35p
0.002
18,144
1.881
0.34
19,958
7.44
14,840
D0218123
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
40p
0.001
18,086
1.879
0.341
19,956
7.218
14,868
D0218124
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
44p
0.002
18,119
1.89
0.34
19,865
6.1
14,849
D0218125
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
49p
0.002
18,123
1.897
0.34
19,972
5.923
14,933
D0218126
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
53p
0.001
18,478
1.874
0.339
20,224
6.706
15,245
D0218127
SPC
2/
18/
00
9:
58p
0.001
18,814
1.85
0.337
20,422
7.918
15,487
D0218128
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
02p
0.001
18,883
1.843
0.338
20,424
7.272
15,487
D0218129
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
07p
0.001
18,945
1.851
0.338
20,480
7.878
15,460
D0218130
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
12p
0.001
19,113
1.855
0.339
20,526
7.137
15,466
D0218131
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
16p
0
19,160
1.853
0.338
20,642
6.056
15,606
D0218132
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
21p
0
19,168
1.843
0.338
20,676
5.206
15,777
D0218133
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
25p
0.001
19,227
1.824
0.337
20,703
5.133
15,942
D0218134
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
30p
0.001
19,144
1.809
0.336
20,703
4.811
16,065
D0218135
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
34p
0.001
19,085
1.801
0.337
20,690
4.302
16,090
D0218136
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
39p
0.001
19,096
1.797
0.336
20,655
4.167
16,057
D0218137
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
43p
0
19,126
1.797
0.337
20,656
3.855
16,120
D0218138
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
48p
0
19,034
1.8
0.337
20,673
3.478
16,115
D0218139
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
52p
0
19,049
1.808
0.337
20,672
2.869
16,103
D0218140
SPC
2/
18/
00
10:
57p
0
18,968
1.818
0.338
20,622
2.597
16,048
D0218141
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
01p
0
19,093
1.823
0.338
20,619
2.258
16,118
D0218142
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
06p
0
19,128
1.826
0.338
20,706
2.122
16,138
D0218143
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
10p
0
19,359
1.84
0.338
20,830
2.091
16,299
D0218144
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
15p
0
19,526
1.865
0.337
21,029
2.207
16,510
D0218145
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
19p
0
19,554
1.902
0.338
21,129
2.204
16,635
D0218146
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
24p
0
19,672
1.89
0.337
21,193
2.279
16,669
D0218147
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
29p
0
19,759
1.881
0.337
21,200
2.23
16,753
D0218148
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
33p
0
19,421
1.859
0.337
21,015
2.142
16,631
D0218149
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
38p
0
19,402
1.863
0.337
20,974
2.149
16,579
D0218150
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
42p
0
19,443
1.873
0.337
21,084
2.18
16,662
D0218151
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
47p
0
19,304
1.876
0.338
21,045
2.193
16,643
C­
13
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218152
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
51p
0
19,281
1.877
0.338
20,927
2.177
16,547
D0218153
SPC
2/
18/
00
11:
56p
0
18,983
1.86
0.338
20,652
2.131
16,232
D0218154
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
00a
0
18,808
1.858
0.338
20,524
2.157
16,069
D0218155
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
05a
0
18,686
1.854
0.338
20,428
2.144
15,929
D0218156
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
09a
0
18,846
1.866
0.338
20,517
2.205
15,931
D0218157
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
14a
0
18,764
1.878
0.337
20,498
2.213
15,927
D0218158
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
18a
0
18,472
1.871
0.338
20,280
2.2
15,647
D0218159
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
23a
0
17,854
1.85
0.339
19,686
2.052
15,082
D0218160
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
27a
0
17,736
1.845
0.339
19,557
2.061
14,934
D0218161
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
32a
0
17,403
1.847
0.341
19,252
2.091
14,672
D0218162
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
36a
0
17,355
1.85
0.34
19,136
2.045
14,569
D0218163
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
41a
0
17,379
1.855
0.339
19,129
2.075
14,505
D0218164
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
46a
0
17,087
1.837
0.339
18,732
2.087
14,338
D0218165
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
50a
0
16,961
1.838
0.339
18,336
2.154
14,137
D0218166
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
55a
0
17,003
1.848
0.339
18,388
2.161
14,177
D0218167
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
59a
0
16,695
1.846
0.34
18,111
2.134
13,937
D0218168
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
04a
0
16,473
1.839
0.34
17,922
2.156
13,728
D0218169
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
08a
0
16,540
1.843
0.339
17,942
2.179
13,705
D0218170
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
13a
0
16,537
1.849
0.34
17,880
2.106
13,670
D0218171
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
17a
0
16,301
1.841
0.34
17,694
2.032
13,479
D0218172
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
22a
0
16,331
1.843
0.34
17,661
2.021
13,384
D0218173
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
26a
0.001
16,265
1.846
0.339
17,629
2.058
13,371
D0218174
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
31a
0
16,265
1.845
0.34
17,606
1.979
13,303
D0218175
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
35a
0
16,209
1.843
0.339
17,544
1.9
13,263
D0218176
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
40a
0
16,209
1.85
0.339
17,572
1.905
13,277
D0218177
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
45a
0
16,289
1.861
0.339
17,647
1.956
13,317
D0218178
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
49a
0
16,364
1.86
0.338
17,739
1.972
13,393
D0218179
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
54a
0.001
16,246
1.854
0.339
17,548
1.88
13,224
D0218180
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
58a
0.001
16,199
1.855
0.338
17,493
1.865
13,277
D0218181
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
03a
0.001
16,088
1.86
0.338
17,482
1.877
13,232
C­
14
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218182
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
07a
0.001
16,075
1.862
0.338
17,454
1.868
13,195
D0218183
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
12a
0.002
16,040
1.867
0.339
17,427
1.868
13,183
D0218184
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
16a
0.001
16,150
1.867
0.338
17,449
1.88
13,192
D0218185
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
21a
0.001
16,000
1.867
0.339
17,391
1.858
13,143
D0218186
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
25a
0.001
16,088
1.862
0.339
17,416
1.863
13,154
D0218187
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
30a
0.001
16,098
1.859
0.338
17,338
1.865
13,079
D0218188
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
34a
0.001
16,049
1.865
0.339
17,313
1.879
13,051
D0218189
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
39a
0.001
16,082
1.857
0.339
17,344
1.889
13,095
D0218190
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
43a
0.001
16,022
1.859
0.339
17,333
1.91
13,063
D0218191
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
48a
0.002
16,145
1.869
0.339
17,414
1.981
13,042
D0218192
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
53a
0.002
16,110
1.865
0.338
17,379
1.979
13,079
D0218193
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
57a
0.001
16,142
1.859
0.339
17,329
1.943
13,125
D0218194
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
02a
0.001
16,169
1.868
0.339
17,367
1.996
13,082
D0218195
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
06a
0.001
16,069
1.866
0.339
17,384
2.04
13,105
D0218196
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
11a
0
15,997
1.862
0.34
17,336
2.058
13,104
D0218197
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
15a
0.001
16,144
1.867
0.339
17,466
2.079
13,226
D0218198
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
20a
0.001
16,135
1.869
0.34
17,507
2.057
13,233
D0218199
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
24a
0.002
16,196
1.868
0.339
17,528
2.053
13,167
D0218200
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
29a
0.002
16,265
1.871
0.339
17,569
2.117
13,214
D0218201
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
33a
0.002
16,247
1.879
0.339
17,587
2.146
13,220
D0218202
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
38a
0.002
16,218
1.876
0.339
17,599
2.091
13,243
D0218203
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
42a
0.001
16,320
1.871
0.339
17,634
2.048
13,266
D0218204
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
47a
0.002
16,428
1.874
0.339
17,685
2.224
13,363
D0218205
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
52a
0.002
16,236
1.871
0.338
17,663
2.202
13,349
D0218206
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
56a
0.002
16,350
1.868
0.339
17,713
2.203
13,383
D0218207
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
01a
0.002
16,486
1.875
0.339
17,837
2.389
13,461
D0218208
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
05a
0.001
16,566
1.87
0.338
17,820
2.117
13,502
D0218209
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
10a
0
16,449
1.876
0.339
17,846
2.121
13,588
D0218210
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
14a
0
16,570
1.883
0.339
17,956
2.147
13,718
D0218211
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
19a
0.001
16,643
1.882
0.34
17,936
2.059
13,681
C­
15
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218212
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
23a
0.001
16,573
1.886
0.339
17,969
2.083
13,714
D0218213
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
28a
0.001
16,677
1.885
0.34
18,022
2.119
13,744
D0218214
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
32a
0.001
16,667
1.883
0.34
18,104
2.071
13,798
D0218215
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
37a
0.001
16,770
1.875
0.34
18,231
2.014
13,895
D0218216
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
41a
0
16,910
1.875
0.339
18,355
1.958
14,079
D0218217
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
46a
0.002
17,033
1.887
0.339
18,608
2.008
14,282
D0218218
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
51a
0.001
17,167
1.883
0.338
18,797
2.089
14,410
D0218219
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
55a
0.001
17,374
1.88
0.338
19,082
2.173
14,474
D0218220
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
00a
0.001
17,349
1.908
0.339
19,248
2.214
14,601
D0218221
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
04a
0.001
17,506
1.911
0.339
19,355
2.047
14,702
D0218222
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
09a
0
17,549
1.899
0.339
19,400
2.01
14,759
D0218223
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
13a
0.001
17,665
1.895
0.338
19,476
2.03
14,858
D0218224
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
18a
0.001
17,754
1.9
0.338
19,619
2.022
14,979
D0218225
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
22a
0.002
17,823
1.905
0.338
19,728
2.163
15,054
D0218226
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
27a
0.001
17,890
1.907
0.338
19,813
2.13
15,184
D0218227
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
31a
0.001
18,167
1.917
0.338
20,116
2.2
15,456
D0218228
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
36a
0
18,048
1.919
0.339
20,015
2.284
15,324
D0218229
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
40a
0
17,920
1.913
0.339
19,857
2.084
15,180
D0218230
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
45a
0.001
17,895
1.91
0.339
19,853
1.996
15,165
D0218231
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
49a
0
18,033
1.912
0.339
19,911
1.965
15,276
D0218232
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
54a
0
18,035
1.917
0.338
20,013
1.945
15,379
D0218233
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
59a
0
18,082
1.919
0.338
20,072
1.947
15,408
D0218234
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
03a
0
18,166
1.912
0.338
20,092
1.904
15,462
D0218235
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
08a
0
18,274
1.909
0.338
20,212
1.875
15,588
D0218236
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
12a
0.001
18,261
1.905
0.338
20,229
1.865
15,654
D0218237
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
17a
0.001
18,376
1.908
0.338
20,297
1.854
15,784
D0218238
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
21a
0
18,339
1.909
0.338
20,315
1.855
15,787
D0218239
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
26a
0
18,395
1.908
0.338
20,343
1.845
15,860
D0218240
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
30a
0
18,536
1.91
0.338
20,395
1.842
15,906
D0218241
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
35a
0
18,538
1.91
0.338
20,419
1.838
15,928
C­
16
C­
16
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218242
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
39a
0
18,534
1.912
0.338
20,430
1.844
16,014
D0218243
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
44a
0
18,552
1.917
0.339
20,492
1.845
16,076
D0218244
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
48a
0
18,693
1.92
0.338
20,562
1.844
16,144
D0218245
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
53a
0
18,683
1.917
0.337
20,609
1.839
16,211
D0218246
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
58a
0.001
18,814
1.922
0.337
20,667
1.847
16,309
D0218247
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
02a
0
18,894
1.925
0.337
20,731
1.842
16,377
D0218248
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
07a
0
18,897
1.925
0.337
20,758
1.833
16,400
D0218249
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
11a
0
18,961
1.926
0.337
20,802
1.846
16,425
D0218250
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
16a
0
19,040
1.929
0.337
20,858
1.839
16,508
D0218251
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
20a
0
19,163
1.933
0.337
20,913
1.84
16,580
D0218252
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
25a
0.001
19,166
1.94
0.337
20,947
1.835
16,609
D0218253
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
29a
0.001
19,056
1.941
0.337
20,944
1.848
16,642
D0218254
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
34a
0
19,116
1.933
0.337
20,951
1.84
16,630
D0218255
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
38a
0
19,167
1.939
0.337
21,034
1.845
16,712
D0218256
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
43a
0
19,327
1.94
0.337
21,040
1.841
16,701
D0218257
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
47a
0
19,331
1.953
0.337
21,103
1.844
16,768
D0218258
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
52a
0
19,384
1.946
0.336
21,140
1.837
16,843
D0218259
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
56a
0
19,353
1.942
0.336
21,152
1.832
16,853
D0218260
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
01a
0
19,445
1.944
0.336
21,157
1.828
16,907
D0218261
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
06a
0
19,451
1.982
0.336
21,225
1.84
16,947
D0218262
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
10a
0
19,552
1.974
0.336
21,335
1.864
17,034
D0218263
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
15a
0
19,608
1.98
0.336
21,287
1.861
16,956
D0218264
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
19a
0
19,576
1.958
0.336
21,325
1.864
17,091
D0218265
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
24a
0
19,562
1.951
0.336
21,325
1.878
17,080
D0218266
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
28a
0
19,741
1.952
0.336
21,397
1.89
17,209
D0218267
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
33a
0
19,796
1.946
0.336
21,414
1.866
17,172
D0218268
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
37a
0
19,808
1.943
0.336
21,416
1.862
17,219
D0218269
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
42a
0
19,697
1.94
0.336
21,413
1.859
17,250
D0218270
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
46a
0
19,783
1.941
0.336
21,483
1.862
17,274
D0218271
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
51a
0
19,859
1.938
0.336
21,527
1.861
17,375
C­
17
C­
17
Table
C­
2.
(
Continued)
Quantification
Method
Collection
Data
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0218272
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
55a
0
19,796
1.94
0.336
21,542
1.869
17,401
D0218273
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
00a
0
19,828
1.941
0.337
21,568
1.852
17,447
D0218274
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
05a
0
20,004
1.937
0.336
21,642
1.842
17,593
D0218275
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
09a
0
20,028
1.937
0.336
21,674
1.833
17,620
D0218276
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
14a
0
20,008
1.938
0.337
21,724
1.821
17,744
D0218277
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
18a
0
20,015
1.927
0.337
21,674
1.82
17687
Table
C­
3.
Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219002
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
26a
0
21,206
1.922
0.333
22,564
1.791
18,870
D0219003
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
31a
0
21,661
1.927
0.33
22,868
1.8
19,147
D0219004
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
35a
0
21,580
1.922
0.331
22,814
1.795
19,165
D0219005
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
40a
0
21,769
1.921
0.329
22,888
1.789
19,224
D0219006
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
44a
0
21,620
1.92
0.331
22,803
1.79
19,127
D0219007
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
49a
0
21,457
1.917
0.332
22,685
1.789
19,059
D0219008
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
54a
0
21,457
1.917
0.331
22,738
1.785
19,130
D0219009
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
58a
0
21,920
1.917
0.33
22,938
1.787
19,366
D0219010
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
03a
0
21,709
1.917
0.33
22,951
1.789
19,389
D0219011
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
07a
0
21,847
1.92
0.33
22,968
1.79
19,386
D0219012
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
12a
0
21,703
1.922
0.331
22,878
1.784
19,276
D0219013
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
16a
0
21,380
1.918
0.333
22,684
1.789
19,104
D0219014
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
21a
0
21,775
1.919
0.331
22,860
1.781
19,250
D0219015
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
28a
0
21,913
1.924
0.33
22,997
1.782
19,401
D0219016
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
37a
0
21,890
1.921
0.33
22,980
1.785
19,387
D0219017
SPC
2/
19/
00
12:
12p
0
22,296
1.932
0.329
23,261
1.797
19,778
D0219018
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
05p
0
22,677
1.926
0.327
23,520
1.866
20,151
D0219019
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
14p
0
22,844
1.928
0.326
23,642
1.868
20,272
D0219020
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
41p
0
22,368
1.934
0.327
23,297
1.838
19,837
D0219021
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
47p
0
22,753
1.935
0.326
23,528
1.919
20,061
D0219022
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
52p
0
22,525
1.935
0.326
23,374
1.885
19,912
D0219023
SPC
2/
19/
00
1:
56p
0
22,937
1.941
0.324
23,660
1.862
20,182
D0219024
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
01p
0
22,618
1.944
0.325
23,432
1.844
19,938
D0219025
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
05p
0.001
22,584
1.944
0.324
23,378
1.874
19,784
D0219026
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
10p
0.002
22,423
1.94
0.325
23,280
1.875
19,723
D0219027
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
14p
0.002
22,272
1.94
0.326
23,172
1.881
19,570
D0219028
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
19p
0.002
22,062
1.941
0.327
23,102
1.889
19,509
D0219029
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
23p
0.005
22,293
1.953
0.325
23,168
1.944
19,488
D0219030
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
28p
0.002
22,251
1.949
0.325
23,193
1.969
19,540
D0219031
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
32p
0.001
22,416
1.954
0.324
23,304
1.889
19,663
C­
19
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219032
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
37p
0
21,986
1.95
0.327
22,964
1.875
19,260
D0219033
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
41p
0
21,817
1.947
0.327
22,841
1.875
19,151
D0219034
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
46p
0
22,017
1.949
0.327
23,015
1.891
19,342
D0219035
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
50p
0
21,795
1.955
0.328
22,847
1.863
19,109
D0219036
SPC
2/
19/
00
2:
55p
0
21,531
1.945
0.328
22,667
1.848
18,893
D0219037
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
00p
0
21,908
1.951
0.326
22,849
1.88
19,130
D0219038
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
04p
0
21,376
1.951
0.328
22,531
1.871
18,681
D0219039
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
09p
0
21,195
1.959
0.327
22,457
1.837
18,489
D0219040
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
13p
0
21,075
1.962
0.327
22,302
1.897
18,294
D0219041
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
18p
0
21,170
1.965
0.326
22,318
1.853
18,259
D0219042
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
22p
0
20,910
1.964
0.328
22,161
1.854
18,059
D0219043
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
27p
0
20,668
1.969
0.328
22,048
1.877
17,924
D0219044
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
31p
0
20,759
1.977
0.327
22,082
1.863
17,867
D0219045
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
36p
0
20,863
1.976
0.327
22,076
1.817
17,843
D0219046
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
40p
0
20,301
1.964
0.329
21,637
1.842
17,405
D0219047
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
45p
0
20,768
1.974
0.326
22,040
1.915
17,816
D0219048
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
49p
0
21,031
1.974
0.325
22,214
1.913
18,016
D0219049
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
54p
0
20,813
1.976
0.327
22,023
1.818
17,761
D0219050
SPC
2/
19/
00
3:
58p
0
20,906
1.976
0.326
22,118
1.808
17,825
D0219051
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
03p
0
20,915
1.977
0.326
22,087
1.81
17,836
D0219052
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
07p
0
20,654
1.99
0.327
21,985
1.799
17,685
D0219053
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
12p
0
20,272
1.984
0.328
21,782
1.786
17,436
D0219054
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
17p
0
20,521
1.984
0.326
21,942
1.799
17,597
D0219055
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
21p
0
20,770
1.997
0.327
22,153
1.806
17,861
D0219056
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
26p
0
20,969
2.035
0.328
22,337
1.827
18,158
D0219057
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
30p
0
20,694
2.051
0.329
22,154
1.829
17,845
D0219058
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
35p
0
20,354
2.036
0.329
21,926
1.846
17,548
D0219059
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
39p
0
19,741
2.03
0.331
21,466
1.835
16,950
D0219060
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
44p
0
19,750
2.029
0.331
21,424
1.827
16,906
D0219061
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
48p
0
19,974
2.035
0.33
21,590
1.829
17,081
C­
20
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219062
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
53p
0
20,120
2.047
0.33
21,646
1.831
17,196
D0219063
SPC
2/
19/
00
4:
57p
0
19,622
2.054
0.331
21,397
1.84
16,824
D0219064
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
02p
0
19,194
2.076
0.333
21,000
1.847
16,296
D0219065
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
06p
0
18,344
2.067
0.335
20,326
1.86
15,412
D0219066
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
11p
0
17,703
2.071
0.336
19,814
1.859
14,775
D0219067
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
15p
0
17,363
2.227
0.339
19,449
1.869
14,400
D0219068
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
20p
0
17,084
2.056
0.336
19,059
1.867
14,116
D0219069
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
24p
0
17,111
2.095
0.336
18,887
1.865
14,028
D0219070
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
29p
0
16,869
2.068
0.336
18,387
1.87
13,818
D0219071
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
33p
0
16,070
2.054
0.338
17,589
1.868
13,070
D0219072
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
38p
0
15,709
2.055
0.339
17,138
1.878
12,630
D0219073
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
42p
0
15,108
2.042
0.339
16,325
1.873
11,993
D0219074
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
47p
0
14,752
2.05
0.34
15,841
1.882
11,748
D0219075
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
51p
0
14,328
2.051
0.341
15,344
1.88
11,252
D0219076
SPC
2/
19/
00
5:
56p
0
13,938
2.056
0.342
15,003
1.885
10,916
D0219077
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
01p
0
13,595
2.063
0.342
14,707
1.889
10,656
D0219078
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
05p
0
13,135
2.074
0.342
14,172
1.894
10,149
D0219079
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
10p
0
12,463
2.043
0.342
13,189
1.893
9,552
D0219080
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
14p
0
12,137
2.031
0.342
12,907
1.892
9,307
D0219081
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
19p
0
12,344
2.04
0.342
12,996
1.891
9,386
D0219082
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
23p
0
12,497
2.055
0.342
13,228
1.896
9,562
D0219083
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
28p
0
12,473
2.069
0.342
13,268
1.9
9,594
D0219084
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
32p
0
12,549
2.067
0.343
13,223
1.909
9,615
D0219085
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
37p
0
12,535
2.062
0.343
13,215
1.912
9,602
D0219086
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
41p
0
12,359
2.061
0.343
13,154
1.912
9,538
D0219087
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
46p
0
12,335
2.063
0.344
13,031
1.916
9,430
D0219088
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
50p
0
12,018
2.075
0.347
12,871
1.918
9,286
D0219089
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
55p
0
11,996
2.071
0.347
12,720
1.924
9,190
D0219090
SPC
2/
19/
00
6:
59p
0
11,697
2.079
0.347
12,518
1.92
8,976
D0219091
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
04p
0
11,733
2.077
0.347
12,460
1.922
8,900
C­
21
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219092
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
08p
0
11,837
2.078
0.348
12,594
1.928
9,089
D0219093
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
13p
0
11,931
2.082
0.348
12,790
1.935
9,244
D0219094
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
18p
0
12,217
2.083
0.347
13,057
1.931
9,494
D0219095
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
22p
0
12,390
2.088
0.347
13,224
1.928
9,622
D0219096
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
27p
0
12,381
2.096
0.347
13,247
1.938
9,666
D0219097
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
31p
0
12,654
2.107
0.347
13,450
1.946
9,813
D0219098
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
36p
0
12,748
2.108
0.348
13,543
1.949
9,882
D0219099
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
40p
0.001
12,605
2.109
0.348
13,630
1.956
9,932
D0219100
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
45p
0.002
12,760
2.11
0.347
13,870
1.956
10,030
D0219101
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
49p
0.001
12,669
2.11
0.349
13,680
1.955
9,964
D0219102
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
54p
0.002
12,711
2.115
0.349
13,698
1.956
9,962
D0219103
SPC
2/
19/
00
7:
58p
0.002
12,493
2.116
0.35
13,381
1.96
9,842
D0219104
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
03p
0.002
12,062
2.13
0.35
12,991
1.966
9,455
D0219105
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
07p
0.002
11,481
2.121
0.354
12,475
1.969
9,002
D0219106
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
12p
0.002
11,211
2.12
0.355
12,194
1.974
8,780
D0219107
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
17p
0.002
11,202
2.115
0.354
12,169
1.975
8,734
D0219108
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
21p
0.003
11,128
2.121
0.355
12,111
1.974
8,701
D0219109
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
26p
0.004
11,103
2.12
0.354
12,104
1.98
8,652
D0219110
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
30p
0.003
11,149
2.13
0.354
12,089
1.969
8,641
D0219111
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
35p
0.003
10,981
2.133
0.354
12,063
1.97
8,626
D0219112
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
39p
0.004
11,048
2.134
0.355
11,935
1.97
8,517
D0219113
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
44p
0.004
10,806
2.143
0.356
11,781
1.969
8,384
D0219114
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
48p
0.005
10,620
2.128
0.356
11,649
1.976
8,275
D0219115
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
53p
0.005
10,540
2.11
0.356
11,358
1.968
8,148
D0219116
SPC
2/
19/
00
8:
57p
0.005
9,984
2.113
0.359
10,673
1.979
7,731
D0219117
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
02p
0.006
10,004
2.109
0.359
10,770
1.973
7,806
D0219118
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
07p
0.005
9,872
2.111
0.359
10,607
1.976
7,692
D0219119
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
11p
0.006
10,053
2.112
0.359
10,732
1.975
7,767
D0219120
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
16p
0.006
10,175
2.111
0.358
10,785
1.97
7,829
D0219121
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
20p
0.008
10,172
2.117
0.357
10,830
1.979
7,828
C­
22
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219122
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
25p
0.008
9,848
2.119
0.358
10,534
1.977
7,584
D0219123
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
29p
0.007
9,346
2.115
0.359
10,176
1.972
7,252
D0219124
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
34p
0.007
9,340
2.118
0.36
10,197
1.983
7,322
D0219125
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
38p
0.008
9,374
2.12
0.36
10,153
1.98
7,232
D0219126
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
43p
0.01
8,939
2.123
0.361
9,819
1.984
6,864
D0219127
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
47p
0.009
8,893
2.126
0.361
9,738
1.977
6,782
D0219128
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
52p
0.009
8,798
2.128
0.361
9,666
1.978
6,661
D0219129
SPC
2/
19/
00
9:
57p
0.011
8,861
2.13
0.361
9,752
1.984
6,800
D0219130
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
01p
0.009
8,939
2.136
0.361
9,774
1.983
6,813
D0219131
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
06p
0.011
8,882
2.137
0.362
9,705
1.987
6,767
D0219132
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
10p
0.011
8,922
2.135
0.361
9,747
1.979
6,787
D0219133
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
15p
0.009
8,924
2.139
0.362
9,727
1.984
6,749
D0219134
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
19p
0.011
8,853
2.135
0.363
9,714
1.985
6,739
D0219135
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
24p
0.01
8,728
2.134
0.364
9,575
1.985
6,593
D0219136
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
28p
0.012
8,573
2.136
0.364
9,547
1.986
6,566
D0219137
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
33p
0.009
8,429
2.137
0.365
9,430
1.991
6,429
D0219138
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
37p
0.011
8,495
2.136
0.364
9,463
1.99
6,486
D0219139
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
42p
0.01
8,539
2.138
0.364
9,406
1.987
6,409
D0219140
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
47p
0.013
8,328
2.14
0.364
9,332
1.993
6,333
D0219141
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
51p
0.014
8,418
2.139
0.364
9,343
1.99
6,322
D0219142
SPC
2/
19/
00
10:
56p
0.016
8,416
2.143
0.363
9,363
1.989
6,348
D0219143
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
00p
0.017
8,486
2.14
0.362
9,399
1.985
6,385
D0219144
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
05p
0.016
8,319
2.157
0.363
9,389
1.987
6,372
D0219145
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
09p
0.017
8,408
2.15
0.363
9,410
1.987
6,351
D0219146
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
14p
0.017
8,478
2.15
0.364
9,417
1.994
6,389
D0219147
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
18p
0.016
8,430
2.147
0.364
9,385
1.993
6,377
D0219148
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
23p
0.016
8,314
2.151
0.365
9,293
1.996
6,226
D0219149
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
27p
0.017
8,085
2.167
0.365
9,264
1.996
6,213
D0219150
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
32p
0.017
7,891
2.155
0.365
9,184
1.996
6,157
D0219151
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
37p
0.018
8,199
2.156
0.365
9,160
1.991
6,105
C­
23
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219152
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
41p
0.02
7,888
2.151
0.365
9,099
1.99
6,037
D0219153
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
46p
0.019
8,254
2.155
0.365
9,240
2
6,211
D0219154
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
50p
0.019
8,034
2.153
0.366
9,156
1.996
6,108
D0219155
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
55p
0.024
8,053
2.151
0.365
9,165
1.994
6,125
D0219156
SPC
2/
19/
00
11:
59p
0.023
8,107
2.155
0.366
9,130
2.005
6,093
D0219157
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
04a
0.021
8,029
2.155
0.365
9,126
1.995
6,073
D0219158
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
08a
0.021
8,002
2.155
0.365
9,087
2.001
6,015
D0219159
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
13a
0.021
7,917
2.159
0.366
9,009
1.995
5,920
D0219160
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
17a
0.022
8,023
2.162
0.366
9,052
2
5,975
D0219161
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
22a
0.022
7,884
2.159
0.366
9,004
1.997
5,956
D0219162
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
27a
0.022
7,869
2.163
0.366
9,018
2.005
5,936
D0219163
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
31a
0.02
7,903
2.159
0.366
9,032
2
5,987
D0219164
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
36a
0.021
7,886
2.163
0.367
9,041
2.006
5,990
D0219165
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
40a
0.023
7,993
2.164
0.366
9,055
2.004
5,995
D0219166
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
45a
0.025
7,996
2.163
0.366
9,092
1.998
6,019
D0219167
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
49a
0.024
8,030
2.162
0.366
9,076
1.994
6,032
D0219168
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
54a
0.024
7,916
2.182
0.366
9,074
1.994
6,001
D0219169
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
58a
0.023
7,955
2.165
0.366
9,038
2.003
5,978
D0219170
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
03a
0.023
7,908
2.163
0.366
9,013
2.001
5,952
D0219171
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
08a
0.025
7,840
2.165
0.367
9,020
2.004
5,931
D0219172
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
12a
0.027
7,873
2.163
0.366
9,016
2
5,967
D0219173
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
17a
0.025
7,911
2.163
0.367
8,980
2.002
5,902
D0219174
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
21a
0.022
7,798
2.165
0.367
8,951
2.008
5,835
D0219175
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
26a
0.023
7,759
2.164
0.367
8,948
2.004
5,827
D0219176
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
30a
0.024
7,939
2.163
0.367
8,965
1.998
5,879
D0219177
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
35a
0.026
7,728
2.166
0.367
8,958
2.001
5,882
D0219178
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
39a
0.023
7,721
2.165
0.367
8,898
2.006
5,775
D0219179
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
44a
0.026
7,844
2.164
0.367
8,935
1.995
5,849
D0219180
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
49a
0.027
7,711
2.168
0.367
8,943
2.009
5,881
D0219181
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
53a
0.025
7,726
2.163
0.367
8,906
2.004
5,806
C­
24
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219182
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
58a
0.025
7,697
2.164
0.367
8,919
2.003
5,821
D0219183
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
02a
0.025
7,757
2.197
0.368
8,895
2.009
5,834
D0219184
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
07a
0.026
7,792
2.248
0.368
8,908
2.008
5,800
D0219185
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
11a
0.026
7,736
2.256
0.368
8,897
2.003
5,768
D0219186
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
16a
0.033
7,763
2.168
0.367
8,906
2.006
5,834
D0219187
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
20a
0.028
7,635
2.162
0.367
8,839
1.996
5,745
D0219188
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
25a
0.027
7,691
2.16
0.367
8,834
2.003
5,728
D0219189
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
30a
0.026
7,593
2.16
0.368
8,793
1.999
5,703
D0219190
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
34a
0.027
7,655
2.168
0.368
8,834
2.012
5,752
D0219191
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
39a
0.028
7,686
2.166
0.368
8,819
2.005
5,704
D0219192
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
43a
0.028
7,639
2.171
0.368
8,830
2.006
5,697
D0219193
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
48a
0.029
7,639
2.172
0.369
8,810
2.01
5,709
D0219194
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
52a
0.033
7,624
2.166
0.368
8,810
2.004
5,675
D0219195
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
57a
0.032
7,575
2.167
0.369
8,808
2.01
5,717
D0219196
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
02a
0.029
7,608
2.17
0.369
8,798
2.021
5,706
D0219197
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
06a
0.027
7,643
2.166
0.368
8,781
2.01
5,691
D0219198
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
11a
0.026
7,519
2.171
0.368
8,752
2.002
5,647
D0219199
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
15a
0.026
7,569
2.174
0.368
8,752
2.004
5,649
D0219200
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
20a
0.027
7,529
2.178
0.369
8,768
2.019
5,650
D0219201
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
24a
0.03
7,499
2.169
0.369
8,747
2.008
5,645
D0219202
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
29a
0.032
7,583
2.171
0.369
8,749
2.013
5,642
D0219203
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
34a
0.032
7,573
2.17
0.37
8,728
2.011
5,610
D0219204
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
38a
0.029
7,505
2.172
0.369
8,720
2.017
5,600
D0219205
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
43a
0.036
7,501
2.173
0.369
8,729
2.014
5,605
D0219206
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
47a
0.033
7,605
2.175
0.369
8,742
2.014
5,630
D0219207
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
52a
0.026
7,488
2.174
0.369
8,713
2.017
5,576
D0219208
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
56a
0.031
7,507
2.178
0.369
8,723
2.021
5,600
D0219209
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
01a
0.037
7,460
2.177
0.368
8,714
2.018
5,593
D0219210
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
06a
0.034
7,515
2.18
0.369
8,720
2.019
5,622
D0219211
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
10a
0.033
7,525
2.181
0.369
8,688
2.025
5,586
C­
25
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219212
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
15a
0.035
7,494
2.181
0.37
8,692
2.022
5,574
D0219213
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
19a
0.032
7,445
2.181
0.37
8,664
2.019
5,535
D0219214
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
24a
0.034
7,424
2.181
0.37
8,662
2.015
5,556
D0219215
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
28a
0.029
7,424
2.182
0.37
8,646
2.016
5,520
D0219216
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
33a
0.03
7,420
2.179
0.37
8,657
2.015
5,537
D0219217
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
37a
0.03
7,480
2.176
0.37
8,651
2.022
5,512
D0219218
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
42a
0.03
7,372
2.177
0.37
8,627
2.016
5,516
D0219219
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
47a
0.031
7,458
2.179
0.37
8,664
2.017
5,547
D0219220
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
51a
0.03
7,440
2.176
0.37
8,628
2.012
5,519
D0219221
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
56a
0.03
7,421
2.177
0.371
8,610
2.014
5,470
D0219222
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
00a
0.03
7,444
2.178
0.37
8,606
2.014
5,480
D0219223
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
05a
0.033
7,314
2.181
0.37
8,612
2.02
5,472
D0219224
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
09a
0.042
7,347
2.181
0.37
8,630
2.017
5,502
D0219225
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
14a
0.044
7,281
2.179
0.37
8,609
2.015
5,461
D0219226
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
18a
0.042
7,335
2.181
0.371
8,580
2.014
5,425
D0219227
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
23a
0.029
7,305
2.179
0.372
8,560
2.03
5,395
D0219228
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
28a
0.029
7,341
2.193
0.371
8,578
2.022
5,456
D0219229
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
32a
0.031
7,289
2.185
0.371
8,534
2.023
5,411
D0219230
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
37a
0.031
7,289
2.186
0.371
8,542
2.022
5,378
D0219231
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
41a
0.032
7,280
2.178
0.371
8,513
2.02
5,376
D0219232
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
46a
0.03
7,247
2.178
0.372
8,499
2.019
5,339
D0219233
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
50a
0.033
7,178
2.175
0.372
8,466
2.02
5,314
D0219234
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
55a
0.032
7,166
2.178
0.372
8,464
2.023
5,320
D0219235
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
00a
0.034
7,242
2.177
0.372
8,474
2.023
5,340
D0219236
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
04a
0.036
7,170
2.181
0.372
8,472
2.022
5,314
D0219237
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
09a
0.036
7,216
2.184
0.372
8,465
2.022
5,307
D0219238
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
13a
0.031
7,154
2.196
0.373
8,439
2.024
5,288
D0219239
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
18a
0.033
7,140
2.182
0.374
8,424
2.017
5,289
D0219240
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
22a
0.032
7,198
2.179
0.373
8,399
2.021
5,265
D0219241
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
27a
0.032
7,149
2.184
0.374
8,406
2.022
5,268
C­
26
C­
26
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219242
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
32a
0.034
7,177
2.186
0.373
8,398
2.021
5,271
D0219243
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
36a
0.033
7,135
2.184
0.374
8,373
2.021
5,239
D0219244
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
41a
0.032
7,185
2.185
0.374
8,409
2.027
5,290
D0219245
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
45a
0.033
7,150
2.18
0.374
8,391
2.021
5,204
D0219246
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
50a
0.035
7,201
2.18
0.373
8,433
2.027
5,291
D0219247
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
54a
0.034
7,177
2.218
0.374
8,423
2.029
5,275
D0219248
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
59a
0.032
7,117
2.184
0.373
8,385
2.026
5,236
D0219249
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
04a
0.036
7,120
2.189
0.374
8,398
2.03
5,249
D0219250
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
08a
0.037
7,132
2.191
0.373
8,402
2.034
5,275
D0219251
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
13a
0.032
7,084
2.191
0.373
8,361
2.033
5,238
D0219252
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
17a
0.034
7,113
2.209
0.373
8,397
2.026
5,250
D0219253
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
22a
0.035
7,090
2.205
0.374
8,399
2.031
5,246
D0219254
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
26a
0.034
7,067
2.207
0.374
8,357
2.031
5,188
D0219255
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
31a
0.033
7,043
2.202
0.373
8,328
2.029
5,187
D0219256
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
36a
0.034
7,029
2.215
0.373
8,350
2.028
5,211
D0219257
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
40a
0.032
7,067
2.226
0.374
8,349
2.035
5,201
D0219258
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
45a
0.035
7,070
2.229
0.375
8,332
2.039
5,183
D0219259
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
49a
0.034
7,099
2.221
0.374
8,330
2.034
5,164
D0219260
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
54a
0.04
7,148
2.219
0.373
8,361
2.034
5,186
D0219261
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
58a
0.044
7,190
2.229
0.373
8,433
2.039
5,284
D0219262
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
03a
0.045
7,178
2.228
0.373
8,444
2.039
5,294
D0219263
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
08a
0.045
7,273
2.245
0.372
8,505
2.047
5,369
D0219264
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
12a
0.044
7,311
2.243
0.371
8,515
2.049
5,413
D0219265
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
17a
0.039
7,320
2.252
0.372
8,569
2.056
5,415
D0219266
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
21a
0.042
7,375
2.245
0.371
8,629
2.081
5,509
D0219267
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
26a
0.045
7,397
2.249
0.371
8,657
2.138
5,508
D0219268
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
30a
0.046
7,479
2.353
0.371
8,726
2.175
5,619
D0219269
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
35a
0.032
7,462
2.25
0.37
8,758
2.173
5,661
D0219270
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
40a
0.009
7,475
2.216
0.37
8,769
2.193
5,696
D0219271
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
44a
0.004
7,364
2.211
0.371
8,720
2.22
5,635
C­
27
C­
27
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219272
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
49a
0.002
7,385
2.211
0.371
8,742
2.231
5,624
D0219273
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
53a
0.001
7,308
2.205
0.371
8,723
2.19
5,617
D0219274
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
36a
0
7,099
2.167
0.375
8,476
2.029
5,261
D0219275
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
41a
0
7,184
2.173
0.375
8,566
2.035
5,331
D0219276
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
45a
0
7,186
2.17
0.374
8,526
2.035
5,297
D0219277
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
50a
0
7,005
2.167
0.374
8,483
2.039
5,247
D0219278
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
54a
0
7,005
2.16
0.372
8,432
2.032
5,195
D0219279
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
59a
0
7,099
2.158
0.371
8,485
2.036
5,301
D0219280
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
03a
0
7,152
2.202
0.371
8,506
2.037
5,307
D0219281
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
08a
0
7,119
2.157
0.369
8,514
2.047
5,309
D0219282
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
12a
0
6,976
2.147
0.367
8,431
2.039
5,187
D0219283
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
17a
0
6,957
2.146
0.367
8,427
2.045
5,195
D0219284
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
22a
0
7,099
2.144
0.366
8,494
2.04
5,299
D0219285
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
26a
0
7,067
2.148
0.366
8,463
2.04
5,208
D0219286
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
31a
0
7,086
2.157
0.368
8,470
2.048
5,223
D0219287
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
35a
0
6,972
2.158
0.368
8,451
2.053
5,206
D0219288
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
40a
0
7,076
2.149
0.367
8,439
2.05
5,206
D0219289
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
44a
0
6,969
2.143
0.367
8,340
2.05
5,079
D0219290
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
49a
0
6,887
2.137
0.365
8,369
2.043
5,129
D0219291
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
53a
0
6,926
2.135
0.365
8,323
2.04
5,097
D0219292
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
58a
0
6,825
2.135
0.366
8,339
2.041
5,112
D0219293
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
02a
0
7,060
2.132
0.366
8,408
2.041
5,173
D0219294
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
07a
0
7,027
2.132
0.365
8,423
2.034
5,172
D0219295
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
12a
0
6,772
2.125
0.364
8,240
2.033
4,954
D0219296
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
16a
0
6,737
2.12
0.364
8,144
2.029
4,892
D0219297
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
21a
0
6,788
2.127
0.365
8,215
2.037
4,960
D0219298
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
25a
0
6,760
2.125
0.364
8,209
2.031
4,912
D0219299
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
30a
0
6,534
2.128
0.366
8,132
2.043
4,828
D0219300
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
34a
0
6,793
2.126
0.365
8,188
2.039
4,871
D0219301
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
39a
0
6,669
2.119
0.364
8,123
2.033
4,821
C­
28
Table
C­
3.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0219302
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
43a
0
6,579
2.116
0.364
8,034
2.026
4,733
D0219303
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
48a
0
6,594
2.117
0.365
8,050
2.022
4,720
D0219304
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
52a
0
6,817
2.127
0.367
8,269
2.027
5,016
D0219305
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
57a
0
6,780
2.124
0.367
8,213
2.019
4,948
D0219306
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
02p
0
6,853
2.124
0.367
8,263
2.025
4,957
D0219307
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
06p
0
6,875
2.14
0.368
8,294
2.033
4,997
D0219308
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
11p
0
7,006
2.133
0.367
8,318
2.025
5,052
D0219309
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
15p
0
6,665
2.119
0.367
8,082
2.011
4,770
D0219310
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
30p
0
6,820
2.122
0.369
8,138
2.011
4,855
D0219311
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
35p
0
6,896
2.126
0.37
8,275
2.016
4,950
D0219312
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
40p
0
6,994
2.13
0.37
8,290
2.006
4,984
D0219313
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
44p
0
6,837
2.133
0.371
8,194
2.016
4,872
D0219314
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
49p
0
6,810
2.134
0.371
8,215
2.032
4,865
D0219315
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
53p
0
6,683
2.132
0.371
8,062
2.025
4,687
D0219316
SPC
2/
20/
00
12:
58p
0
6,837
2.136
0.37
8,183
2.033
4,855
D0219317
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
02p
0
6,832
2.135
0.368
8,210
2.027
4,887
D0219318
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
07p
0
6,588
2.133
0.37
8,033
2.028
4,655
D0219319
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
11p
0
6,719
2.132
0.368
8,137
2.026
4,774
D0219320
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
16p
0
6,721
2.129
0.366
8,112
2.033
4,757
D0219321
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
20p
0
6,765
2.128
0.364
8,165
2.048
4,799
D0219322
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
25p
0
6,803
2.131
0.364
8,165
2.031
4,815
D0219323
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
29p
0
6,807
2.162
0.366
8,181
2.043
4,832
D0219324
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
34p
0
6,611
2.131
0.363
8,049
2.018
4,716
D0219325
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
38p
0
6,609
2.131
0.363
8,039
2.029
4,673
D0219326
SPC
2/
20/
00
1:
43p
0
6,761
2.138
0.363
8,152
2.045
4,800
D0219327
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
32p
0
6,301
2.142
0.365
7,828
1.989
4,453
D0219328
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
36p
0
6,443
2.12
0.364
7,813
2.008
4386
C­
29
Table
C­
4.
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220002
SPC
2/
20/
00
2:
59p
0.001
6,066
2.106
0.364
7,556
1.982
4,177
DO220003
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
03p
0.001
6,132
2.105
0.363
7,606
1.989
4,178
DO220004
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
08p
0.001
5,949
2.102
0.364
7,442
1.974
4,048
DO220005
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
13p
0.001
5,949
2.103
0.364
7,479
1.998
4,090
DO220006
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
17p
0.002
6,007
2.107
0.363
7,511
2.002
4,090
DO220007
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
22p
0.002
6,122
2.109
0.362
7,560
1.987
4,134
DO220008
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
26p
0.001
5,966
2.111
0.363
7,468
1.996
4,036
DO220009
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
31p
0.002
6,027
2.11
0.363
7,526
1.99
4,083
DO220010
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
35p
0.001
5,961
2.114
0.364
7,486
1.997
4,050
DO220011
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
40p
0.002
5,976
2.123
0.363
7,525
1.996
4,095
DO220012
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
44p
0.002
6,226
2.143
0.362
7,709
1.986
4,321
DO220013
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
49p
0.001
6,276
2.142
0.363
7,797
1.995
4,403
DO220014
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
53p
0.002
6,313
2.12
0.363
7,761
2.001
4,369
DO220015
SPC
2/
20/
00
3:
58p
0.002
6,368
2.114
0.362
7,757
1.997
4,396
DO220016
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
02p
0.002
6,310
2.112
0.362
7,718
1.981
4,314
DO220017
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
07p
0.002
6,234
2.117
0.363
7,649
1.993
4,278
DO220018
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
11p
0.002
6,285
2.152
0.363
7,736
1.996
4,342
DO220019
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
16p
0.002
6,360
2.122
0.362
7,775
1.997
4,391
DO220020
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
21p
0.001
6,276
2.139
0.363
7,722
1.997
4,308
DO220021
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
25p
0.001
6,381
2.127
0.363
7,780
1.984
4,361
DO220022
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
30p
0.001
6,260
2.114
0.363
7,715
1.981
4,325
DO220023
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
34p
0.002
6,386
2.12
0.363
7,729
2.005
4,332
DO220024
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
39p
0.002
6,370
2.107
0.362
7,744
2.006
4,323
DO220025
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
43p
0.001
6,271
2.101
0.363
7,695
1.986
4,304
DO220026
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
48p
0.001
6,541
2.101
0.363
7,865
1.978
4,436
DO220027
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
52p
0.001
6,474
2.114
0.363
7,884
1.98
4,506
DO220028
SPC
2/
20/
00
4:
57p
0.001
6,527
2.104
0.362
7,938
1.972
4,543
DO220029
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
01p
0.001
6,528
2.104
0.361
7,904
1.979
4,505
DO220030
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
06p
0.001
6,425
2.101
0.363
7,799
1.978
4,427
DO220031
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
10p
0.002
6,422
2.101
0.362
7,842
1.995
4,482
C­
30
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220032
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
15p
0.002
6,529
2.101
0.362
7,909
1.988
4,543
DO220033
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
19p
0.001
6,441
2.13
0.362
7,886
1.977
4,484
DO220034
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
24p
0.001
6,393
2.102
0.362
7,825
1.973
4,445
DO220035
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
29p
0.001
6,441
2.113
0.362
7,861
1.97
4,447
DO220036
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
33p
0.001
6,517
2.141
0.363
7,918
1.969
4,514
DO220037
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
38p
0.002
6,399
2.112
0.362
7,865
1.972
4,483
DO220038
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
42p
0.002
6,396
2.111
0.361
7,792
1.982
4,401
DO220039
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
47p
0.002
6,281
2.102
0.362
7,763
1.977
4,387
DO220040
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
51p
0.002
6,352
2.102
0.362
7,772
1.98
4,380
DO220041
SPC
2/
20/
00
5:
56p
0.002
6,462
2.105
0.362
7,828
1.979
4,435
DO220042
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
00p
0.002
6,319
2.108
0.361
7,792
2.03
4,407
DO220043
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
05p
0.002
6,315
2.108
0.362
7,745
2.071
4,375
DO220044
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
09p
0.002
6,222
2.106
0.362
7,751
2.068
4,360
DO220045
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
14p
0.002
6,327
2.107
0.362
7,752
2.036
4,365
DO220046
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
18p
0.002
6,350
2.103
0.362
7,760
2.009
4,382
DO220047
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
23p
0.002
6,358
2.102
0.362
7,747
1.999
4,356
DO220048
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
28p
0.002
6,454
2.101
0.363
7,829
2.001
4,484
DO220049
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
32p
0.002
6,385
2.102
0.362
7,809
1.983
4,454
DO220050
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
37p
0.002
6,475
2.105
0.363
7,828
1.988
4,436
DO220051
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
41p
0.002
6,495
2.102
0.363
7,828
1.984
4,438
DO220052
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
46p
0.002
6,510
2.098
0.363
7,901
1.989
4,537
DO220053
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
50p
0.002
6,508
2.096
0.364
7,921
1.987
4,556
DO220054
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
55p
0.002
6,517
2.097
0.363
7,890
1.974
4,518
DO220055
SPC
2/
20/
00
6:
59p
0.002
6,562
2.101
0.363
7,929
1.977
4,576
DO220056
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
04p
0.003
6,636
2.092
0.363
8,035
1.982
4,708
DO220057
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
08p
0.002
6,730
2.088
0.364
8,089
1.977
4,787
DO220058
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
13p
0.003
6,724
2.096
0.364
8,068
1.975
4,743
DO220059
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
17p
0.003
6,766
2.148
0.365
8,079
1.973
4,763
DO220060
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
22p
0.003
6,831
2.151
0.365
8,140
1.986
4,813
DO220061
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
26p
0.003
6,821
2.15
0.365
8,152
2.003
4,798
C­
31
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220062
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
31p
0.003
6,784
2.119
0.366
8,132
2.003
4,845
DO220063
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
36p
0.003
6,776
2.141
0.366
8,125
2
4,786
DO220064
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
40p
0.003
7,095
2.161
0.367
8,344
2.017
5,051
DO220065
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
45p
0.003
7,199
2.137
0.367
8,413
2.045
5,191
DO220066
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
49p
0.004
7,204
2.145
0.367
8,383
2.11
5,127
DO220067
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
54p
0.004
7,148
2.155
0.367
8,399
2.253
5,118
DO220068
SPC
2/
20/
00
7:
58p
0.004
7,290
2.174
0.367
8,437
2.321
5,193
DO220069
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
03p
0.005
7,244
2.329
0.369
8,472
2.301
5,197
DO220070
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
07p
0.005
7,243
2.198
0.368
8,468
2.307
5,197
DO220071
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
12p
0.006
7,176
2.156
0.368
8,434
2.314
5,153
DO220072
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
16p
0.007
7,206
2.195
0.368
8,433
2.295
5,185
DO220073
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
21p
0.007
7,131
2.233
0.369
8,456
2.282
5,184
DO220074
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
25p
0.007
7,186
2.212
0.369
8,488
2.253
5,204
DO220075
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
30p
0.007
7,284
2.25
0.37
8,487
2.232
5,215
DO220076
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
35p
0.008
7,206
2.283
0.37
8,552
2.295
5,273
DO220077
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
39p
0.008
7,553
2.229
0.37
8,611
2.322
5,370
DO220078
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
44p
0.008
7,457
2.229
0.37
8,593
2.185
5,352
DO220079
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
48p
0.008
7,357
2.262
0.371
8,577
2.107
5,307
DO220080
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
53p
0.009
7,350
2.297
0.37
8,628
2.157
5,405
DO220081
SPC
2/
20/
00
8:
57p
0.009
7,511
2.228
0.37
8,665
2.125
5,396
DO220082
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
02p
0.01
7,205
2.267
0.371
8,616
2.122
5,373
DO220083
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
06p
0.009
7,423
2.269
0.371
8,632
2.141
5,339
DO220084
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
11p
0.008
7,621
2.257
0.371
8,746
2.119
5,500
DO220085
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
15p
0.009
7,616
2.256
0.371
8,740
2.097
5,469
DO220086
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
20p
0.011
7,535
2.268
0.372
8,685
2.119
5,400
DO220087
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
25p
0.011
7,544
2.277
0.372
8,671
2.11
5,408
DO220088
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
29p
0.011
7,481
2.282
0.372
8,638
2.111
5,363
DO220089
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
34p
0.012
7,503
2.287
0.372
8,639
2.13
5,367
DO220090
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
38p
0.012
7,524
2.372
0.372
8,652
2.169
5,381
DO220091
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
43p
0.012
7,532
2.279
0.372
8,741
2.172
5,529
C­
32
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220092
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
47p
0.012
7,557
2.287
0.372
8,677
2.312
5,474
DO220093
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
52p
0.011
7,435
2.437
0.373
8,634
2.422
5,355
DO220094
SPC
2/
20/
00
9:
57p
0.012
7,415
2.631
0.375
8,627
2.429
5,330
DO220095
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
01p
0.012
7,504
2.399
0.373
8,644
2.388
5,387
DO220096
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
06p
0.013
7,350
2.332
0.373
8,589
2.329
5,385
DO220097
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
10p
0.012
7,444
2.347
0.374
8,624
2.321
5,423
DO220098
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
15p
0.013
7,409
2.358
0.374
8,593
2.39
5,402
DO220099
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
19p
0.015
7,405
2.452
0.375
8,597
2.484
5,387
DO220100
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
24p
0.016
7,419
2.384
0.374
8,580
2.316
5,384
DO220101
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
29p
0.016
7,479
2.333
0.374
8,671
2.32
5,453
DO220102
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
33p
0.015
7,524
2.305
0.374
8,725
2.286
5,594
DO220103
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
38p
0.015
7,507
2.299
0.374
8,724
2.24
5,593
DO220104
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
42p
0.014
7,422
2.313
0.375
8,625
2.209
5,432
DO220105
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
47p
0.014
7,350
2.338
0.375
8,530
2.223
5,338
DO220106
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
51p
0.014
7,215
2.35
0.375
8,473
2.253
5,273
DO220107
SPC
2/
20/
00
10:
56p
0.014
7,227
2.346
0.376
8,432
2.197
5,212
DO220108
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
01p
0.016
7,206
2.463
0.377
8,461
2.338
5,239
DO220109
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
05p
0.016
7,264
2.428
0.376
8,446
2.234
5,218
DO220110
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
10p
0.016
7,115
2.478
0.376
8,395
2.427
5,147
DO220111
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
14p
0.017
7,083
2.814
0.378
8,419
2.539
5,145
DO220112
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
19p
0.017
6,961
2.56
0.378
8,297
2.387
5,076
DO220113
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
23p
0.016
6,959
2.514
0.378
8,266
2.408
5,033
DO220114
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
28p
0.016
7,002
2.442
0.377
8,279
2.638
5,053
DO220115
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
33p
0.017
6,859
2.396
0.376
8,133
2.583
4,893
DO220116
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
37p
0.017
6,767
2.362
0.375
8,082
2.546
4,829
DO220117
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
42p
0.016
6,595
2.327
0.374
7,996
2.507
4,696
DO220118
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
46p
0.018
6,764
2.373
0.375
8,073
2.501
4,795
DO220119
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
51p
0.021
7,082
2.335
0.374
8,312
2.438
5,096
DO220120
SPC
2/
20/
00
11:
55p
0.02
7,301
2.318
0.374
8,486
2.442
5,317
DO220121
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
00a
0.018
7,463
2.309
0.375
8,558
2.498
5,360
C­
33
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220122
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
05a
0.017
7,238
2.32
0.375
8,472
2.509
5,289
DO220123
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
09a
0.017
7,237
2.317
0.376
8,496
2.544
5,330
DO220124
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
14a
0.018
7,263
2.313
0.376
8,517
2.412
5,315
DO220125
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
18a
0.018
7,238
2.311
0.375
8,422
2.318
5,260
DO220126
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
23a
0.019
7,065
2.342
0.376
8,314
2.346
5,082
DO220127
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
27a
0.02
6,986
2.332
0.376
8,234
2.395
5,013
DO220128
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
32a
0.023
7,015
2.33
0.376
8,224
2.4
4,982
DO220129
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
37a
0.022
7,047
2.337
0.376
8,281
2.439
5,087
DO220130
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
41a
0.024
7,127
2.348
0.375
8,369
2.435
5,167
DO220131
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
46a
0.018
7,112
2.34
0.377
8,358
2.439
5,168
DO220132
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
50a
0.019
7,123
2.338
0.376
8,308
2.452
5,102
DO220133
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
55a
0.02
7,067
2.339
0.376
8,288
2.447
5,080
DO220134
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
00a
0.019
7,009
2.378
0.377
8,229
2.456
5,044
DO220135
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
04a
0.017
6,966
2.37
0.376
8,198
2.464
4,937
DO220136
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
09a
0.018
6,955
2.342
0.377
8,226
2.494
5,049
DO220137
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
13a
0.022
6,911
2.338
0.376
8,147
2.491
4,937
DO220138
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
18a
0.021
6,830
2.341
0.377
8,134
2.485
4,912
DO220139
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
22a
0.021
6,943
2.351
0.377
8,159
2.473
4,968
DO220140
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
27a
0.021
6,783
2.345
0.378
8,060
2.488
4,840
DO220141
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
32a
0.018
6,755
2.344
0.378
8,014
2.488
4,784
DO220142
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
36a
0.019
6,624
2.331
0.378
7,936
2.651
4,719
DO220143
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
41a
0.022
6,652
2.32
0.377
7,928
2.889
4,695
DO220144
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
45a
0.018
6,542
2.323
0.378
7,883
2.691
4,645
DO220145
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
50a
0.021
6,558
2.327
0.377
7,908
2.677
4,679
DO220146
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
55a
0.022
6,586
2.324
0.378
7,866
2.694
4,603
DO220147
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
59a
0.021
6,548
2.303
0.378
7,839
2.722
4,601
DO220148
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
04a
0.023
6,496
2.291
0.378
7,838
2.688
4,607
DO220149
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
08a
0.022
6,698
2.308
0.378
7,931
2.536
4,699
DO220150
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
13a
0.025
6,667
2.32
0.379
7,974
2.54
4,751
DO220151
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
17a
0.027
6,800
2.337
0.38
8,045
2.524
4,826
C­
34
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220152
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
22a
0.027
6,841
2.358
0.381
8,081
2.493
4,842
DO220153
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
27a
0.028
6,769
2.363
0.382
7,993
2.472
4,751
DO220154
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
31a
0.026
6,689
2.37
0.381
7,972
2.464
4,721
DO220155
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
36a
0.026
6,718
2.402
0.38
8,051
2.445
4,763
DO220156
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
40a
0.024
6,618
2.414
0.379
7,940
2.466
4,636
DO220157
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
45a
0.026
6,705
2.434
0.379
8,033
2.459
4,752
DO220158
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
49a
0.026
6,835
2.463
0.379
8,090
2.492
4,795
DO220159
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
54a
0.024
6,796
2.487
0.378
8,145
2.529
4,875
DO220160
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
59a
0.024
6,880
2.473
0.378
8,173
2.759
4,932
DO220161
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
03a
0.025
6,868
2.482
0.378
8,173
3.116
4,932
DO220162
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
08a
0.025
6,923
2.506
0.378
8,218
3.174
4,965
DO220163
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
12a
0.026
6,871
2.494
0.377
8,215
2.923
4,958
DO220164
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
17a
0.029
7,035
2.592
0.377
8,328
2.779
5,050
DO220165
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
22a
0.03
7,121
2.513
0.376
8,400
2.668
5,136
DO220166
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
26a
0.031
7,039
2.496
0.376
8,298
2.585
5,079
DO220167
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
31a
0.03
6,850
2.465
0.377
8,185
2.487
4,915
DO220168
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
35a
0.029
6,813
2.464
0.377
8,135
2.451
4,856
DO220169
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
40a
0.03
6,820
2.504
0.378
8,109
2.432
4,794
DO220170
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
44a
0.027
6,715
2.556
0.379
8,044
2.454
4,774
DO220171
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
49a
0.029
6,639
2.538
0.379
7,980
2.508
4,677
DO220172
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
54a
0.027
6,683
2.482
0.378
8,024
2.553
4,733
DO220173
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
58a
0.029
6,749
2.496
0.378
8,079
2.62
4,801
DO220174
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
03a
0.026
6,582
2.467
0.379
7,976
2.608
4,712
DO220175
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
07a
0.028
6,629
2.438
0.378
7,993
2.532
4,694
DO220176
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
12a
0.03
6,603
2.42
0.378
7,928
2.485
4,623
DO220177
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
17a
0.03
6,644
2.413
0.379
7,948
2.479
4,646
DO220178
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
21a
0.029
6,568
2.388
0.38
7,916
2.526
4,636
DO220179
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
26a
0.028
6,474
2.37
0.381
7,872
2.538
4,532
DO220180
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
30a
0.028
6,433
2.343
0.383
7,800
2.555
4,479
DO220181
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
35a
0.029
6,405
2.309
0.385
7,765
2.539
4,440
C­
35
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220182
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
39a
0.031
6,354
2.281
0.388
7,714
2.507
4,405
DO220183
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
44a
0.03
6,309
2.257
0.389
7,657
2.447
4,313
DO220184
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
49a
0.03
6,259
2.243
0.393
7,574
2.395
4,220
DO220185
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
53a
0.029
6,196
2.246
0.393
7,584
2.392
4,213
DO220186
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
05a
0.004
5,494
2.066
0.374
7,248
1.978
3,887
DO220187
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
09a
0.003
5,584
2.051
0.374
7,276
1.976
3,959
DO220188
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
14a
0.003
5,416
2.058
0.373
7,116
1.972
3,774
DO220189
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
18a
0.003
5,355
2.047
0.374
7,060
1.975
3,725
DO220190
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
23a
0.002
5,410
2.049
0.373
7,104
1.978
3,768
DO220191
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
27a
0.002
5,461
2.06
0.373
7,108
1.981
3,757
DO220192
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
32a
0.002
5,439
2.09
0.373
7,230
1.979
3,913
DO220193
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
37a
0.002
5,501
2.043
0.373
7,186
1.969
3,855
DO220194
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
41a
0.002
5,477
2.05
0.373
7,170
1.985
3,842
DO220195
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
46a
0.002
5,446
2.039
0.372
7,159
1.975
3,784
DO220196
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
50a
0.001
5,668
2.039
0.371
7,382
1.981
4,012
DO220197
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
55a
0.002
5,664
2.062
0.372
7,360
1.973
4,051
DO220198
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
06a
0.002
5,588
2.052
0.371
7,344
1.978
4,008
DO220199
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
12a
0.002
5,530
2.08
0.372
7,193
1.969
3,869
DO220200
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
17a
0.002
5,424
2.061
0.372
7,144
1.967
3,770
DO220201
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
22a
0.001
5,471
2.032
0.37
7,124
1.976
3,781
DO220202
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
26a
0.001
5,465
2.047
0.371
7,185
1.974
3,841
DO220203
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
31a
0.002
5,750
2.056
0.371
7,179
1.972
3,818
DO220204
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
35a
0.001
5,640
2.087
0.371
7,331
1.976
3,960
DO220205
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
40a
0.002
6,096
2.092
0.37
7,475
1.977
4,143
DO220206
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
44a
0.002
5,734
2.055
0.37
7,233
1.977
3,827
DO220207
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
49a
0.001
5,424
2.056
0.37
7,182
1.982
3,766
DO220208
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
53a
0.001
5,472
2.046
0.371
7,174
1.982
3,782
DO220209
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
58a
0.002
5,599
2.046
0.37
7,288
1.988
3,843
DO220210
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
03a
0.002
5,910
2.047
0.37
7,434
1.984
3,979
DO220211
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
07a
0.002
5,625
2.022
0.369
7,333
2.043
3,608
C­
36
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220212
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
12a
0.002
5,715
2.033
0.369
7,301
2.008
3,809
DO220213
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
16a
0.002
5,695
2.043
0.369
7,298
1.978
3,873
DO220214
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
21a
0.001
5,752
2.038
0.37
7,294
1.972
3,878
DO220215
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
25a
0.002
5,726
2.027
0.369
7,317
1.97
3,947
DO220216
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
30a
0.002
6,154
2.017
0.368
7,563
1.971
4,209
DO220217
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
34a
0.001
5,834
2.021
0.369
7,262
1.975
3,916
DO220218
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
39a
0.001
5,683
2.037
0.369
7,288
1.971
3,943
DO220219
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
46a
0.001
5,706
2.023
0.369
7,339
1.968
3,948
DO220220
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
50a
0.001
6,039
2.024
0.368
7,521
1.971
4,162
DO220221
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
55a
0.001
5,802
2.015
0.368
7,425
1.961
4,099
DO220222
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
59a
0.001
6,123
2.023
0.368
7,485
1.967
4,147
DO220223
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
04p
0.001
6,063
2.026
0.368
7,549
1.965
4,199
DO220224
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
08p
0.001
5,800
2.016
0.368
7,361
1.962
4,001
DO220225
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
13p
0.001
5,867
2.026
0.368
7,366
1.966
3,981
DO220226
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
26p
0
5,995
2.021
0.369
7,487
1.971
4,113
DO220227
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
31p
0
5,892
2.024
0.367
7,486
1.967
4,094
DO220228
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
35p
0
5,899
2.023
0.367
7,521
1.972
4,136
DO220229
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
40p
0
5,959
2.024
0.367
7,525
1.964
4,127
DO220230
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
44p
0
6,045
2.057
0.367
7,534
1.982
4,120
DO220231
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
49p
0
6,091
2.03
0.367
7,517
1.978
4,097
DO220232
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
53p
0
6,003
2.026
0.366
7,555
1.987
4,094
DO220233
SPC
2/
21/
00
12:
58p
0
5,999
2.027
0.366
7,588
2.009
4,026
DO220234
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
02p
0
5,966
2.025
0.367
7,496
1.982
4,113
DO220235
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
07p
0
6,036
2.044
0.367
7,552
2.013
4,059
DO220236
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
11p
0
6,188
2.036
0.367
7,623
1.999
4,141
DO220237
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
16p
0
6,137
2.03
0.366
7,636
1.997
4,199
DO220238
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
21p
0
6,010
2.03
0.367
7,609
2.002
4,169
DO220239
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
25p
0
6,135
2.035
0.366
7,618
1.986
4,189
DO220240
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
30p
0
6,044
2.029
0.367
7,610
1.996
4,227
DO220241
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
34p
0
6,190
2.029
0.366
7,697
2
4,303
C­
37
C­
37
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220242
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
39p
0
6,157
2.045
0.366
7,718
1.989
4,373
DO220243
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
43p
0
6,031
2.036
0.367
7,645
1.994
4,246
DO220244
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
48p
0
6,125
2.052
0.366
7,669
2.017
4,257
DO220245
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
52p
0
6,162
2.065
0.366
7,639
1.999
4,204
DO220246
SPC
2/
21/
00
1:
57p
0
6,279
2.064
0.366
7,767
1.998
4,335
DO220247
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
02p
0
6,250
2.07
0.366
7,783
2.018
4,384
DO220248
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
06p
0
6,273
2.087
0.366
7,736
2.018
4,338
DO220249
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
11p
0
6,168
2.054
0.366
7,656
1.997
4,268
DO220250
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
15p
0
6,283
2.091
0.368
7,722
2.012
4,348
DO220251
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
20p
0
6,485
2.049
0.367
7,851
2.019
4,505
DO220252
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
24p
0
6,334
2.068
0.367
7,764
2.002
4,363
DO220253
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
29p
0
6,276
2.052
0.367
7,790
2.007
4,430
DO220254
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
33p
0
6,379
2.061
0.369
7,796
2.043
4,369
DO220255
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
38p
0
6,459
2.07
0.368
7,908
2.044
4,508
DO220256
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
42p
0
6,632
2.076
0.369
7,999
2.014
4,628
DO220257
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
47p
0
6,615
2.077
0.369
8,031
2.017
4,656
DO220258
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
52p
0
6,532
2.093
0.37
7,920
2.021
4,530
DO220259
SPC
2/
21/
00
2:
56p
0
6,572
2.107
0.371
7,957
2.022
4,544
DO220260
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
01p
0
6,449
2.077
0.373
7,810
1.996
4,380
DO220261
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
05p
0
6,414
2.071
0.371
7,798
1.998
4,395
DO220262
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
10p
0
6,345
2.062
0.37
7,788
2.012
4,418
DO220263
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
14p
0
6,271
2.069
0.371
7,738
2.016
4,315
DO220264
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
19p
0
6,387
2.088
0.373
7,834
2.011
4,444
DO220265
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
23p
0
6,375
2.092
0.374
7,851
2.003
4,423
DO220266
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
28p
0
6,426
2.101
0.373
7,836
2.005
4,421
DO220267
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
32p
0
6,350
2.097
0.373
7,788
2.013
4,354
DO220268
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
37p
0
6,234
2.077
0.372
7,714
2.009
4,303
DO220269
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
41p
0
6,212
2.069
0.37
7,630
2.001
4,246
DO220270
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
46p
0
6,330
2.074
0.37
7,715
1.997
4,300
DO220271
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
51p
0
6,229
2.084
0.373
7,652
2.005
4,245
C­
38
C­
38
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220272
SPC
2/
21/
00
3:
55p
0
6,234
2.087
0.372
7,661
2.016
4,272
DO220273
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
00p
0
6,157
2.068
0.37
7,550
2.015
4,155
DO220274
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
04p
0
6,239
2.135
0.372
7,659
2.031
4,223
DO220275
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
09p
0
6,528
2.074
0.371
7,832
2.02
4,462
DO220276
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
13p
0
6,362
2.079
0.371
7,785
1.999
4,389
DO220277
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
18p
0
6,286
2.081
0.371
7,730
1.994
4,269
DO220278
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
22p
0
6,373
2.08
0.369
7,782
1.994
4,377
DO220279
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
27p
0
6,284
2.081
0.37
7,678
1.981
4,221
DO220280
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
31p
0
6,062
2.066
0.37
7,566
1.982
4,136
DO220281
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
36p
0
6,225
2.07
0.372
7,656
1.992
4,253
DO220282
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
41p
0
6,159
2.065
0.373
7,568
1.976
4,150
DO220283
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
45p
0
6,197
2.094
0.372
7,626
2
4,218
DO220284
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
50p
0
6,172
2.074
0.371
7,599
1.984
4,141
DO220285
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
54p
0
6,218
2.06
0.369
7,569
1.976
4,127
DO220286
SPC
2/
21/
00
4:
59p
0
6,075
2.068
0.367
7,583
1.973
4,134
DO220287
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
03p
0
6,124
2.059
0.369
7,581
1.974
4,141
DO220288
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
08p
0
6,095
2.06
0.369
7,550
1.991
4,135
DO220289
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
12p
0
6,198
2.065
0.368
7,656
1.988
4,232
DO220290
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
17p
0
6,343
2.059
0.369
7,696
1.99
4,281
DO220291
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
22p
0
6,095
2.062
0.369
7,650
1.99
4,245
DO220292
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
26p
0
6,164
2.045
0.369
7,586
1.987
4,167
DO220293
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
31p
0
6,177
2.047
0.368
7,572
1.992
4,164
DO220294
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
35p
0
6,133
2.05
0.369
7,630
1.977
4,203
DO220295
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
40p
0
6,290
2.062
0.369
7,629
1.979
4,239
DO220296
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
44p
0
6,154
2.051
0.369
7,626
1.981
4,232
DO220297
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
49p
0
6,205
2.049
0.368
7,645
1.973
4,238
DO220298
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
53p
0
6,324
2.048
0.368
7,689
1.968
4,318
DO220299
SPC
2/
21/
00
5:
58p
0
6,184
2.044
0.368
7,649
1.971
4,261
DO220300
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
02p
0
6,120
2.047
0.368
7,595
1.969
4,199
DO220301
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
07p
0
6,230
2.051
0.368
7,677
1.969
4,274
C­
39
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220302
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
12p
0
6,361
2.042
0.369
7,787
1.973
4,431
DO220303
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
16p
0
6,442
2.085
0.369
7,812
1.97
4,429
DO220304
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
21p
0
6,470
2.055
0.368
7,804
1.97
4,404
DO220305
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
25p
0
6,601
2.045
0.367
7,951
1.967
4,586
DO220306
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
30p
0
6,506
2.035
0.365
7,986
1.96
4,629
DO220307
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
34p
0
6,655
2.032
0.366
7,968
1.96
4,625
DO220308
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
39p
0
6,535
2.029
0.366
7,940
1.967
4,593
DO220309
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
43p
0
6,493
2.03
0.366
7,952
1.959
4,595
DO220310
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
48p
0
6,471
2.029
0.366
7,895
1.959
4,514
DO220311
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
52p
0
6,506
2.026
0.366
7,915
1.96
4,578
DO220312
SPC
2/
21/
00
6:
57p
0
6,627
2.03
0.367
8,018
1.965
4,668
DO220313
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
02p
0
6,771
2.028
0.367
8,077
1.967
4,750
DO220314
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
06p
0
6,726
2.027
0.367
8,056
1.964
4,704
DO220315
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
11p
0
6,736
2.026
0.368
8,119
1.968
4,783
DO220316
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
15p
0
6,781
2.021
0.368
8,162
1.969
4,916
DO220317
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
20p
0
6,822
2.025
0.369
8,198
1.965
4,925
DO220318
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
24p
0
6,981
2.033
0.37
8,332
1.969
5,100
DO220319
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
29p
0
6,978
2.051
0.371
8,258
1.977
5,001
DO220320
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
33p
0
6,926
2.119
0.371
8,231
2.033
4,934
DO220321
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
38p
0
6,943
2.16
0.372
8,229
2.269
4,886
DO220322
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
42p
0
6,850
2.176
0.373
8,293
2.391
4,986
DO220323
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
47p
0
6,994
2.189
0.373
8,341
2.76
5,038
DO220324
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
52p
0
6,968
2.203
0.373
8,296
2.744
4,989
DO220325
SPC
2/
21/
00
7:
56p
0
6,964
2.148
0.372
8,256
2.613
4,998
DO220326
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
01p
0
6,957
2.149
0.373
8,263
2.272
4,962
DO220327
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
05p
0
6,736
2.254
0.374
8,206
2.097
4,891
DO220328
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
10p
0
6,847
2.254
0.374
8,234
2.108
4,920
DO220329
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
14p
0
6,782
2.177
0.373
8,199
2.165
4,900
DO220330
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
19p
0
6,788
2.167
0.373
8,169
2.174
4,893
DO220331
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
23p
0
6,680
2.18
0.375
8,137
2.119
4,851
C­
40
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220332
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
28p
0
6,783
2.168
0.374
8,154
2.1
4,856
DO220333
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
33p
0
6,980
2.207
0.374
8,232
2.245
4,871
DO220334
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
37p
0
6,893
2.231
0.373
8,270
2.626
4,968
DO220335
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
42p
0
6,905
2.205
0.373
8,304
2.557
4,971
DO220336
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
46p
0
7,093
2.238
0.374
8,361
2.784
5,038
DO220337
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
51p
0
7,030
2.254
0.374
8,330
2.593
5,018
DO220338
SPC
2/
21/
00
8:
55p
0
6,899
2.274
0.375
8,252
2.481
4,931
DO220339
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
00p
0
6,826
2.227
0.375
8,209
2.416
4,872
DO220340
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
04p
0
6,903
2.223
0.375
8,254
2.494
4,928
DO220341
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
09p
0
6,966
2.225
0.375
8,371
3.264
5,011
DO220342
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
14p
0
7,209
2.227
0.375
8,464
4.103
5,051
DO220343
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
18p
0
7,020
2.243
0.375
8,381
3.379
5,026
DO220344
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
23p
0
6,990
2.306
0.376
8,383
2.843
5,039
DO220345
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
27p
0
6,960
2.31
0.376
8,329
2.371
5,012
DO220346
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
32p
0
6,961
2.27
0.376
8,332
2.38
5,038
DO220347
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
36p
0
6,875
2.242
0.376
8,256
2.36
4,956
DO220348
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
41p
0
6,755
2.239
0.376
8,223
2.35
4,891
DO220349
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
46p
0
6,834
2.336
0.376
8,243
2.419
4,899
DO220350
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
50p
0
6,842
3.158
0.382
8,310
2.402
4,811
DO220351
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
55p
0
6,865
2.532
0.378
8,266
2.285
4,874
DO220352
SPC
2/
21/
00
9:
59p
0
6,859
2.262
0.377
8,241
2.301
4,927
DO220353
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
04p
0
6,676
2.246
0.376
8,144
2.326
4,768
DO220354
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
08p
0
6,715
2.234
0.376
8,122
2.29
4,758
DO220355
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
13p
0
6,772
2.294
0.376
8,208
2.312
4,795
DO220356
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
18p
0
6,661
2.278
0.377
8,145
2.232
4,800
DO220357
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
22p
0
6,683
2.313
0.377
8,121
2.238
4,726
DO220358
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
27p
0
6,658
2.303
0.377
8,156
2.24
4,775
DO220359
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
31p
0
6,633
2.272
0.378
8,126
2.277
4,762
DO220360
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
36p
0
6,618
2.277
0.378
8,102
2.258
4,716
DO220361
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
40p
0
6,575
2.277
0.378
8,072
2.268
4,719
C­
41
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220362
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
45p
0
6,566
2.255
0.378
8,022
2.269
4,647
DO220363
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
50p
0
6,557
2.27
0.379
8,039
2.228
4,692
DO220364
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
54p
0
6,605
2.261
0.378
8,081
2.244
4,771
DO220365
SPC
2/
21/
00
10:
59p
0
6,704
2.345
0.379
8,172
2.258
4,864
DO220366
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
03p
0
6,622
2.393
0.38
8,140
2.149
4,847
DO220367
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
08p
0
6,537
2.349
0.38
8,057
2.146
4,761
DO220368
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
12p
0
6,603
2.327
0.379
8,089
2.162
4,789
DO220369
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
17p
0
6,633
2.276
0.378
8,162
2.219
4,875
DO220370
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
22p
0
6,995
2.266
0.377
8,424
2.273
5,141
DO220371
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
26p
0
7,091
2.318
0.379
8,528
2.79
5,182
DO220372
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
31p
0
7,318
2.305
0.379
8,660
4.833
5,174
DO220373
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
35p
0
7,256
2.375
0.38
8,590
4.279
5,016
DO220374
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
40p
0
8,234
2.374
0.379
9,238
8.988
5,222
DO220375
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
44p
0
8,489
2.312
0.379
9,372
11.253
5,333
DO220376
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
49p
0
8,227
2.309
0.379
9,246
12.173
5,134
DO220377
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
54p
0
7,639
2.372
0.381
8,848
7.817
4,869
DO220378
SPC
2/
21/
00
11:
58p
0
7,394
2.38
0.381
8,704
7.133
4,717
DO220379
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
03a
0
7,168
2.379
0.381
8,559
6.394
4,754
DO220380
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
07a
0
7,100
2.381
0.381
8,503
5.486
4,826
DO220381
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
12a
0
7,027
2.384
0.381
8,458
5.11
4,710
DO220382
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
16a
0
6,849
2.366
0.381
8,351
4.421
4,740
DO220383
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
21a
0
6,883
2.338
0.381
8,323
4.217
4,676
DO220384
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
26a
0
6,721
2.34
0.382
8,210
3.892
4,641
DO220385
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
30a
0
6,633
2.346
0.381
8,143
3.612
4,549
DO220386
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
35a
0
6,583
2.352
0.381
8,144
3.125
4,652
DO220387
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
39a
0
6,588
2.366
0.382
8,103
2.893
4,696
DO220388
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
44a
0
6,501
2.381
0.381
8,061
2.889
4,632
DO220389
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
48a
0
6,503
2.379
0.382
8,061
3.053
4,587
DO220390
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
53a
0
6,415
2.378
0.382
7,995
2.787
4,605
DO220391
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
58a
0
6,342
2.374
0.382
7,963
2.544
4,615
C­
42
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220392
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
02a
0
6,409
2.359
0.382
7,959
2.58
4,566
DO220393
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
07a
0
6,271
2.349
0.382
7,909
2.547
4,533
DO220394
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
11a
0
6,362
2.349
0.382
7,896
2.587
4,536
DO220395
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
16a
0
6,228
2.316
0.382
7,860
2.474
4,518
DO220396
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
20a
0
6,200
2.294
0.382
7,806
2.396
4,493
DO220397
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
25a
0
6,205
2.298
0.382
7,784
2.407
4,486
DO220398
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
30a
0
6,130
2.294
0.383
7,754
2.399
4,445
DO220399
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
34a
0
6,128
2.292
0.382
7,747
2.39
4,440
DO220400
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
39a
0
6,078
2.291
0.382
7,700
2.4
4,406
DO220401
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
43a
0
6,033
2.299
0.383
7,638
2.402
4,361
DO220402
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
48a
0
6,121
2.338
0.383
7,776
2.422
4,481
DO220403
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
53a
0
6,243
2.301
0.382
7,823
2.451
4,535
DO220404
SPC
2/
22/
00
1:
57a
0
6,236
2.32
0.382
7,841
2.504
4,553
DO220405
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
02a
0
6,117
2.321
0.383
7,735
2.453
4,415
DO220406
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
06a
0
5,925
2.278
0.384
7,579
2.444
4,303
DO220407
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
11a
0
5,993
2.295
0.383
7,584
2.497
4,307
DO220408
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
15a
0
5,937
2.319
0.384
7,629
2.561
4,340
DO220409
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
20a
0
5,983
2.334
0.384
7,640
2.59
4,337
DO220410
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
25a
0
6,017
2.356
0.383
7,671
2.683
4,388
DO220411
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
29a
0
6,043
2.418
0.384
7,692
2.689
4,378
DO220412
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
34a
0
6,027
2.353
0.383
7,670
2.674
4,389
DO220414
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
43a
0
5,895
2.375
0.383
7,563
2.632
4,253
DO220415
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
47a
0
5,880
2.37
0.383
7,536
2.652
4,236
DO220416
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
52a
0
5,791
2.348
0.384
7,483
2.688
4,193
DO220417
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
56a
0
5,828
2.342
0.383
7,519
2.782
4,250
DO220418
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
01a
0
5,956
2.348
0.384
7,578
2.886
4,288
DO220419
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
06a
0
5,882
2.335
0.384
7,515
2.869
4,251
DO220420
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
10a
0
5,853
2.343
0.384
7,513
2.945
4,216
DO220421
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
15a
0
5,908
2.358
0.384
7,534
2.961
4,241
DO220422
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
19a
0
5,853
2.386
0.385
7,516
2.999
4,208
C­
43
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220423
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
24a
0
5,732
2.403
0.385
7,482
2.979
4,170
DO220424
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
29a
0
5,735
2.45
0.385
7,501
2.934
4,205
DO220425
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
33a
0
5,893
2.465
0.384
7,547
2.938
4,260
DO220426
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
38a
0
5,837
2.486
0.385
7,537
2.953
4,248
DO220427
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
42a
0
5,848
2.518
0.385
7,559
2.959
4,248
DO220428
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
47a
0
5,931
2.466
0.385
7,596
2.884
4,280
DO220429
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
51a
0
5,918
2.471
0.385
7,610
2.87
4,290
DO220430
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
56a
0
5,881
2.482
0.385
7,563
2.863
4,245
DO220431
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
01a
0
5,839
2.498
0.385
7,493
2.864
4,192
DO220432
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
05a
0
5,767
2.524
0.385
7,485
2.891
4,169
DO220433
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
10a
0
5,691
2.495
0.386
7,441
2.95
4,143
DO220434
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
14a
0
5,828
2.532
0.386
7,523
2.933
4,216
DO220435
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
19a
0
5,903
2.565
0.386
7,557
2.928
4,225
DO220436
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
24a
0
5,868
2.531
0.386
7,490
3.015
4,167
DO220437
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
28a
0
5,756
2.531
0.387
7,464
3.045
4,161
DO220438
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
33a
0
5,805
2.5
0.386
7,455
3.105
4,114
DO220439
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
37a
0
5,824
2.522
0.387
7,455
3.105
4,127
DO220440
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
42a
0
5,839
2.531
0.387
7,452
3.1
4,123
DO220441
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
46a
0
5,875
2.567
0.387
7,496
3.1
4,188
DO220442
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
51a
0
5,749
2.537
0.387
7,447
3.149
4,124
DO220443
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
56a
0
5,746
2.551
0.386
7,435
3.136
4,117
DO220444
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
00a
0
5,797
2.596
0.386
7,481
3.146
4,164
DO220445
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
05a
0
5,805
2.593
0.387
7,456
3.168
4,093
DO220446
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
09a
0
5,747
2.611
0.387
7,441
3.178
4,101
DO220447
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
14a
0
5,671
2.531
0.387
7,407
3.209
4,084
DO220448
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
19a
0
5,753
2.526
0.388
7,400
3.227
4,064
DO220449
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
23a
0
5,646
2.508
0.387
7,357
3.272
4,006
DO220450
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
28a
0
5,715
2.515
0.387
7,396
3.26
4,054
DO220451
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
32a
0
5,807
2.536
0.388
7,412
3.223
4,106
DO220452
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
37a
0
5,752
2.563
0.389
7,468
3.174
4,150
C­
44
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220453
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
42a
0
5,778
2.567
0.388
7,490
3.116
4,161
DO220454
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
46a
0
5,744
2.567
0.389
7,434
3.143
4,098
DO220455
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
51a
0
5,773
2.594
0.388
7,480
3.103
4,158
DO220456
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
55a
0
5,714
2.664
0.389
7,415
3.146
4,046
DO220457
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
00a
0
5,664
2.695
0.389
7,360
3.211
3,948
DO220458
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
04a
0
5,760
2.615
0.389
7,431
3.166
4,103
DO220459
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
09a
0
5,813
2.611
0.388
7,481
3.132
4,126
DO220460
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
14a
0
5,749
2.638
0.389
7,464
3.166
4,078
DO220461
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
18a
0
5,762
2.812
0.39
7,501
3.112
4,116
DO220462
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
23a
0
5,752
2.625
0.389
7,476
3.1
4,069
DO220463
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
27a
0
5,680
2.624
0.39
7,388
3.147
4,007
DO220464
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
32a
0
5,734
2.673
0.391
7,417
3.132
4,034
DO220465
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
36a
0
5,786
2.654
0.392
7,382
3.107
4,036
DO220466
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
41a
0
5,629
2.821
0.393
7,413
3.128
4,029
DO220467
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
46a
0
5,581
2.757
0.394
7,355
3.15
3,972
DO220468
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
50a
0
5,653
2.798
0.395
7,375
3.099
4,010
DO220469
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
55a
0
5,665
2.647
0.395
7,394
3.038
4,023
DO220470
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
59a
0
5,696
2.669
0.394
7,420
3.015
4,064
DO220471
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
04a
0
5,759
2.661
0.394
7,402
2.983
4,072
DO220472
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
08a
0
5,515
2.68
0.395
7,368
3.009
3,959
DO220473
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
13a
0
5,533
2.735
0.396
7,330
3.076
3,911
DO220474
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
18a
0
5,599
2.73
0.395
7,344
3.028
3,935
DO220475
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
22a
0
5,680
2.768
0.398
7,407
3.038
4,008
DO220476
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
27a
0
5,789
2.861
0.397
7,438
3.047
4,016
DO220477
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
31a
0
5,726
3.109
0.4
7,471
3.032
4,000
DO220478
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
36a
0
5,851
2.908
0.401
7,550
2.965
4,113
DO220479
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
41a
0
5,816
2.928
0.399
7,566
2.961
4,157
DO220480
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
45a
0
5,939
2.816
0.398
7,606
2.897
4,185
DO220481
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
50a
0
5,960
2.858
0.398
7,670
2.875
4,289
DO220482
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
54a
0
5,951
2.846
0.397
7,698
2.866
4,296
C­
45
Table
C­
4.
(
Continued)
Collection
Data
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO220483
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
59a
0
6,102
2.78
0.398
7,775
2.833
4,425
DO220484
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
03a
0
6,089
2.8
0.397
7,815
2.819
4,488
DO220485
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
08a
0
6,179
2.782
0.395
7,876
2.857
4,497
DO220486
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
13a
0.008
6,314
2.801
0.394
7,956
2.91
4,582
DO220487
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
17a
0
6,297
2.866
0.396
7,967
2.927
4,552
DO220488
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
22a
0
6,397
2.908
0.397
8,058
2.911
4,657
DO220489
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
26a
0
6,510
2.87
0.398
8,128
2.872
4,721
DO220490
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
31a
0
6,570
2.84
0.398
8,197
2.874
4,812
DO220491
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
35a
0
6,586
2.841
0.396
8,249
2.899
4,840
DO220492
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
40a
0
6,728
2.844
0.394
8,356
2.934
4,968
DO220493
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
45a
0
6,674
2.792
0.397
8,365
2.904
5,006
DO220494
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
49a
0
6,798
2.788
0.397
8,415
2.838
5,025
DO220495
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
54a
0
6,926
2.73
0.394
8,467
2.78
5,081
DO220496
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
58a
0
6,906
2.707
0.393
8,459
2.769
5,060
DO220497
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
03a
0
7,025
2.728
0.393
8,609
2.795
5,248
DO220498
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
08a
0
7,119
2.719
0.395
8,686
2.898
5,332
DO220499
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
12a
0
7,185
2.708
0.399
8,761
3.044
5,454
DO220500
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
17a
0
7,305
2.702
0.402
8,861
3.081
5,566
DO220501
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
21a
0
7,367
2.657
0.402
8,871
3.01
5,565
DO220502
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
50a
0
7,456
2.178
0.385
8,809
2.306
5,610
DO220503
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
56a
0
7,490
2.168
0.38
8,844
2.282
5639
C­
46
Table
C­
5.
Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222002
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
01p
0.001
6163
1.998
0.365
7685
1.979
4272
DO222003
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
06p
0.001
6,148
1.982
0.365
7,583
1.981
4,212
DO222004
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
14p
0.001
6,083
2.028
0.366
7,635
2.008
4,247
DO222005
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
18p
0.001
6,352
1.988
0.365
7,773
1.99
4,397
DO222006
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
27p
0.001
6,360
1.967
0.365
7,779
1.994
4,425
DO222007
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
33p
0.001
6,564
1.966
0.364
7,962
2
4,645
DO222008
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
38p
0.001
6,394
1.977
0.364
7,786
1.996
4,411
DO222009
SPC
2/
22/
00
12:
43p
0.001
6,389
1.983
0.364
7,801
1.998
4,433
DO222010
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
04p
0.001
6,756
1.988
0.363
8,052
2.072
4,745
DO222011
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
09p
0.001
7,289
1.961
0.361
8,383
2.053
5,071
DO222012
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
13p
0.001
7,077
1.959
0.362
8,175
2.066
4,909
DO222013
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
18p
0.001
6,792
1.963
0.363
8,042
2.052
4,700
DO222014
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
22p
0.002
6,594
1.982
0.364
7,960
2.045
4,633
DO222015
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
27p
0.002
6,680
2.094
0.364
7,939
2.039
4,553
DO222016
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
32p
0.001
6,540
2.04
0.363
7,875
2.036
4,473
DO222017
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
36p
0.001
6,476
2.005
0.363
7,816
2.038
4,400
DO222018
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
41p
0.001
6,677
1.98
0.361
7,945
2.039
4,558
DO222019
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
45p
0.001
6,899
2.014
0.362
8,074
2.055
4,749
DO222020
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
50p
0.001
6,814
1.997
0.362
8,044
2.022
4,653
DO222021
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
54p
0.001
7,128
1.986
0.361
8,321
2.037
4,966
DO222022
SPC
2/
22/
00
2:
59p
0.001
7,345
1.962
0.361
8,189
2.04
4,813
DO222023
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
03p
0
7,629
1.973
0.359
8,205
2.06
4,832
DO222024
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
08p
0.001
7,750
1.964
0.359
8,277
2.053
4,902
DO222025
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
12p
0.001
7,264
1.955
0.361
7,958
2.016
4,558
DO222026
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
17p
0.001
7,277
1.96
0.361
7,959
2.026
4,526
DO222027
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
21p
0.001
6,973
1.968
0.361
7,940
2.014
4,485
DO222028
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
26p
0.001
7,070
1.973
0.361
7,988
2.039
4,562
DO222029
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
30p
0.001
7,061
1.959
0.36
7,910
2.007
4,518
DO222030
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
35p
0.001
7,100
1.977
0.361
7,854
2.002
4,433
DO222031
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
40p
0.001
7,038
1.965
0.361
7,974
2.021
4,547
C­
47
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222032
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
44p
0.001
7,258
1.954
0.36
8,036
2.017
4,626
DO222033
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
49p
0.001
7,116
1.952
0.36
7,982
2.004
4,563
DO222034
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
53p
0.001
7,091
1.953
0.36
7,992
2.001
4,584
DO222035
SPC
2/
22/
00
3:
58p
0.001
7,250
1.968
0.36
8,142
2.02
4,701
DO222036
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
02p
0.001
6,860
1.956
0.36
7,875
1.993
4,444
DO222037
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
07p
0.001
6,786
1.953
0.36
7,827
1.987
4,395
DO222038
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
11p
0.001
7,103
1.956
0.361
7,875
2.021
4,473
DO222039
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
16p
0.001
6,927
1.953
0.36
7,816
1.989
4,396
DO222040
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
20p
0.001
7,039
1.986
0.362
7,776
2.01
4,333
DO222041
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
25p
0.001
7,215
2.021
0.36
8,033
2.038
4,614
DO222042
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
29p
0.001
7,088
1.996
0.36
7,996
2.009
4,574
DO222043
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
34p
0.001
7,131
2.007
0.36
7,970
1.996
4,567
DO222044
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
38p
0.001
7,181
1.989
0.36
7,937
1.993
4,485
DO222045
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
43p
0.001
6,957
1.957
0.361
7,877
2.017
4,482
DO222046
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
47p
0.001
7,312
1.955
0.359
8,135
2
4,722
DO222047
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
52p
0.001
7,483
1.955
0.359
8,231
2.012
4,840
DO222048
SPC
2/
22/
00
4:
57p
0.001
7,364
2.007
0.36
8,122
2.033
4,706
DO222049
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
01p
0.001
7,289
1.963
0.359
8,050
2.037
4,626
DO222050
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
06p
0.001
7,143
1.964
0.36
7,897
2.023
4,527
DO222051
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
10p
0.001
7,243
1.977
0.36
8,052
2.023
4,699
DO222052
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
15p
0.001
7,367
1.971
0.359
8,170
2.02
4,803
DO222053
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
19p
0.001
7,291
1.97
0.359
8,098
2.013
4,693
DO222054
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
24p
0.001
7,225
1.968
0.36
8,079
2.033
4,660
DO222055
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
28p
0.001
7,306
1.964
0.36
8,087
2.003
4,692
DO222056
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
33p
0.001
7,103
1.963
0.361
8,005
1.998
4,655
DO222057
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
37p
0.001
7,273
1.963
0.361
8,072
2.004
4,697
DO222058
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
42p
0.001
7,086
1.961
0.361
7,961
1.988
4,593
DO222059
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
46p
0.001
7,120
1.96
0.361
7,998
1.986
4,603
DO222060
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
51p
0.001
7,675
1.963
0.36
8,364
1.999
5,004
DO222061
SPC
2/
22/
00
5:
56p
0
7,598
1.965
0.36
8,331
1.997
5,008
C­
48
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222062
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
00p
0.001
7,642
1.97
0.36
8,381
1.99
5,048
DO222063
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
05p
0
7,727
1.961
0.361
8,419
1.996
5,094
DO222064
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
09p
0.001
7,691
1.958
0.361
8,445
1.974
5,131
DO222065
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
14p
0.001
7,895
1.954
0.36
8,574
1.968
5,283
DO222066
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
18p
0.001
7,932
1.956
0.36
8,632
1.967
5,334
DO222067
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
23p
0.001
7,870
1.962
0.36
8,601
1.963
5,306
DO222068
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
27p
0.001
7,946
1.967
0.362
8,616
1.966
5,363
DO222069
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
32p
0.001
7,879
1.975
0.362
8,533
1.96
5,286
DO222070
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
36p
0.001
7,659
1.97
0.362
8,438
1.954
5,126
DO222071
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
41p
0.001
7,674
1.968
0.362
8,451
1.953
5,147
DO222072
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
45p
0.001
7,597
1.965
0.362
8,396
1.951
5,071
DO222073
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
50p
0.001
7,858
1.965
0.362
8,557
1.955
5,286
DO222074
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
55p
0.001
8,067
1.963
0.361
8,730
1.958
5,451
DO222075
SPC
2/
22/
00
6:
59p
0.001
7,802
1.972
0.363
8,521
1.955
5,231
DO222076
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
04p
0.001
7,612
1.964
0.363
8,445
1.95
5,183
DO222077
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
08p
0.002
7,696
1.966
0.363
8,438
1.945
5,166
DO222078
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
13p
0.002
7,743
1.968
0.364
8,455
1.955
5,160
DO222079
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
17p
0.002
7,884
1.963
0.364
8,578
1.94
5,281
DO222080
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
22p
0.002
7,990
1.961
0.364
8,734
1.938
5,505
DO222081
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
26p
0.002
8,278
1.99
0.364
8,897
1.94
5,657
DO222082
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
31p
0.002
8,304
2.091
0.365
8,912
1.967
5,664
DO222083
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
35p
0.002
8,268
2.106
0.365
8,840
1.968
5,554
DO222084
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
40p
0.002
8,045
2.087
0.365
8,845
1.954
5,572
DO222085
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
45p
0.003
8,544
2.017
0.365
9,094
1.949
5,872
DO222086
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
49p
0.003
8,748
2.042
0.365
9,281
1.943
6,147
DO222087
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
54p
0.003
9,017
1.977
0.364
9,478
1.938
6,411
DO222088
SPC
2/
22/
00
7:
58p
0.003
9,241
1.98
0.364
9,643
1.936
6,586
DO222089
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
03p
0.003
9,274
1.989
0.364
9,626
1.941
6,595
DO222090
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
07p
0.003
9,133
1.994
0.365
9,536
1.937
6,510
DO222091
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
12p
0.003
8,972
2.028
0.366
9,476
1.931
6,426
C­
49
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222092
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
16p
0.003
8,911
2.031
0.366
9,425
1.939
6,334
DO222093
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
21p
0.003
8,616
2.047
0.367
9,283
1.932
6,134
DO222094
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
25p
0.003
8,513
2.018
0.368
9,117
1.931
5,960
DO222095
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
30p
0.004
8,373
2.011
0.368
9,070
1.94
5,941
DO222096
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
35p
0.004
8,429
1.982
0.368
9,044
1.939
5,865
DO222097
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
39p
0.004
8,165
1.964
0.367
8,818
1.934
5,623
DO222098
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
44p
0.004
8,182
2.001
0.368
8,917
1.954
5,689
DO222099
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
48p
0.004
8,292
2.054
0.368
8,934
2.013
5,646
DO222100
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
53p
0.004
8,059
2.012
0.369
8,843
1.992
5,596
DO222101
SPC
2/
22/
00
8:
57p
0.004
8,032
1.993
0.37
8,772
1.968
5,555
DO222102
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
02p
0.005
8,011
1.981
0.368
8,756
1.976
5,489
DO222103
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
06p
0.005
7,884
1.999
0.37
8,685
1.97
5,402
DO222104
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
11p
0.005
7,915
2.012
0.37
8,643
1.974
5,350
DO222105
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
15p
0.005
7,934
2
0.37
8,575
1.969
5,258
DO222106
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
20p
0.005
7,812
2.011
0.37
8,586
2.006
5,304
DO222107
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
24p
0.005
7,752
2.066
0.37
8,594
2.037
5,315
DO222108
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
29p
0.006
7,822
2.06
0.37
8,572
2.01
5,257
DO222109
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
34p
0.006
7,766
2.062
0.371
8,639
2.007
5,335
DO222110
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
38p
0.006
7,858
2.059
0.37
8,648
2.014
5,346
DO222111
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
43p
0.006
7,800
2.076
0.371
8,564
2.001
5,248
DO222112
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
47p
0.006
7,719
2.041
0.371
8,490
2.006
5,245
DO222113
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
52p
0.006
7,695
2.035
0.37
8,511
2.018
5,239
DO222114
SPC
2/
22/
00
9:
56p
0.007
7,666
2.049
0.37
8,500
2.051
5,165
DO222115
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
01p
0.007
7,615
2.102
0.37
8,560
2.083
5,224
DO222116
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
05p
0.007
7,885
2.098
0.37
8,612
2.107
5,326
DO222117
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
10p
0.008
7,838
2.013
0.369
8,686
2.146
5,480
DO222118
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
15p
0.007
8,164
1.995
0.369
8,864
2.191
5,698
DO222119
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
19p
0.007
8,046
2.027
0.37
8,823
2.208
5,593
DO222120
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
24p
0.007
7,987
2.077
0.37
8,812
2.152
5,563
DO222121
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
28p
0.007
8,002
2.039
0.37
8,730
2.15
5,478
C­
50
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222122
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
33p
0.008
7,802
2.095
0.37
8,604
2.166
5,320
DO222123
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
37p
0.007
7,703
2.066
0.371
8,494
2.194
5,224
DO222124
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
42p
0.008
7,679
2.037
0.371
8,456
2.21
5,171
DO222125
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
47p
0.009
7,483
2.021
0.371
8,411
2.221
5,138
DO222126
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
51p
0.009
7,502
2.013
0.371
8,395
2.234
5,095
DO222127
SPC
2/
22/
00
10:
56p
0.01
7,528
2.018
0.371
8,372
2.218
5,093
DO222128
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
00p
0.01
7,639
2.018
0.371
8,403
2.229
5,156
DO222129
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
05p
0.01
7,705
2.01
0.371
8,520
2.185
5,301
DO222130
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
09p
0.01
7,803
2.084
0.371
8,716
2.131
5,463
DO222131
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
14p
0.011
8,118
2.007
0.371
8,860
2.058
5,713
DO222132
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
18p
0.011
8,084
1.996
0.371
8,859
2.05
5,725
DO222133
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
23p
0.011
8,135
2.004
0.372
8,812
2.039
5,614
DO222134
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
27p
0.011
7,882
2.007
0.372
8,696
2.064
5,474
DO222135
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
32p
0.012
7,699
2.065
0.372
8,531
2.091
5,264
DO222136
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
37p
0.013
7,658
2.017
0.373
8,494
2.074
5,269
DO222137
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
41p
0.014
7,542
1.998
0.372
8,428
2.075
5,161
DO222138
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
46p
0.013
7,541
1.997
0.372
8,413
2.066
5,183
DO222139
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
50p
0.014
7,630
2.02
0.372
8,428
2.1
5,160
DO222140
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
55p
0.013
7,476
2.054
0.373
8,362
2.106
5,109
DO222141
SPC
2/
22/
00
11:
59p
0.016
7,484
2.088
0.374
8,357
2.081
5,057
DO222142
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
04a
0.014
7,373
2.087
0.373
8,348
2.077
5,090
DO222143
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
08a
0.013
7,395
2.051
0.374
8,322
2.08
5,058
DO222144
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
13a
0.014
7,548
2.088
0.373
8,388
2.066
5,097
DO222145
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
18a
0.016
7,582
2.087
0.373
8,396
2.094
5,098
DO222146
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
22a
0.016
7,505
2.078
0.373
8,389
2.133
5,106
DO222147
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
27a
0.015
7,517
2.081
0.374
8,374
2.112
5,139
DO222148
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
31a
0.015
7,398
2.084
0.374
8,358
2.094
5,074
DO222149
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
36a
0.015
7,491
2.066
0.374
8,384
2.201
5,097
DO222150
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
40a
0.015
7,645
2.078
0.374
8,427
2.321
5,152
DO222151
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
45a
0.014
7,537
2.107
0.373
8,449
2.408
5,155
C­
51
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222152
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
49a
0.015
7,399
2.065
0.373
8,356
2.407
5,072
DO222153
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
54a
0.015
7,528
2.066
0.373
8,432
2.454
5,140
DO222154
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
59a
0.015
7,404
2.083
0.373
8,352
2.293
5,029
DO222155
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
03a
0.015
7,388
2.073
0.375
8,255
2.126
4,989
DO222156
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
08a
0.017
7,493
2.077
0.374
8,356
2.12
5,105
DO222157
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
12a
0.017
7,450
2.083
0.374
8,353
2.123
5,104
DO222158
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
17a
0.017
7,486
2.104
0.375
8,365
2.172
5,123
DO222159
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
21a
0.017
7,636
2.086
0.374
8,480
2.15
5,220
DO222160
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
26a
0.019
7,661
2.124
0.375
8,518
2.106
5,263
DO222161
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
30a
0.019
7,644
2.146
0.377
8,497
2.105
5,203
DO222162
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
35a
0.02
7,503
2.165
0.377
8,414
2.117
5,099
DO222163
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
40a
0.019
7,505
2.196
0.378
8,380
2.136
5,074
DO222164
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
44a
0.02
7,589
2.257
0.377
8,437
2.202
5,078
DO222165
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
49a
0.021
7,676
2.361
0.378
8,474
2.525
5,139
DO222166
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
53a
0.017
7,686
2.246
0.377
8,521
2.413
5,168
DO222167
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
58a
0.016
7,729
2.213
0.377
8,541
2.377
5,202
DO222168
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
02a
0.019
7,730
2.206
0.377
8,519
2.38
5,226
DO222169
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
07a
0.018
7,700
2.207
0.378
8,531
2.276
5,250
DO222170
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
12a
0.017
7,632
2.201
0.378
8,452
2.259
5,158
DO222171
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
16a
0.018
7,562
2.268
0.379
8,391
2.387
5,054
DO222172
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
21a
0.019
7,539
2.239
0.379
8,369
2.338
5,055
DO222173
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
25a
0.02
7,489
2.256
0.379
8,394
2.347
5,071
DO222174
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
30a
0.021
7,531
2.259
0.379
8,361
2.414
5,070
DO222175
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
34a
0.019
7,422
2.261
0.38
8,348
2.411
5,019
DO222176
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
39a
0.02
7,431
2.272
0.38
8,357
2.499
5,021
DO222177
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
43a
0.02
7,468
2.277
0.38
8,367
2.571
5,050
DO222178
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
48a
0.019
7,493
2.25
0.38
8,366
2.595
5,107
DO222179
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
53a
0.02
7,480
2.297
0.381
8,355
2.602
5,090
DO222180
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
57a
0.02
7,501
2.279
0.381
8,367
2.542
5,051
DO222181
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
02a
0.021
7,436
2.249
0.381
8,354
2.461
5,065
C­
52
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222182
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
06a
0.02
7,548
2.257
0.38
8,405
2.466
5,129
DO222183
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
11a
0.019
7,515
2.29
0.382
8,424
2.507
5,104
DO222184
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
15a
0.019
7,540
2.299
0.383
8,432
2.459
5,112
DO222185
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
20a
0.018
7,504
2.315
0.383
8,459
2.445
5,104
DO222186
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
25a
0.019
7,556
2.364
0.384
8,458
2.459
5,092
DO222187
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
29a
0.02
7,512
2.345
0.385
8,404
2.412
5,078
DO222188
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
34a
0.02
7,586
2.272
0.384
8,448
2.493
5,165
DO222189
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
38a
0.019
7,572
2.263
0.384
8,455
2.576
5,156
DO222190
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
43a
0.02
7,519
2.257
0.385
8,445
2.556
5,103
DO222191
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
47a
0.018
7,447
2.259
0.385
8,362
2.507
5,034
DO222192
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
52a
0.019
7,437
2.27
0.385
8,357
2.479
4,981
DO222193
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
57a
0.022
7,347
2.271
0.387
8,326
2.454
4,995
DO222194
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
01a
0.022
7,562
2.298
0.39
8,364
2.505
5,047
DO222195
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
06a
0.024
7,534
2.299
0.391
8,422
2.613
5,149
DO222196
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
10a
0.022
7,503
2.354
0.39
8,387
2.628
5,104
DO222197
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
15a
0.022
7,347
2.336
0.391
8,272
2.436
4,919
DO222198
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
19a
0.022
7,428
2.307
0.392
8,276
2.456
4,973
DO222199
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
24a
0.022
7,413
2.291
0.393
8,281
2.483
4,968
DO222200
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
29a
0.023
7,355
2.311
0.394
8,269
2.58
4,962
DO222201
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
33a
0.026
7,445
2.325
0.396
8,312
2.712
4,995
DO222202
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
38a
0.024
7,448
2.329
0.394
8,308
2.812
5,015
DO222203
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
42a
0.024
7,367
2.312
0.396
8,226
2.671
4,903
DO222204
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
47a
0.023
7,359
2.327
0.395
8,253
2.66
4,966
DO222205
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
51a
0.025
7,347
2.324
0.395
8,237
2.743
4,892
DO222206
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
56a
0.024
7,324
2.394
0.395
8,264
2.765
4,950
DO222207
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
00a
0.025
7,344
2.329
0.395
8,238
2.698
4,903
DO222208
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
05a
0.023
7,335
2.299
0.397
8,183
2.637
4,871
DO222209
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
10a
0.022
7,268
2.298
0.396
8,202
2.638
4,901
DO222210
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
14a
0.023
7,342
2.295
0.396
8,216
2.658
4,877
DO222211
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
19a
0.023
7,296
2.29
0.395
8,181
2.56
4,856
C­
53
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222212
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
23a
0.023
7,226
2.297
0.395
8,158
2.513
4,821
DO222213
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
28a
0.024
7,202
2.296
0.395
8,176
2.472
4,871
DO222214
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
32a
0.023
7,248
2.311
0.396
8,188
2.438
4,864
DO222215
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
37a
0.023
7,285
2.312
0.396
8,174
2.449
4,859
DO222216
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
42a
0.026
7,304
2.305
0.394
8,166
2.467
4,869
DO222217
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
46a
0.026
7,305
2.303
0.396
8,142
2.534
4,783
DO222218
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
51a
0.024
7,198
2.327
0.394
8,153
2.552
4,825
DO222219
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
55a
0.025
7,214
2.332
0.392
8,151
2.548
4,851
DO222220
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
00a
0.025
7,208
2.356
0.391
8,164
2.587
4,822
DO222221
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
04a
0.025
7,245
2.327
0.389
8,175
2.602
4,847
DO222222
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
09a
0.025
7,293
2.35
0.388
8,180
2.58
4,882
DO222223
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
14a
0.025
7,222
2.368
0.389
8,141
2.657
4,810
DO222224
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
18a
0.025
7,289
2.408
0.391
8,152
2.711
4,845
DO222225
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
23a
0.027
7,252
2.6
0.391
8,195
2.643
4,822
DO222226
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
27a
0.024
7,207
2.473
0.391
8,181
2.607
4,734
DO222227
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
32a
0.024
7,349
2.474
0.392
8,209
2.655
4,804
DO222228
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
37a
0.026
7,279
2.448
0.391
8,195
2.653
4,846
DO222229
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
41a
0.028
7,318
2.318
0.39
8,242
2.615
4,951
DO222230
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
46a
0.025
7,351
2.294
0.391
8,235
2.595
4,929
DO222231
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
50a
0.025
7,219
2.447
0.392
8,146
2.547
4,771
DO222232
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
55a
0.025
7,194
2.661
0.395
8,156
2.587
4,781
DO222233
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
59a
0.024
7,242
2.622
0.395
8,172
2.583
4,817
DO222234
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
04a
0.025
7,193
2.616
0.396
8,155
2.618
4,794
DO222235
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
09a
0.025
7,272
2.606
0.397
8,155
2.778
4,785
DO222236
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
13a
0.025
7,237
2.544
0.394
8,207
3.337
4,810
DO222237
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
18a
0.028
7,506
2.487
0.391
8,325
3.206
4,960
DO222238
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
22a
0.026
7,556
2.431
0.388
8,449
2.754
5,088
DO222239
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
27a
0.024
7,429
2.392
0.387
8,369
2.652
5,018
DO222240
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
31a
0.028
7,504
2.406
0.386
8,394
2.69
5,064
DO222241
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
36a
0.027
7,522
2.361
0.385
8,423
2.805
5,164
C­
54C­
54
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222242
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
40a
0.025
7,572
2.347
0.387
8,460
2.854
5,149
DO222243
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
45a
0.024
7,623
2.318
0.384
8,450
2.787
5,124
DO222244
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
50a
0.024
7,601
2.315
0.384
8,510
2.758
5,221
DO222245
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
54a
0.027
7,849
2.398
0.383
8,655
2.765
5,342
DO222246
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
59a
0.027
7,819
2.604
0.383
8,700
2.832
5,327
DO222247
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
03a
0.022
7,896
2.648
0.384
8,756
3.025
5,402
DO222248
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
08a
0.022
7,910
2.806
0.385
8,810
3.041
5,464
DO222249
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
12a
0.02
7,881
2.681
0.385
8,742
2.961
5,388
DO222250
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
17a
0.025
7,905
2.644
0.384
8,749
2.976
5,411
DO222251
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
22a
0.028
7,978
2.614
0.386
8,815
2.986
5,475
DO222252
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
26a
0.029
8,041
2.605
0.386
8,840
3.023
5,509
DO222253
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
31a
0.029
7,922
2.599
0.387
8,809
2.966
5,474
DO222254
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
35a
0.029
8,093
2.581
0.388
8,899
2.883
5,524
DO222255
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
40a
0.026
8,096
2.581
0.387
8,914
2.776
5,579
DO222256
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
44a
0.022
8,036
2.559
0.387
8,873
2.73
5,558
DO222257
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
49a
0.022
8,122
2.541
0.389
8,895
2.708
5,552
DO222258
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
54a
0.021
8,079
2.518
0.388
8,863
2.718
5,543
DO222259
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
58a
0.021
8,081
2.494
0.388
8,844
2.743
5,514
DO222260
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
03a
0.021
7,954
2.451
0.386
8,816
2.711
5,499
DO222261
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
07a
0.021
8,035
2.429
0.388
8,838
2.692
5,522
DO222262
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
12a
0.022
8,153
2.407
0.387
8,931
2.68
5,648
DO222263
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
16a
0.023
8,196
2.377
0.385
8,931
2.553
5,579
DO222264
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
21a
0.023
7,967
2.249
0.381
8,818
2.323
5,494
DO222265
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
26a
0.018
7,941
2.279
0.382
8,846
2.259
5,588
DO222266
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
30a
0.016
8,217
2.157
0.381
8,971
2.214
5,760
DO222267
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
35a
0.017
8,167
2.14
0.377
9,019
2.197
5,787
DO222268
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
39a
0.015
8,293
2.111
0.376
9,077
2.174
5,919
DO222269
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
44a
0.015
8,361
2.136
0.374
9,120
2.161
5,959
DO222270
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
48a
0.014
8,672
2.116
0.371
9,288
2.146
6,143
DO222271
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
53a
0.013
8,473
2.099
0.369
9,240
2.118
6,075
C­
55
C­
55
Table
C­
5.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
DO222272
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
58a
0.013
8,513
2.046
0.367
9,223
2.084
6,040
DO222273
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
02a
0.01
8,527
2.042
0.366
9,265
2.082
6077
Table
C­
6.
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223002
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
16a
0.001
9,238
1.97
0.359
9,774
1.964
6658
D0223003
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
20a
0.001
9,325
2.013
0.359
9,810
1.956
6,674
D0223004
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
41a
0.008
9,179
1.994
0.359
9,654
1.941
6,547
D0223005
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
46a
0.007
9,297
1.957
0.358
9,727
1.956
6,662
D0223006
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
50a
0.009
9,619
1.957
0.357
9,934
1.969
6,870
D0223007
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
55a
0.009
9,658
1.949
0.356
9,986
1.97
6,965
D0223008
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
59a
0.01
9,401
1.952
0.357
9,787
1.969
6,711
D0223009
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
04p
0.008
9,470
1.968
0.357
9,880
1.977
6,798
D0223010
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
08p
0.008
9,971
1.974
0.356
10,245
1.999
7,144
D0223011
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
13p
0.009
10,339
1.96
0.355
10,656
1.997
7,527
D0223012
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
17p
0.009
10,017
1.935
0.355
10,342
1.964
7,257
D0223013
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
22p
0.008
10,130
1.932
0.356
10,459
1.986
7,348
D0223014
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
26p
0.012
10,619
1.929
0.354
10,908
1.997
7,806
D0223015
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
31p
0.01
10,976
1.956
0.356
11,529
1.998
8,043
D0223016
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
36p
0.01
11,029
1.947
0.355
11,591
2.016
8,153
D0223017
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
40p
0.01
10,961
1.951
0.356
11,535
2.021
8,104
D0223018
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
45p
0.008
10,918
1.947
0.356
11,380
2.008
7,969
D0223019
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
49p
0.008
10,987
1.946
0.355
11,626
2.018
8,122
D0223020
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
54p
0.012
11,162
1.964
0.355
11,730
1.978
8,270
D0223021
SPC
2/
23/
00
12:
58p
0.009
11,187
1.968
0.354
11,848
1.977
8,338
D0223022
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
03p
0.011
11,381
1.944
0.354
11,962
2.164
8,192
D0223023
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
07p
0.011
11,670
1.946
0.353
12,182
2.039
8,586
D0223024
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
12p
0.011
11,927
1.952
0.352
12,553
2.09
8,901
D0223025
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
16p
0.011
11,851
1.936
0.352
12,464
2.016
8,881
D0223026
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
21p
0.012
11,737
1.935
0.353
12,354
1.996
8,762
D0223027
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
25p
0.011
11,901
1.934
0.352
12,437
2.007
8,845
D0223028
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
30p
0.011
12,043
2.153
0.354
12,671
2.026
9,030
D0223029
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
34p
0.011
12,240
2.484
0.357
12,930
2.01
9,120
D0223030
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
39p
0.009
12,218
2.632
0.359
12,987
2.02
9,136
D0223031
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
44p
0.009
12,105
2.372
0.356
12,739
2.043
9,049
C­
57
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223032
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
48p
0.009
12,175
1.984
0.35
12,772
2.098
9,102
D0223033
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
53p
0.009
12,481
1.975
0.349
12,896
2.112
9,256
D0223034
SPC
2/
23/
00
1:
57p
0.008
12,394
1.995
0.352
12,870
2.121
9,223
D0223035
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
02p
0.007
12,465
1.966
0.349
12,886
2.074
9,226
D0223036
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
06p
0.009
12,668
2.043
0.349
13,166
2.144
9,524
D0223037
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
11p
0.007
12,560
1.977
0.349
13,108
2.062
9,440
D0223038
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
15p
0.01
12,763
1.97
0.348
13,234
2.106
9,525
D0223039
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
20p
0.007
12,940
1.994
0.35
13,365
2.098
9,602
D0223040
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
24p
0.005
13,053
1.976
0.349
13,580
2.08
9,743
D0223041
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
29p
0.006
13,183
2.02
0.349
13,959
2.209
9,879
D0223042
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
33p
0.007
13,154
1.958
0.349
13,867
2.095
9,894
D0223043
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
38p
0.007
13,383
1.97
0.349
14,135
2.027
10,013
D0223044
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
42p
0.011
13,565
1.994
0.348
14,322
2.044
10,192
D0223045
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
47p
0.009
13,615
1.994
0.349
14,380
2.088
10,194
D0223046
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
51p
0.007
13,288
1.985
0.349
14,163
2.129
10,030
D0223047
SPC
2/
23/
00
2:
56p
0.007
13,567
1.981
0.348
14,323
2.129
10,194
D0223048
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
00p
0.008
13,677
2.095
0.349
14,465
2.143
10,310
D0223049
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
05p
0.007
13,799
2.041
0.348
14,606
2.092
10,397
D0223050
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
10p
0.007
13,790
2.029
0.348
14,635
2.152
10,487
D0223051
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
14p
0.007
13,792
2.026
0.347
14,502
2.134
10,328
D0223052
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
19p
0.006
13,705
2.104
0.349
14,428
2.152
10,234
D0223053
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
23p
0.007
13,643
2.039
0.349
14,485
2.15
10,272
D0223054
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
28p
0.007
13,536
2.002
0.348
14,371
2.092
10,210
D0223055
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
32p
0.007
13,604
2.005
0.348
14,329
2.083
10,166
D0223056
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
37p
0.007
13,748
1.981
0.347
14,592
2.111
10,444
D0223057
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
41p
0.005
14,130
1.995
0.347
14,844
2.119
10,640
D0223058
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
46p
0.007
14,296
1.989
0.347
15,115
2.076
10,892
D0223059
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
50p
0.006
14,326
2.03
0.346
15,135
2.058
10,917
D0223060
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
55p
0.006
14,230
2.017
0.347
15,043
2.075
10,806
D0223061
SPC
2/
23/
00
3:
59p
0.021
14,266
2.002
0.346
15,109
2.071
10,923
C­
58
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223062
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
04p
0.013
14,391
1.992
0.346
15,202
2.123
10,978
D0223063
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
08p
0.007
14,229
1.988
0.346
14,950
2.195
10,719
D0223064
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
13p
0.022
14,104
1.984
0.346
15,003
2.032
10,811
D0223065
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
17p
0.013
14,297
1.986
0.345
15,100
2.107
10,894
D0223066
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
22p
0.031
14,253
1.993
0.346
15,159
2.205
10,933
D0223067
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
26p
0.022
14,042
1.983
0.347
14,920
2.064
10,728
D0223068
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
31p
0.033
14,106
1.985
0.346
15,137
2.127
10,903
D0223069
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
36p
0.04
14,193
1.979
0.345
15,224
2.119
11,026
D0223070
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
40p
0.042
14,073
1.969
0.345
15,199
2.136
10,954
D0223071
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
45p
0.043
14,122
1.967
0.345
15,295
2.198
11,057
D0223072
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
49p
0.042
14,108
1.97
0.344
15,264
2.176
11,075
D0223073
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
54p
0.042
14,331
1.938
0.341
15,239
2.325
11,044
D0223074
SPC
2/
23/
00
4:
58p
0.042
14,184
1.942
0.346
15,276
2.37
11,125
D0223075
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
03p
0.042
14,396
1.929
0.336
15,149
2.195
10,943
D0223076
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
07p
0.044
14,554
1.962
0.337
15,278
2.336
11,146
D0223077
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
12p
0.042
14,474
1.921
0.336
15,231
2.274
11,081
D0223078
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
16p
0.042
14,627
1.92
0.338
15,298
2.071
11,205
D0223079
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
21p
0.045
14,633
1.924
0.338
15,419
2.188
11,265
D0223080
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
25p
0.044
14,478
1.923
0.337
15,191
2.177
11,123
D0223081
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
30p
0.043
14,474
1.924
0.338
15,131
2.138
11,017
D0223082
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
35p
0.038
14,699
1.942
0.337
15,261
2.2
11,054
D0223083
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
39p
0.041
14,522
1.933
0.338
15,234
2.043
11,102
D0223084
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
44p
0.043
14,489
1.923
0.338
15,279
2.216
11,155
D0223085
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
48p
0.043
14,573
1.932
0.338
15,312
2.248
11,194
D0223086
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
53p
0.046
14,410
1.939
0.339
15,231
2.172
11,147
D0223087
SPC
2/
23/
00
5:
57p
0.043
14,811
1.93
0.338
15,507
2.143
11,370
D0223088
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
02p
0.044
14,769
1.92
0.338
15,533
1.962
11,428
D0223089
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
06p
0.047
15,053
1.914
0.338
15,640
1.927
11,570
D0223090
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
11p
0.048
15,008
1.914
0.34
15,658
1.922
11,606
D0223091
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
15p
0.042
14,905
1.911
0.339
15,513
1.898
11,498
C­
59
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223092
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
20p
0.047
14,790
1.919
0.339
15,531
1.893
11,490
D0223093
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
25p
0.047
14,677
1.924
0.339
15,496
1.912
11,496
D0223094
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
29p
0.045
14,700
1.925
0.341
15,446
1.9
11,388
D0223095
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
34p
0.047
14,595
1.926
0.341
15,405
1.916
11,397
D0223096
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
38p
0.044
14,701
1.922
0.341
15,445
1.915
11,405
D0223097
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
43p
0.044
14,835
1.923
0.342
15,425
1.919
11,425
D0223098
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
47p
0.048
14,598
1.922
0.341
15,396
1.917
11,450
D0223099
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
52p
0.049
14,631
1.924
0.341
15,443
1.933
11,507
D0223100
SPC
2/
23/
00
6:
56p
0.047
14,542
1.924
0.342
15,345
1.922
11,416
D0223101
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
01p
0.045
14,634
1.927
0.342
15,289
1.903
11,333
D0223102
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
05p
0.05
14,563
1.931
0.343
15,293
1.908
11,368
D0223103
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
10p
0.049
14,521
1.934
0.345
15,297
1.91
11,332
D0223104
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
15p
0.05
14,648
2.029
0.344
15,444
1.933
11,520
D0223105
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
19p
0.05
14,643
2.035
0.345
15,402
1.945
11,432
D0223106
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
24p
0.045
14,556
1.977
0.345
15,232
1.925
11,287
D0223107
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
28p
0.047
14,701
1.959
0.344
15,304
1.927
11,384
D0223108
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
33p
0.046
14,436
1.96
0.344
15,129
1.912
11,167
D0223109
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
37p
0.048
14,407
1.953
0.344
15,137
1.922
11,166
D0223110
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
42p
0.049
14,485
1.952
0.344
15,280
1.95
11,361
D0223111
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
46p
0.05
14,512
1.954
0.344
15,451
1.95
11,532
D0223112
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
51p
0.049
14,672
1.95
0.344
15,535
1.989
11,602
D0223113
SPC
2/
23/
00
7:
55p
0.047
14,681
1.946
0.345
15,490
2.088
11,538
D0223114
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
00p
0.046
14,815
1.948
0.344
15,542
1.964
11,637
D0223115
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
04p
0.046
14,971
1.954
0.344
15,589
1.963
11,697
D0223116
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
09p
0.048
14,673
1.983
0.345
15,407
1.904
11,468
D0223117
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
14p
0.047
14,860
1.99
0.345
15,548
1.91
11,630
D0223118
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
18p
0.045
15,346
1.97
0.344
16,104
2.115
12,064
D0223119
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
23p
0.05
15,366
1.984
0.344
16,400
2.527
12,153
D0223120
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
27p
0.047
15,645
1.976
0.345
16,735
2.948
12,349
D0223121
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
32p
0.046
15,748
1.968
0.345
16,797
2.819
12,456
C­
60
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223122
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
36p
0.046
15,666
1.971
0.346
16,667
2.819
12,346
D0223123
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
41p
0.048
15,625
1.975
0.346
16,627
2.394
12,268
D0223124
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
45p
0.048
15,581
2.075
0.345
16,675
2.273
12,243
D0223125
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
50p
0.047
15,578
1.974
0.344
16,581
2.118
12,219
D0223126
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
54p
0.051
15,437
1.978
0.344
16,468
2.157
12,191
D0223127
SPC
2/
23/
00
8:
59p
0.048
15,276
1.949
0.345
16,144
2.027
12,086
D0223128
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
04p
0.049
15,058
1.941
0.345
15,794
2.131
11,833
D0223129
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
08p
0.05
14,860
1.939
0.347
15,518
2.121
11,644
D0223130
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
13p
0.051
14,945
1.947
0.347
15,711
2.088
11,782
D0223131
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
17p
0.049
15,025
1.956
0.347
15,871
2.339
11,883
D0223132
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
22p
0.049
15,132
1.956
0.347
15,843
2.842
11,912
D0223133
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
26p
0.052
14,920
1.95
0.346
15,655
2.726
11,785
D0223134
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
31p
0.048
14,992
1.959
0.347
15,642
2.861
11,723
D0223135
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
35p
0.052
15,125
1.962
0.347
15,749
2.855
11,780
D0223136
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
40p
0.048
15,330
1.965
0.345
16,408
3.373
12,225
D0223137
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
44p
0.047
15,433
1.981
0.347
16,718
4.308
12,305
D0223138
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
49p
0.047
15,652
1.976
0.348
16,723
4.543
12,368
D0223139
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
53p
0.048
15,233
1.977
0.348
16,639
4.687
12,233
D0223140
SPC
2/
23/
00
9:
58p
0.046
15,058
1.951
0.347
15,920
3.864
11,951
D0223141
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
02p
0.049
14,884
1.953
0.349
15,606
3.166
11,689
D0223142
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
07p
0.05
14,545
2.02
0.35
15,574
2.897
11,615
D0223143
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
12p
0.05
14,881
1.963
0.349
15,662
2.736
11,772
D0223144
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
16p
0.047
15,291
1.975
0.347
16,344
2.728
12,180
D0223145
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
21p
0.05
15,470
1.994
0.348
16,746
2.443
12,452
D0223146
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
25p
0.049
15,849
1.988
0.349
16,625
2.337
12,371
D0223147
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
30p
0.049
15,336
1.982
0.348
16,395
2.482
12,112
D0223148
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
34p
0.053
15,443
1.989
0.349
16,299
2.4
12,093
D0223149
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
39p
0.051
15,137
1.982
0.348
16,063
2.253
12,092
D0223150
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
43p
0.053
15,502
2.028
0.35
16,704
2.221
12,454
D0223151
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
48p
0.051
15,199
2.043
0.349
16,039
2.351
12,080
C­
61
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223152
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
52p
0.053
14,677
1.956
0.349
15,627
2.34
11,858
D0223153
SPC
2/
23/
00
10:
57p
0.056
15,099
1.973
0.349
15,735
2.371
11,883
D0223154
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
02p
0.057
14,763
1.97
0.349
15,482
2.449
11,649
D0223155
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
06p
0.055
14,339
1.984
0.35
15,504
2.358
11,674
D0223156
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
11p
0.057
14,439
2.059
0.351
15,312
2.353
11,489
D0223157
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
15p
0.053
14,661
1.971
0.35
15,546
2.414
11,703
D0223158
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
20p
0.053
14,954
1.964
0.351
15,375
2.487
11,563
D0223159
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
24p
0.056
14,421
1.966
0.351
15,281
2.53
11,487
D0223160
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
29p
0.054
14,360
1.985
0.352
15,070
2.444
11,253
D0223161
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
33p
0.053
14,351
2.032
0.354
15,136
2.28
11,302
D0223162
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
38p
0.057
14,340
1.998
0.353
15,205
2.299
11,344
D0223163
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
42p
0.056
14,405
1.991
0.353
15,212
2.329
11,403
D0223164
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
47p
0.053
14,459
2.013
0.353
15,325
2.376
11,501
D0223165
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
52p
0.056
14,342
2.031
0.353
15,192
2.316
11,345
D0223166
SPC
2/
23/
00
11:
56p
0.051
14,395
2.061
0.354
15,102
2.251
11,191
D0223167
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
01a
0.052
14,513
2.006
0.353
15,287
2.308
11,557
D0223168
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
05a
0.052
14,858
2.009
0.353
15,595
2.296
11,826
D0223169
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
10a
0.054
14,867
2.006
0.353
15,776
2.214
11,966
D0223170
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
14a
0.051
14,728
1.992
0.353
15,569
2.217
11,804
D0223171
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
19a
0.051
14,809
2.001
0.354
15,532
2.23
11,759
D0223172
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
23a
0.053
14,497
1.991
0.354
15,337
2.149
11,510
D0223173
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
28a
0.053
14,406
1.987
0.354
15,237
2.133
11,484
D0223174
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
32a
0.055
14,358
1.995
0.354
15,295
2.135
11,554
D0223175
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
37a
0.056
14,206
1.992
0.354
15,200
2.127
11,465
D0223176
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
42a
0.053
14,262
1.991
0.355
15,033
2.089
11,291
D0223177
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
46a
0.051
13,767
1.984
0.355
14,593
2.094
10,880
D0223178
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
51a
0.049
13,807
1.976
0.356
14,460
2.088
10,853
D0223179
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
55a
0.052
14,037
1.991
0.356
14,664
2.117
10,932
D0223180
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
00a
0.052
13,745
1.986
0.357
14,545
2.17
10,827
D0223181
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
04a
0.044
13,659
1.98
0.356
14,447
2.246
10,800
C­
62
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223182
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
09a
0.04
14,088
2
0.356
14,767
2.151
11,042
D0223183
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
13a
0.043
13,929
2.004
0.357
14,648
2.129
10,951
D0223184
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
18a
0.046
13,854
2.029
0.356
14,561
2.188
10,771
D0223185
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
22a
0.047
13,717
2.019
0.356
14,504
2.233
10,828
D0223186
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
27a
0.042
13,822
2.036
0.357
14,543
2.355
10,776
D0223187
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
32a
0.039
13,784
2.028
0.358
14,448
2.316
10,609
D0223188
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
36a
0.037
13,780
2.021
0.358
14,383
2.142
10,695
D0223189
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
41a
0.049
13,831
2.047
0.357
14,665
2.207
10,829
D0223190
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
45a
0.054
14,353
2.082
0.356
14,984
2.244
11,220
D0223191
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
50a
0.05
13,949
2.084
0.356
14,827
2.202
11,017
D0223192
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
54a
0.052
14,076
2.057
0.356
14,797
2.044
11,089
D0223193
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
59a
0.056
13,653
2.033
0.357
14,528
2.121
10,831
D0223194
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
03a
0.057
13,572
2.049
0.358
14,468
2.278
10,677
D0223195
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
08a
0.053
13,372
2.051
0.358
14,374
2.281
10,660
D0223196
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
13a
0.047
13,537
2.043
0.358
14,379
2.289
10,706
D0223197
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
17a
0.051
13,672
2.057
0.358
14,334
2.331
10,557
D0223198
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
22a
0.054
13,203
2.042
0.357
14,063
2.353
10,394
D0223199
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
26a
0.056
13,386
2.07
0.358
14,170
2.385
10,427
D0223200
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
31a
0.054
13,470
2.082
0.359
14,311
2.349
10,554
D0223201
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
35a
0.052
13,455
2.09
0.358
14,214
2.338
10,447
D0223202
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
40a
0.061
13,676
2.167
0.36
14,546
2.731
10,713
D0223203
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
44a
0.058
13,691
2.137
0.359
14,521
2.609
10,787
D0223204
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
49a
0.057
13,368
2.123
0.359
14,304
2.453
10,507
D0223205
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
53a
0.056
13,247
2.124
0.359
14,237
2.38
10,487
D0223206
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
58a
0.056
13,484
2.143
0.36
14,272
2.638
10,549
D0223207
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
03a
0.053
13,536
2.21
0.36
14,279
2.569
10,420
D0223208
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
07a
0.054
13,419
2.171
0.36
14,383
2.586
10,517
D0223209
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
12a
0.056
13,314
2.116
0.359
14,133
2.472
10,363
D0223210
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
16a
0.055
13,190
2.13
0.359
14,160
2.403
10,387
D0223211
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
21a
0.054
13,197
2.133
0.359
14,106
2.346
10,324
C­
63
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223212
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
25a
0.055
13,585
2.181
0.36
14,487
2.444
10,661
D0223213
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
30a
0.058
13,606
2.184
0.36
14,513
2.749
10,799
D0223214
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
34a
0.051
13,298
2.159
0.36
14,141
2.404
10,342
D0223215
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
39a
0.054
13,166
2.153
0.36
14,097
2.271
10,299
D0223216
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
43a
0.058
13,278
2.211
0.361
14,224
2.333
10,419
D0223217
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
48a
0.056
13,229
2.17
0.359
14,232
2.256
10,445
D0223218
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
53a
0.055
13,125
2.155
0.36
14,057
2.179
10,337
D0223219
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
57a
0.057
13,079
2.149
0.361
13,690
2.144
10,174
D0223220
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
02a
0.056
13,433
2.167
0.36
14,208
2.181
10,452
D0223221
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
06a
0.054
13,433
2.183
0.36
14,296
2.175
10,535
D0223222
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
11a
0.056
13,517
2.18
0.361
14,356
2.184
10,604
D0223223
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
15a
0.057
13,541
2.187
0.361
14,390
2.224
10,596
D0223224
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
20a
0.056
13,608
2.189
0.361
14,501
2.252
10,715
D0223225
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
24a
0.057
13,646
2.207
0.362
14,535
2.306
10,762
D0223226
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
29a
0.055
13,799
2.222
0.364
14,600
2.435
10,764
D0223227
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
34a
0.053
13,739
2.242
0.364
14,518
2.531
10,691
D0223228
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
38a
0.055
13,728
2.281
0.365
14,526
2.801
10,660
D0223229
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
43a
0.057
13,218
2.244
0.364
14,145
3.004
10,367
D0223230
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
47a
0.058
13,024
2.212
0.363
13,689
2.928
10,122
D0223231
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
52a
0.058
12,734
2.214
0.363
13,481
2.762
10,067
D0223232
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
56a
0.055
12,787
2.374
0.364
13,276
2.626
9,843
D0223233
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
01a
0.054
12,876
2.269
0.363
13,308
2.449
9,852
D0223234
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
05a
0.05
13,317
2.251
0.363
13,785
2.519
10,135
D0223235
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
10a
0.05
13,184
2.269
0.364
13,801
2.643
10,169
D0223236
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
15a
0.051
13,053
2.346
0.366
13,721
3.057
10,108
D0223237
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
19a
0.052
12,703
2.291
0.365
13,221
2.769
9,783
D0223238
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
24a
0.055
12,807
2.33
0.369
13,484
3.013
10,003
D0223239
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
28a
0.052
12,793
2.342
0.373
13,428
3.064
9,989
D0223240
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
33a
0.052
12,875
2.414
0.372
13,399
3.203
9,866
D0223241
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
37a
0.05
12,866
2.398
0.374
13,325
3.439
9,790
C­
64
C­
64
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223242
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
42a
0.05
13,136
2.385
0.377
13,687
3.57
10,011
D0223243
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
46a
0.052
13,105
2.404
0.371
13,888
3.21
10,178
D0223244
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
51a
0.052
13,313
2.441
0.368
14,192
3.022
10,381
D0223245
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
56a
0.052
13,446
2.45
0.367
14,303
2.904
10,453
D0223246
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
00a
0.052
13,278
2.428
0.367
14,134
2.958
10,296
D0223247
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
05a
0.052
13,073
2.422
0.367
13,816
2.939
10,072
D0223248
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
09a
0.052
13,147
2.422
0.367
13,944
2.893
10,232
D0223249
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
14a
0.055
13,038
2.425
0.367
13,957
2.786
10,195
D0223250
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
18a
0.056
13,113
2.754
0.372
14,120
2.69
10,160
D0223251
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
23a
0.056
12,903
2.624
0.372
13,773
2.65
10,014
D0223252
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
28a
0.057
12,964
2.456
0.373
13,833
2.653
10,190
D0223253
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
32a
0.056
13,105
2.396
0.373
13,930
2.741
10,201
D0223254
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
37a
0.054
13,133
2.376
0.373
14,091
2.798
10,218
D0223255
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
41a
0.054
13,430
2.33
0.369
14,234
3.79
10,354
D0223256
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
46a
0.051
13,325
2.325
0.369
14,169
3.842
10,285
D0223257
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
50a
0.05
13,030
2.445
0.373
13,717
3.127
10,032
D0223258
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
55a
0.053
13,045
2.612
0.374
13,662
3.054
9,943
D0223259
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
59a
0.053
12,856
2.557
0.374
13,518
3.168
9,878
D0223260
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
04a
0.053
12,698
2.559
0.374
13,345
3.185
9,819
D0223261
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
09a
0.054
12,837
2.609
0.374
13,498
3.192
9,906
D0223262
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
13a
0.053
13,082
2.58
0.374
13,719
3.142
10,021
D0223263
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
18a
0.053
13,072
2.469
0.374
13,640
3.103
10,025
D0223264
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
22a
0.052
13,320
2.486
0.373
14,172
3.099
10,284
D0223265
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
27a
0.05
13,837
2.598
0.373
14,765
3.157
10,810
D0223266
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
31a
0.048
13,934
2.561
0.371
14,833
3.13
10,931
D0223267
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
36a
0.046
13,944
2.47
0.372
14,856
2.933
10,928
D0223268
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
40a
0.037
14,307
2.417
0.373
15,058
2.846
11,183
D0223269
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
45a
0.042
13,968
2.388
0.374
14,756
2.81
10,913
D0223270
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
50a
0.048
13,717
2.377
0.374
14,632
2.87
10,782
D0223271
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
54a
0.051
13,993
2.46
0.375
14,955
3.048
11,070
C­
65
C­
65
Table
C­
6.
(
Continued)
Collection
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0223272
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
59a
0.05
14,363
2.495
0.376
15,198
3.316
11,323
D0223273
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
03a
0.054
14,307
2.449
0.375
15,150
3.259
11,313
D0223274
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
08a
0.057
13,909
2.538
0.374
14,956
3.169
11,055
D0223275
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
12a
0.054
13,759
2.569
0.376
14,752
3.3
10,791
D0223276
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
17a
0.053
13,717
2.646
0.377
14,722
3.187
10,771
D0223277
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
22a
0.051
13,752
2.493
0.374
14,553
3.155
10,704
D0223278
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
26a
0.051
13,613
2.497
0.374
14,540
3.19
10,674
D0223279
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
31a
0.052
13,542
2.49
0.373
14,519
3.154
10,664
D0223280
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
35a
0.052
13,778
2.474
0.374
14,669
3.098
10,825
D0223281
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
40a
0.05
13,888
2.459
0.375
14,728
3.138
10,807
D0223282
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
44a
0.048
14,081
2.483
0.384
14,915
3.2
10,961
D0223283
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
49a
0.052
14,019
2.521
0.393
15,011
3.186
11092
C­
66
Table
C­
7.
Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224002
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
40a
0.047
15684
2.243
0.356
17442
2.367
13145
D0224003
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
45a
0.046
15,897
2.199
0.354
17,643
2.251
13,343
D0224004
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
53a
0.043
15,881
2.15
0.353
17,750
2.175
13,474
D0224005
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
57a
0.042
16,189
2.233
0.354
17,932
2.161
13,597
D0224006
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
02a
0.04
16,048
2.176
0.354
17,881
2.213
13,606
D0224007
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
06a
0.039
16,226
2.161
0.353
17,883
2.255
13,590
D0224008
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
11a
0.04
16,141
2.202
0.354
17,900
2.325
13,558
D0224009
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
15a
0.044
16,247
2.148
0.353
17,990
2.492
13,634
D0224010
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
20a
0.04
16,365
2.143
0.352
17,960
2.557
13,601
D0224011
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
24a
0.039
16,341
2.16
0.352
17,912
2.624
13,566
D0224012
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
29a
0.038
16,208
2.166
0.352
17,943
2.541
13,589
D0224013
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
35a
0.042
16,344
2.113
0.349
18,123
2.415
13,782
D0224014
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
40a
0.043
16,463
2.159
0.349
18,162
2.37
13,768
D0224015
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
44a
0.042
16,534
2.173
0.35
18,184
2.358
13,761
D0224016
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
49a
0.041
16,505
2.114
0.349
18,180
2.335
13,822
D0224017
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
53a
0.044
16,423
2.116
0.348
18,195
2.322
13,864
D0224018
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
58a
0.042
16,568
2.104
0.347
18,282
2.322
13,914
D0224019
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
02a
0.04
16,659
2.097
0.346
18,307
2.298
13,991
D0224020
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
07a
0.042
16,714
2.09
0.345
18,417
2.362
13,986
D0224021
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
11a
0.044
16,709
2.101
0.345
18,526
2.357
14,006
D0224022
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
16a
0.041
16,705
2.094
0.344
18,386
2.25
13,960
D0224023
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
21a
0.043
16,792
2.079
0.343
18,674
2.191
14,041
D0224024
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
25a
0.043
16,971
2.074
0.342
18,803
2.248
14,110
D0224025
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
30a
0.039
17,142
2.039
0.34
18,950
2.216
14,190
D0224026
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
34a
0.04
17,046
2.018
0.34
18,814
2.087
14,062
D0224027
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
39a
0.039
16,924
2.009
0.339
18,542
2.058
13,982
D0224028
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
43a
0.039
16,868
1.994
0.339
18,494
2.05
13,987
D0224029
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
48a
0.033
16,921
2
0.34
18,542
2.175
14,013
D0224030
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
52a
0.042
16,964
2.006
0.338
18,579
2.129
14,025
D0224031
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
57a
0.035
16,804
1.994
0.339
18,230
2.157
13,781
C­
67
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224032
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
01p
0.038
16,839
1.985
0.338
18,467
2.222
13,975
D0224033
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
06p
0.038
16,796
1.968
0.338
18,313
2.063
13,839
D0224034
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
10p
0.039
16,654
1.965
0.338
18,124
2.091
13,663
D0224035
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
15p
0.028
16,662
1.969
0.34
18,125
2.058
13,629
D0224036
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
19p
0.03
16,480
1.964
0.34
17,943
1.932
13,516
D0224037
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
24p
0.033
16,547
1.968
0.339
18,121
1.972
13,694
D0224038
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
28p
0.03
16,869
1.975
0.339
18,315
1.999
13,838
D0224039
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
33p
0.032
16,848
1.988
0.339
18,365
1.968
13,881
D0224040
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
37p
0.032
16,891
2.002
0.339
18,349
2.01
13,896
D0224041
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
42p
0.029
16,563
1.961
0.339
18,035
1.885
13,596
D0224042
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
47p
0.032
16,647
1.961
0.339
18,167
1.945
13,775
D0224043
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
51p
0.038
16,746
1.973
0.338
18,257
1.966
13,801
D0224044
SPC
2/
24/
00
12:
56p
0.036
16,831
1.966
0.338
18,441
2.136
13,980
D0224045
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
00p
0.032
17,001
1.982
0.338
18,591
2.148
14,041
D0224046
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
05p
0.039
17,036
1.99
0.337
18,727
2.498
14,042
D0224047
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
09p
0.042
16,768
1.983
0.337
18,345
2.409
13,857
D0224048
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
14p
0.039
16,605
1.975
0.337
18,177
2.282
13,671
D0224049
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
18p
0.039
16,412
1.969
0.338
17,963
2.221
13,493
D0224050
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
23p
0.037
16,767
1.971
0.337
18,154
2.246
13,666
D0224051
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
27p
0.029
16,720
1.981
0.338
18,233
2.239
13,748
D0224052
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
32p
0.033
17,052
1.977
0.338
18,705
2.126
14,056
D0224053
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
36p
0.037
16,939
1.985
0.337
18,603
2.091
14,053
D0224054
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
41p
0.038
16,773
1.994
0.338
18,325
2.024
13,861
D0224055
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
45p
0.038
16,825
1.985
0.337
18,366
2.095
13,912
D0224056
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
50p
0.035
16,856
1.971
0.337
18,390
2.072
13,924
D0224057
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
54p
0.039
16,792
1.983
0.336
18,447
2.056
13,989
D0224058
SPC
2/
24/
00
1:
59p
0.034
16,927
1.97
0.336
18,417
2.075
13,937
D0224059
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
03p
0.034
16,916
1.991
0.337
18,455
2.128
13,914
D0224060
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
08p
0.037
16,882
1.986
0.336
18,483
2.327
13,956
D0224061
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
13p
0.038
16,820
1.99
0.336
18,733
2.092
14,088
C­
68
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224062
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
17p
0.037
17,012
1.978
0.336
18,843
2.037
14,134
D0224063
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
22p
0.03
17,079
1.985
0.336
18,625
2.285
13,994
D0224064
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
26p
0.034
17,082
2.007
0.336
18,554
2.321
13,945
D0224065
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
31p
0.037
16,900
1.972
0.335
18,322
2.22
13,784
D0224066
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
35p
0.039
16,795
1.978
0.335
18,301
2.344
13,721
D0224067
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
40p
0.034
16,680
1.982
0.336
18,179
2.434
13,647
D0224068
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
44p
0.035
16,469
2.004
0.336
17,989
2.289
13,438
D0224069
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
49p
0.039
16,528
1.981
0.335
18,002
2.267
13,493
D0224070
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
53p
0.04
16,444
1.972
0.336
18,022
2.283
13,483
D0224071
SPC
2/
24/
00
2:
58p
0.04
16,634
1.981
0.336
18,127
2.455
13,585
D0224072
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
02p
0.033
16,710
1.983
0.336
18,087
2.431
13,590
D0224073
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
07p
0.036
16,555
1.974
0.336
18,054
2.31
13,538
D0224074
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
11p
0.035
16,868
1.969
0.336
18,257
2.321
13,773
D0224075
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
16p
0.037
16,742
1.972
0.336
18,070
2.394
13,564
D0224076
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
20p
0.036
16,857
1.976
0.336
18,293
2.366
13,777
D0224077
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
25p
0.033
17,034
2.001
0.336
18,686
2.447
13,985
D0224078
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
29p
0.035
16,820
1.974
0.336
18,358
2.513
13,848
D0224079
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
34p
0.038
16,523
1.982
0.336
18,086
2.389
13,547
D0224080
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
39p
0.037
16,733
2.03
0.337
18,249
2.328
13,696
D0224081
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
43p
0.038
16,508
1.985
0.336
18,021
2.267
13,480
D0224082
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
48p
0.038
16,473
1.992
0.336
17,976
2.264
13,478
D0224083
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
52p
0.035
16,719
1.982
0.337
18,067
2.233
13,531
D0224084
SPC
2/
24/
00
3:
57p
0.035
16,988
1.98
0.336
18,482
2.38
13,923
D0224085
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
01p
0.035
16,905
1.976
0.336
18,308
2.412
13,786
D0224086
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
06p
0.038
16,654
1.981
0.336
18,136
2.19
13,535
D0224087
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
10p
0.031
16,801
1.977
0.336
18,151
2.298
13,581
D0224088
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
15p
0.029
16,850
1.977
0.336
18,202
2.128
13,630
D0224089
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
19p
0.028
16,754
1.98
0.336
18,239
2.07
13,697
D0224090
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
24p
0.036
16,662
1.985
0.336
18,053
2.222
13,476
D0224091
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
28p
0.035
16,624
1.992
0.337
18,068
2.458
13,477
C­
69
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224092
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
33p
0.037
16,719
1.976
0.337
18,119
2.535
13,553
D0224093
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
37p
0.036
16,740
1.982
0.336
18,153
2.623
13,632
D0224094
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
42p
0.038
17,026
1.981
0.336
18,312
2.922
13,745
D0224095
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
47p
0.038
16,736
1.979
0.337
18,225
3.116
13,683
D0224096
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
51p
0.038
16,882
1.981
0.336
18,329
3.296
13,773
D0224097
SPC
2/
24/
00
4:
56p
0.04
16,785
1.98
0.336
18,242
2.971
13,720
D0224098
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
00p
0.04
16,748
1.986
0.336
18,185
2.57
13,646
D0224099
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
05p
0.037
16,931
1.984
0.337
18,276
2.656
13,736
D0224100
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
09p
0.037
16,830
1.984
0.337
18,285
2.785
13,764
D0224101
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
14p
0.039
16,774
1.98
0.337
18,214
2.699
13,687
D0224102
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
18p
0.039
16,813
1.98
0.337
18,192
2.627
13,703
D0224103
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
23p
0.04
16,687
1.986
0.337
18,117
2.683
13,584
D0224104
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
27p
0.037
16,665
1.987
0.337
18,148
2.749
13,629
D0224105
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
32p
0.038
16,770
1.987
0.337
18,149
2.864
13,635
D0224106
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
37p
0.038
16,679
1.989
0.337
18,265
3.22
13,719
D0224107
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
41p
0.037
16,996
1.991
0.337
18,496
3.945
13,873
D0224108
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
46p
0.036
17,141
1.992
0.336
18,806
4.26
13,915
D0224109
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
50p
0.036
17,163
1.997
0.337
18,732
4.028
13,949
D0224110
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
55p
0.036
17,108
1.993
0.337
18,706
3.761
13,968
D0224111
SPC
2/
24/
00
5:
59p
0.038
17,035
1.99
0.337
18,691
3.67
13,962
D0224112
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
04p
0.039
17,090
1.989
0.337
18,672
3.59
13,967
D0224113
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
08p
0.038
17,143
1.991
0.337
18,840
3.689
14,023
D0224114
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
13p
0.035
17,243
1.995
0.337
18,862
3.704
14,050
D0224115
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
17p
0.04
17,338
2.001
0.338
18,970
3.766
14,037
D0224116
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
22p
0.036
17,245
1.999
0.338
19,084
3.809
14,113
D0224117
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
26p
0.038
17,400
2.004
0.338
19,276
4.061
14,202
D0224118
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
31p
0.037
17,563
2.02
0.339
19,342
4.386
14,222
D0224119
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
36p
0.035
17,648
2.023
0.339
19,346
4.824
14,248
D0224120
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
40p
0.036
17,661
2.02
0.34
19,371
4.874
14,280
D0224121
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
45p
0.037
17,635
2.023
0.339
19,325
4.388
14,260
C­
70
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224122
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
49p
0.034
17,749
2.032
0.34
19,354
4.052
14,270
D0224123
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
54p
0.034
17,627
2.031
0.339
19,353
3.892
14,299
D0224124
SPC
2/
24/
00
6:
58p
0.036
17,658
2.054
0.34
19,396
4.202
14,281
D0224125
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
03p
0.036
17,758
2.054
0.34
19,537
4.674
14,351
D0224126
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
07p
0.036
17,772
2.046
0.34
19,684
5.284
14,463
D0224127
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
12p
0.035
18,045
2.048
0.341
19,703
5.333
14,517
D0224128
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
16p
0.035
17,935
2.049
0.341
19,682
5.307
14,489
D0224129
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
21p
0.035
17,868
2.041
0.341
19,657
5.225
14,493
D0224130
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
25p
0.034
17,877
2.039
0.341
19,669
4.833
14,530
D0224131
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
30p
0.034
17,982
2.051
0.341
19,737
4.889
14,567
D0224132
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
35p
0.033
17,906
2.048
0.342
19,704
4.842
14,545
D0224133
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
39p
0.034
17,956
2.046
0.342
19,616
4.581
14,489
D0224134
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
44p
0.036
17,758
2.047
0.341
19,569
4.397
14,478
D0224135
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
48p
0.033
17,843
2.039
0.341
19,533
4.761
14,478
D0224136
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
53p
0.034
17,778
2.036
0.341
19,549
5.522
14,475
D0224137
SPC
2/
24/
00
7:
57p
0.036
17,174
2.014
0.34
19,177
4.329
14,251
D0224138
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
02p
0.034
17,287
2.024
0.34
19,005
3.553
14,144
D0224139
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
06p
0.037
17,303
2.031
0.341
19,062
3.153
14,215
D0224140
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
11p
0.039
16,889
2.033
0.343
18,539
2.755
14,072
D0224141
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
15p
0.041
16,778
2.044
0.344
18,398
2.452
13,968
D0224142
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
20p
0.039
16,676
2.037
0.344
18,274
2.578
13,908
D0224143
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
24p
0.036
16,637
2.028
0.344
18,147
2.587
13,763
D0224144
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
29p
0.04
16,551
2.027
0.344
18,125
2.549
13,739
D0224145
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
33p
0.043
16,555
2.029
0.345
18,043
2.664
13,647
D0224146
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
38p
0.042
16,444
2.036
0.346
17,919
2.706
13,566
D0224147
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
43p
0.043
16,417
2.048
0.347
17,864
2.708
13,498
D0224148
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
47p
0.04
16,377
2.036
0.347
17,912
2.621
13,583
D0224149
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
52p
0.039
16,260
2.037
0.347
17,835
2.575
13,507
D0224150
SPC
2/
24/
00
8:
56p
0.039
16,152
2.034
0.349
17,690
2.776
13,362
D0224151
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
01p
0.04
16,142
2.033
0.349
17,603
2.782
13,335
C­
71
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224152
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
05p
0.042
15,929
2.028
0.349
17,524
2.731
13,226
D0224153
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
10p
0.043
15,819
2.028
0.349
17,372
2.607
13,075
D0224154
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
14p
0.04
15,755
2.048
0.35
17,235
2.671
12,995
D0224155
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
19p
0.041
15,694
2.038
0.35
17,184
2.673
12,950
D0224156
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
23p
0.042
15,678
2.034
0.348
17,131
2.653
12,895
D0224157
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
28p
0.041
15,857
2.042
0.35
17,179
2.457
12,924
D0224158
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
32p
0.04
15,583
2.043
0.349
17,086
2.37
12,839
D0224159
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
37p
0.039
15,484
2.046
0.35
17,010
2.281
12,783
D0224160
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
41p
0.037
15,480
2.054
0.348
16,977
2.374
12,744
D0224161
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
46p
0.04
15,360
2.069
0.348
16,910
2.495
12,673
D0224162
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
51p
0.042
15,493
2.076
0.349
16,974
2.484
12,684
D0224163
SPC
2/
24/
00
9:
55p
0.041
15,224
2.103
0.35
16,768
2.502
12,519
D0224164
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
00p
0.04
15,199
2.134
0.35
16,757
2.519
12,481
D0224165
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
04p
0.04
15,067
2.082
0.349
16,811
2.485
12,594
D0224166
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
09p
0.041
14,864
2.065
0.349
16,832
2.444
12,626
D0224167
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
13p
0.043
15,255
2.066
0.35
16,857
2.427
12,653
D0224168
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
18p
0.044
15,219
2.053
0.349
16,803
2.326
12,607
D0224169
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
22p
0.044
15,076
2.065
0.349
16,780
2.298
12,605
D0224170
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
27p
0.042
15,211
2.084
0.349
16,777
2.197
12,587
D0224171
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
32p
0.041
15,348
2.114
0.35
16,772
2.077
12,581
D0224172
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
36p
0.043
15,169
2.054
0.351
16,668
2.082
12,509
D0224173
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
41p
0.044
14,929
2.061
0.35
16,328
2.236
12,303
D0224174
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
45p
0.041
14,820
2.045
0.352
16,085
2.261
12,208
D0224175
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
50p
0.042
15,067
2.046
0.35
16,517
2.099
12,391
D0224176
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
54p
0.041
15,063
2.056
0.349
16,528
2.058
12,377
D0224177
SPC
2/
24/
00
10:
59p
0.044
14,954
2.062
0.349
16,478
2.087
12,358
D0224178
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
03p
0.041
14,992
2.057
0.349
16,425
2.159
12,332
D0224179
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
08p
0.041
14,904
2.052
0.35
16,286
2.174
12,255
D0224180
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
12p
0.041
14,855
2.122
0.352
16,123
2.048
12,150
D0224181
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
17p
0.044
14,908
2.059
0.35
16,190
1.965
12,210
C­
72
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224182
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
22p
0.045
14,793
2.048
0.35
16,256
1.963
12,280
D0224183
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
26p
0.041
14,897
2.048
0.349
16,239
1.974
12,262
D0224184
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
31p
0.043
14,738
2.084
0.351
15,868
2.061
12,031
D0224185
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
35p
0.044
14,561
2.077
0.352
15,812
2.059
12,000
D0224186
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
40p
0.044
14,699
2.055
0.351
15,884
1.973
12,066
D0224187
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
44p
0.041
14,671
2.051
0.351
16,085
1.952
12,179
D0224188
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
49p
0.041
15,052
2.053
0.35
16,540
1.914
12,396
D0224189
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
53p
0.038
15,075
2.052
0.35
16,543
1.938
12,393
D0224190
SPC
2/
24/
00
11:
58p
0.04
15,188
2.054
0.349
16,718
1.986
12,494
D0224191
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
02a
0.039
15,212
2.07
0.348
16,727
2.099
12,541
D0224192
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
07a
0.043
15,322
2.076
0.348
16,819
2.247
12,630
D0224193
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
12a
0.041
15,391
2.083
0.35
16,952
2.304
12,713
D0224194
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
16a
0.045
15,368
2.1
0.35
16,927
2.307
12,692
D0224195
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
21a
0.043
15,336
2.119
0.348
16,902
2.433
12,592
D0224196
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
25a
0.043
15,308
2.111
0.348
16,953
2.942
12,684
D0224197
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
30a
0.044
15,450
2.094
0.35
16,994
3.955
12,644
D0224198
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
34a
0.041
15,236
2.094
0.349
16,769
4.159
12,454
D0224199
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
39a
0.04
14,940
2.084
0.351
16,250
4.071
12,113
D0224200
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
43a
0.041
14,671
2.076
0.352
15,869
3.374
12,001
D0224201
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
48a
0.043
14,306
2.063
0.353
15,553
2.813
11,793
D0224202
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
53a
0.042
14,182
2.058
0.354
15,453
2.66
11,706
D0224203
SPC
2/
25/
00
12:
57a
0.041
14,210
2.059
0.354
15,623
2.894
11,861
D0224204
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
02a
0.039
14,409
2.049
0.355
15,669
2.714
11,935
D0224205
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
06a
0.042
14,295
2.053
0.355
15,487
2.494
11,752
D0224206
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
11a
0.041
14,069
2.058
0.354
15,391
2.381
11,648
D0224207
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
15a
0.044
14,063
2.061
0.355
15,298
2.273
11,590
D0224208
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
20a
0.042
13,633
2.062
0.356
14,925
2.242
11,158
D0224209
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
25a
0.042
13,382
2.064
0.357
14,649
2.269
10,949
D0224210
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
29a
0.042
13,213
2.066
0.357
14,472
2.241
10,739
D0224211
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
34a
0.04
13,227
2.07
0.357
14,498
2.208
10,798
C­
73
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224212
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
38a
0.042
13,334
2.061
0.357
14,583
2.132
10,861
D0224213
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
43a
0.043
13,429
2.06
0.356
14,643
2.121
10,906
D0224214
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
47a
0.042
13,404
2.062
0.356
14,644
2.118
10,934
D0224215
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
52a
0.043
13,330
2.087
0.357
14,523
2.093
10,818
D0224216
SPC
2/
25/
00
1:
56a
0.042
13,253
2.067
0.357
14,474
2.135
10,794
D0224217
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
01a
0.041
13,367
2.068
0.357
14,565
2.159
10,871
D0224218
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
05a
0.042
13,215
2.066
0.357
14,405
2.187
10,733
D0224219
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
10a
0.044
13,106
2.064
0.357
14,260
2.158
10,591
D0224220
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
15a
0.042
13,088
2.095
0.358
14,187
2.121
10,497
D0224221
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
19a
0.04
12,785
2.12
0.358
13,858
2.189
10,272
D0224222
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
24a
0.042
12,681
2.089
0.358
13,998
2.229
10,346
D0224223
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
28a
0.04
12,802
2.087
0.357
13,810
2.345
10,264
D0224224
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
33a
0.039
12,942
2.122
0.357
14,180
2.56
10,445
D0224225
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
37a
0.042
13,357
2.132
0.357
14,565
2.609
10,773
D0224226
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
42a
0.046
13,095
2.156
0.358
14,222
2.834
10,435
D0224227
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
46a
0.044
12,971
2.133
0.357
14,141
2.716
10,344
D0224228
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
51a
0.043
13,130
2.141
0.357
14,295
2.501
10,521
D0224229
SPC
2/
25/
00
2:
56a
0.044
13,248
2.137
0.357
14,428
2.694
10,687
D0224230
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
00a
0.043
13,082
2.121
0.357
14,333
2.498
10,592
D0224231
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
05a
0.038
13,057
2.102
0.358
14,282
2.512
10,591
D0224232
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
09a
0.04
13,177
2.116
0.358
14,370
2.842
10,657
D0224233
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
14a
0.046
12,987
2.121
0.358
14,349
3.222
10,583
D0224234
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
18a
0.042
13,493
2.136
0.356
14,754
4.074
10,896
D0224235
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
23a
0.042
13,626
2.142
0.356
14,922
4.844
11,025
D0224236
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
28a
0.043
13,038
2.161
0.358
14,241
4.142
10,375
D0224237
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
32a
0.042
13,073
2.164
0.358
14,349
3.483
10,457
D0224238
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
37a
0.043
13,180
2.158
0.357
14,433
3.386
10,520
D0224239
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
41a
0.043
13,253
2.161
0.357
14,454
3.197
10,576
D0224240
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
46a
0.044
13,129
2.136
0.358
14,369
3.122
10,510
D0224241
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
50a
0.044
13,103
2.126
0.358
14,408
3.156
10,497
C­
74
C­
74
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224242
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
55a
0.043
12,882
2.105
0.358
14,113
2.927
10,341
D0224243
SPC
2/
25/
00
3:
59a
0.04
12,667
2.107
0.358
13,583
2.78
10,138
D0224244
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
04a
0.041
12,294
2.118
0.359
13,187
2.748
9,827
D0224245
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
09a
0.042
12,419
2.116
0.359
13,298
2.774
9,936
D0224246
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
13a
0.043
12,399
2.099
0.359
13,227
2.706
9,878
D0224247
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
18a
0.044
12,342
2.12
0.359
13,289
2.731
9,930
D0224248
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
22a
0.043
12,387
2.171
0.359
13,204
2.614
9,839
D0224249
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
27a
0.042
12,162
2.123
0.36
13,039
2.496
9,742
D0224250
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
31a
0.044
11,968
2.109
0.36
12,906
2.421
9,593
D0224251
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
36a
0.044
11,912
2.099
0.36
12,871
2.393
9,580
D0224252
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
41a
0.042
12,021
2.106
0.36
12,974
2.53
9,664
D0224253
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
45a
0.042
12,223
2.116
0.359
13,052
2.618
9,754
D0224254
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
50a
0.041
12,178
2.109
0.36
13,096
2.31
9,789
D0224255
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
54a
0.045
12,246
2.1
0.361
13,160
2.09
9,876
D0224256
SPC
2/
25/
00
4:
59a
0.043
12,229
2.153
0.362
13,061
2.157
9,755
D0224257
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
03a
0.043
11,977
2.173
0.362
12,873
2.198
9,551
D0224258
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
08a
0.043
11,817
2.172
0.362
12,755
2.244
9,429
D0224259
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
13a
0.039
11,784
2.175
0.363
12,657
2.26
9,316
D0224260
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
17a
0.043
11,553
2.152
0.363
12,452
2.292
9,154
D0224261
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
22a
0.042
11,639
2.172
0.362
12,579
2.293
9,246
D0224262
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
26a
0.045
11,899
2.15
0.361
12,801
2.288
9,495
D0224263
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
31a
0.045
11,959
2.168
0.361
12,914
2.391
9,568
D0224264
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
35a
0.043
12,038
2.148
0.361
12,935
2.411
9,582
D0224265
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
40a
0.046
11,871
2.137
0.361
12,830
2.323
9,513
D0224266
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
45a
0.042
11,809
2.138
0.361
12,759
2.379
9,476
D0224267
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
49a
0.042
11,673
2.138
0.362
12,546
2.367
9,267
D0224268
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
54a
0.043
11,586
2.208
0.363
12,467
2.342
9,152
D0224269
SPC
2/
25/
00
5:
58a
0.042
11,563
2.202
0.363
12,380
2.311
9,074
D0224270
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
03a
0.043
11,592
2.189
0.363
12,429
2.288
9,150
D0224271
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
07a
0.041
11,629
2.219
0.363
12,497
2.282
9,179
C­
75
C­
75
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
D0224272
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
12a
0.041
11,632
2.255
0.363
12,596
2.249
9,267
D0224273
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
16a
0.041
11,889
2.619
0.365
12,861
2.412
9,386
D0224274
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
21a
0.042
12,113
2.473
0.365
13,019
2.943
9,558
D0224275
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
26a
0.044
11,887
2.304
0.364
12,828
2.836
9,444
D0224276
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
30a
0.043
11,873
2.253
0.364
12,794
2.783
9,451
D0224277
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
35a
0.042
11,846
2.268
0.363
12,777
2.736
9,386
D0224278
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
39a
0.043
11,713
2.407
0.365
12,751
2.657
9,318
D0224279
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
44a
0.042
11,838
2.457
0.365
12,798
2.575
9,361
D0224280
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
48a
0.04
12,011
2.46
0.365
12,853
2.515
9,444
D0224281
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
53a
0.041
11,894
2.515
0.365
12,867
2.531
9,410
D0224282
SPC
2/
25/
00
6:
58a
0.039
11,833
2.479
0.365
12,821
2.54
9,381
D0224283
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
02a
0.037
11,665
2.441
0.365
12,640
2.516
9,228
D0224284
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
07a
0.042
11,511
2.406
0.365
12,504
2.522
9,142
D0224285
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
11a
0.042
11,447
2.706
0.368
12,525
2.539
9,037
D0224286
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
16a
0.039
11,597
2.653
0.368
12,587
2.559
9,070
D0224287
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
20a
0.04
11,457
2.726
0.369
12,497
2.577
8,921
D0224288
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
25a
0.042
11,696
2.746
0.368
12,748
2.62
9,190
D0224289
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
29a
0.042
11,756
2.709
0.368
12,786
2.749
9,200
D0224290
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
34a
0.054
11,023
2.691
0.367
12,889
2.759
9,322
D0224291
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
39a
0.059
10,623
2.744
0.369
12,699
2.795
9,046
D0224292
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
43a
0.013
11,605
2.812
0.369
12,692
2.872
8,907
D0224293
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
48a
0.006
11,629
2.886
0.37
12,735
2.999
8,881
D0224294
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
52a
0.003
11,797
2.77
0.368
12,906
3.053
9,226
D0224295
SPC
2/
25/
00
7:
57a
0.002
12,090
2.591
0.366
13,153
2.841
9,564
D0224296
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
01a
0.001
12,221
2.62
0.366
13,280
2.79
9,685
D0224297
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
06a
0
12,257
2.551
0.365
13,291
2.809
9,709
D0224298
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
11a
0
12,322
2.499
0.364
13,331
2.776
9,808
D0224299
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
15a
0
12,475
2.462
0.364
13,445
2.775
9,926
D0224300
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
20a
0
12,707
2.566
0.365
14,021
2.926
10,171
D0224301
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
24a
0
12,872
2.564
0.364
14,273
2.917
10,323
C­
76
Table
C­
7.
(
Continued)

Data
Collection
Information
Quantification
Method
Concentrations
in
ppm
Olin
Mercury
Plant
Olin
2
Olin
3
File
Date
Time
sulfur
hexafluoride
water
carbon
monoxide
nitrous
oxide
water
methane
Water
C­
77
D0224302
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
29a
0
13,065
2.491
0.363
14,447
2.838
10,543
D0224303
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
33a
0
13,233
2.468
0.369
14,661
2.841
10,766
D0224304
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
38a
0
13,306
2.485
0.374
14,762
2.966
10,874
D0224305
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
43a
0
13,420
2.489
0.375
14,835
3.054
10,877
D0224306
SPC
2/
25/
00
8:
47a
0
13,500
2.502
0.377
14,912
3.136
10943
D­
i
Appendix
D
Roof
Vent
Manual
Velocity
Data
D­
ii
C­
79
(
Intentionally
Blank)
Table
D­
1.
East
Platform:
Hand­
Held
Anemometer
Data
At
LOA
Beam
Height
Date
Sampling
Location
Points
­
3
­
2
­
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Average
2/
22
Meters
Fm.
S.
Wall
­
0.41
­
0.2
0.41
0.81
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
2.84
3.25
3.66
4.06
4.57
4.88
Inches
Fm.
S.
Wall
­
16
­
8
16
32
48
64
80
96
112
128
144
160
180
192
1545
hrs
(
Prop)
0
0.6
1
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.5
0.4
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.8
0.6
0
0.9
2/
23
Meters
Fm.
S.
Wall
­
0.51
­
0.1
0
0.41
0.81
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
2.84
3.25
3.66
4.06
4.52
4.57
Inches
Fm.
S.
Wall
­
20
­
4
0
16
32
48
64
80
96
112
128
144
160
178
180
~
1008
hrs
(
Prop)
0
0.6
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.7
0.1
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.4
0.6
0
1
~
1021
hrs
(
Hot
Wire)
1.5
2
2
1.7
1.6
1.4
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.9
1.2
1.5
Table
D­
2.
West
Platform:
Hand­
Held
Anemometer
Data
At
LOA
Beam
Height
Date
Sampling
Location
Points
+
3
+
2
+
1
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
­
1
­
2
­
3
Average
2/
22
Meters
Fm.
S.
Wall
0.05
0.2
0.2
0.61
1.0
1.4
1.8
2.2
2.64
3.05
3.45
3.86
4.27
4.67
4.78
5.08
Inches
Fm.
S.
Wall
2
6
8
24
40
56
72
88
104
120
136
152
168
184
188
200
1500
hrs
(
Prop)
0
0.6
1.1
1.7
1.4
0.9
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.4
1
0.6
0
0.9
2/
23
1030
hrs
(
Prop)
0
0.6
1.6
1.7
1.2
1.1
0.8
0.3
0.5
0.9
1
1.5
1.7
1.2
0.6
0
0.9
D­
1
E­
i
Appendix
E
Manual
Velocity
Data
for
Cell
Building
Openings
and
Associated
Flow
Balance
Calculations
E­
ii
(
Intentionally
Blank)
Table
E­
1.
Hand­
Held
Velocity
Measurements
in
Cell
Building
Openings
on
2/
24/
00a
Velocity
Sampling
Point
Approximate
"
X"
Coordinate
(
ft
from
NE
corner)
b
Approximat
e
"
Y"
Coordinate
(
ft
above
curb)
Available
Open
Area
(
ft2)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
m/
s)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Prop"

Vol.
Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min
)
"
Hot
Wire"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Hot
Wire"
Vol.

Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min
)

1a
8.25
9.87
109
1.1
2.2E+
02
2.4E+
04
2.6E+
04
310
3.38E+
04
3.63E+
04
1b
8.25
3.29
109
0.65
1.3E+
02
1.4E+
04
1.5E+
04
245
2.67E+
04
2.87E+
04
2a
24.75
9.87
109
1.1
2.2E+
02
2.4E+
04
2.6E+
04
410
4.47E+
04
4.81E+
04
2b
(
C
Filter)
29.84
3.29
50.6
0.7
1.4E+
02
7.1E+
03
7.6E+
03
385
1.95E+
04
2.10E+
04
3a
41.25
9.87
109
1.3
2.6E+
02
2.8E+
04
3.0E+
04
395
4.31E+
04
4.63E+
04
3b
41.25
3.29
109
1.1
2.2E+
02
2.4E+
04
2.6E+
04
290
3.16E+
04
3.40E+
04
4a
57.75
9.87
109
1.1
2.2E+
02
2.4E+
04
2.6E+
04
270
2.94E+
04
3.16E+
04
4b
57.75
3.29
109
0.9
1.8E+
02
2.0E+
04
2.1E+
04
290
3.16E+
04
3.40E+
04
5a
74.25
9.87
109
1
2.0E+
02
2.2E+
04
2.4E+
04
240
2.62E+
04
2.82E+
04
5b
74.25
3.29
109
0.7
1.4E+
02
1.5E+
04
1.6E+
04
260
2.83E+
04
3.04E+
04
6a
90.75
9.87
109
0.7
1.4E+
02
1.5E+
04
1.6E+
04
245
2.67E+
04
2.87E+
04
6b
90.75
3.29
109
0.2
3.9E+
01
4.3E+
03
4.6E+
03
215
2.34E+
04
2.52E+
04
7a
8.25
9.87
109
1
2.0E+
02
2.2E+
04
2.4E+
04
240
2.62E+
04
2.81E+
04
7b
8.25
3.29
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
190
2.07E+
04
2.22E+
04
8a
24.75
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
245
2.67E+
04
2.87E+
04
8b
24.75
3.29
109
0.3
5.9E+
01
6.4E+
03
6.9E+
03
195
2.13E+
04
2.29E+
04
9a
41.25
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
220
2.40E+
04
2.58E+
04
9b
41.25
3.29
109
0.1
2.0E+
01
2.2E+
03
2.4E+
03
50
5.45E+
03
5.85E+
03
10a
57.75
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
245
2.67E+
04
2.87E+
04
10b
57.75
3.29
109
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.1E+
04
1.2E+
04
197
2.15E+
04
2.31E+
04
11a
74.25
9.87
109
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.1E+
04
1.2E+
04
215
2.34E+
04
2.51E+
04
11b
74.25
3.29
109
0.2
3.9E+
01
4.3E+
03
4.6E+
03
113
1.23E+
04
1.32E+
04
12a
90.75
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
205
2.23E+
04
2.39E+
04
12b
90.75
3.29
109
0.3
5.9E+
01
6.4E+
03
6.9E+
03
150
1.64E+
04
1.76E+
04
13a
8.25
9.87
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
16
1.74E+
03
1.87E+
03
13b
8.25
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
11
1.20E+
03
1.29E+
03
14
(
Small
Door)
N/
A
N/
A
100
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
108
1.08E+
04
1.16E+
04
15
(
Large
Door)
N/
A
N/
A
252
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
65
1.64E+
04
1.76E+
04
16a
87.92
2.39
17.2
0.9
1.8E+
02
3.1E+
03
3.3E+
03
153
2.63E+
03
2.83E+
03
16b
87.92
0.8
17.2
0.9
1.8E+
02
3.1E+
03
3.3E+
03
131
2.25E+
03
2.42E+
03
17a
72.09
2.39
19.4
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.7E+
03
2.9E+
03
225
4.37E+
03
4.70E+
03
17b
72.09
0.8
19.4
0.8
1.6E+
02
3.1E+
03
3.3E+
03
177
3.43E+
03
3.69E+
03
18a
41.25
2.39
26.2
1
2.0E+
02
5.2E+
03
5.6E+
03
265
6.94E+
03
7.46E+
03
E­
1
Table
E­
1.
(
Continued)

Velocity
Sampling
Point
Approximate
"
X"
Coordinate
(
ft
from
NE
corner)
b
Approximat
e
"
Y"
Coordinate
(
ft
above
curb)
Available
Open
Area
(
ft2)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
m/
s)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Prop"

Vol.
Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min
)
"
Hot
Wire"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Hot
Wire"
Vol.

Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min
)

18b
41.25
0.8
26.2
1
2.0E+
02
5.2E+
03
5.6E+
03
83
2.17E+
03
2.33E+
03
20a
24.75
5
9.17
0.3
5.9E+
01
5.4E+
02
5.8E+
02
88
8.07E+
02
8.67E+
02
20b
24.75
1.67
9.17
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.5E+
03
1.6E+
03
200
1.83E+
03
1.97E+
03
21a
12.29
2.39
13.4
0.3
5.9E+
01
7.9E+
02
8.5E+
02
53
7.10E+
02
7.63E+
02
21b
12.29
0.8
13.4
0.3
5.9E+
01
7.9E+
02
8.5E+
02
100
1.34E+
03
1.44E+
03
22a
11.09
2.39
17.2
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.4E+
03
2.6E+
03
184
3.16E+
03
3.40E+
03
22b
11.09
0.8
17.2
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.4E+
03
2.6E+
03
130
2.24E+
03
2.41E+
03
23a
19.34
2.39
9.02
0.3
5.9E+
01
5.3E+
02
5.7E+
02
130
1.17E+
03
1.26E+
03
23b
19.34
0.8
9.02
0.6
1.2E+
02
1.1E+
03
1.2E+
03
100
9.02E+
02
9.70E+
02
24a
41.25
2.39
26.2
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
20
5.24E+
02
5.63E+
02
24b
41.25
0.8
26.2
0.3
5.9E+
01
1.5E+
03
1.6E+
03
87
2.28E+
03
2.45E+
03
25a
64.46
5
10.3
­
0.3
­
5.9E+
01
­
6.1E+
02
­
6.6E+
02
140
1.44E+
03
1.55E+
03
25b
64.46
1.67
10.3
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
50
5.15E+
02
5.54E+
02
26a
100.5
5
10.0
0.3
5.9E+
01
5.9E+
02
6.3E+
02
126
1.26E+
03
1.35E+
03
26b
100.5
1.67
10.0
0.3
5.9E+
01
5.9E+
02
6.3E+
02
62
6.20E+
02
6.66E+
02
27a
123.8
2.39
26.2
0.3
5.9E+
01
1.5E+
03
1.6E+
03
137
3.59E+
03
3.86E+
03
27b
123.8
0.8
26.2
0.5
9.8E+
01
2.6E+
03
2.8E+
03
156
4.09E+
03
4.40E+
03
28a
140.3
2.39
26.2
0.5
9.8E+
01
2.6E+
03
2.8E+
03
90
2.36E+
03
2.54E+
03
28b
140.3
0.8
26.2
0.5
9.8E+
01
2.6E+
03
2.8E+
03
158
4.14E+
03
4.45E+
03
29a
156.8
5
9.44
0.4
7.9E+
01
7.5E+
02
8.1E+
02
45
4.25E+
02
4.57E+
02
29b
156.8
1.67
9.44
0.6
1.2E+
02
1.1E+
03
1.2E+
03
120
1.13E+
03
1.21E+
03
No.
of
Fansc
11
2.43E+
05
2.61E+
05
2.43E+
05
2.61E+
05
Totals
3567.46
6.6E+
05
7.1E+
05
9.41E+
05
1.01E+
06
Volume
of
moist
air
mix
@
inlet
(
v
1
=
actual
ft3/
lb
m)
12.735
a
fpm
=
ft/
min;
acfm
=
actual
ft3/
min;
and
wscf/
min
=
wet
standard
ft3/
min.

b
Points
22­
29
from
SE
corner.

c
Assumes
fan
ratings
=
22,100
acfm
each.

E­
2
E­
2
Table
E­
2.
(
Continued)

Table
E­
2.
Hand­
Held
Velocity
Measurements
in
Cell
Building
Openings
on
2/
25/
00a
Velocity
Sampling
Point
Approximate
"
X"
Coordinate
(
ft
from
NE
corner)
b
Approximate
"
Y"
Coordinate
(
ft
above
curb)
Available
Open
Area
(
ft2)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
m/
s)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Prop"
Vol.

Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)

1a
8.25
9.87
109
0.9
1.8E+
02
2.0E+
04
2.1E+
04
1b
8.25
3.29
109
0.4
7.9E+
01
8.6E+
03
9.2E+
03
2a
24.75
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
2b
(
C
Filter)
29.84
3.29
50.6
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
3a
41.25
9.87
109
1
2.0E+
02
2.2E+
04
2.3E+
04
3b
41.25
3.29
109
0.4
7.9E+
01
8.6E+
03
9.2E+
03
4a
57.75
9.87
109
1
2.0E+
02
2.2E+
04
2.3E+
04
4b
57.75
3.29
109
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.1E+
04
1.2E+
04
5a
74.25
9.87
109
0.8
1.6E+
02
1.7E+
04
1.8E+
04
5b
74.25
3.29
109
0.4
7.9E+
01
8.6E+
03
9.2E+
03
6a
90.75
9.87
109
0.3
5.9E+
01
6.4E+
03
6.8E+
03
6b
90.75
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
7a
8.25
9.87
109
0.7
1.4E+
02
1.5E+
04
1.6E+
04
7b
8.25
3.29
109
0.4
7.9E+
01
8.6E+
03
9.2E+
03
8a
24.75
9.87
109
0.6
1.2E+
02
1.3E+
04
1.4E+
04
8b
24.75
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
9a
41.25
9.87
109
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.1E+
04
1.2E+
04
9b
41.25
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
10a
57.75
9.87
109
0.2
3.9E+
01
4.3E+
03
4.6E+
03
10b
57.75
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
11a
74.25
9.87
109
0.1
2.0E+
01
2.2E+
03
2.3E+
03
11b
74.25
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
12a
90.75
9.87
109
0.6
1.2E+
02
1.3E+
04
1.4E+
04
12b
90.75
3.29
109
0.4
7.9E+
01
8.6E+
03
9.2E+
03
13a
8.25
9.87
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
13b
8.25
3.29
109
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
14
(
Small
Door)
N/
A
N/
A
100
0.1
2.0E+
01
2.0E+
03
2.1E+
03
15
(
Large
Door)
N/
A
N/
A
252
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
16a
87.92
2.39
17.2
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.4E+
03
2.6E+
03
16b
87.92
0.8
17.2
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.4E+
03
2.6E+
03
17a
72.09
2.39
19.4
0.7
1.4E+
02
2.7E+
03
2.9E+
03
17b
72.09
0.8
19.4
0.8
1.6E+
02
3.1E+
03
3.3E+
03
18a
41.25
2.39
26.2
1.1
2.2E+
02
5.8E+
03
6.2E+
03
E­
3
Table
E­
2.
(
Continued)

Velocity
Sampling
Point
Approximate
"
X"
Coordinate
(
ft
from
NE
corner)
b
Approximate
"
Y"
Coordinate
(
ft
above
curb)
Available
Open
Area
(
ft2)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
m/
s)
"
Prop"
Air
Velocity
(
fpm)
"
Prop"
Vol.

Flowrate
(
acfm)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)

18b
41.25
0.8
26.2
1
2.0E+
02
5.2E+
03
5.5E+
03
20a
24.75
5
9.17
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
20b
24.75
1.67
9.17
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
21a
12.29
2.39
13.4
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
21b
12.29
0.8
13.4
0.9
1.8E+
02
2.4E+
03
2.6E+
03
22a
11.09
2.39
17.2
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.7E+
03
1.8E+
03
22b
11.09
0.8
17.2
0.5
9.8E+
01
1.7E+
03
1.8E+
03
23a
19.34
2.39
9.02
0.5
9.8E+
01
8.8E+
02
9.4E+
02
23b
19.34
0.8
9.02
0.7
1.4E+
02
1.3E+
03
1.4E+
03
24a
41.25
2.39
26.2
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
24b
41.25
0.8
26.2
0.1
2.0E+
01
5.2E+
02
5.5E+
02
25a
64.46
5
10.3
­
1
­
2.0E+
02
­
2.1E+
03
­
2.2E+
03
25b
64.46
1.67
10.3
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
26a
100.5
5
10.0
0.3
5.9E+
01
5.9E+
02
6.3E+
02
26b
100.5
1.67
10.0
0.7
1.4E+
02
1.4E+
03
1.5E+
03
27a
123.8
2.39
26.2
0.8
1.6E+
02
4.2E+
03
4.5E+
03
27b
123.8
0.8
26.2
0.6
1.2E+
02
3.1E+
03
3.3E+
03
28a
140.3
2.39
26.2
0.7
1.4E+
02
3.7E+
03
3.9E+
03
28b
140.3
0.8
26.2
0.8
1.6E+
02
4.2E+
03
4.5E+
03
29a
156.8
5
9.44
0
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
0.0E+
00
29b
156.8
1.67
9.44
0.5
9.8E+
01
9.3E+
02
9.9E+
02
No.
of
Fansc
13
2.87E+
05
3.06E+
05
Totals
3567.46
5.5E+
05
5.9E+
05
Volume
of
moist
air
mix
@
inlet
(
v
1
=
actual
ft3/
lb
m)
12.855
a
fpm
=
ft/
min;
acfm
=
actual
ft3/
min;
and
wscf/
min
=
wet
standard
ft3/
min.

b
Points
22­
29
from
SE
corner.

c
Assumes
fan
ratings
=
22,100
acfm
each.

G­
4
E­
4
Table
E­
3.
Roof
Vent
Optical
Anemometer
Results
on
2/
24/
00a
LOA
Time
LOA
Reading
(
actual
m/
s)
Vol.
Air
Flow
(
acfm)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
C
)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
F)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)
Rel.
Humidity
(%)

5:
30:
10
1.10
6.14E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.28E+
05
49.1
5:
31:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.04E+
05
49.1
5:
32:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.88E+
05
49.1
5:
34:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.82E+
05
49.1
5:
35:
10
1.13
6.30E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.44E+
05
49.1
5:
36:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.88E+
05
49.1
5:
37:
10
1.08
6.02E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.15E+
05
49.1
5:
38:
15
1.00
5.58E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.70E+
05
49.1
5:
39:
10
1.08
6.02E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.15E+
05
49.1
5:
40:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.82E+
05
49.1
5:
41:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.4
74.1
6.04E+
05
49.1
5:
42:
10
1.01
5.63E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.76E+
05
49.1
5:
43:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.42E+
05
49.1
5:
44:
10
0.96
5.36E+
05
23.4
74.1
5.48E+
05
49.1
5:
45:
10
0.91
5.08E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.19E+
05
49.3
5:
46:
10
0.93
5.19E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.30E+
05
49.3
5:
47:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.42E+
05
49.3
5:
48:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.81E+
05
49.3
5:
49:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.42E+
05
49.3
5:
51:
15
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.81E+
05
49.3
5:
52:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.81E+
05
49.3
5:
53:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.42E+
05
49.3
5:
54:
10
1.01
5.63E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.75E+
05
49.3
5:
55:
10
0.96
5.36E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.48E+
05
49.3
5:
56:
10
1.00
5.58E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.70E+
05
49.3
5:
57:
10
1.01
5.63E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.75E+
05
49.3
5:
58:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.59E+
05
49.3
5:
59:
10
0.91
5.08E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.19E+
05
49.3
6:
00:
10
0.96
5.36E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.48E+
05
49.4
6:
01:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.87E+
05
49.4
6:
02:
15
0.91
5.08E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.19E+
05
49.4
6:
03:
10
0.89
4.96E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.07E+
05
49.4
6:
04:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.41E+
05
49.4
6:
05:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.41E+
05
49.4
6:
06:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.59E+
05
49.4
6:
07:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.59E+
05
49.4
6:
08:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.6
74.5
6.04E+
05
49.4
E­
5
Table
E­
3.
(
Continued)

LOA
Time
LOA
Reading
(
actual
m/
s)
Vol.
Air
Flow
(
acfm)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
C
)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
F)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)
Rel.
Humidity
(%)

6:
09:
10
0.99
5.52E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.64E+
05
49.4
6:
10:
10
1.05
5.86E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.99E+
05
49.4
6:
11:
10
1.05
5.86E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.99E+
05
49.4
6:
12:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.59E+
05
49.4
6:
13:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.53E+
05
49.4
6:
15:
10
0.94
5.24E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.35E+
05
49.1
6:
16:
10
1.04
5.80E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.93E+
05
49.1
6:
17:
10
1.05
5.86E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.99E+
05
49.1
6:
18:
10
1.14
6.36E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.50E+
05
49.1
6:
19:
10
1.09
6.08E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.21E+
05
49.1
6:
20:
10
1.12
6.25E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.39E+
05
49.1
6:
21:
10
1.07
5.97E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.10E+
05
49.1
6:
22:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.04E+
05
49.1
6:
23:
10
1.15
6.42E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.56E+
05
49.1
6:
24:
10
1.12
6.25E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.39E+
05
49.1
6:
26:
10
1.15
6.42E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.56E+
05
49.1
6:
27:
10
1.14
6.36E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.50E+
05
49.1
6:
28:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.04E+
05
49.1
6:
29:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.81E+
05
49.1
6:
30:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.87E+
05
48.6
6:
31:
10
1.10
6.14E+
05
23.6
74.5
6.27E+
05
48.6
6:
32:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.81E+
05
48.6
6:
33:
10
0.94
5.24E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.35E+
05
48.6
6:
34:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.59E+
05
48.6
6:
35:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.87E+
05
48.6
6:
36:
10
1.07
5.97E+
05
23.6
74.5
6.10E+
05
48.6
6:
37:
10
1.04
5.80E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.92E+
05
48.6
6:
38:
10
1.01
5.63E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.75E+
05
48.6
6:
39:
10
0.96
5.36E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.48E+
05
48.6
6:
43:
10
0.99
5.52E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.64E+
05
48.6
6:
44:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.6
74.5
5.41E+
05
48.6
6:
45:
10
0.92
5.13E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.24E+
05
48.1
6:
46:
10
0.95
5.30E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.41E+
05
48.1
6:
47:
10
1.05
5.86E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.98E+
05
48.1
6:
49:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.52E+
05
48.1
6:
50:
10
1.00
5.58E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.70E+
05
48.1
6:
51:
10
0.99
5.52E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.64E+
05
48.1
E­
6
Table
E­
3.
(
Continued)

LOA
Time
LOA
Reading
(
actual
m/
s)
Vol.
Air
Flow
(
acfm)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
C
)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
F)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)
Rel.
Humidity
(%)

6:
52:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.52E+
05
48.1
6:
53:
10
1.04
5.80E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.92E+
05
48.1
6:
54:
10
1.04
5.80E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.92E+
05
48.1
6:
55:
10
1.02
5.69E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.81E+
05
48.1
6:
56:
10
1.04
5.80E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.92E+
05
48.1
6:
57:
10
1.13
6.30E+
05
23.7
74.7
6.43E+
05
48.1
6:
58:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.7
74.7
6.03E+
05
48.1
6:
59:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.7
74.7
5.59E+
05
48.1
7:
00:
10
0.98
5.47E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.59E+
05
48.1
7:
01:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.53E+
05
48.1
7:
02:
10
1.03
5.75E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.88E+
05
48.1
7:
03:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.53E+
05
48.1
7:
05:
10
1.08
6.02E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.15E+
05
48.1
7:
06:
10
1.09
6.08E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.21E+
05
48.1
7:
07:
10
0.97
5.41E+
05
23.5
74.3
5.53E+
05
48.1
7:
08:
10
1.06
5.91E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.04E+
05
48.1
7:
09:
10
1.16
6.47E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.61E+
05
48.1
7:
10:
10
1.08
6.02E+
05
23.5
74.3
6.15E+
05
48.1
Average
1.02
5.68E+
05
23.5
74.4
5.81E+
05
48.9
%
Volume
Balance
81.8
Volume
of
moist
air
mix
@
outlet
(
v
2
=
actual
ft3/
lb
m)
13.43
%
Mass
Balance
81.6
a
fpm
=
ft/
min;
acfm
=
actual
ft3/
min;
and
wscf/
min
=
wet
standard
ft3/
min.

E­
7
Table
E­
4.
Roof
Vent
Optical
Anemometer
Results
on
2/
25/
00a
LOA
Time
LOA
Reading
(
actual
m/
s)
Vol.
Air
Flow
(
acfm)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
C
)
DB
Air
Temp.
(
o
F)
Std.
Flowrate
(
wscf/
min)
Rel.
Humidity
(%)

8:
45:
10
1.03
5.7E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.81E+
05
49.5
8:
46:
10
0.99
5.5E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.61E+
05
49.5
8:
47:
10
0.96
5.4E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.50E+
05
49.5
8:
48:
10
1.06
5.9E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.01E+
05
49.5
8:
49:
10
1.02
5.7E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.81E+
05
49.5
8:
50:
10
1.00
5.6E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.71E+
05
49.5
8:
51:
10
0.97
5.4E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.50E+
05
49.5
8:
52:
10
1.04
5.8E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.91E+
05
49.5
8:
53:
10
0.95
5.3E+
05
23.8
74.8
5.40E+
05
49.5
8:
54:
10
1.06
5.9E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.01E+
05
49.5
8:
55:
10
1.11
6.2E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.32E+
05
49.5
8:
56:
10
1.11
6.2E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.32E+
05
49.5
8:
57:
10
1.07
6.0E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.12E+
05
49.5
8:
58:
10
1.06
5.9E+
05
23.8
74.8
6.01E+
05
49.5
9:
00:
09
1.04
5.8E+
05
24
75.2
5.91E+
05
49.7
9:
00:
10
1.04
5.8E+
05
24
75.2
5.91E+
05
49.7
Average
1.03
5.7E+
05
23.8
74.9
5.87E+
05
49.5
%
Volume
Balance
99.5
Volume
of
moist
air
mix
@
outlet
(
v
2
=
actual
ft3/
lb
m)
13.47
%
Mass
Balance
98.9
a
fpm
=
ft/
min;
acfm
=
actual
ft3/
min;
and
wscf/
min
=
wet
standard
ft3/
min.

E­
8
